patrick.net

Patrick says

O'Keefe was really the whole show.

He can become independent and retain his reach.

PV probably owns the IP process which gleaned the Research and Reports on who to target and when.
O'Keefe was just the face that confronted them after the Journo Presstitutes, caught their Whistleblowing Johns spilling the beans.

This proves he was part of a Psyop system designed to keep everyone in a huff. Even though things gets exposed, nobody never goes to jail. This Pfizer thing is bigger than the Psyops game, as Internationally Governments and Heads of States are calling for accountability and heads on a platter. I bet the heads at the PV were blind sided by O'Keefe's latest attack. They have to wrangle him in, and shut it down. My guess without O'Keefe PV will get hijacked by the NPR architects and will be used for Propaganda psyops as it was intended to be. The problem is, you can't propagandatize Conservative issues, like you can Liberal issues.

Hyping Dicks on Chicks is less dangerous than exposing a global Genocide racket.

There's a lot of speculation here. Sources indicate there have been problems for some time. They recently re-instated the CFO and someone else O'Keefe had been instrumental in firing.

Simplest explanation here is he's someone who's difficult to work with, and may not best suited to the role her currently occupy's in the company. The fact that no one is officially saying anything tells me it's just an internal company matter.

AmericanKulak says

The timing, going after Pfizer and having an executive admit on video about the menstrual/pregnancy issues, that they knew the toxine was harmful, etc., is impeccable.

I don't think the Pfizzer twink's words is any way proof that Pizzer knew the toxxines were causing menstrual/pregnancy issues. I am not saying they are not, just that this is a long way from any type of proof.

Enough people believe the police can induce false confessions. Has Veritas released the entire transcripts of the interview? Was the Veritas hunky trapster repeatedly asking leading questions? Was he providing the words, over and over again, for the desired confession?

wtf?

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

Has Veritas released the entire transcripts of the interview? Was the Veritas hunky trapster repeatedly asking leading questions? Was he providing the words, over and over again, for the desired confession?

Yes, that 100% more believable than a company with a long history of immoral activity engaging in the described malfeasance. Forget that Pfizer's own documents provide proof they lied about everything.

I seriously don't get why some people try so hard to shoe-horn the least likely explanation. You cannot have good without evil, stop sugar-coating the evil.

NuttBoxer says

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

Has Veritas released the entire transcripts of the interview? Was the Veritas hunky trapster repeatedly asking leading questions? Was he providing the words, over and over again, for the desired confession?

Yes, that 100% more believable than a company with a long history of immoral activity engaging in the described malfeasance. Forget that Pfizer's own documents provide proof they lied about everything.

I seriously don't get why some people try so hard to shoe-horn the least likely explanation. You cannot have good without evil, stop sugar-coating the evil.

Pfizer is evil, but really, the full video should be released to show it.

The sort of journalism I demand at this point, is a synopsis of a story, and maybe some conclusions, and ALL their source data, so I can check.

At this point, if somebody says something like "The Mueller Report said X", my immediate response is "what page and what paragraph? Provide a quote", and if they can't or won't do that, I just conclude I'm talking to either a propagandist, or somebody that has been fooled by a propagandist.

richwicks says

NuttBoxer says

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

Has Veritas released the entire transcripts of the interview? Was the Veritas hunky trapster repeatedly asking leading questions? Was he providing the words, over and over again, for the desired confession?

Yes, that 100% more believable than a company with a long history of immoral activity engaging in the described malfeasance. Forget that Pfizer's own documents provide proof they lied about everything.

I seriously don't get why some people try so hard to shoe-horn the least likely explanation. You cannot have good without evil, stop sugar-coating the evil.

Pfizer is evil, but really, the full video should be released to show it.

The sort of journalism I demand at this point, is a synopsis of a story, and maybe s...

