patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,265,749 comments by 15,133 users - Ceffer, Misc online now
invite response« First « Previous Comments 4,890 - 4,929 of 5,744 Next » Last » Search these comments
4890
richwicks
2022 Dec 27, 1:39pm
richwicks
2022 Dec 27, 1:39pm
Undoctored says
He was born in Australia, but his father was very wealthy and dragged him all over the world - and that's where he got polio as a child. He seems fine during the summer, but in winter he has to use crutches. I've lost touch with him although we used to be good friends 20 years ago. He was born around 1970 and got it as a child.
Undoctored says
Polio, as far as I know (and I may be wrong) seems to be MOSTLY eradicated. Every case of an outbreak I've heard of in the last 10 years follows a vaccination program using attenuated viruses.
Viruses do exist, because otherwise, attenuated viruses wouldn't cause polio.
What happens is children get inoculated with an attenuated virus and pass it on to people who are not vaccinated. An attenuated virus (from my limited understanding) is a virus that has been bred in an environment that they can survive in, but which the human body would kill by just body heat. They are "live viruses", but are injected into a very inhospitable host. They are not supposed to replicate, but there's that nasty evolution and so on. Some of the viruses manage to survive and replicate, then infect other people.
Interesting. Where was he born? What were his symptoms? When did they start and how is he today?
He was born in Australia, but his father was very wealthy and dragged him all over the world - and that's where he got polio as a child. He seems fine during the summer, but in winter he has to use crutches. I've lost touch with him although we used to be good friends 20 years ago. He was born around 1970 and got it as a child.
Undoctored says
Here’s a lecture by Suzanne Humphries M.D., who claims that vaccines did not eradicate polio. In the U.S. it came and went with use of highly toxic pesticides, but even then it never really left us; it’s still around by other names such as Acute Flaccid Paralysis or Transverse Myelitis.
Polio, as far as I know (and I may be wrong) seems to be MOSTLY eradicated. Every case of an outbreak I've heard of in the last 10 years follows a vaccination program using attenuated viruses.
Viruses do exist, because otherwise, attenuated viruses wouldn't cause polio.
What happens is children get inoculated with an attenuated virus and pass it on to people who are not vaccinated. An attenuated virus (from my limited understanding) is a virus that has been bred in an environment that they can survive in, but which the human body would kill by just body heat. They are "live viruses", but are injected into a very inhospitable host. They are not supposed to replicate, but there's that nasty evolution and so on. Some of the viruses manage to survive and replicate, then infect other people.
4891
richwicks
2022 Dec 27, 1:46pm
richwicks
2022 Dec 27, 1:46pm
mell says
I have read (perhaps it's untrue?) that respiratory diseases need mucosal immunity for prevention. These vaccines need to be inhaled. Basically it's your lungs that need to have immunity, not your body. If it gets past your lungs, you're sick.
I'm a kid that was definitely intentionally infected with chickenpox as a kid - "get it over with" was the thinking because chickenpox as an adult is very dangerous, but not as a kid. I think it's hopeless to try to protect children from every possible disease. For diseases like sars-cov2-19 - it's stupid, children have practically no chance of dying from it. They should not be inoculated against that. The vaccine is more dangerous.
there are still plenty of illnesses that claim way too man lives each year for which a safe and effective vaccine would be very useful, rsv and the flu for babies are just one example.
I have read (perhaps it's untrue?) that respiratory diseases need mucosal immunity for prevention. These vaccines need to be inhaled. Basically it's your lungs that need to have immunity, not your body. If it gets past your lungs, you're sick.
I'm a kid that was definitely intentionally infected with chickenpox as a kid - "get it over with" was the thinking because chickenpox as an adult is very dangerous, but not as a kid. I think it's hopeless to try to protect children from every possible disease. For diseases like sars-cov2-19 - it's stupid, children have practically no chance of dying from it. They should not be inoculated against that. The vaccine is more dangerous.
