patrick.net

I am not too sure about that. I am a woman and do not want children mutilated, abused, aborted, abandoned. I want women to stay home with their children and teach them good manners and feed them decent food. Probably born too late, cannot follow all that young folk that want children when they are old and want to have a 'carreer'. The most beautiful carreer a woman can have is to be a good mother. Most woman might not be educated well, if I dare say so. I did not get any cooking or household lessons in school either and mom was not a good cook. But there are schools at night for that, as are sewing and handicraft schools! Turn the clock back 100 years... well may be I cannot vote but that is okay. Why do we vote for to begin with? We voted to keep the clock on summer time and did we get it? No. Curious if they will keep it on winter time. We will know in a few weeks.

What did society get by giving the women vote?

50 Shades of Grey
Twerking
Twillight
Nicki Minaj
$34T Deficits
Abortion
Prepubescent Mutiliation
MeToo frauds
Amber Heard
Christine Blasey Ford
E Jean Carroll
Madonna
Nancy Pelosi.
Below replacement rate birth rate
Mass Immigration for Young Men
Tighenting Restrictions on Foreign Wives (Sweden)

Women now demand equal pay, equal rights, but all the Courtly Love & Spoiling from an era when women were kept out of the workforce whenever possible. And society still looks at the man to provide the final protection and provision; a family that loses it's home or life that man will be blamed first, in all the "Equality." Even the Churches claim against the Bible that Women are "Co-pilots" when the Bible states The Man is to the wife and children like Christ is to the Church.

The biggest plus for the ability to vote has got to be all the pre-marital sex that is given.

Women are suckers when it comes to bleeding heart issues. Oh look at the poor illegal, without thinking of the long term consequences of open border policies. Spreading feminism and destroying the family. Thinking men and women are the same. Most of the LGBTp+ nonsense is from women especially single moms. Women are supposed to be the nurturing, caring, life giving part of the human race. They should not try to be men.
Women can't be drafted to go to war and die, they should not be able vote or put in positions of power on such matters.

Ingrid says

Why do we vote for to begin with?

@Ingrid Do you think the US is better off with women voting?

Serious question. I'm not sure of the answer.

RC2006 says

Women are suckers when it comes to bleeding heart issues. Oh look at the poor illegal, without thinking of the long term consequences of open border policies.

No they aren't. They just don't think very deeply. They will say "oh look at the poor illegal", but they will never ask why they are destitute. If the US wasn't blowing up, say, Syria, we wouldn't have many Syrian refugees at all, or Afghani, or Libyan, or Iraqi, or Ukrainian...

I expect some standard of men, but men are are dumb too "yeah!!! BLOW EM UP!!!". Our current "refugee" crisis is directly linked with our last 25 years of foreign policy. Chickens have come home to roost.

Ignoring the morality of these stupid wars, just pay attention to the consequences. People are loathe to do that, although the connection is obvious. The same people bitching and moaning about the "refugee" crisis tend to support the same exact policies that creates it. They're stupid animals.

I AM sorry for the people who flee violence. But I do not agree with letting everyone come on in. There used to be laws under which circumstances you can immigrate. Only 20 years ago when I came here, it was quite a hassle and quite expensive to immigrate. You cannot put all women in one basket. Just like men there is a lot of difference. And don't forget ALL white people are descendants of immigrants. If you want to send all immigrants back, that most probably includes you.

Ingrid says

I AM sorry for the people who flee violence. But I do not agree with letting everyone come on in.

Your government is doing it. Stop them.

Ingrid says

You cannot put all women in one basket. Just like men there is a lot of difference.

I'm not doing that, I'm drawing generalities among groups. ON AVERAGE women don't think very strategically. In the early 2000's, the propaganda then was "we have to fight them over there so we don't have to fight them here", and I heard that repeated over and over and over again. We didn't have to do that, we just had to close our borders. That would have been successful and cheap.

Our government obviously doesn't look for solutions to real problems, they create real problems to create excuses for whatever stupid wasteful shit they want to do, and the drone animals around me fall for it every time.

Ingrid says

You cannot put all women in one basket.

True, but men's and women's minds are as different as their bodies. Women are literally softer than men (on average), and softer on criminal aliens. Destroying the border destroys the country.

I'm not at all opposed to immigration! I love legal immigrants like you. All my ancestors immigrated to the US.

All we need is for men to vote by paper ballot with no mail ins and ID, and the women to be programmed by the Dominion machines for purely pretend votes. Maybe perfume the machines or something or put makeup ads on them.

UkraineIsFucked says

You realize this problem is solved in time.

Married women, despite the "welfare queens", don't tend to have children.

Misc says

The biggest plus for the ability to vote has got to be all the pre-marital sex that is given.

If she's great at riding or sucking, she probably wasn't born that way, but learned from many.

If forced to choose, I'd rather have an inexperienced, shy, loving woman, than dozens of well trained skanks with lots of tricks in all positions.

Of course I'd rather have both!

richwicks says

Married women, despite the "welfare queens", don't tend to have children.

Did you mean to say 'unmarried' women?

UkraineIsFucked says

What is desperately needed imho is a clear and compelling psychological explanation for these large political differences by sex and marriage.

Here's a stab at it:

1. Unmarried women tend to resent men because they feel rejected by men. And this resentment tends to make those women customers of the party that openly hates men, no matter what else the party does.

2. Married women are more interested in keeping the world functional for their children. Married women with sons in particular are more able to see the world from the male point of view because they sympathize with their sons.

