patrick.net

Eric Holder says

Here's one: in 2016 election Wisconsin Republican Senator Ron Johnson received more votes than Republican candidate at the top of the ticket - Donald Trump.

So?

DOGEWontAmountToShit says

Eric Holder says

Here's one: in 2016 election Wisconsin Republican Senator Ron Johnson received more votes than Republican candidate at the top of the ticket - Donald Trump.

So?

Answers the question positively. That's all. If you have twatter account feel free to reply to that Vance Murphy twat with this shocking revelation.

https://omega4america.substack.com/p/how-the-kari-lake-election-was-stolen

How The Kari Lake Election Was Stolen - Again

Lake and 3 other senate seats were stolen, by legal ballots, to legal people at legal addresses that were UNDELIVERABLE

Kari Lake did not lose.

The Arizona senate election was stolen, in plain sight, in a provable, predictable way.

There are three overriding reasons Lake “lost.”

First, she was marked early on as a breakout candidate who, left unchecked, would quickly become a national, perhaps international star propagating the hated common sense of the MAGA crowd.

Second, for 4 years after the 2020 steal, the election integrity narrative focused on cleaning voter rolls to stop the Left’s steal.

Lake lost to legal ballots, sent to legal addresses, to legal voters, which were undeliverable.

Cleaning voter rolls - which never happened - although great money was spent on lawyers in that quest - would do nothing - did nothing - to thwart undeliverable ballots, collected by NGOs against Lake.

Lake’s party and her campaign fought a 2024 battle, using 1980s tactics, against a determined opponent who knew how to find over 80,000 loose ballots invisible to all current voter integrity technology.

The third reason Lake lost is the belief that the get-out-the-vote campaign and voter registration drives were effective. They were not.

Let’s build an Undeliverable Ballot Database for Arizona, time stamped to election day and see how many ballots were cast from an address where a mail-in ballot cannot be received.

So if a ballot comes from a Walmart, a bank, a gas station, it’s ineligible and likely fraudulent.

If a ballot comes from any of the innumerable address types where a ballot cannot be received - no apartment number, wrong street address, incorrect zip to the city, and two dozen more - those are likely ineligible.

Why is this important?

The Left commits fraud in elections.

We see it in the data of every state we have examined - over 20 so far.

Republicans do not commit voter fraud at scale - for a number of reasons, but they just don’t.

So when we find a pile of ineligible ballots, we know 97% or more of them are set to vote for a Leftist. Ineligible ballots come in flavors.

The flavor of the day for 20 years is PHANTOMS. Fake people casting a ballot.

Patrick says

"Lake and 3 other senate seats were stolen, by legal ballots, to legal people at legal
addresses that were UNDELIVERABLE"

If mail to these voters, at their home address is undeliverable, then these says that the ballots are
fraudulent and the elections were indeed stolen. This is election fraud that can be proven in court.
Just because the fraudsters declared victory does not mean they won the election.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/shall-not-be-counted-pennsylvania-supreme-court-orders-rogue-officials-stop-counting

DOGEWontAmountToShit says

Not misinterpreted at all, she was full gangster until she saw that election judge in MN actually get arrested. Now she is scared.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/walking-backwards-thursday-november

Ruh roh! In this morning’s first “great moments in walking it back” story, CNN ran an article yesterday headlined, “Pennsylvania Democratic official apologizes for comments about ignoring election laws.” She must have realized it’s not the pre-2020 world anymore.




I am sure you will recall Bucks County, Pennsylvania’s arrogant, hyphenated Democrat Commissioner Diane Ellis-Marseglia who, while counting illegal votes that the state’s Supreme Court forbade be counted, infamously sneered “People violate laws any time they want.” To drive the stake deeper into her own shriveled heart, she pompously added, for absolute clarity, as though she were the center of the universe, “For me, if I violate this law, it’s because I want a court to pay attention to it.” Then, to clamp shut her own coffin lid, she snidely tossed in for good measure, “precedent by a court doesn’t matter anymore in this country.”

The feckless county commissioner was practically daring Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court to do something about it.

Ms. Ellis-Marseglia rapidly became a woman on a deserted political island. On Monday, following national fury, Democrat Governor Josh Shapiro distanced himself from the debacle saying, “to be clear: any insinuation that our laws can be ignored or do not matter is irresponsible and does damage to faith in our electoral process.” The same day, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered all counties (meaning Bucks County) to comply with its previous rulings over undated ballots. Some of the justices blasted Bucks officials for “upending the rule of law.”

In Sunday’s C&C, I observed that Ms. Ellis-Marseglia had placed herself in the crosshairs of potential criminal prosecution as an insurrectionist or worse, an election interferer. There’s no evidence she’s yet been charged but apparently, for some reason, Ms. Ellis-Marseglia has experienced a significant heart change.

At yesterday’s board meeting, Ellis-Marseglia faced a fiery crowd and international news coverage. She began by apologizing. She first apologized that people misunderstood her comment and took it out of context. When that non-apology landed with a thud, Ellis-Marseglia groveled a little further, seeking empathy and blaming her controversial comments on her passion for public service. “The passion in my heart got the best of me, and I apologize again for that," she said.

Internet: 1, Rebellious County Commissioners: 0.

Just California digesting the election fraud at its leisure, making sure any anti-fraud activities are identified and roundly squashed so that the designated appointments can proceed as if they are real.

Globohomo is trying to spread the story that Trump won by mass E-voting fraud.

Go figure . . .

Patrick says

It turns out that many voters voted for Trump...but didn't vote for any other office on their ballots. They left those blank.

DOGEWontAmountToShit says

It turns out that many voters voted for Trump...but didn't vote for any other office on their ballots. They left those blank.

I'd agree with this. Not all but a lot of Trump voters in my area are rather low IQ if I'm being honest. They just went to vote for Trump and that was it. I'd guess 5 out of 10 don't know what Congress is when voting. Probably common in other states. Likely shy or embarrassed to make a vote on down ballot because they have no clue who the people are.

Low IQ men will also likely vote for the man on the ballot. I'll probably never vote for a female POTUS, but I think that may have been a factor for Kari Lake. I don't think there will ever be a women at the top job. Senators are about the max and Kamala was DEI by default VP pick. I'm still youngish and don't see a female POTUS in my lifetime. We like military and I can't see a woman running the executive branch. They'll either be weak or overly aggressive to act tough and get us into wars.

WookieMan says

I'd agree with this. Not all but a lot of Trump voters in my area are rather low IQ if I'm being honest. They just went to vote for Trump and that was it. I'd guess 5 out of 10 don't know what Congress is when voting. Probably common in other states. Likely shy or embarrassed to make a vote on down ballot because they have no clue who the people are.

Dems had these voters up until recently. That is why they worked so hard to remove barriers to voting (barriers to lazy voters).

Now that the GOP has them, look to see Dems start to insist on voter ID, etc. while the GOP actually starts to warm up to it.

DOGEWontAmountToShit says

Now that the GOP has them, look to see Dems start to insist on voter ID

The lack of voter ID was to enable fraud. It had nothing to do with lazy voters. Dems will continue to fight voter ID.

HeadSet says

had nothing to do with lazy voters

Sorry, but it is the main reason. Same for being auto registered at the DMV. Then mail in voting.

Low propensity voters are that bad.

The voter fraud bennies became apparent later.

https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1861848407582654967