« First « Previous Comments 5,087 - 5,126 of 5,744 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://dailyclout.io/drink-your-vaccines-china-successfully-immunizes-mice-with-mrna-loaded-cows-milk/
the FDA is raising the white flag on the mRNA Covid shots.
Unvaccinated adults will no longer be offered more than a single mRNA dose. (Tell that to the 230 million Americans who already took two.) And almost no one under 65 is eligible for a second booster.
Yesterday, in a significant stealth policy change, the FDA published all-new covid vaccination guidelines. In its online news release, the FDA said that the new rules are intended to “simplify” the “complicated” U.S. vaccination program, which currently requires two initial shots, any brand, then six-month boosters, any brand. That’s it.
Apparently the FDA now feels that is too complicated or something.
“At this stage of the pandemic, data support simplifying the use of the authorized mRNA bivalent COVID-19 vaccines and the agency believes that this approach will help encourage future vaccination,” said Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
The over-funded, morbidly-obese health agency “simplified” the vaccine schedule by taking a single easy-to-remember rule and creating 23 separate rules with internal conditions. I am not making that up except I didn’t actually count all the new rules, because I got distracted during counting and had to start over twice. It could be more than 23.
There are now seven different groups of people that each have their own rule or rules, including: people who got one or more regular (not bivalent) vaccines; un-vaccinated kids and adults; un-vaccinated babies and toddlers; vaccinated babies and toddlers; people who got at least one of the new bivalent vaccines, EXCEPT: 65+ who had only one bivalent vaccine, and some types of immunocompromised who’ve gotten ANY of the bivalent vaccine, except for un-vaccinated babies and toddlers, who have a different rule.
Each of the groups has their own special guidance. I can’t wait to see the flowchart for this new “simplified” vaccine schedule.
Setting that initial lie aside, the FDA buried the really big news in the second group, about halfway down the long, “simplified” list of groups and rules, which covers the largest group of vaxxers. Here it is, in full:
Most individuals who have already received a single dose of the bivalent vaccine are not currently eligible for another dose. The FDA intends to make decisions about future vaccination after receiving recommendations on the fall strain composition at an FDA advisory committee in June.
See that? “Not currently eligible.” They’re cut off. The FDA just ended vaccinations for almost everyone following the regularly-scheduled jab programming. This holdout group of vaccine addicts, who are still lining up every four to six months to get their FREE booster shots, have all taken the bivalent vaccine by now. So the free part of the ride is over, baby!
Enter your credit card number to continue. If they want any more of the magic covid juice, they’ll have to pay for it themselves. Bivalent boosters are no longer FDA approved, not for them. (We’ll see about letting you have another one for next year’s covid season.)
The headline should have been: FDA ENDS VACCINE PROGRAM FOR MOST VACCINATED ADULTS. All remaining private vaccine mandates at colleges and private companies just hit the wall. It’s over.
It’s a grab bag of options for everyone else, depending on age, health, and vaccine status. For example, the FDA is giving older folks (65+) just ONE MORE TASTE before cutting them off:
Individuals 65 years of age and older who have received a single dose of a bivalent vaccine may receive one additional dose at least four months following their initial bivalent dose.
And they still want the kids, of course. Kids — at the lowest risk for covid — can still take advantage of a dizzying array of shots (3 doses if under five, and 2 doses of Moderna or 1 dose of Pfizer at 5 and over), unless they’ve had covid, maybe, it isn’t entirely clear.
The least newsworthy but most ironic rule was the new one for all the unjabbed people. If, like me, you’ve hesitated to get the jibby jab, there’s terrific news for you in the FDA’s new vaccine guidance:
Most unvaccinated individuals may receive a single dose of a bivalent vaccine, rather than multiple doses of the original monovalent mRNA vaccines.
Hahahahahahahahaha! That’s comedic gold! “Peter, how are we going to convince these hesitaters and skeptics now?” “Well Dr. Kwammi, let’s simplify their decision and let them skate with just one shot.” “But Peter, that doesn’t seem fair to all the people who took the shots we’ve required so far — they might get angry!” “Dr. Kwammi, the vaccinated will believe anything we tell them; they’ll never even notice.”
The FDA’s explanation for why an unvaccinated person can just have one shot and be “fully vaccinated” even though everyone else had to get seven shots was, get ready for this, a lot of people have already had covid.
Natural immunity!
I don’t know about you, but for me, as a vaccine-hesitant person, well, to be fair, a vaccine skeptical person … alright, truthfully I’m probably ANTI VACCINE at this point (I can’t follow all the definitional rules) — I’m going to ‘pass’ on the FDA’s offer to let me get be “fully vaccinated” with just one little prick.
Hard pass.
