patrick.net

richwicks says

It was Saudi Arabia, Israel, and US intelligence agencies that did 9/11.

...

It looks like the main purpose of 9/11 was to start up a "war on terror" which is of course unwinnable, to beef up spending on the military since the Cold War was gone. That didn't work out very well, which is why the US kept expanding NATO, overthrew Ukraine. They are jumping for JOY with Russia attacking Ukraine

So it's SA, Mossad, CIA and KGB then. The only logical conclusion here. Why did you try to obfuscate KGB role in this?

Eric Holder says

So it's SA, Mossad, CIA and KGB then. The only logical conclusion here. Why did you try to obfuscate KGB role in this?

I don't know if the KGB WAS involved with it. I've heard no evidence of this over the last 20 years. KGB supposedly warned the CIA (or somebody) about an impending attack, but it's not like our own intelligence agencies didn't know. Ramzi Yousef was part of the bombing of the WTC in 1993, and one of his cousins I think was involved in 9/11. There's so much data that Israel was involved and that either our intelligence agencies are fucking staffed by retards or they knew. Saudi Arabia is the US' and Israel's bitch, we all know it. The binLadens are Saudi.

And It doesn't have to be specifically the CIA or Mossad, it's US intelligence.

Why would the KGB be involved? Also, the KGB doesn't exist, it's the FSB. KGB was done away with 30 years ago.

https://thefreethoughtproject.com/government-corruption/declassified-guantanamo-court-filing-suggests-some-9-11-hijackers-were-cia-agents

Declassified Guantanamo court filing suggests some 9/11 hijackers were CIA agents
What does the intelligence agency have to do with the suicide terrorist attack?

An explosive court filing from the Guantanamo Military Commission – a court considering the cases of defendants accused of carrying out the "9/11" terrorist attacks on New York – has seemingly confirmed the unthinkable.

The document was originally published via a Guantanamo Bay court docket, but while public, it was completely redacted. Independent researchers obtained an unexpurgated copy. It is an account by the Commission’s lead investigator, DEA veteran Don Canestraro, of his personal probe of potential Saudi government involvement in the 9/11 attacks, conducted at the request of the defendants’ lawyers.

Two of the hijackers were being closely monitored by the CIA and may, wittingly or not, have been recruited by Langley long before they flew planes into the World Trade Center buildings.

https://twitter.com/LeadingReport/status/1652844656403570690?ref_src=patrick.net

https://sashastone.substack.com/p/episode-17-vivek-ramaswamy-and-tucker

Ramaswamy points out that that two of the hijackers were met at the LA airport by a Saudi intelligence agent.

And that both parties look down on the public as incapable of handling the truth. As if the public is composed of children and the only adults are the elite.

OK, what was the angle, if it was really them?

(I have my theory on whodunnit with a very solid motive and benefits but I'd like to hear the SA version first.)

RWSGFY says

OK, what was the angle, if it was really them?

(I have my theory on whodunnit with a very solid motive and benefits but I'd like to hear the SA version first.)

Want to know whodunit?

https://www.ancreport.com/?s=9%2F11

It will take you a while to go through all that crap. You're going to need a noted and pen and paper, you're going to have to look up stuff, you're going to have to verify the people, and what they did, you're going to have to use search engines OTHER than Google. Wikipedia is surprisingly correct, but they don't draw links for you, but Dawson will. You won't be able to edit Wikipedia to draw the links, they don't allow "original research", it has to come from a "reliable source", so in order to post it, you'll need to find a mainstream media source saying it, and even then, it will be deleted.

I know who did it. It was a join operation between Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the US intelligence agencies, using terrorists as proxies, terrorist groups they control without the knowledge of the terrorists. Like how they get the US military to fight a war over some dumb ass excuse, but the real reason is something entirely unrelated to what they told the public AND the soldiers. The reason recruitment is down in the military is people are losing faith. Many of them know that there's been at least ONE lie told - 1/2 of potential recruits know that there was no weapons of mass destruction program in Iraq, and know the US government was aware of it before the war started.

Patrick says

And that both parties look down on the public as incapable of handling the truth. As if the public is composed of children and the only adults are the elite.

OR:
If the truth were known the elite would face the gallows.

