patrick.net

Moderna hid serious side effects suffered by its Covid vaccine recipients when it reported clinical trial results for the shot
Moderna scientists said in a 2021 paper no mRNA jab recipients in the trial had "serious adverse effects." In fact, 14 ultimately did, including three miscarriages. No placebo recipients did.

In February 2021, Moderna scientists published results from the Phase 2 trial of the company’s mRNA Covid jab in the journal Vaccine.

Moderna had started the “P201” trial with 600 healthy volunteers on May 29, 2020, mostly to examine if the shots were safe.

The company had good news on that front. In the “Highlights” section at the top of the paper, Moderna’s scientists reported:

No serious adverse effects were observed.

That statement was untrue. ...

In all, during the placebo-controlled phase of the trial, which ended in early 2021, seven of the 400 healthy volunteers who received a two-shot regimen of Moderna’s vaccine suffered serious side effects. ...

The problems included a heart attack and two miscarriages.

In comparison, the 200 people who received a placebo shot without any mRNA had no serious side effects.

Seven vs. zero. ...

Comments

Brooke
21 min ago
Fear fueled EUA shifted endless dollars into pharma coffers, which they paid to lawmakers who won’t hold them accountable because: endless dollars. 🔄

Howling for Harmony
16 min ago
"Moderna says it hopes to offer new vaccines for cancer, heart disease, and other conditions by 2030" Moderna ---the firefighter that sets the fires!!

Regular readers will immediately recognize Dr. Peter McCullough’s point, made in a recent Shannon Joy interview, and previously discussed here on C&C. The heroic covid doc explained that, according to a solid recent study, the real numbers of American adults that somehow avoided jabbing was actually 25%, not 8% like the CDC claims.

And 25% of adults — obstinate, passionate, and more than a little chafed at being prodded with needles every time they turned around in 2021 — that 25% group forms a monolithic, single-issue voting bloc, if some politician is smart enough to take advantage of it.

In other words, given that — even in a presidential election cycle — only 60% of Americans vote, we are THIS CLOSE to becoming an Anti-Vaxx Nation. Assuming the morons in charge don’t blast us back into the Stone Age, that is, I know, that’s a pretty big assumption, but if we somehow survive the next couple years, there WILL be a reckoning.

https://twitter.com/twc_health/status/1649511940220403712?ref_src=patrick.net

Dr. McCullough: The Voting Power of Unv'd Americans Cannot Be Ignored

The CDC said 92% of Americans took at least one S , but it turns out the CDC was double-counting people. 25% of American adults took zero shots.

And when it comes to the ballot box, "Let me tell you — this 25% is going to vote

25% of the adult population who's gonna vote are going to be charged on the v issue. Only 60% of adults vote in a presidential election.

So nearly half of the voting base will want a candidate who addresses the v issue."

It’s not just the United States. The COVID Blog® is confident in declaring that the global population has dropped from 7.8 billion in January 2020 to 6.8 billion today – about a 13% drop in 28 months.

https://twitter.com/AnneMar45451941/status/1651115196922863618?ref_src=patrick.net

There is no possibility that COVID-19 vaccines in use can cause HIV, AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome, the name given to illness resulting from HIV) or false positive HIV tests, according to experts who spoke to Reuters.

https://twitter.com/AnneMar45451941/status/1651115196922863618?ref_src=patrick.net

And it looks like Reuters is just another elite lapdog which will publish lies to protect toxxine industry revenue at the cost of public health:

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-boosters-hiv-idUSL1N2UM1Q0

There is no possibility that COVID-19 vaccines in use can cause HIV, AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome, the name given to illness resulting from HIV) or false positive HIV tests, according to experts who spoke to Reuters.

Social media users have since shared a quote attributed to Montagnier, but Reuters could not find any evidence the words came from the French scientist. It reads: "For those of you that have taken the third dose, go and take a test for AIDS. The results may surprise you. Then sue your government.”

A celebrated member of the globalist World Economic Forum (WEF) has called for a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans, arguing that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.”

