patrick.net

socal2 says

My long range Y does it in 4.4 seconds. .

Most people spending extra money to buy muscle cars and sports cars are typically car enthusiasts and know what they are getting. Some people spend thousands of dollars on standard ICE cars for mod packages just to shave half a second on acceleration because it is so noticable.

My B58 Straight-6 engine powered BMW also does 0-60 in that time range, and can run well over 400 miles on a tank of gas (while keeping heat on full blast in winter) then takes only 5min to gas up before repeating. The only times I can push the gas pedal all the way are (1) highway merging, from on-ramp 30mph to 80mph speeding ticket risk takes only about 4 seconds each time; (2) passing other vehicles on two-lane roads (i.e. momentarily on the other side of the dotted median). There is very little chance of doing either in a Tesla or any other battery EV, because the limited range of battery EV means it won't go on road trips, and the high probability of a fiery death in case of any collision damaging lithium battery would dissuade one from trying to pass on dotted median while driving a battery EV.

BTW, I would't call driving any Tesla fun, simply due to the harsh ride quality.

Reality says

BTW, I would't call driving any Tesla fun, simply due to the harsh ride quality.

I'm an SUV guy, obviously from my posts. Just redid my suspension for the first time at 238k miles. All cars will need this, so no advantage for EV's there. They also can't ride through the soybean fields of farmers I know. It's more fun than speed. Still have a V8 so have actually quick acceleration at speed. So 55-75mph to pass someone in 1.5 seconds is all I need. And merging on the highway I'm visible and everyone gets the fuck out of the way in the other lane.

Only thing I ever worry about is blown stop signs and traffic lights or getting rear ended by distracted drivers. No EV is stopping that. Outside of a semi, anyone that hits me is going to be hurting, not me. Oh and I can tow 9k lbs with about 350 miles of range. Every car starts on fire, so I generally don't argue that. It's the charging that concerns me. We will have an EV charger in our new garage. Not required.

I just don't think EV's are functional in the midwest outside of cities. Thursday is 14ºF high and 3ºF low. That battery ain't gonna last. I'll do 100 miles in a day. Between heat and payload of kids, it's not happening. I get warm weather folks, but 100 miles you enter range anxiety land in those temps. The heat has to be produced and not come from the engine. That's power. I'd guess 90% active on this site are CA or southern states that generally don't have a hard freeze. Lithium does not do well in cold. Easier to cool air 20ºF on a bad day than raise the temp 60ºF in a deep freeze by battery.

RWSGFY says

Nice try: Sequoia is available with a 2nd row bench making it a 8-pax vehicle. And, unlike Tesla, actual adults can ride in the 3rd.

Yeah - the Model Y is a compact SUV at best. The 3rd row is worthless except for small children.

The Sequoia I believe is the larger of the 2 SUV's that Toyota offers.

So apples/oranges comparison.

Better to compare it to an X.

Reality says

My B58 Straight-6 engine powered BMW also does 0-60 in that time range, and can run well over 400 miles on a tank of gas (while keeping heat on full blast in winter) then takes only 5min to gas up before repeating. The only times I can push the gas pedal all the way are (1) highway merging, from on-ramp 30mph to 80mph speeding ticket risk takes only about 4 seconds each time; (2) passing other vehicles on two-lane roads (i.e. momentarily on the other side of the dotted median). There is very little chance of doing either in a Tesla or any other battery EV, because the limited range of battery EV means it won't go on road trips, and the high probability of a fiery death in case of any collision damaging lithium battery would dissuade one from trying to pass on dotted median while driving a battery EV.

BTW, I would't call driving any Tesla fun, simply due to the harsh ride quality.

I bet any new BMW that can meet that acceleration costs several thousand dollars more to purchase than a Tesla. Also cost thousands of dollars more to maintain and fuel up compared to a Tesla.

I don't know which Tesla's you have driven, but all the new models (especially the revamped 3) has really good ride quality.

You simply can't beat one pedal driving and regenerative braking. So much more natural and sophisticated than using primitive friction brakes to waste all that heat/dust energy to slow big heavy cars down.

socal2 says

You simply can't beat one pedal driving and regenerative braking. So much more natural and sophisticated than using primitive friction brakes to waste all that heat/dust energy to slow big heavy cars down.

