"We are crippling the Republic to preserve the nexus of criminal enterprise and money laundering in Ukraine that pay our ongoing bribes and overheads. The whores are getting restless, and we don't want them fucking somebody else."
As with the pipeline destruction, MI6 is responsible for this and Priggy's assassination. Daily Mail is a Fleet Street Royal owned rag, managed as British Mockingbird.
"Would you mind if we burned down your parents' homes and abducted you for our adrenochrome factories? Ooops, you are the chilluns of EliteFucks, never mind!"
No, the simple industrial chemical is not the same as the complex chemical derived from the blood of terrified children. Also, you don't just buy it from the local street corner dealer. You have to be ceded a grant to purchase it from the Satanist Globalists as a form of service reward and binding addiction. By all counts, it is the cocaine of cocaines in terms of euphoric, manic grandiosity and joy.
Anti-gravity would break all our physics. It would mean Relativity is wrong or at very least, extremely flawed.
Relativity predicts time dilatation in a gravity well, and we know this happens with atomic clocks. You can actually measure the difference of a gravity field between two SHELVES in a lab with an atomic clock.
Anti-gravity would break all our physics. It would mean Relativity is wrong or at very least, extremely flawed.
Relativity predicts time dilatation in a gravity well, and we know this happens with atomic clocks. You can actually measure the difference of a gravity field between two SHELVES in a lab with an atomic clock.
No it doesn't. If mass is zero or near zero, look at what happens with the formula then.
So if an object can be rendered massless, then gravity and inertia would be nullified. Speed of light limitations will no longer apply.
Anti-gravity would break all our physics. It would mean Relativity is wrong or at very least, extremely flawed.
And what exactly is wrong with that? It means that it is falsifiable. That's a good thing.
Many observes believe that an arcane advanced physics exists, for the secret few, to hold it back from the teeming masses (as usual) and we are given the archaic and stagnant physics of Einstein and Newton as if they are the final inquiries. The masses are supposed to gnaw on these forever as flawed bones, while the elites, as usual, keep the good stuff for their own utilitarian, secretive academians.
And what exactly is wrong with that? It means that it is falsifiable. That's a good thing.
What I mean by that is that it's highly unlikely. The thing about physics is that it's self reliant. Take for example the OceanGate Titan submersible. You can calculate the energy of the implosion a few ways. Many people did it based on pressure, but another way to do it is how much water was displaced by the submersible, and how far that water had to fall down. You get the same energy release. You can calculate energy, mass, power, in multiple ways, and come up with the same solution.
It's internally consistent, and it's kind of remarkable in a way. That's how you know it's correct, there are no internal inconsistencies, but it does break between QM and Relativity. When you try to use relativity along with QM you end up with zeros and infinities. We definitely have an error somewhere, but they are entirely different domains of comprehension. We probably really end up with something NEAR zero and NEAR infinity with the equations, something is missing, but I doubt gravity is entirely different than what we thought.
But maybe?
It's like Newtonian mechanics, there's a bunch of stuff left out because it's NEAR zero for most cases. F=ma doesn't take into account relativistic effects, because they are so small, it's near zero. Newton didn't have the precision to measure it, and we didn't either, until recently.
If there's an error in how we understand gravity it will be entirely consistent with our known physics, it will just take into account some other thing, just like Newtonian mechanics. We do really weird stuff, we've had things near absolute zero, and it's very strange, but it's consistent with our math still, no new math came out of it. When helium is near absolute zero, it does odd things like drains out of an open container. It becomes a single molecule. We understand it.
Many observes believe that an arcane advanced physics exists, for the secret few, to hold it back from the teeming masses (as usual) and we are given the archaic and stagnant physics of Einstein and Newton as if they are the final inquiries. The masses are supposed to gnaw on these forever as flawed bones, while the elites, as usual, keep the good stuff for their own utilitarian, secretive academians.
Nah.
I'm an engineer, I've seen stuff invented and created based on physics. I've seen stuff invented that FAILED in the marketplace because when it came out, something better than it already existed.
We wouldn't have gone through all this waste if it wasn't necessary. Why create a VCR when a computer and a SD Card could replace it?
