by AD ➕follow (1) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 2,277 - 2,316 of 5,634 Next » Last » Search these comments
WookieMan says
Which debt literally doesn't matter at all.
How does debt doesn't matter at all?
2. Student debt. Lots of kids out there live off their student loans in college. There’s lots of people out there with worthless degrees and 100+K of debt that cannot ever be discharged.
But then the market takes a dip and the bank calls your loan and then you’re forced to sell into a down market
Sears. It's okay for big companies to fail financially but you can't as a person? You are a business and it's the same thing.
Would still pay for the house of course.... which they also can't touch.
NuttBoxer says
"In 1950 the median American home price was 7,354 and median household income was 2,970 which is 40%. Today the median household income is 70,000 and median home price is 440,000. That's 16%. What makes this even more alarming is most households that are $70,000 are with two earners. 34% of US households are single earning. In 1950 only 12% where two income."
(edited for typos)
-redditor
What was the average square footage of a house in 1950? How many bathrooms did it have? What was the r-value of the insulation?
Let me answer those for you. 1000, 1, 0
You could build a 1950 level home today for 100K. Problem is your wife will look at it and tell you to keep renting the condo. So nobody builds houses like that anymore.
What was the average square footage of a house in 1950? How many bathrooms did it have? What was the r-value of the insulation?
Let me answer those for you. 1000, 1, 0
You could build a 1950 level home today for 100K. Problem is your wife will look at it and tell you to keep renting the condo. So nobody builds houses like that anymore.
NuttBoxer says
"In 1950 the median American home price was 7,354 and median household income was 2,970 which is 40%. Today the median household income is 70,000 and median home price is 440,000. That's 16%. What makes this even more alarming is most households that are $70,000 are with two earners. 34% of US households are single earning. In 1950 only 12% where two income."
(edited for typos)
-redditor
What was the average square footage of a house in 1950? How many bathrooms did it have? What was the r-value of the insulation?
Let me answer those for you. 1000, 1, 0
You could build a 1950 level home today for 100K. Problem is your wife will look at it and tell you to keep renting the condo. So nobody builds houses like that anymore.
Only complaint was the single bathroom
it's pretty fucking depressing to admit that your wealth is being stolen from in front of your eyes, and the system you've been told leads to prosperity, actually leads to slavery.
Few investors rode the pandemic-era housing boom as high as Jay Gajavelli. Fewer still have fallen as far.
Before Gajavelli found his real-estate career, the 61-year-old immigrant from India was just another information-technology worker, putting in 60-hour weeks for a middling job in Dallas. Last year, Gajavelli’s company owned more than $500 million worth of Sunbelt apartment buildings with more than 7,000 units, and was one of Houston’s biggest landlords.
Over the past four years, Gajavelli built his real-estate empire using funds from dozens of small investors who wanted a chance to earn a landlord’s riches without any of the work. He pitched double-your-money returns in ebullient, can-do talks at investor conferences and on YouTube videos.
He described buying buildings with plans to upgrade units, raise rents and sell for a profit after as little as three years. The idea that everybody needs a place to live was the bedrock of Gajavelli’s pitch. “I never worry about [the] economy now,” Gajavelli told investors in a webinar presentation last year for his company, Applesway Investment Group. “Even if [the] economy goes down, still I make money.”
Gajavelli’s investors were, in fact, highly vulnerable to interest-rate increases over the past year that crushed the business model that they and thousands of others in similar deals across the U.S. had hoped would make them wealthy. For them and a host of small investors —who were expecting a share of rents and a piece of the profit in an eventual sale—it is looking like a looming investment-property disaster.
In April, Gajavelli’s company lost more than 3,000 apartments at four rental complexes taken in foreclosure, one of the biggest commercial real estate blowups since the financial crisis. Investors lost millions. Gajavelli didn’t respond to requests for comment.
His company had taken out commercial real-estate loans that carried floating interest rates and were adjusted each month. Those types of loans in 2021 offered initial rates as low as 3.5%. Everything changed when the Federal Reserve began raising rates last year, driving up monthly loan payments. Inflation contributed to higher expenses, and Applesway couldn’t raise rents fast enough to keep pace. After bills went unpaid, company properties went into foreclosure.
Al_Sharpton_for_President says
Noooooooooooo!
@pudil,
There’s two problems with debt.
1. You get overextended. Sure it’s all great on paper when you’re using 5% down loans to build your real estate empire. But then the market takes a dip and the bank calls your loan and then you’re forced to sell into a down market.
That looks like bullshit. Weren't prices still going up in 2022?