"Metallica's Merchandising Staff oust Hatfield over erratic behavior"

Koch

Some substantial donors are suing for their donations back. Legal threats issued to PV Board, making the case that O'Keefe's top billing and advertising by the Non-Profit made it clear it was a vehicle for his journalism.

https://twitter.com/OldRowSwig/status/1624093172639887361?t=UhFvPwXc8JSMQOX3NAkhEw&ref_src=patrick.net

AmericanKulak says

Yes, that 100%

The videos are edited, right? What I am asking to see would reside in the unedited videos. What have they edited out? Transcripts for the unedited videos would help establish the scope, content, and context of the entire date night discussions.

Why? It's nothing new, nothing unknown. As I said when this broke, the only thing I heard was confirmation. If Pfizer's own documents prove the statements factual, what the fuck else are you looking for?

https://notthebee.com/article/a-group-of-major-donors-have-served-the-project-veritas-board-of-directors-with-a-cease-and-desist-letter-as-it-considers-firing-james-okeefe

A group of major donors have served the Project Veritas board with a cease-and-desist letter as it considers firing James O'Keefe

what the hell going on with PV?

im starting to think they got too close to pfizer, so someone high up made a call

NuttBoxer says

Why? It's nothing new, nothing unknown. As I said when this broke, the only thing I heard was confirmation. If Pfizer's own documents prove the statements factual, what the fuck else are you looking for?

It's not about preaching to the choir.

I've come to my conclusions 2 years ago, but there's few people like me that is going to go through a bunch of scientific papers, find out who Kerry Mullis is, look up statistics, confirm the claims are correct, record and save "news" stories so you can see what they were (supposedly) wrong about, etc.

If I attempt to introduce my thinking and why I think what I do to most people in my peer group, and I'm an electrical engineer in Silly Con Valley, I'm a conspiracy nut. I can't even reach the (supposedly) educated and smart people. They won't spend an hour learning, much less a day or a week, which I have. Veritas is needed to reach the busy so-called "common man" who SUSPECTS but isn't certain.

I can more easily convince a car mechanic about the situation, than an engineer. It's not that fellow engineers are dumb, because they aren't, they are arrogant, and will rarely admit error. They don't believe they can be victims of disinformation or propaganda. Their ego can't handle it. It's a SEVERE character fault of us "edumacated people". It's a very severe one. Until I learned to dispense with the idea that being wrong made me stupid, it kept me in intellectual infantilism.

Being wrong does NOT make you stupid, it just makes you wrong. When you are fed incorrect data, you come to incorrect conclusions and even if you're a genius this will happen to you.

Garbage in garbage out. People are made to feel stupid for not detecting garbage in though. You cant help it. NONE of us are above being mislead and propagandized.

O'Keefe told a subordinate that PV had donors to pay for their mission, and PV's mission was not to attract Donors.

Fired the employee after multiple incidents for insubordination on this guidance.

The next day, a Special Emergency Meeting of the Board was held, scheduled to start as the plane doors closed and to be concluded before his flight landed.

https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1627743289033240576?ref_src=patrick.net

RINO board was instructed to shut down PV for the Pfizer Bust, this is clear.

Here's the RINO inside Spy that O'Keefe fired, now running PV.

IMO, this is a sign that PV has been taken over by the CIA.

Gather round everyone and watch Project Veritas lose followers in real time!

https://socialblade.com/twitter/user/project_veritas/realtime

Still sounds like a disagreement between CEO and board, not an uncommon occurrence. Could there have been outside influence due to the PV videos showing increasingly sensitive and alarming materials? To know for sure I'd be interested in any recent changes in wealth among the board, or the other executives who helped oust O'Keefe.

DhammaStep says

Gather round everyone and watch Project Veritas lose followers in real time!

https://socialblade.com/twitter/user/project_veritas/realtime

The ruling class retaliated, called in favors, killed off PV. I just assume deep state.

