by AD ➕follow (1) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 2,243 - 2,282 of 5,634 Next » Last » Search these comments
Just came back from a sushi buffet in Concord. $30.99/person plus drinks. Great food and service for a reasonable price.
Eman says
Look at this flip last spring. I missed the market by a couple months. I could have gotten $100-$150k more had it hit the market sooner thanks to low mortgage rates.
https://redf.in/H28A6Z
1.7M for a 1.2 sqft shoebox. That was quite the bidding war since your list price was
1.195M ?! Did you add sqft to this house too?
You may also call it survival of the fittest. A lot of aspiring buyers are cut out of the RE market. There is a chance they will be life-long renters. I couldn’t afford to buy all the properties I own in todays market - even though my salary has gone up substantially (same for my wife). On the other hand you have people buying $1M - $2M homes in all cash. And realtors are to not to blame for this imbalanced market. Low inventory, no forced selling, low interest rates with duration and a concentration of wealth are the reason.
You know more than I do on the owner end and you can spot issues with properties having flipped and done a bunch I assume. Listing brokers are the ones that scare me the most if you're the buyer. They 100% will lie unless you spot it. I doubt you use inspectors anymore, I won't anymore as a non-licensed person and having done enough rehab. Only time would be structural concern on an older home, pre-1950's. It's easy to spot hack jobs.
Dual agency is the biggie. Ethic (some text omitted to shorten quote...) find something else. It's not like a car where you can search and get the same one somewhere else. THAT is the house you want. I know you're on the investment side, but just pointing out from previously being in the trenches why people hate Realtors. It's not wrong to hate them. And it's not wrong to like or have a "good" one. They've lied to you though, almost certainly. It's like playing football and never having an injury for 25 years. That's impossible for 99.99999% of players.
As long as your ROI is 15% or greater annually, investors will give you money.
My avg. yearly ROI in the stock market has been 20%-30%, obviously with less leverage. You need to do research though on individual stocks like you would do on any other asset, such as houses etc.
mell says
My avg. yearly ROI in the stock market has been 20%-30%, obviously with less leverage. You need to do research though on individual stocks like you would do on any other asset, such as houses etc.
Come on, are you pulling our leg? You'd be retired in 10 years.
GNL says
mell says
My avg. yearly ROI in the stock market has been 20%-30%, obviously with less leverage. You need to do research though on individual stocks like you would do on any other asset, such as houses etc.
Come on, are you pulling our leg? You'd be retired in 10 years.
Depends on the amount invested.
just_passing_through says
sushi buffet
Usually a step up from gas station sushi.
mell says
My avg. yearly ROI in the stock market has been 20%-30%, obviously with less leverage. You need to do research though on individual stocks like you would do on any other asset, such as houses etc.
Come on, are you pulling our leg? You'd be retired in 10 years.
My avg. yearly ROI in the stock market has been 20%-30%, obviously with less leverage. You need to do research though on individual stocks like you would do on any other asset, such as houses etc.
Nice, was the condo all cash or did you finance? Any advice you can give someone for buying their first vacation rental?
Right now I'm only accumulating company stock.
Or were you just talking companies in general?
Started with 10k excess money roughly 17 years ago, which has now grown to over 1MM excess money, with the caveat that not all of it were gains, whenever there was a prolonged rout in the market and I maxed out margins I would add a few k here and there from my checkings and savings, so after adjusting for those infusions the yearly ROI roughly falls between 20%-30%. It is not that hard to make a multi-bagger if you hit a really good biotech (my main sector) pick where you have (some text omitted to shorten quote...) etire (esp. with wife and 3 kids), house is roughly 35% paid off, but I'm aiming for semi-retirement, aka freedom from the man, at least within the next 1-3 years, and keep continuing tech by contract only while focusing on investing. As some mentioned, with a leverage of 1:2 max. and starting with a humble amount you don't become financially independent that quickly. We also have some family properties and I am not interested in doing any landlording or taking over any mortgages ;)
property manager…cough…cough
mell says
1337irr says
property manager…cough…cough
Definitely the way to go, would need on the combined patnet expertise to pick a good one though, being overseas complicates the matter
Mell, are you back in DE?
You don't need debt for a good credit score, you need debt for slavery.
WookieMan says
Which debt literally doesn't matter at all.
How does debt doesn't matter at all?
gabbar says
WookieMan says
Which debt literally doesn't matter at all.
How does debt doesn't matter at all?
The idea is that a default hurts the lenders more than the borrowers, so the lenders accept devalued currency or a debt swap / mutual debt forgiveness. Most nations run large deficits, and not being able to redeem the loans they are owed would make their situations far worse. I don't think this will hold true forever, but until now it mostly has.
mell says
gabbar says
WookieMan says
Which debt literally doesn't matter at all.
How does debt doesn't matter at all?
The idea is that a default hurts the lenders more than the borrowers, so the lenders accept devalued currency or a debt swap / mutual debt forgiveness. Most nations run large deficits, and not being able to redeem the loans they are owed would make their situations far worse. I don't think this will hold true forever, but until now it mostly has.
Would this apply to individual american citizens? No, right?
So, owning a place with a lot of land around it to keep out the assholes is probably the best scenario
"In 1950 the median American home price was 7,354 and median household income was 2,970 which is 40%. Today the median household income is 70,000 and median home price is 440,000. That's 16%. What makes this even more alarming is most households that are $70,000 are with two earners. 34% of US households are single earning. In 1950 only 12% where two income."
(edited for typos)
-redditor
WookieMan says
Which debt literally doesn't matter at all.
How does debt doesn't matter at all?
2. Student debt. Lots of kids out there live off their student loans in college. There’s lots of people out there with worthless degrees and 100+K of debt that cannot ever be discharged.
But then the market takes a dip and the bank calls your loan and then you’re forced to sell into a down market
Sears. It's okay for big companies to fail financially but you can't as a person? You are a business and it's the same thing.
Would still pay for the house of course.... which they also can't touch.
NuttBoxer says
"In 1950 the median American home price was 7,354 and median household income was 2,970 which is 40%. Today the median household income is 70,000 and median home price is 440,000. That's 16%. What makes this even more alarming is most households that are $70,000 are with two earners. 34% of US households are single earning. In 1950 only 12% where two income."
(edited for typos)
-redditor
What was the average square footage of a house in 1950? How many bathrooms did it have? What was the r-value of the insulation?
Let me answer those for you. 1000, 1, 0
You could build a 1950 level home today for 100K. Problem is your wife will look at it and tell you to keep renting the condo. So nobody builds houses like that anymore.
« First « Previous Comments 2,243 - 2,282 of 5,634 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pimco-kiesel-called-housing-top-160339396.html?source=patrick.net
Bond manager Mark Kiesel sold his California home in 2006, when he presciently predicted the housing bubble would pop. He bought again in 2012, after U.S. prices fell more than 30% and found a floor.
Now, after a record surge in prices, Kiesel says the time to sell is once again at hand.