LOL! Are you still wearing masks and taking new Covid-19 jabs? Do you eat up every piece of propaganda? Do you sleep in your Tesla as it drives itself down the highway like in those idiotic youtube videos? The one pedal-driving is just as suicidal: it's setting the driver up to press hard on the one pedal during a desired emergency braking.

I don't know which Tesla's you have driven, but all the new models (especially the revamped 3) has really good ride quality.

Does your Tesla's suspension components get magically replaced when new models come out? Even the latest ones are still poor-riding / hard-riding compared to the proper gasoline luxury cars.

I bet any new BMW that can meet that acceleration costs several thousand dollars more to purchase than a Tesla. Also cost thousands of dollars more to maintain and fuel up compared to a Tesla.

And you'd have lost that bet. When I bought the car in early 2021, it was priced comparable to a Model 3 at the time with similar 0-60; however, the Tesla Model 3 wouldn't have the far superior physical dial+buttons iDrive user interface but would have relied on another suicidal feature -- the giant touch screen taking the driver's eyes off the road. The interior material quality in Model 3 was/is at best comparable only to a VW GTI / Golf R or Ford Mustang (GT), both econoboxes focused on 0-60, and the Model 3 has even lower manufacturing quality than those two, not at all comparable to a BMW built on the CLAR platform. In terms of operating cost, my car's fuel cost is about 12 cents per mile, $100 for oil change and tire rotation per year, no mechanical failure so far. My local electricity is about 40 cents per kwh at home, double that at public fast chargers, so a Tesla would work out to be about 10 cents to 20 cents per mile and that's before taking into account the sitting electricity cost during cold winter days+nights and hot summer days. Chances are that a Tesla would cost more simply due to battery temperature maintenance when the car is not even driven (I average about 7k miles per year on this car when no extensive road trips are planned; and another 8k miles on a convertible pickup that is far more functional than the Cybertrash). Insurance on the Tesla would have been much higher. Service life of a Tesla would also be much shorter so depreciation would be much higher. Now Model 3 price is probably much lower than any BMW with comparable 0-60, but that's because the less intelligent are finally catching up to the reality that battery EV's are nearly worthless trash when compared to a proper gasoline car like any of the BMW models built on the CLAR platform. The carmakers are turning out the battery EV cars to fulfill government regulatory mandates, just like pediatricians and many primary care doctors pressuring clients to take the jabs in order to get paid. The banks / governments / pension institutions need you to die and release them from account balance liabilities.

Reality says

The banks / governments / pension institutions need you to die and release them from account balance liabilities.

LOL! KILL THE ACCOUNT HOLDERS! KILL THEM ALL! The Ponzi harvest begins!

Reality says

convertible pickup

Which model is this? I want one, but I only know of a Dodge convertible pickup from long ago.

HeadSet says

Reality says

convertible pickup

Which model is this? I want one, but I only know of a Dodge convertible pickup from long ago.

Jeep Gladiator. After leasing one for 4yrs (they had incredible lease residual when coming out in 2019 for 2020 model year: 70% residual after 4yrs) then buying a new one last year, I'd recommend a soft top one with hard toneau cover so that the rear window can be quickly removed to allow longer items extending into the cab (crew cab, 5 seats, 5ft bed, the only configuration available); even the windshield can be dropped for items longer than 16ft. The non-turbo V6 and ZF-designed 8-speed are very good. The 11.5" ground clearance is awesome. The ride quality is very good for a truck when the tires are round (some of them, especially if you are looking for the V6 + 8speed auto option, may have sat on the lot for a few months therefore having flat spots in the tires, like mine did and took a couple weeks of driving to round the tires); very good discounts can be found on near-zero mile vehicles on the lot. I got nearly 20% off MSRP last year for a brand new one (3 miles on the odometer for a car made 4 months before I bought it, so apparently the dealer wasn't moving it around often enough to keep the tires round).

Reality says

The one pedal-driving is just as suicidal: it's setting the driver up to press hard on the one pedal during a desired emergency braking.

I am on my 3rd EV (1 Chevy Bolt, 2 Teslas) and the one pedal driving is absolutely sublime and one of the best features of EV's. One pedal driving makes driving fast so much more fun because you can accelerate and quickly slow down as if you are in a sports car in 1st gear with never-ending torque.

I live in a hilly place and can't stand driving my wife's ICE car smoking the brakes coming down hills and needing brake jobs every year.