People who got seven+ shots should be furious about this. Many of them got multiple jabs after getting covid, sometimes even after getting covid twice or three times. The FDA says, “follow the science?” The science is meandering around crazier than a Baltimore panhandler who just finished his second bottle of Jack Daniels, and it’s only eight o’clock in the morning.
How are we supposed to follow THAT? Science needs to go to rehab.
Moderna hid serious side effects suffered by its Covid vaccine recipients when it reported clinical trial results for the shot
Moderna scientists said in a 2021 paper no mRNA jab recipients in the trial had "serious adverse effects." In fact, 14 ultimately did, including three miscarriages. No placebo recipients did.
In February 2021, Moderna scientists published results from the Phase 2 trial of the company’s mRNA Covid jab in the journal Vaccine.
Moderna had started the “P201” trial with 600 healthy volunteers on May 29, 2020, mostly to examine if the shots were safe.
The company had good news on that front. In the “Highlights” section at the top of the paper, Moderna’s scientists reported:
No serious adverse effects were observed.
That statement was untrue. ...
In all, during the placebo-controlled phase of the trial, which ended in early 2021, seven of the 400 healthy volunteers who received a two-shot regimen of Moderna’s vaccine suffered serious side effects. ...
The problems included a heart attack and two miscarriages.
In comparison, the 200 people who received a placebo shot without any mRNA had no serious side effects.
Seven vs. zero. ...
Comments
Brooke
21 min ago
Fear fueled EUA shifted endless dollars into pharma coffers, which they paid to lawmakers who won’t hold them accountable because: endless dollars. 🔄
Howling for Harmony
16 min ago
"Moderna says it hopes to offer new vaccines for cancer, heart disease, and other conditions by 2030" Moderna ---the firefighter that sets the fires!!
Regular readers will immediately recognize Dr. Peter McCullough’s point, made in a recent Shannon Joy interview, and previously discussed here on C&C. The heroic covid doc explained that, according to a solid recent study, the real numbers of American adults that somehow avoided jabbing was actually 25%, not 8% like the CDC claims.
And 25% of adults — obstinate, passionate, and more than a little chafed at being prodded with needles every time they turned around in 2021 — that 25% group forms a monolithic, single-issue voting bloc, if some politician is smart enough to take advantage of it.
In other words, given that — even in a presidential election cycle — only 60% of Americans vote, we are THIS CLOSE to becoming an Anti-Vaxx Nation. Assuming the morons in charge don’t blast us back into the Stone Age, that is, I know, that’s a pretty big assumption, but if we somehow survive the next couple years, there WILL be a reckoning.
https://twitter.com/twc_health/status/1649511940220403712?ref_src=patrick.net
Dr. McCullough: The Voting Power of Unv'd Americans Cannot Be Ignored
The CDC said 92% of Americans took at least one S , but it turns out the CDC was double-counting people. 25% of American adults took zero shots.
And when it comes to the ballot box, "Let me tell you — this 25% is going to vote
25% of the adult population who's gonna vote are going to be charged on the v issue. Only 60% of adults vote in a presidential election.
So nearly half of the voting base will want a candidate who addresses the v issue."
It’s not just the United States. The COVID Blog® is confident in declaring that the global population has dropped from 7.8 billion in January 2020 to 6.8 billion today – about a 13% drop in 28 months.
https://twitter.com/AnneMar45451941/status/1651115196922863618?ref_src=patrick.net
There is no possibility that COVID-19 vaccines in use can cause HIV, AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome, the name given to illness resulting from HIV) or false positive HIV tests, according to experts who spoke to Reuters.
And it looks like Reuters is just another elite lapdog which will publish lies to protect toxxine industry revenue at the cost of public health:
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-boosters-hiv-idUSL1N2UM1Q0
There is no possibility that COVID-19 vaccines in use can cause HIV, AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome, the name given to illness resulting from HIV) or false positive HIV tests, according to experts who spoke to Reuters.
Social media users have since shared a quote attributed to Montagnier, but Reuters could not find any evidence the words came from the French scientist. It reads: "For those of you that have taken the third dose, go and take a test for AIDS. The results may surprise you. Then sue your government.”
A celebrated member of the globalist World Economic Forum (WEF) has called for a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans, arguing that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.”
A celebrated member of the globalist World Economic Forum (WEF) has called for a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans, arguing that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.”
« First « Previous Comments 5,087 - 5,126 of 5,744 Next » Last » Search these comments
I know a few and they sound like absolute shit, and both feel like absolute crap.
Anyone else?
Why the fuck are people injecting themselves with a non-FDA approved biological agent?
And what the fuck are people afraid of, when this covid has a 99.97% survival rate?
I don't understand this level of retardedness... Or maybe I am just super, over the top, fucking retarded, that I can't understand this shit.