4892
mell
2022 Dec 27, 2:00pm
richwicks says
Completely agree, most childhood illnesses and common respiratory illnesses are no problem for kids, but with everything there are exceptions, rsv kills or maims many babies each year, the flu is pretty dangerous as well for babies, so is whooping cough. I don't think you have to inhale to get benefits, as long as the illness stays in the upper respiratory tract it's harmless. The antibodies in the mucosa are usually IGA and those are only short lived during a vaccination or natural response, otherwise you'd have chronic inflammation and the IGAs would harm you in the long run if always present in high concentration. But IGG and IGM still provide protection and prevent worse illness throughout the body.
mell says
there are still plenty of illnesses that claim way too man lives each year for which a safe and effective vaccine would be very useful, rsv and the flu for babies are just one example.
I have read (perhaps it's untrue?) that respiratory diseases need mucosal immunity for prevention. These vaccines need to be inhaled. Basically it's your lungs that need to have immunity, not your body. If it gets past your lungs, you're sick.
I'm a kid that was definitely intentionally infected with chickenpox as a kid - "get it over with" was the thinking because chickenpox as an adult is very dangerous, but not as a kid. I think it's hopeless to try to protect children from every possible disease. For diseases like sars-cov2-19 - it's stupid, children have practically no chance of dying from it. They should not be inoculated against that. The vaccine is more dangerous.
Completely agree, most childhood illnesses and common respiratory illnesses are no problem for kids, but with everything there are exceptions, rsv kills or maims many babies each year, the flu is pretty dangerous as well for babies, so is whooping cough. I don't think you have to inhale to get benefits, as long as the illness stays in the upper respiratory tract it's harmless. The antibodies in the mucosa are usually IGA and those are only short lived during a vaccination or natural response, otherwise you'd have chronic inflammation and the IGAs would harm you in the long run if always present in high concentration. But IGG and IGM still provide protection and prevent worse illness throughout the body.
4893
DhammaStep
2022 Dec 27, 2:48pm
mell says
Are you trying to tell me that DDT wasn't responsible for countless birth defects, hormonal problems, nervous system disorders and cancers? Or are you saying that potentially making your children lame and infertile is a fair trade off from malaria? Even now we're finding that DDT possibly effects people three generations later from exposure: https://aacrjournals.org/cebp/article/30/8/1480/671027/Grandmaternal-Perinatal-Serum-DDT-in-Relation-to
I'm either severely misinformed about DDT or you're downplaying the side effects.
You also mentioned DDT earlier which has been vilified unnecessary over decades
Are you trying to tell me that DDT wasn't responsible for countless birth defects, hormonal problems, nervous system disorders and cancers? Or are you saying that potentially making your children lame and infertile is a fair trade off from malaria? Even now we're finding that DDT possibly effects people three generations later from exposure: https://aacrjournals.org/cebp/article/30/8/1480/671027/Grandmaternal-Perinatal-Serum-DDT-in-Relation-to
I'm either severely misinformed about DDT or you're downplaying the side effects.
4894
mell
2022 Dec 27, 3:01pm
DhammaStep says
Not downplaying, the side effects and birth defect risks are real and terrible. However it was completely taken off market / avoided for a long time, though it has been extremely effective in preventing malaria and malaria deaths. You can buy mosquito repellents these days which contain a DDT derivative, N, N-Diethyltoluamide, (DEET)—which is extremely safe (yet carries some of the risk of DDT if abused) and would not have been developed/discovered without DDT. So it's no question that using DEET these days is better than using nothing, and the question is whether removing DDT entirely until the advent of DEET has harmed/killed or saved more lives, there is no easy answer to this, and I have studied a few articles by respected scientists who now say it was a mistake to entirely ban DDT. Please note that there is no incentive to come out and say this now since DEET exists and is extremely cheap as well, so the chances that they are "shilling" for an industry are fairly slim, as there is no money to be made (and lawsuits have expired). I cannot say if there was a better way to adjust the dosage to a minimum and keeping it on the market while there was no alternative, as it is known to build up in the food chain, what I do know is that people have been using the same arguments to not use DEET and caught Malaria while traveling, and from the few I know how caught it it has been a horrible, without strong available treatment life-threatening illness with long-term effects, and which has been killing between 500000 to 1000000 people globally each year since 2000 on average. Not everything is black and white, esp. not in medicine. I certainly did not mean to downplay the potential side-effects of DDT (though there is much debate about the risks being overstated), if it came across that way, it wasn't intended.