ICE vehicles are so primitive!

socal2 says

I am on my 3rd EV (1 Chevy Bolt, 2 Teslas) and the one pedal driving is absolutely sublime and one of the best features of EV's. One pedal driving makes driving fast so much more fun because you can accelerate and quickly slow down as if you are in a sports car in 1st gear with never-ending torque.

I live in a hilly place and can't stand driving my wife's ICE car smoking the brakes coming down hills and needing brake jobs every year.

Why not shift into 1st gear (or 2nd, 3rd) on a proper ICE car with proper conventional (torque-converter) automatic w/ sport-shift? If you are a commercial driver, it's not even legal to run the vehicle down a long descent without down-shifting. Is your wife driving a belt/chain-driven CVT car in a hilly environment? In that case, replacing brakes might be a lesser problem than replacing transmission! Hilly place poses a greater problem for battery EV's than to ICE cars that have conventional torque-converter automatics: the EV range is further reduced due to having to climb hills.

ICE vehicles are so primitive!

Robert Anderson invented the first battery EV in 1832, nearly 3 decades before the invention of the first ICE!

BTW, I'm not entirely against battery EV's: I bought a pink plastic Jeep for my daughter when she was 3years old; that was either $200 or $500. The proper price for something like the Model Y is about $15k, if they can either have solid state battery or have a thick armored box enclosing the lithium battery so the car doesn't go up in flames as soon as a nail punctures the battery.

Reality says

Why not shift into 1st gear (or 2nd, 3rd) on a proper ICE car with proper conventional (torque-converter) automatic w/ sport-shift? Is your wife driving a belt/chain-driven CVT car in a hilly environment? In that case, replacing brakes might be a lesser problem than replacing transmission! Hilly place poses a greater problem for battery EV's than ICE cars that have conventional torque-converter automatics: the EV range is further reduced due to having to climb hills.

Too much work. Rather just push the go pedal and have all that power instantly available without having to dick around with primitive transmissions trying find the right gear going up and down hills. I can be doing 80 mph screaming down the big hill out of my neighborhood and the car will come to a complete and smooth stop simply taking my foot off the accelerator and all that kinetic energy is captured in my battery instead of wasted heat and brake dust particles.

Hills are an absolute blast for Tesla's going up and down.

We don't need to force it or have stupid government regulations - but I truly believe ICE will go the way of the steam engine in our lifetimes.

Especially now that Tesla has perfected the Semi Tesla that will revolutionize long hauls saving the trucking industry billions in energy and maintenance.

You should ask the guys test driving Tesla semis going up and down the mountain between Reno and Fremont if they miss all the gears and double clutching.

socal2 says

Too much work. Rather just push the go pedal and have all that power instantly available without having to dick around with primitive transmissions trying find the right gear going up and down hills. I can be doing 80 mph screaming down the big hill out of my neighborhood and the car will come to a complete and smooth stop simply taking my foot off the accelerator and all that kinetic energy is captured in my battery instead of wasted heat and brake dust particles.

Hills are an absolute blast for Tesla's going up and down.

LOL! On the ICE BMW, the feature is called cruise-control with automatic speed reduction. It will control speed to the set target regardless up hill or down hill, down-shifting and gently/unnoticeably braking/shaving off gravitational acceleration if necessary when going down hill. You can drive without touching any foot pedal until an emergency braking is required (rolling a thumb-wheel/switch on the steering wheel to increase or decrease target speed). It will maintain the speed instead of coming to a stop. That's without using ACC (radar cruise control).

socal2 says

ICE vehicles are so primitive!

socal2 says

We don't need to force it or have stupid government regulations - but I truly believe ICE will go the way of the steam engine in our lifetimes.

Especially now that Tesla has perfected the Semi Tesla that will revolutionize long hauls saving the trucking industry billions in energy and maintenance.

You should ask the guys test driving Tesla semis going up and down the mountain between Reno and Fremont if they miss all the gears and double clutching.

You may need some information updates. Battery EV Semi-truck projects are being abandoned due to range issues (and weight/capacity, safety, etc..); even the EV box-truck projects are heading toward bankruptcy (due to range problem).

