patrick.net

.

Barack Hussein Obama was the first to send troops there. Interestingly it was a few months after Russia took Crimea.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_intervention_in_the_Syrian_civil_war

.

ad says

.

Barack Hussein Obama was the first to send troops there. Interestingly it was a few months after Russia took Crimea.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_intervention_in_the_Syrian_civil_war

.

Yes. Note that doesn't answer my question, which is in the present tense.

stealing Syrian oil.

GasTheYoungTurks says

It is never discussed by Biden or the media.

I mean...ZILCH!

According to this, half of 'our troops' are PMC employees.

https://youtu.be/1PmRVE6pn14?si=RCpHvHO_5XwdCvCH

Bashar Assad is a terd that just wont flush, and the NWO hates that.

Tenpoundbass says

Bashar Assad is a terd that just wont flush, and the NWO hates that.

You mean the secretary-general of the Central Command of the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party, that Ass-ad? NWO hates socialists now?

GasTheYoungTurks says

ad says

.

Barack Hussein Obama was the first to send troops there. Interestingly it was a few months after Russia took Crimea.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_intervention_in_the_Syrian_civil_war

.

Yes. Note that doesn't answer my question, which is in the present tense.

Supporting the Kurds, which serves as a leverage over Erdogan, would be my guess.

Part of it is Israel wants to expand more into the Golan which is Syrian land. Part of it is that Genie Energy is stealing oil in the Golan.

We don't care about the Kids either, they are the PKK.

This is more of a war for Israel's benefit I think. For some reason Israel hates Syria.

US has wanted an excuse to take out Iran for a LONG time. And as mentioned, stealing oil.

Stealing oil. Stealing oil. Stealing oil. Stealing oil. Oil stealing. Stealing oil.

Ceffer says

Stealing oil. Stealing oil. Stealing oil. Stealing oil. Oil stealing. Stealing oil.

How come we didn't steal Iraq's oil after 15+ years.

9/11 Troofers constantly say 9/11 was an inside job so America could steal Middle East oil. Where the fuck is it? Our country's strategic oil reserve is lower than ever. Where are all the pipelines and thousands of US oil tankers taking oil back to the US? How much oil would we have to steal just to cover the mobilization costs of bringing thousands of Americans and military gear to Iraq in the first year?

Also, thought all the Globalhomo NWO is all about EV's and getting America off oil? Why would they all be in on this?

Morons want us to believe it was easier to create a MASSIVE conspiracy to kill thousands of Americans at home and thousands more people abroad to get Iraqi oil - as opposed to beating Environmentalists so we can drill for more oil at home? America has more energy reserves then we know what do with.

Morons - pot, kettle . . . .

Fucking around to find out?

Ceffer says

Stealing oil. Stealing oil. Stealing oil. Stealing oil. Oil stealing. Stealing oil.

Too little oil in that particular country, must be something else

Bd6r says

Too little oil in that particular country, must be something else

The sheer honor of piracy uber alles?

Ceffer says

Bd6r says

Too little oil in that particular country, must be something else

The sheer honor of piracy uber alles?

Or just the habit which is difficult to kick

oil, some anti russia geopolitical chess move above my level of comprehension… i just know russia backs syria.

FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says

some anti russia geopolitical chess move

FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says

i just know russia backs syria.

Exactly. And Oceana has always been at war with EastAsia! Right Winston?

Keeping the MIC oiled.

GasTheYoungTurks says

ad says

.

Barack Hussein Obama was the first to send troops there. Interestingly it was a few months after Russia took Crimea.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_intervention_in_the_Syrian_civil_war

.

Yes. Note that doesn't answer my question, which is in the present tense.

So you do not think we are still in Syria for the same reasons why Barack Hussein Obama sent US troops there ? Its a protracted geopolitcal conflict.

And the same career civil servants who formulated it sitting in the halls of CIA and NSC are still there, just in higher positions like GS 15 and SES.
.

ad says

So you do not think we are still in Syria for the same reasons why Barack Hussein Obama sent US troops there ? Its a protracted geopolitcal conflict.

And the same career civil servants who formulated it sitting in the halls of CIA and NSC are still there, just in higher positions like GS 15 and SES.

And that is as good as an answer as any.

Just a damning one. :)

PumpingRedheads says

ad says

So you do not think we are still in Syria for the same reasons why Barack Hussein Obama sent US troops there ? Its a protracted geopolitcal conflict.

