Not sure in what context she said that if it came from her! This devilish looking Suzanna Arundhati Roy is a 'feminist' single (no man can stand next) who is a anti-Indian/anti-National hardcore communist openly loves Pakistan and China. She is life time member of the few Jihadi groups and 'Naxalites' a China backed Maoist terrorist group!
It brings in no new people (certainly not secular/mainline religionists)
It turns off the apoliticals/lifetime Dems who might think of switching Right.
It annoys the Libertarian and many on the populist wing of the Republican Party (why that is important in a second)
It divides the Religious (Secular/mainline/nominal Right, Firm Protestants who think it's Catholic-ish, and Firm Protestants who don't mind it)
It's only used when debating Jews (never heard Candace or FedFuentes use it on a Destiny or Pink Hair)
The FIB and NGOs are no longer just working on getting the Left out, they're working on splitting the right.
Also, Candace Owens is married to a Farmer, one of the Wealthiest 0.1% families in the entire UK that controls huge swaths of the metals industry globally, and whose own Father sits in the House of Lords.
In short, it's the kind of thing you wouldn't want to start in an election year, UNLESS you were grifting or trying to sabotage the Right.
I wrote her off the day she married him. This isn't news to me. I even posted how she has lost her only valid political talking point. To reach out to Black men to step up to the plate and be fathers and husbands, in spite of what the Media, Culture, and Education demands out of them. Which is thuggery, and be on constant stand by to vote the worst motherfuckers on the planet into office because they had better manipulation of their situation than the best candidates.
A trophy wife has zero pollical value as a speaker.
The rest of your Jewish rant wasn't needed. I would feel the way if she married an Amish guy that struck Oil and became a gazilionare.
I even posted how she has lost her only valid political talking point. To reach out to Black men to step up to the plate and be fathers and husbands, in spite of what the Media, Culture, and Education demands out of them. Which is thuggery, and be on constant stand by to vote the worst motherfuckers on the planet into office because they had better manipulation of their situation than the best candidates.
Dude, if black man are shit, should she marry into that? I mean if 9 out of 10 of them are garbage, and 1 out of 2 of other races aren't - do you really think she "betrayed" anybody by making a good choice? She chose money, well, that's 99.999% of women, and it's the right choice. Her children will do fine, because they are born into wealth. This is an understandable, rational choice - and probably, he's not a shit guy. He's just from a shit family.
It should be obvious she's controlled opposition - the first indicator is she was allowed on the propaganda box. That's red flag #1.
I imagine the answer is in the various prenup codicils and particular settlements for particular services, tours of duty and time brackets. The prenup is probably the size of a Gutenberg Bible.
« First « Previous Comments 36,842 - 36,881 of 42,089 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/127905
Not sure in what context she said that if it came from her!
This devilish looking Suzanna Arundhati Roy is a 'feminist' single (no man can stand next) who is a anti-Indian/anti-National hardcore communist openly loves Pakistan and China. She is life time member of the few Jihadi groups and 'Naxalites' a China backed Maoist terrorist group!
"Christ is King" is a perfect division for an op.
It brings in no new people (certainly not secular/mainline religionists)
It turns off the apoliticals/lifetime Dems who might think of switching Right.
It annoys the Libertarian and many on the populist wing of the Republican Party (why that is important in a second)
It divides the Religious (Secular/mainline/nominal Right, Firm Protestants who think it's Catholic-ish, and Firm Protestants who don't mind it)
It's only used when debating Jews (never heard Candace or FedFuentes use it on a Destiny or Pink Hair)
The FIB and NGOs are no longer just working on getting the Left out, they're working on splitting the right.
Also, Candace Owens is married to a Farmer, one of the Wealthiest 0.1% families in the entire UK that controls huge swaths of the metals industry globally, and whose own Father sits in the House of Lords.
In short, it's the kind of thing you wouldn't want to start in an election year, UNLESS you were grifting or trying to sabotage the Right.
I even posted how she has lost her only valid political talking point. To reach out to Black men to step up to the plate and be fathers and husbands, in spite of what the Media, Culture, and Education demands out of them. Which is thuggery, and be on constant stand by to vote the worst motherfuckers on the planet into office because they had better manipulation of their situation than the best candidates.
A trophy wife has zero pollical value as a speaker.
The rest of your Jewish rant wasn't needed.
I would feel the way if she married an Amish guy that struck Oil and became a gazilionare.
Dude, if black man are shit, should she marry into that? I mean if 9 out of 10 of them are garbage, and 1 out of 2 of other races aren't - do you really think she "betrayed" anybody by making a good choice? She chose money, well, that's 99.999% of women, and it's the right choice. Her children will do fine, because they are born into wealth. This is an understandable, rational choice - and probably, he's not a shit guy. He's just from a shit family.
It should be obvious she's controlled opposition - the first indicator is she was allowed on the propaganda box. That's red flag #1.
https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/127999
« First « Previous Comments 36,842 - 36,881 of 42,089 Next » Last » Search these comments