An ICE engine can last decades, whereas batteries' service life span is measured in a few years, resulting in an industrial plastic waste nightmare. ICE fuel has far higher energy density than chemical EV batteries. ICE + fuel tank is the most efficient non-nuclear "battery": not even having to carry the oxidation agent and not having to carry the reaction output/waste home, taking advantage of geothermal energy to turn CO2 dissolved in ocean water and depositing at the ocean floor as limestone (CaCO3) (plus water) into methane (CH4) and longer chains of hydrocarbon, gasoline being mostly C8H18 mixed with shorter and longer hydrocarbon chains with distribution centered around 8-carbon length.

Reality says

You may need some information updates. Battery EV Semi-truck projects are being abandoned due to range issues (and weight/capacity, safety, etc..); even the EV box-truck projects are heading toward bankruptcy (due to range problem).

Not Tesla - they are building their new Semi factory in Reno right now. Pepsi and Frito Lay who got the first Tesla Semi's a year ago absolutely love them and demand is huge. The ROI is only a few years. Cost and maintenance to operate traditional ICE Semis is enormous. Doesn't matter how gay or green people think they are - Fleet Managers know how to manage their P&L's and Tesla will sell every Semi they manufacture.

Tesla batteries will last 1 million miles and the value of old batteries will be huge to the growing recycling industry. No EV batteries will go to waste. It is so much easier to refine and recycle the critical metals like cobalt and nickel from an existing battery than having to mine and process them from the earth.

socal2 says

Too much work. Rather just push the go pedal and have all that power instantly available without having to dick around with primitive transmissions trying find the right gear going up and down hills.

You ever drive a manual transmission ICE vehicle? It's fun. If you're a good driver your brakes will last 100k miles if you know what you're doing. I like driving manual, keeps you paying attention. I can't do the self drive and all that other shit. I don't trust 99% of humans, so not sure how to trust the ones that made them. I can't. I know how to control a car.

I'll take ICE 10 out of 10 times for now. Been doing it over 100 years and there are millions of mechanics that know what they're doing. There's no one trained on the batteries besides the manufacturer. It will be 50 years before EV even come close to being 50-60% of the market. They don't work in cold, so north of I-80 they're basically useless in winter. Can't tow. Long charge times on long trips.

If you live in a city and like living in hell, that's your choice. I'm not getting an EV though until I can get 7-8pax, 9K lbs towing on 350 miles range. Our gas is under $3 here in my part of IL. The horror of filling up a V8 SUV once every other week to the tune of $65. We make $1,232.87 every day 365. I'm sure that bi-weekly gas fill up will bankrupt us.... Wife doesn't pay for gas either

Maybe I'm unique. But I can get a muti-use car for the same price as the lowest model Tesla. Go 400 miles with 5 people and gear up to Northern Wisconsin. Oil changes won't bankrupt me. I don't need speed although my V8 has some go for a big SUV. Tesla or any EV is not remotely appealing to me at all and can't do what I need.

socal2 says

Not Tesla - they are building their new Semi factory in Reno right now. Pepsi and Frito Lay who got the first Tesla Semi's a year ago absolutely love them and demand is huge. The ROI is only a few years. Cost and maintenance to operate traditional ICE Semis is enormous. Doesn't matter how gay or green people think they are - Fleet Managers know how to manage their P&L's and Tesla will sell every Semi they manufacture.

Tesla batteries will last 1 million miles and the value of old batteries will be huge to the growing recycling industry. No EV batteries will go to waste. It is so much easier to refine and recycle the critical metals like cobalt and nickel from an existing battery than having to mine and process them from the earth.

Here is a hint on how to recognize those press releases as way out-of-date material: where in Lithium-Iron-Phosphate or Sodium-Ion batteries do you find Cobalt or Nickel? In any case, your resorting to talking about semi-trucks and Flintstone-mobile is indicative of exhausting valid arguments in support of battery EV's for private passenger vehicle applications.

socal2 says

Not Tesla - they are building their new Semi factory in Reno right now. Pepsi and Frito Lay who got the first Tesla Semi's a year ago absolutely love them and demand is huge.

They're not viable for the cost. They're local "semi" trucks if you can even call them that. They're delivery trucks. Within 20-30 miles of a distribution center for 4-8 deliveries.

Time is money. You can't ship Chicago to say Austin, TX with an EV semi. You'd add on 5 hours. Time is money in shipping. They're gas station delivery trucks. There's a market, but it's not going to be earth shattering.