14 PV Employees stand by O'Keefe.

https://twitter.com/Perpetualmaniac/status/1629090011437047814?ref_src=patrick.net

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/02/i-stand-with-james-okeefe-exclusive-14-courageous-project-veritas-whistleblowers-release-powerful-video-and-letter-in-support-of-james-okeefe/

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/anti-establishmentarianism-friday

I hate to say I told you so. Well, maybe that’s too strong. Anyway, the Post Millennial ran a story yesterday headlined, “BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: CHAOS at Project Veritas—almost ALL employees have been laid off: sources.”




Last year, in an astounding act of self-immolation, right after breaking the historic undercover video of a Pfizer executive admitting the pharma company was dabbling in illegal gain-of-function genetic tinkering with viruses — to make them more deadly — Project Veritas summarily and mysteriously defenestrated its founder, investigative journalist James O’Keefe.

Now, according to the Post Millennial, yesterday the scrappy anti-establishment media group fired most of its operations staff, about 20 people, leaving basically a skeleton crew. The news momentarily appeared on Project Veritas’ official, blue-checked Twitter account:




Ironically, the story hasn’t yet been confirmed by pro-transparency Project Veritas, and normally I would wait a day or two to see what shakes out. But it looks like the predicted chickens of failure are finally nesting right in the bankrupt roosts where we thought they’d be.

"Since James quit," a source told the Post Millennial, "the donations dried up...the donations never resumed. The board were desperate to bring Hannah on board because they thought it would be cute, but the problem is she's a charlatan and a fraud. Everything she's ever done has been a failure, and she lied to everyone, claiming she had all these donors she could bring in."

It was always a childlike fantasy to believe that a heterodox, donation-supported organization like Project Veritas could ever survive without its iconic founder. But maybe that was the point?

I bet there was a call from Pfizer which resulted in their firing O'Keefe. Pfizer is a dedicated enemy of truth.

Patrick says

I bet there was a call from Pfizer which resulted in their firing O'Keefe. Pfizer is a dedicated enemy of truth.

Of course there was a call from Pfizer, or more likely the DOD.

Our government is a mafia. Always has been, and revealing that is dangerous to the mafia. We all live in a happy democratic republic, and what our awful shitty government does, and what are are terrible corporations do, is because that's what people want. THAT is the illusion.

Want spyware as part of your operating system? That's Windows. I'm not even certain it's not part of Linux at this point. Popping up wireshark, I can't tell what the fuck they're doing, or why.

If people really knew what sort of system we had, they'd revolt, so truth has to be suppressed.

He's still going though:

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/irredeemable-wednesday-july-31-2024

Lol:

https://x.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1818377737599410433

@JamesOKeefeIII
BREAKING: DNC Manager: ‘I Don’t Think Kamala Harris Would Win;' Admits to Making Empty Promises to Donors

“I don’t think Kamala Harris would win this year,” reveals Joyce DeCerce (@JoyceDecerce) (he/him), Compliance Manager for the Democratic National Committee (
@DNC
) and Kamala Harris' (
@KamalaHarris
) Campaign. DeCerce adds, “She doesn’t have any accomplishments to speak of,” suggesting that Harris’s lack of popularity stems from her underachievement while in office.

Regarding Harris’s approval amongst voters, the DNC Compliance manager states, “She's weirdly unpopular."

DeCerce describes his role within the DNC as “an accounting function,” explaining, “It’s kind of like where accounting and legal meet.”

DeCerce admits that the DNC’s engagement with donors is little more than a façade. He explains, “You just put on a performance for them, a little show, right?” implying that the DNC merely tells donors what they want to hear in order to receive donations. He further claims that the DNC’s approach is to fuel donors’ fantasies with empty promises, emphasizing, “They want their fantasy to be, you know, fed.”

When @OKeefeMedia reached out to Kristin Hetherington, the CFO of the DNC, for comment, she hung up the phone in frustration after questioned if the DNC tells donors "what they want to hear," and if they play to donor's "fantasies."

The undercover journalist who recorded Joyce DeCerce received a threatening postcard at her house featuring racial undertones in an apparent attempt to intimate her and prevent this story from being aired.

Good video showing the kind of person working for the Democrats.