And the same career civil servants who formulated it sitting in the halls of CIA and NSC are still there, just in higher positions like GS 15 and SES.

And that is as good as an answer as any.

Just a damning one. :)

...................................................................................................................................



.
Lloyd : No charge to you, Mr Torrance.

Jack Torrance : No charge?

Lloyd : Your money is no good here. Orders from the house.

Jack Torrance : Orders from the house?

Lloyd : Drink up, Mr Torrance.

Jack Torrance : I'm the kind of man who likes to know who's buying their drinks, Lloyd.

Lloyd : It's not a matter that concerns you, Mr Torrance. At least not at this point.

Jack Torrance : Anything you say, Lloyd. Anything you say.

.

Preventing further development of Syrian oil fields, and limit the production of existing fields. With improving technology, too much oil is available in the world for the banksters who have made big loans to existing oil fields in other parts of the world, so the banksters want to keep oil price high in order to prevent the loan portfolio from collapsing . . . just like all the shenanigans disrupting automotive production in the past decade+: too many loans are riding on used cars being expensive instead of being dumped in favor of buying cheap new cars (cash-for-clunkers, electric cars, ridiculous mpg requirement, zero-emission, etc., all for the purpose of driving car prices higher, so consumers would have to take out more loans and keep servicing loans.)

Keep in mind, oil drilling is capital intensive initially and low marginal cost after drilling, similar to airline industry. JD Rockefeller discovered a century and half ago that in the absence of cartelization, the oil drillers would drive each other into bankruptcy simply because competition would drive oil price towards the low marginal cost, which wouldn't cover the high fixed cost.

Stealing oil would not be as profitable as driving oil price up 2x to 4x while capping oil production to a little less than existing demand.

socal2 says

9/11 Troofers constantly say 9/11 was an inside job so America could steal Middle East oil. Where the fuck is it? Our country's strategic oil reserve is lower than ever. Where are all the pipelines and thousands of US oil tankers taking oil back to the US? How much oil would we have to steal just to cover the mobilization costs of bringing thousands of Americans and military gear to Iraq in the first year?

Also, thought all the Globalhomo NWO is all about EV's and getting America off oil? Why would they all be in on this?

Morons want us to believe it was easier to create a MASSIVE conspiracy to kill thousands of Americans at home and thousands more people abroad to get Iraqi oil - as opposed to beating Environmentalists so we can drill for more oil at home? America has more energy reserves then we know what do with.

The banksters' goal is not making oil cheap and more available to Americans, but making oil expensive, so the petro-dollar can be worthwhile. Invasion of Iraq was not to steal their oil (using a puppet local regime is always more cost-effective than having US marines standing over an oil well over there), but to stop / disrupt production/export, so that oil price can be kept higher. 9-11 and invasion of Iraq were planned when oil price was near bottom below $10/bbl and gasoline price around $1/gallon or less.

Reality says

so that oil price can be kept higher

The war with Iran that they are conjuring will certainly gratify them then, when the Straight of Hormuz is inevitably closed.
$300 oil and a global 'depression' for them to feast on.

PeopleUnited says

FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says

some anti russia geopolitical chess move

FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says

i just know russia backs syria.

Exactly. And Oceana has always been at war with EastAsia! Right Winston?

Ah, poor little USSR suffering from eeeevil Merica again.... I'm old enough to remember that there were no Red Army in Syria until Obongo's Sec of State John Kerry invited the fuckers in. You guys were on this site back then, so not too young to remember these facts... Is it Alzheimer kicking in already?

Reality says

The banksters' goal is not making oil cheap and more available to Americans, but making oil expensive, so the petro-dollar can be worthwhile. Invasion of Iraq was not to steal their oil (using a puppet local regime is always more cost-effective than having US marines standing over an oil well over there), but to stop / disrupt production/export, so that oil price can be kept higher. 9-11 and invasion of Iraq were planned when oil price was near bottom below $10/bbl and gasoline price around $1/gallon or less.

FFS - the spinning and spinning. Do you guys ever get dizzy pushing Islamist and Commie prop?

It is no longer: "9/11 was an inside job so we could go to war for oil"?
It is now: "9/11 was an inside job so we could go to war and make oil super expensive!"?

America is one of the biggest consumers of oil on the planet. As if higher energy prices from OPEC would not have a massive negative impact on the US economy, interest rates and bank's balance sheets?

Also, expensive oil would only prop up Russia, Venezuela and OPEC.

Make it all make sense!