mell says
You also mentioned DDT earlier which has been vilified unnecessary over decades
Are you trying to tell me that DDT wasn't responsible for countless birth defects, hormonal problems, nervous system disorders and cancers? Or are you saying that potentially making your children lame and infertile is a fair trade off from malaria? Even now we're finding that DDT possibly effects people three generations later from exposure: https://aacrjournals.org/cebp/article/30/8/1480/671027/Grandmaternal-Perinatal-Serum-DDT-in-Relation-to
I'm either severely misinformed about DDT or you're downplaying the side effects.
Not downplaying, the side effects and birth defect risks are real and terrible. However it was completely taken off market / avoided for a long time, though it has been extremely effective in preventing malaria and malaria deaths. You can buy mosquito repellents these days which contain a DDT derivative, N, N-Diethyltoluamide, (DEET)—which is extremely safe (yet carries some of the risk of DDT if abused) and would not have been developed/discovered without DDT. So it's no question that using DEET these days is better than using nothing, and the question is whether removing DDT entirely until the advent of DEET has harmed/killed or saved more lives, there is no easy answer to this, and I have studied a few articles by respected scientists who now say it was a mistake to entirely ban DDT. Please note that there is no incentive to come out and say this now since DEET exists and is extremely cheap as well, so the chances that they are "shilling" for an industry are fairly slim, as there is no money to be made (and lawsuits have expired). I cannot say if there was a better way to adjust the dosage to a minimum and keeping it on the market while there was no alternative, as it is known to build up in the food chain, what I do know is that people have been using the same arguments to not use DEET and caught Malaria while traveling, and from the few I know how caught it it has been a horrible, without strong available treatment life-threatening illness with long-term effects, and which has been killing between 500000 to 1000000 people globally each year since 2000 on average. Not everything is black and white, esp. not in medicine. I certainly did not mean to downplay the potential side-effects of DDT (though there is much debate about the risks being overstated), if it came across that way, it wasn't intended.
4895
mell
2022 Dec 27, 3:10pm
@DhammaStep if you're interested, here is one article: https://junkscience.com/2012/03/it-was-a-mistake-to-ban-ddt-in-1972/#:~:text=Yes%2C%20DDT%20was%20overused%2C%20and,Africa%20and%20other%20tropical%20areas.
Or here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1119118/
Not saying they are right, but it's definitely worth considering.
Or here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1119118/
Not saying they are right, but it's definitely worth considering.
4896
DhammaStep
2022 Dec 27, 3:20pm
mell says
"So, if DDT can be this successful, why ban it? The latest campaign stems from charges that DDT is an “endocrine disrupter” whose ability to cause harm (like Melville's Moby Dick and all excellent monsters since) is both indiscriminate and vast. The World Wildlife Fund and Physicians for Social Responsibility indict DDT chillingly: as a carcinogen, a teratogen, an immunosupressant, and so on.
All this would be worrisome if it were true. Conspicuously absent behind the campaigners' claims are any epidemiological studies to demonstrate adverse health effects."
Sorry, this reads exactly like "you can't prove the vaccine is harmful so it's not". I personally know people effected by DDT. I will never accept the use of DDT ever again. Find a better way, sure.
Edit: To be very clear. Yes, I believe the death of a million people a year is acceptable to not release chemicals into the environment that can effect every living organism in ways we don't fully understand yet.