The US government doesn't have to pay off its $31 trillion debt. The government debt can't be compared to something like a household's finances. When governments for one reason or another run up large debts, it is, as far as I can tell, unusual to pay those debts off. - Paul Krugman, May 23, 2023
Inflation contributed to higher expenses, and Applesway couldn’t raise rents fast enough to keep pace.
I've known people that have committed suicide over debt.
I have never seen or known anyone who got their loan called due.
“I never worry about [the] economy now,” Gajavelli told investors in a webinar presentation last year for his company, Applesway Investment Group. “Even if [the] economy goes down, still I make money.”
Banks are in the business of lending, not foreclosing, or calling the loans due and taking losses. As long as people keep making payments, banks will let them be and not calling anything due.
If it wasn't taken from the ground, it wasn't earned.
Eman says
Banks are in the business of lending, not foreclosing, or calling the loans due and taking losses. As long as people keep making payments, banks will let them be and not calling anything due.
What do regulators say about that? Banks don't ever have to mark their assets to market?
(I have no idea).
NuttBoxer says
If it wasn't taken from the ground, it wasn't earned.
I've long said that real wealth can only come from labor and land. Everything else is a skim.
Eman says
Banks are in the business of lending, not foreclosing, or calling the loans due and taking losses. As long as people keep making payments, banks will let them be and not calling anything due.
Is Warren Buffett a skimmer or a labor? Some people work with their brain while others with their hands. However, they don’t get compensate equally. One thing most people don’t realize is that we get to determine how much our time is worth.
Let’s look at it from this perspective.
House 1 is worth $1M. Bank lent $800k. House drops to $600k. Borrower still makes monthly payments like clockwork. What’s the mark to market value?
House 2 is worth $1M. Bank lent $500k. House drops to $600k. What’s the mark to market value when the borrower defaults on payments?
In general, banks only mark it to market once the assets have been foreclosed and on the book. This is when the assets are called “bank owned”.
Another scenario, house is worth $1M. Bank lent $800k at 3%. However, banks now have to pay depositors 4.5% for their money. What’s the mark to market value on this $800k note?
Nuttboxer, since you don’t like loans and banks…..wouldn’t you need a million in cash first to buy the land, equipment, etc to be self-sufficient? Or are you thinking of renting the land and the equipment?
Eman,
Everything is and has been built upon labor+land. No offense but you're not adding anything to the economy imo. I'm not a hater, I'm just a simple thinker. I'm a business owner. My goal is also to build generational wealth. I think I have a good shot at making it happen. The difference is that I will be adding to the economy by eliminating middlemen by giving their employees everything they need to be a one man/woman business...for free. Yep, free. Many of these employees will go from earning minimum wage to over $100k.
How are landlords or home flippers not adding to the economy?
Supply purchases to improve/remodel homes/apartment, employing contractors, collecting rent and re-investing the profit. And providing shelter to renters and a remodeled home to new homeowners. And being a RE millionaire means you spend your excess money on nice vacations, good food and entertainment.
What type of business do you own GNL?
Taking a dilapidated 2/1 house, made it into a 3/2 and sold for the highest price in the neighborhood is not adding value.
https://redf.in/rdeBNa
Taking a small 1,100 3/2 house, made it into a 1,700sf 4/3 house is not adding anything to the economy.
https://www.redfin.com/CA/Oakland/4266-Maple-Ave-94602/home/1913776?600390594=copy_variant&231528114=control&1778901559=variant&utm_nooverride=1
What does putting money in the stock market add to the economy? What does money managers add to managing money when everyone can just by SPY or QQQ? Adding value is relative IMO.
Taking a dilapidated 2/1 house, made it into a 3/2 and sold for the highest price in the neighborhood is not adding value.
I love real estate for a simple reason. It’s like planting trees. One time effort while we get to reap the rewards for decades to come. All we have to do is watering it and adding fertilizer as needed.
Watching local billionaires such as John Sobrato, George Marcus, Todd and Ned Spiekers, who built their real estate empire and got to where they are today, there’s no reason to feel ashamed of what we do. Real estate is there for the taking. Anyone can do it, but not everyone will. It’s much easier to make excuses.
Eman says
Taking a dilapidated 2/1 house, made it into a 3/2 and sold for the highest price in the neighborhood is not adding value.
How so? An uninhabitable house was converted to a livable asset.
« First « Previous Comments 2,277 - 2,316 of 5,634 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/pimco-kiesel-called-housing-top-160339396.html?source=patrick.net
Bond manager Mark Kiesel sold his California home in 2006, when he presciently predicted the housing bubble would pop. He bought again in 2012, after U.S. prices fell more than 30% and found a floor.
Now, after a record surge in prices, Kiesel says the time to sell is once again at hand.