HeadSet says

Patrick says

And that both parties look down on the public as incapable of handling the truth. As if the public is composed of children and the only adults are the elite.

OR:
If the truth were known the elite would face the gallows.

Or the truth requires a retaliatory action the elites have no balls for.

So now that the government admits that Saudi Arabia was involved in 9/11, when do we got the prosecution for treason and hanging of every scumbag official who covered it up, literally giving aid and comfort to the enemy?

Patrick says

So now that the government admits that Saudi Arabia was involved in 9/11, when do we got the prosecution for treason and hanging of every scumbag official who covered it up, literally giving aid and comfort to the enemy?

When a mob shows up to lynch them. Not a second before.

https://pjmedia.com/culture/robert-spencer/2023/08/31/just-in-time-for-9-11-anniversary-new-york-city-allows-islamic-call-to-prayer-over-loudspeakers-n1723561

Just In Time for 9/11 Anniversary, New York City Allows Islamic Call to Prayer Over Loudspeakers

Did the 9/11 hijackers and plotters succeed? Can it finally be said, nearly twenty-two years after they murdered nearly three thousand people in New York and Washington, that they have attained their objectives?

Back in 2003, Osama bin Laden wrote a letter to the American people in which he explained, “The first thing that we are calling you to is Islam.” Twenty years later, that very call will resound from loudspeakers all over the city that was his chief target on Sept. 11, 2001. (All the 9/11-was-an-inside-job types can find bin Laden taking responsibility for the attacks here). New York Mayor Eric Adams on Tuesday announced what Gothamist described as “new NYPD rules” that “will allow mosques in New York City to broadcast the Muslim call to prayer without a permit.”

SA is a red herring and nobody made a convincing case on how they supposedly benefited from 9/11.

RWSGFY says

SA is a red herring and nobody made a convincing case on how they supposedly benefited from 9/11.

The United States had military bases in Saudi Arabia, you know, Mecca? That was one of binLaden's demands, and we moved our bases to Iraq after the 2nd Iraq war.

Saudi Arabia was obviously involved, probably at the behest of the United States AND Israel. All the hijackers were Saudi except for one. Osama binLaden was a CIA asset during the Russian/Afghanistan war in the 1980s. Israeli intelligence was following around the hijackers, even followed them to Florida when they were getting their pilots licenses.

We needed an excuse to go to war in the Middle East, killing 3,000 people in the WTC justified that excuse. Plus, the buildings were filled with asbestos, and they weren't being rented out much. Working in a skyscraper isn't really that convenient.

RWSGFY says

SA is a red herring and nobody made a convincing case on how they supposedly benefited from 9/11.

@RWSGFY Most of the hijackers were Saudis and you don't believe that Saudis did it?

Saudi intelligence greeted hijackers at LAX and housed them (now declassified after 20 years) and you don't believe Saudis did it?

Islam is motive enough. Islam demands the submission or murder of all infidels - plus they were pretty pissed about US troops on the "holy" soil of SA.

I'm not saying that it was only the Saudis. GW Bush looks like he played a part too. Remember that he grew up with "Bandar bin Bush", one of the Saudi royals that the Bush family hosted.

I'm a fan of David Chandler. As a physicist he has performed careful analysis of the 3 WTC towers that fell on 9-11-2001. I am convinced that explosives were involved.

But who cares? The last couple of years have shown us who are enemies are. The FBI, CIA, NSA, IRS, etc., along with all of the corrupt politicians need to be splintered into a thousand pieces and scattered to the winds.

https://911speakout.org/david-chandler/#collections

David Chandler is best known in the 9/11 Truth Movement for proving that NIST lied in denying that Building 7 underwent freefall. Freefall is a literal smoking gun for controlled demolition. See David’s 6-part serial essay entitled Free Fall on Medium.com.

David has looked at the overall behavior of Building 7 as it comes down in freefall. Others have looked carefully at the structural details and whether it is possible for the building to come down the way it did due to natural causes. Most notable in this research is a project by Dr. Leroy Hulsey at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, who, with two graduate students, has constructed mathematical models in two different finite element analysis systems to simulate the behavior of the structure. (A quick summary of the conclusions is that fire could not have caused the observed failures.)