DhammaStep if you're interested, here is one article: https://junkscience.com/2012/03/it-was-a-mistake-to-ban-ddt-in-1972/#:~:text=Yes%2C%20DDT%20was%20overused%2C%20and,Africa%20and%20other%20tropical%20areas.
Or here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1119118/
Not saying they are right, but it's definitely worth considering.
"So, if DDT can be this successful, why ban it? The latest campaign stems from charges that DDT is an “endocrine disrupter” whose ability to cause harm (like Melville's Moby Dick and all excellent monsters since) is both indiscriminate and vast. The World Wildlife Fund and Physicians for Social Responsibility indict DDT chillingly: as a carcinogen, a teratogen, an immunosupressant, and so on.
All this would be worrisome if it were true. Conspicuously absent behind the campaigners' claims are any epidemiological studies to demonstrate adverse health effects."
Sorry, this reads exactly like "you can't prove the vaccine is harmful so it's not". I personally know people effected by DDT. I will never accept the use of DDT ever again. Find a better way, sure.
Edit: To be very clear. Yes, I believe the death of a million people a year is acceptable to not release chemicals into the environment that can effect every living organism in ways we don't fully understand yet.
4897
mell
2022 Dec 27, 3:28pm
DhammaStep says
Not disagreeing, interestingly though it comes from people who are critical of mainstream science claims, incl. climate change etc. So not the same agenda. Nobody should be forced to endure something they don't want, even in the US there are sprayings of insecticides or herbicides every day you have no say over which I don't agree with. What I am saying is that if I were in a high Malaria region (mostly in Africa) that I would take DDT spray if nothing else were available to protect myself, not on a daily basis, but for the duration of the stay. And I have applied DEET occasionally when summering in high mosquito areas to repel them. I certainly think that with DEET the benefits outweigh the risks greatly. But there should never be forced treatments or widespread aerial spraying with something like this imo.
mell says
DhammaStep if you're interested, here is one article: https://junkscience.com/2012/03/it-was-a-mistake-to-ban-ddt-in-1972/#:~:text=Yes%2C%20DDT%20was%20overused%2C%20and,Africa%20and%20other%20tropical%20areas.
Or here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1119118/
Not saying they are right, but it's definitely worth considering.
"So, if DDT can be this successful, why ban it? The latest campaign stems from charges that DDT is an “endocrine disrupter” whose ability to cause harm (like Melville's Moby Dick and all excellent monsters since) is bot...
Not disagreeing, interestingly though it comes from people who are critical of mainstream science claims, incl. climate change etc. So not the same agenda. Nobody should be forced to endure something they don't want, even in the US there are sprayings of insecticides or herbicides every day you have no say over which I don't agree with. What I am saying is that if I were in a high Malaria region (mostly in Africa) that I would take DDT spray if nothing else were available to protect myself, not on a daily basis, but for the duration of the stay. And I have applied DEET occasionally when summering in high mosquito areas to repel them. I certainly think that with DEET the benefits outweigh the risks greatly. But there should never be forced treatments or widespread aerial spraying with something like this imo.
4898
Patrick
2022 Dec 30, 11:43am
Patrick
2022 Dec 30, 11:43am
https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/forecast-2023-get-out-of-the-way-if-you-cant-lend-a-hand/
I think Kunstler is an optimist.
There are still way too many idiots who believe NPR, PBS, and the NY Times are somehow "journalism" and not pure propaganda.
Against the backdrop of a developing new economic depression, the public can no longer avoid seeing the calamity that the mRNA vaccines have instigated. Early death is in the news daily now and from exactly the adverse effects that have been derided as “conspiracy theory” by public health experts since 2021: myocarditis, blood clots, organ damage, neurological illness, unusually aggressive cancers, damaged immune systems. Meanwhile, America’s public health aristocracy — Dr. Tony Fauci, Rochelle Walensky, Francis Collins, Deborah Birx, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, and many, many others will be compelled to testify under oath before newly re-constituted House committees and finally answer for all their dishonesty in the Covid-19 response saga. They lied about everything, especially the “vaccines?” It will go worse for them as public sentiment turns from submission to official bullshit to rage over a deadly fraud.