There may be a 6th force, there is some unstable evidence for it. A being at the QM level would never recognize gravity existed. We may be the same. There might be a force that is only detectable across interstellar distances. Who knows?
If there was some "secret science", it would have been used 300 years ago. We'd have seen flying saucers then. We'd be living under the rule of what we think are gods now. If I had the technology of today and could go back to 1700, I'd easily be able to take over the world, and they'd be eager that I do it. If I was a sociopath, and I'm not, I'd keep the knowledge secret and create an godlike group to keep the knowledge secret. It would be trivial.
What do you think a 1700's KING would think of a computer, or even a television or a radio? A flush toilet, an electric stove, or an airplane? This would be magic to them. There's no "secret science". They claim that the military is ahead by 20 years, I rather doubt it. Military specification is just the least likely to fail part in bad conditions. The public gets the leftovers, which work plenty well.
Just a falling star I think, a meteorite. That one just got low in the atmosphere before it disintegrated. It may have even made it out of the atmosphere, and back into space as well just grazing the planet.
Being confounded by the increasingly limited dictionary of your web-browser?
Here's my personal list of words that the web browsers mark as incorrect spellings - probably one or two are actually wrong, if you can point them out, I would appreciate it:
I saw one, too, a few years ago. Apparently it was an old satellite burning up on re-entry (or so they said). It looked close, but I guess it wasn't, they saw it all the way to Colorado.
« First « Previous Comments 27,822 - 27,861 of 41,439 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://t.me/greatreject/54842
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/91484
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/91488
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/91493
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/91494
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/51534
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/51551
EVERY SINGLE TIME!!!
Anti-gravity would break all our physics. It would mean Relativity is wrong or at very least, extremely flawed.
Relativity predicts time dilatation in a gravity well, and we know this happens with atomic clocks. You can actually measure the difference of a gravity field between two SHELVES in a lab with an atomic clock.
No it doesn't. If mass is zero or near zero, look at what happens with the formula then.
So if an object can be rendered massless, then gravity and inertia would be nullified. Speed of light limitations will no longer apply.
Not super educated on the formula. I did solve for Bohr's model of hydrogen through Schrodinger's equation, ONCE though.
Trollhole says
Even if an object has no mass, it's still constrained by the speed of light. Photons are massless.
And what exactly is wrong with that? It means that it is falsifiable. That's a good thing.
Many observes believe that an arcane advanced physics exists, for the secret few, to hold it back from the teeming masses (as usual) and we are given the archaic and stagnant physics of Einstein and Newton as if they are the final inquiries. The masses are supposed to gnaw on these forever as flawed bones, while the elites, as usual, keep the good stuff for their own utilitarian, secretive academians.
What I mean by that is that it's highly unlikely. The thing about physics is that it's self reliant. Take for example the OceanGate Titan submersible. You can calculate the energy of the implosion a few ways. Many people did it based on pressure, but another way to do it is how much water was displaced by the submersible, and how far that water had to fall down. You get the same energy release. You can calculate energy, mass, power, in multiple ways, and come up with the same solution.
It's internally consistent, and it's kind of remarkable in a way. That's how you know it's correct, there are no internal inconsistencies, but it does break between QM and Relativity. When you try to use relativity along with QM you end up with zeros and infinities. We definitely have an error somewhere, but they are entirely different domains of comprehension. We probably really end up with something NEAR zero and NEAR infinity with the equations, something is missing, but I doubt gravity is entirely different than what we thought.
But maybe?
It's like Newtonian mechanics, there's a bunch of stuff left out because it's NEAR zero for most cases. F=ma doesn't take into account relativistic effects, because they are so small, it's near zero. Newton didn't have the precision to measure it, and we didn't either, until recently.
If there's an error in how we understand gravity it will be entirely consistent with our known physics, it will just take into account some other thing, just like Newtonian mechanics. We do really weird stuff, we've had things near absolute zero, and it's very strange, but it's consistent with our math still, no new math came out of it. When helium is near absolute zero, it does odd things like drains out of an open container. It becomes a single molecule. We understand it.
Ceffer says
Nah.
I'm an engineer, I've seen stuff invented and created based on physics. I've seen stuff invented that FAILED in the marketplace because when it came out, something better than it already existed.