Unmarried men are more amenable to demonrat leftoid policies, some because they are lost simps, and some likely due to game strategy. While they shag the few hot single leftoid womyn for fun and holding over they also look out for more traditional womyn to marry once they find one, then turning more conservative. The numbers look correct

Maybe just removing the ability of women to take on credit card debt would be enough.

Shaman says

Maybe just removing the ability of women to take on credit card debt would be enough.

Good point. One thing I noticed is that even if they themselves don't have the funds, they always push for "renovations" or other house beautifying or modification work, which is of course always nice, but not really necessary. They also cannot seem to stop shopping, the ability to amass, dispose of and update items is a larger factor in their happiness. To be fair it is somewhat linked to the nesting instinct, which has been exploited by corporate America to the hilt, turning many into addicts

The 19th amendment was voted on exclusively by men. It's only fair if men collectively decide to repeal it.

stereotomy says

The 19th amendment was voted on exclusively by men. It's only fair if men collectively decide to repeal it.

No pussy for 6 months would be worth it.

We don’t need to change the constitution. We need to change the people who live under its principles so they can not only understand what it means and why it was written but also how to return to its original intentions.

Ceffer says

No pussy for 6 months would be worth it.

You guys are getting pussy every six months?

https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1765063371244949994

PeopleUnited says

We don’t need to change the constitution. We need to change the people who live under its principles so they can not only understand what it means and why it was written but also how to return to its original intentions.

Entire reason we have the Constitution the way it is: because people can't be changed.

They shouldn't have to worry their pretty little heads about voting. It makes for better sanniches, too, without the distractions.

What created our current border situation is that all women were granted political power by men via the 19th Amendment.

Once women are married and have a male child, they may begin to see the importance of national borders, if only to protect their own sons from hostile invaders who would kill them.

But before that point, women are, as a general rule, greatly aroused by the idea of sexy foreign male invaders who prove themselves physically superior to the local men. This is so deep in the female brain that it's even true among female chimpanzees, and for good evolutionary reason. A woman wants the best (most aggressive) male genes to make sons who can spread her own genes the best.

All of this is utterly unspeakable in polite society precisely because it's so old and so true.

Patrick says

A woman wants the best (most aggressive) male genes to make sons who can spread her own genes the best.

The wrench in that theory is that when women get control, they legalize abortion.

This would be more an argument for repealing the 15th. White men voted 57-61% for Trump over the three elections. White women were 53-54% for Trump. Apart from Hispanic men at 50% in 2024 (and older Cubans and Vietnamese), no “of color” group has come close to voting red.

HeadSet says

Patrick says

A woman wants the best (most aggressive) male genes to make sons who can spread her own genes the best.

The wrench in that theory is that when women get control, they legalize abortion.

Sure, women want absolute control over their own reproduction. So they want to be able to abort babies of lesser men, while keeping the babies of greater men.

My point is that young and especially childless women want whatever seems good for themselves at the moment, even if it destroys their country.

Men tend to think longer term, and about what is good for their country. They are more willing to sacrifice themselves for the group, especially defending borders.

17th should be abolished. Better odds of doing so than 19th, too.

Besides, women were allowed the vote by most states pre-19th anyway. Same would happen again.

https://patrick.net/comment?comment_id=2158142

Doesn't matter they will loose the vote soon enough when the constitution is gone because they have destroyed the US.

Women in power consistently undermine the economy with socialism, undermine justice by letting murderers go free to murder again, undermine national borders in response to sob stories, and most of all, undermine reproduction, leading to demographic collapse.

It's mostly about the sob stories. The majority of women are comically easy to manipulate with sob stories.

It's just part of their neurobiology which evolved to make them successful as mothers.

But it's also a good reason to repeal the 19th Amendment.

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/sob-story-begets-tragedy

here’s some useful context about how serial killers (almost always male) would screen and choose their victims (predominantly female).

keep in mind as you watch this video that it makes little difference if the instigator or the victim is male or female. everyone can do this and everyone can be taken in.

(video)

now consider the implications of all the emotive slop and crisis and pity narrative with which we are so relentlessly barraged. “it’s not their fault! they had a tough upbringing, come from a bad place, a bad culture, mommy didn’t hold them enough,” or whatever. “let’s get emotional about it and be sure we understand that the predator is the victim here.”

this all works like a screen.

consider this now somewhat notorious video featuring carmen di genio, a lawyer on the equal opportunities committee of the salerno court of appeal in italy.

during a legal conference, she stated (translated): “we cannot expect an african to know that you cannot rape a person on the beach in italy, because he probably doesn’t even know, he really doesn’t know.”

leaving aside all the obvious risks of allowing the “they didn’t know any better” or “this is common in whatever culture they grew up in” defense for one of the vilest and most damaging crimes a human may inflict upon another human, pause to consider the signaling effects of ideas like this and acquittals and leniency emerging from them.

imagine you’re a psychopath, a sociopath, a bad person with bad desires, low empathy, and no respect for the sanctity of others. when you hear this, how is it not a dinner bell? every time someone says something like this in public, how is it not an attractor for the worst sort of people?

Repealing 19 would probably never work.

But what would work great, and instantly disqualify all welfare hoes, most single moms, etc. would be a real property or net taxpayer voting requirement. It doesn't matter if it's a deer lease, anything you pay property tax on OR you paid net taxes in the year prior to the election.

Real Property with proof of title or property tax paid in your name, or Just $1 in personal (not LLCs, not trusts, not partnership entites, only personal income) taxes paid in the past two years.

Exceptions would be anybody over 65 and Vet/Current Military can always vote.

Universal Suffrage is stupid.

This would eliminate a huge swath of ne'er do wells and women.