By then, the past efforts of this gang to mislead the public on Twitter and other social media will be well-documented. The exposed slime-trail of money and corruption between Pharma and federal bureaucrats will finally make an impression on the long-bamboozled nation. The mainstream media will be dragged into this morass and the public will begin to understand how the newspaper editors and TV news producers, too, were bought off by Pharma and controlled by the national security state to pimp for the Democratic Party and globalist interests outside the USA. This exposure could be the end of the great legacy news organs, The New York Times and the rest of the gang. Their executives will have to testify along with everyone else. They might not be prosecuted — in a gesture of respect for the First Amendment — but rather will suffer badly from their loss of credibility.
I think Kunstler is an optimist.
There are still way too many idiots who believe NPR, PBS, and the NY Times are somehow "journalism" and not pure propaganda.
4899
richwicks
2022 Dec 30, 9:01pm
richwicks
2022 Dec 30, 9:01pm
Patrick says
One is too many, but do you think it's worse today than it was 20 years ago?
I'm seeing steady improvement. Do you know that the average age of a television news consumer is over 65?
They had to turn off comment sections (or viciously police them) for a reason. Too many people understand the game now.
There are still way too many idiots who believe NPR, PBS, and the NY Times are somehow "journalism" and not pure propaganda.
One is too many, but do you think it's worse today than it was 20 years ago?
I'm seeing steady improvement. Do you know that the average age of a television news consumer is over 65?
They had to turn off comment sections (or viciously police them) for a reason. Too many people understand the game now.
4900
Patrick
2022 Dec 31, 10:44am
Patrick
2022 Dec 31, 10:44am
https://slaynews.com/news/study-vax-mandates-are-unethical-not-science-based/
In a paper published by the British Medical Journal, researchers concluded the mandates are not a science-based policy.
They discovered that the vaccines are failing to prevent infection and transmission and warned that the risks of severe side effects outweigh any potential benefit.
4901
charlie303
2022 Dec 31, 10:57am
At the end u may have to start meds before u get sick:
“…people who are thoroughly 💉 [should] prepare themselves by making sure they have access to antivirals...it will go very, very fast…[at that stage even] early treatment may come too late"
https://twitter.com/DrSyedHaider/status/1608247624544526336?ref_src=patrick.net
“…people who are thoroughly 💉 [should] prepare themselves by making sure they have access to antivirals...it will go very, very fast…[at that stage even] early treatment may come too late"
https://twitter.com/DrSyedHaider/status/1608247624544526336?ref_src=patrick.net
4902
Ceffer
2022 Dec 31, 11:51am
Ceffer
2022 Dec 31, 11:51am
Patrick says
Yup. Of course, maybe it's just living in the mentally contaminated coastal California. Lobotomized liberals.
There are still way too many idiots who believe NPR, PBS, and the NY Times are somehow "journalism" and not pure propaganda.
Yup. Of course, maybe it's just living in the mentally contaminated coastal California. Lobotomized liberals.
4903
Patrick
2023 Jan 5, 7:27pm
Patrick
2023 Jan 5, 7:27pm
Patrick says
https://slaynews.com/news/china-experimenting-mosquitoes-spread-vaccines-consent/
https://www.visiontimes.com/2021/09/21/ucr-engineers-mrna-vaccines-lettuce-spinach.html
Researchers at a U.S.-based university have received a federal grant to study whether they can genetically engineer plants to carry Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines.
The University of California Riverside announced in a Sept. 16 article on their website a project to examine “whether they can turn edible plants like lettuce into mRNA vaccine factories.” The endeavor has received a $500,000 grant from the National Science Foundation and will be in collaboration with UC San Diego and Carnegie Mellon University.