Onvacation says

The FBI, CIA, NSA, IRS, etc., along with all of the corrupt politicians need to be splintered into a thousand pieces and scattered to the winds.

Talk like that is what got JFK killed by the CIA.

I talk like that too. Everyone should!

Trollhole says

https://www.columnblog.com/p/nyt-runs-pro-saudi-op-ed-without

I think most of us are aware of the Pentagon audit report days before 9/11. Something I wasn't aware of, apparently building 7 is where they were holding the audit(the one that was not hit by a plane), and has the on air audio saying to blow it:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/the-pentagon-fails-another-audit-trillions-missing/

A young Alex Jones

75 -85% + people have melanin( shades of dark)
If u live near equator with more sun , u will be dark in after some generation. Can't generalize that all darker skin people r bad or terrorists. May be by religion.

US dropped few nukes on civilians, US exterminated native americans, Germans did holocaust, Lenin killed millions in communist revolution.... ww1 , ww2, doesn't mean all white ppl are evil also.

Most of those 9/11 people were from Saudi, and Pakistan. Bin laden was living nicely in pakistan with 3 wives, near military base. Pakistan military havily funded by USA. I think US created excuse to attack Iraq. Whole thing is made up.

KgK one says

US exterminated native americans

You were probably taught that, but it's not true.

I'm pretty sure there are more American Indians now than when Columbus arrived. And the deaths that did happen were overwhelmingly from diseases that the Indians didn't have immunity to, not from any deliberate policy of killing. This graph is about Mexico, but same thing happened in what is now the US:

Something happened to the Polynesians too.

I had not heard about that. Or maybe I did, with the Hawaiians.

https://images.app.goo.gl/Mc1Voymq5bmJ361L8



May not be delibrate killing, but indirect impact. Columbus landed in 1492. Many Natives may have died from diseases brought on by European migrants. But many were pushed out from their own land. They are hunting n farming, moving to new areas created lack or food n shelter. Many died from moving.

Similar happened to natives of Australia. Polinesias.. British tried to do similar in india, also. Bought up food and let natives die of hunger. Then sent in mother teresa with food to convert people. Bengal hunger. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_famine_of_1943

All that resource collection for what, few rich people got richer (mostly jewish ) n , created more wars. England almost got destroyed in ww2. Lucky that Germany didn't get nukes, it was so close.

The 1800 and 1830 maps are incorrect, because the Spanish were occupying California, Arizona, and New Mexico by that point.

Patrick says

The 1800 and 1830 maps are incorrect, because the Spanish were occupying California, Arizona, and New Mexico by that point.

Texas, too.

RWSGFY says

SA is a red herring and nobody made a convincing case on how they supposedly benefited from 9/11.

I don't think it was SA but I think there were Islamicist Simps inside SA Intel.

Patrick says

I'm pretty sure there are more American Indians now than when Columbus arrived. And the deaths that did happen were overwhelmingly from diseases that the Indians didn't have immunity to, not from any deliberate policy of killing. This graph is about Mexico, but same thing happened in what is now the US:

Squanto was DESPERATE to ally with the Pilgrims because his tribe was more depopulated from disease and other tribes were muscling in on their turf.

The diseases ran ahead of the actual settlers or conquistadores. There were waves of disease in New England due to visiting Basque Fisherman and European Explorers. The Spaniards mapped and quickly surveyed (with landings) Mexico years before Cortez invaded.

In Apocalypto, it shows the mysterious disease impacting the Mayans(?) and their mass sacrifices to the hungry sun to appease it before the Europeans are sighted at the end of the movie.

Patrick says

Well, these days in Gaza, their kid's head might explode when they do. "And here comes the missile into the hospital. Open wide."

Those 'Dancing Israelis' on 9/11 were Saudis? I would have never guessed.

The_Deplorable says

The most secure building in perhaps the entire world somehow had a complete malfunction of all of its security cameras on that fateful day. That sounds familiar. Where have I heard that one before?

AmericanKulak says

I'm pretty sure there are more American Indians now than when Columbus arrived.

Perhaps you're correct in numbers of individuals but if you take the mass of all of the people in the US (where maybe lots have 1% ancestry) then yes, there is definitely a lot more American Indians these days - or so I've seen estimated.