patrick.net

Ingrid says

I AM sorry for the people who flee violence. But I do not agree with letting everyone come on in.

Your government is doing it. Stop them.

Ingrid says

You cannot put all women in one basket. Just like men there is a lot of difference.

I'm not doing that, I'm drawing generalities among groups. ON AVERAGE women don't think very strategically. In the early 2000's, the propaganda then was "we have to fight them over there so we don't have to fight them here", and I heard that repeated over and over and over again. We didn't have to do that, we just had to close our borders. That would have been successful and cheap.

Our government obviously doesn't look for solutions to real problems, they create real problems to create excuses for whatever stupid wasteful shit they want to do, and the drone animals around me fall for it every time.

Ingrid says

You cannot put all women in one basket.

True, but men's and women's minds are as different as their bodies. Women are literally softer than men (on average), and softer on criminal aliens. Destroying the border destroys the country.

I'm not at all opposed to immigration! I love legal immigrants like you. All my ancestors immigrated to the US.

All we need is for men to vote by paper ballot with no mail ins and ID, and the women to be programmed by the Dominion machines for purely pretend votes. Maybe perfume the machines or something or put makeup ads on them.

UkraineIsFucked says

You realize this problem is solved in time.

Married women, despite the "welfare queens", don't tend to have children.

Misc says

The biggest plus for the ability to vote has got to be all the pre-marital sex that is given.

If she's great at riding or sucking, she probably wasn't born that way, but learned from many.

If forced to choose, I'd rather have an inexperienced, shy, loving woman, than dozens of well trained skanks with lots of tricks in all positions.

Of course I'd rather have both!

richwicks says

Married women, despite the "welfare queens", don't tend to have children.

Did you mean to say 'unmarried' women?

UkraineIsFucked says

What is desperately needed imho is a clear and compelling psychological explanation for these large political differences by sex and marriage.

Here's a stab at it:

1. Unmarried women tend to resent men because they feel rejected by men. And this resentment tends to make those women customers of the party that openly hates men, no matter what else the party does.

2. Married women are more interested in keeping the world functional for their children. Married women with sons in particular are more able to see the world from the male point of view because they sympathize with their sons.

Unmarried men are more amenable to demonrat leftoid policies, some because they are lost simps, and some likely due to game strategy. While they shag the few hot single leftoid womyn for fun and holding over they also look out for more traditional womyn to marry once they find one, then turning more conservative. The numbers look correct

Maybe just removing the ability of women to take on credit card debt would be enough.

Shaman says

Maybe just removing the ability of women to take on credit card debt would be enough.

Good point. One thing I noticed is that even if they themselves don't have the funds, they always push for "renovations" or other house beautifying or modification work, which is of course always nice, but not really necessary. They also cannot seem to stop shopping, the ability to amass, dispose of and update items is a larger factor in their happiness. To be fair it is somewhat linked to the nesting instinct, which has been exploited by corporate America to the hilt, turning many into addicts

The 19th amendment was voted on exclusively by men. It's only fair if men collectively decide to repeal it.

stereotomy says

The 19th amendment was voted on exclusively by men. It's only fair if men collectively decide to repeal it.

No pussy for 6 months would be worth it.

We don’t need to change the constitution. We need to change the people who live under its principles so they can not only understand what it means and why it was written but also how to return to its original intentions.

Ceffer says

No pussy for 6 months would be worth it.

You guys are getting pussy every six months?

https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1765063371244949994

PeopleUnited says

We don’t need to change the constitution. We need to change the people who live under its principles so they can not only understand what it means and why it was written but also how to return to its original intentions.

Entire reason we have the Constitution the way it is: because people can't be changed.

They shouldn't have to worry their pretty little heads about voting. It makes for better sanniches, too, without the distractions.