We are going to need a bigger garden if we can no longer trust food from the stores.
https://slaynews.com/news/china-experimenting-mosquitoes-spread-vaccines-consent/
Scientists in China are reportedly experimenting with the use of mosquitoes that could spread vaccines like a virus, without the use of shots, or consent.
4904
Patrick
2023 Jan 6, 10:22am
Patrick
2023 Jan 6, 10:22am
https://www.eugyppius.com/p/review-of-studies-on-vaccine-induced?publication_id=268621&post_id=95074428&isFreemail=true
Review of studies on vaccine-induced myocarditis finds that the Science we're meant to be Following pervasively obfuscates the risk of the mRNA jabs for young men
Of the few studies that even attempt to assess the population-wide risk of myocarditis following vaccination, nearly three-fourths neglect to include the proper stratifiers
4907
Patrick
2023 Jan 10, 12:26am
Patrick
2023 Jan 10, 12:26am
https://thelibertydaily.com/italian-tennis-star-camila-giorgi-faked-vaxx-certificate-to-keep-playing-and-her-whole-family-is-pureblood/
Italian Tennis Star Camila Giorgi Faked Vaxx-Certificate to Keep Playing — Her Whole Family Is Pureblood
4908
GNL
2023 Jan 10, 5:11am
GNL
2023 Jan 10, 5:11am
Patrick says
Legend. And cute to boot. Haha
https://thelibertydaily.com/italian-tennis-star-camila-giorgi-faked-vaxx-certificate-to-keep-playing-and-her-whole-family-is-pureblood/
Italian Tennis Star Camila Giorgi Faked Vaxx-Certificate to Keep Playing — Her Whole Family Is Pureblood
Legend. And cute to boot. Haha
4909
HeadSet
2023 Jan 10, 10:56am
HeadSet
2023 Jan 10, 10:56am
GNL says
And likely quite a few doctors worldwide faked themselves getting the jab as well.
Italian Tennis Star Camila Giorgi Faked Vaxx-Certificate to Keep Playing
And likely quite a few doctors worldwide faked themselves getting the jab as well.
4921
Patrick
2023 Jan 13, 6:03pm
Patrick
2023 Jan 13, 6:03pm
https://tessa.substack.com/p/pandemic-panopticon
This is a story in which I cover a lot of ground. The reason I wrote it is because every time I have a conversation with a friend who is still on the fence about the high percentage of blatant billionaire abuse in what we are currently living through, it turns into a bit of a groundhog day. And so I do the dance, refer to the science I’ve known about for a year but the respectable media is only daring mention now (sideways and with disclaimers), etc. etc. Often, in the middle of the conversation, I find that the person I am talking to has created a psychographic image of a “lockdown skeptic” in their head, and then we have to unwrap the scroll and do the dance again. For example, I often find that because I am observing a clear attempt at global digital colonization, as destructive in its impact as the colonial ventures of the past, or because I don’t trust the famous tech billionaires with my mind or body—or because I haven’t forgotten the story of smallpox blankets (or what Hitler did) and I don’t believe that the mind of a colonizer has changed since then—then it must be that I “don’t believe that the virus can kill” etc. To solve the talking points problem once and for all, I went deep into the woods and described my views (as of this second) in excruciating detail. Everything I say is an opinion. At this moment. My personal opinion based on my life experience and instincts. Experience- and instinct-based opinion is the best a human being can hope for as far as proximity to the truth. Do we agree on that?
4923
richwicks
2023 Jan 13, 6:48pm
richwicks
2023 Jan 13, 6:48pm
mell says
@mell
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/01/holocaust-survivor-hiding-ordered-psychiatric-institution-german-court-faces-forced-covid-vaccine/
@Dholliday126 - please post links. Don't make other people do unnecessary work. You found this somewhere, stop sending JUST screen shots, and include the link. It only takes you a second, and it takes EVERYBODY ELSE time to verify it. Be courteous. If you're trying to spread information, don't make people jump over hoops to do it.