A celebrated member of the globalist World Economic Forum (WEF) has called for a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans, arguing that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.”

💉 On Monday, the National Institutes of Health issued a cheerful press release titled, “Clinical Trial of mRNA Universal Influenza Vaccine Candidate Begins.” The sub-lead stated, “Trial will test the experimental vaccine for safety and its ability to induce an immune response.”

Wait a sec. Right there’s your first problem. “Ability to induce an immune response” is not the same as “preventing disease,” or even “reducing severity” of disease, whatever that means. Injecting topsoil or lemonade mix also induces an immune response, but that doesn’t mean it protects anyone from taking a dirt nap or catching scurvy.

These scientists. S.M.D.H.

Anyway, the NIH’s proud press release described the “clinical trial of an experimental, [mRNA, quadrivalent,] universal influenza vaccine” developed, not by big pharma, but by the government itself. In fact, the new “universal” vaccine was developed by Fauci’s old team, the boys over at the NIAID, the crack team who seems to be all involved with DoD’s bioweapons development, purely for defensive reasons, of course, and not that it has anything whatsoever to do with the new mRNA flu vaccine, no, don’t be a silly goose.

You don’t need to study any of this stuff. Leave it to the government experts. Keep playing your cell phone games, aren’t they fun?

The NIH experimental vaccine trial will enroll up to 50 healthy volunteers, aged 18 through 49. I have some questions for these volunteers. I’d like to understand the thought process that leads someone to agree to have an “experimental quadrivalent mRNA vaccine” injected into them in exchange for a small styrofoam cup of watery orange juice and a stale donut.

Will the volunteers ask who will pay for their long-term medical care, or who will support their loved ones if something bad happens? Do they care?

Somehow I doubt these people are as reckless with their money as they are with their bodies. But, if they are, I have some exciting investment ideas I’d like to pitch to them while the opportunity is ripe (i.e., before they get the shot).

The early-stage jab trial will be run through a government program called the “Collaborative Influenza Vaccine Innovation Centers” (CIVIC) program, which was established by NIAID long, long ago, in 2019. I suppose it wasn’t that long ago.

But what’s so interesting is that the GOVERNMENT is developing this drug, not the pharmaceutical companies. Why? Why is the U.S. government getting into the pharmaceutical business? Is there an “influenza emergency?” For a couple years there, we had a good long stretch without any flu at all, and that was even without any experimental quadrivalent mRNA flu vaccines.

What I’m especially wondering is: are the regulatory rules different, maybe less stringent, for government study researchers as opposed to private sector researchers? Or is this all because the government is completely shielded from liability for jab injuries by sovereign immunity?

“Ability to induce an immune response” is not the same as “preventing disease,” or even “reducing severity” of disease,

Patrick says

“Ability to induce an immune response” is not the same as “preventing disease,” or even “reducing severity” of disease,

Yep. Historically cancer vaccines have induced the generation of target specific T cells with zero effect on the disease.

Al_Sharpton_for_President

https://www.acrobiosystems.com/A1210-Targets-for-Antibody-Drug-Conjugates.html?gclid=CjwKCAjwscGjBhAXEiwAswQqNEnc9VDJudNAXKSEaSMFj9rO9Bzw5Xe2ex64IBvfx2_2Ixf-o6PEDhoC92sQAvD_BwE

https://www.cidara.com/cloudbreak/

Two new studies published this week on the same day. The Biochimie study described three separate, complex systems by which the covid proteins could promote cancer growth. The Cureus study described massive excess deaths in Germany in 2021-22, and suggested an astounding possible reason for them.

Both studies are peer-reviewed. Both studies are lengthy and highly-footnoted. Both studies were very carefully written. Both are remarkable.

But one of the studies is a limited hangout, a psyop that gives us a little bit of new, truthful information, information intended to distract us from the horrifying implications of the other study.

Today’s roundup dives deep into both remarkable studies, so we can nip this new narrative psyop right in the bud light.