We wouldn't have gone through all this waste if it wasn't necessary. Why create a VCR when a computer and a SD Card could replace it?
There may be a 6th force, there is some unstable evidence for it. A being at the QM level would never recognize gravity existed. We may be the same. There might be a force that is only detectable across interstellar distances. Who knows?
If there was some "secret science", it would have been used 300 years ago. We'd have seen flying saucers then. We'd be living under the rule of what we think are gods now. If I had the technology of today and could go back to 1700, I'd easily be able to take over the world, and they'd be eager that I do it. If I was a sociopath, and I'm not, I'd keep the knowledge secret and create an godlike group to keep the knowledge secret. It would be trivial.
What do you think a 1700's KING would think of a computer, or even a television or a radio? A flush toilet, an electric stove, or an airplane? This would be magic to them. There's no "secret science". They claim that the military is ahead by 20 years, I rather doubt it. Military specification is just the least likely to fail part in bad conditions. The public gets the leftovers, which work plenty well.
If an object is massless, it travels at the speed of light.
I saw one of these myself:
https://patrick.net/post/1328018/2019-10-20-patrick-saw-a-green-fireball-last-night
Just a falling star I think, a meteorite. That one just got low in the atmosphere before it disintegrated. It may have even made it out of the atmosphere, and back into space as well just grazing the planet.
dis integrated?
Yes.
Being confounded by the increasingly limited dictionary of your web-browser?
Here's my personal list of words that the web browsers mark as incorrect spellings - probably one or two are actually wrong, if you can point them out, I would appreciate it:
Abiogenesis
Ashkenazi
Douma
Ghislaine
Holodomor
Impactful
Ivermectin
Mossad
Mujahideen
Ossetia
Protease
Reichstag
Sarin
Shekhar
Shikh
Shyamalan
Taleban
Telomeres
Transgendered
Widowmaker
abiogenesis
abiogenic
ableism
abolishment
absentia
absorbtion
accuracies
addictiveness
adjuvant
adjuvent
aerosolized
aerosolizing
algorithmically
antiparasitic
antiparasitical
antisemite
astroturf
biodeisel
biome
capita
capybaras
centripedal
chickenhawks
chroma
colluder
colluders
colorectal
commenters
comorbidities
cormorbidities
customizable
deboard
decrypted
delusionally
democide
deplatforming
dimorphic
dimorphism
discludes
discoverable
disproven
dumbed
embedable
empathic
enjoyability
entendres
ethnicities
exchanger
expatriots
favorability
fentanyl
funder
gasliting
genotype
genotypes
geostrategic
graphene
grifter
grifters
heartworm
hominem
hominems
homophobe
hydroxychloroquine
hypermasculanized
ideation
immunities
immunosuppressant
immunosuppression
incentivize
inclusivity
incongruent
indebt
infantilism
injectable
intelligences
intentioned
intercontinentally
intermit
interpretable
iteratively
literalism
literalist
looniness
malinvestment
masculanized
massless
megalomaniacal
melatonin
mindnumbing
minorly
misallocate
misallocated
misallocation
misattributed
misattributes
miscategorizing
mischaracterize
mischaracterized
miseducation
mistranslating
mucosal
myocarditis
natively
neuroscientist
normie
obvert
opioid
opioids
outgass
parasitize
photodetector
predation
presstitutes
proctologist
propagandistic
puppeteered
pyrophoric
quizzling
researchable
robotically
sakes
sociopathic
sociopathy
stereotypically
stovetops
stupefyingly
subsampling
survivability
telomere
telomeres
themself
thermite
tradeable
transgendered
transmissibility
unburned
uncaptured
uncensorable
uncreative
undirected
unelected
unencrypted
unendingly
unenjoyable
unexamined
unfixable
unindicted
unironically
unprovable
unresolvable
unsalvageable
unsaveable
untestable
untradeable
untrainable
unvaccinated
vaginoplasty
vanishingly
victimizers
warcrimes
whistleblower
whistleblowers
wirelessly
I saw one, too, a few years ago. Apparently it was an old satellite burning up on re-entry (or so they said). It looked close, but I guess it wasn't, they saw it all the way to Colorado.
« First « Previous Comments 27,822 - 27,861 of 41,439 Next » Last » Search these comments