BTW - just so everybody knows "Holocaust survivor" just means anybody who was Jewish that lived during WWII - SERIOUSLY. She MIGHT have gone to a concentration camp, but I doubt it, since she was born in Vinnytsia Ukraine.
Dholliday126 says
Do you have a link?
@mell
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/01/holocaust-survivor-hiding-ordered-psychiatric-institution-german-court-faces-forced-covid-vaccine/
@Dholliday126 - please post links. Don't make other people do unnecessary work. You found this somewhere, stop sending JUST screen shots, and include the link. It only takes you a second, and it takes EVERYBODY ELSE time to verify it. Be courteous. If you're trying to spread information, don't make people jump over hoops to do it.
BTW - just so everybody knows "Holocaust survivor" just means anybody who was Jewish that lived during WWII - SERIOUSLY. She MIGHT have gone to a concentration camp, but I doubt it, since she was born in Vinnytsia Ukraine.
4924
Dholliday126
2023 Jan 13, 8:52pm
Dholliday126
2023 Jan 13, 8:52pm
mell says
I got it from Revolver news which linked to :
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/german-court-orders-holocaust-survivor-to-be-sent-to-psychiatric-institution-for-forced-covid-shots/
Dholliday126 says
Do you have a link?
I got it from Revolver news which linked to :
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/german-court-orders-holocaust-survivor-to-be-sent-to-psychiatric-institution-for-forced-covid-shots/
4925
Dholliday126
2023 Jan 13, 8:53pm
Dholliday126
2023 Jan 13, 8:53pm
richwicks says
Roger
mell says
Dholliday126 says
Do you have a link?
mell
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/01/holocaust-survivor-hiding-ordered-psychiatric-institution-german-court-faces-forced-covid-vaccine/
Dholliday126 - please post links. Don't make other people do unnecessary work. You found this somewhere, stop sending JUST screen shots, and include the link. It only takes you a second, and it takes EVERYBODY ELSE time to verify it. Be courteous. If you're trying to spr...
Roger
4926
Patrick
2023 Jan 13, 8:56pm
Patrick
2023 Jan 13, 8:56pm
https://usmortality.substack.com/p/highly-alarming-analysis-of-vaccine
Lol, more like 25,400 in Germany alone.
The German Industrial Engineer Mr. Holger Reißner, a former consultant to the German Federal Robert-Koch-Institute, has analyzed many vaccine charges for its consistency and ingredients.
He found alarming results:
1) Particle size was up to 23x higher than the allowed threshold!
> Maximum size allowed: 0.22μ (220nm)
> Particle size found: 2-5μ (2000-5000nm)
That means the particle size was up to 23x larger than what is normally allowed in a fluid that's approved for injection.
According to Mr. Reißner, these large particles consist mainly of cholesterol crystals that likely form during the production process.
This can lead to: "Microsis, fibrosis & thrombosis" of blood vessels
That means that capillary vessel can clog, which would explain the side effects that have been observed so widely.
2) Mr. Reißner also found highly concerning ingredients in the injections:
He found adjuvants, that were not listed by the manufacturer, including the highly toxic substance Antimony (as toxic as arsenic).
3) Also, it is well known now that the cationic liquid nano particles (lipids, LNP’s) are highly toxic by themselves, and already cause inflammation and cell damage.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004221014504
4) Lastly, he also confirmed the toxic role of the spike protein itself, which has been found in several autopsies.
This would explain why in 2021 alone, the German government has admitted that (at least) 254 people have died as a direct consequence of these injections...
Lol, more like 25,400 in Germany alone.
« First « Previous Comments 4,890 - 4,929 of 5,744 Next » Last » Search these comments
I know a few and they sound like absolute shit, and both feel like absolute crap.
Anyone else?
Why the fuck are people injecting themselves with a non-FDA approved biological agent?
And what the fuck are people afraid of, when this covid has a 99.97% survival rate?
I don't understand this level of retardedness... Or maybe I am just super, over the top, fucking retarded, that I can't understand this shit.