WookieMan says

You ever drive a manual transmission ICE vehicle? It's fun.

I grew up on manuals and and it's a total pain in the ass. Especially on hills!

Hell - I barely drive my Tesla anymore as the latest version of FSD is that good.

WookieMan says

They're not viable for the cost. They're local "semi" trucks if you can even call them that. They're delivery trucks. Within 20-30 miles of a distribution center for 4-8 deliveries.

Tesla has already demonstrated 500 mile range fully loaded including driving up and down significant grades. Bill Gates bet against Elon (has a big short position on TSLA) claiming that an EV Semi would never work. Pepsi and Frito Lay have been doing medium hauls for over a year now and their drivers love and fight over them. Besides, it is illegal for truckers to drive more than 600 miles without stopping.

Businesses and trucking companies that are lining up to buy these will have megachargers located at the loading docks. Will take less than 30 minutes to charge while they are loading and unloading.

We will ALL benefit getting more Tesla Semis on the road as they can maintain speed and won't slow down the rest of the drivers causing gridlock with the accordion effect. Tesla Semis will also reduce road noise and will ultimately reduce the overall cost of domestic shipping.

Speaking of BMW.

They are impressed with version 13 of FSD.

https://x.com/BMW/status/1866548798798844297

socal2 says

I grew up on manuals and and it's a total pain in the ass. Especially on hills!

Weird. I grew up on manuals and after severald decades it doesn't require any brain power to drive one, hills or no hills. It comes as natural as walking or, dare I say, breathing. Used to have a hellish 1.5hr commute over SM/Dumbarton bridges and even then it absolutely didn't bother me one bit. Maybe because I never stopped driving manuals.

Eric Holder says

Weird. I grew up on manuals and after severald decades it doesn't require any brain power to drive one, hills or no hills. It comes as natural as walking or, dare I say, breathing. Used to have a hellish 1.5hr commute over SM/Dumbarton bridges and even then it absolutely didn't bother me one bit. Maybe because I never stopped driving manuals.

I remember when I had to get off the couch to change the channel on the TV. Didn't think it was a bother until I got a remote control.

With a manual, you have to occupy your left foot on the clutch and right hand to manually change gears. And still need a foot free to work Flinstone friction brakes managing the coasting or trying to slow down with downshifting.

With Tesla's one pedal driving I can easily speed up and slow down to slot my car into any position. It is such a more enjoyable, quicker and more efficient way of driving than having all your appendages commandeered.

One of my gearhead buddies would go on and on about how he preferred manuals (so he could drive faster) until he test drove my car realizing all the extra work he had to put into his ICE car to do less.

socal2 says

With Tesla's one pedal driving I can easily speed up and slow down to slot my car into any position. It is such a more enjoyable, quicker and more efficient way of driving than having all your appendages commandeered.

One of my gearhead buddies would go on and on about how he preferred manuals (so he could drive faster) until he test drove my car realizing all the extra work he had to put into his ICE car to do less.

Writings like this make one wonder if the author drives any car made in the last decade at all. Why would a regular two-pedal automatic car commandeer any additional appendage of the driver at all? Does he use left foot for braking all the time before discovering the "1 pedal driving"? That would be a bad idea due to the risk of pressing both pedals at the same time in an emergency (due to the way human brains are wired, prone to having both halves command both sides of the body doing the same thing at the same time unless specifically trained to do different things: try drawing a circle with one hand and drawing a triangle at the same time with the other hand; it would take long practice to do that.) That's why it's a good idea to condition the driver to shifting the right foot to the left for braking, a mutually exclusive action from pressing the right pedal down for acceleration. It's the conditioning for avoiding accidents. One-pedal-driving breaks that conditioning and therefore brings the risk of the driver either taking no action or pressing down hard on the right when emergency braking is required.

Cars with ACC (Advanced Cruise Control, usually implemented using Radar cruise control on cars made by most brands except for Tesla since 2021 for cost-cutting) can easily follow the car in front for stopping and moving along, without requiring any input from the driver (so long as the speed cap set by the user matches or exceeds the speed of the car in front). The only requirement from driver is deciding when to turn on/off the blinkers and when to change lane (some of the more recent ACC systems take care of that too). Even the earliest implementations like those on my four-cars-ago car 2014 Acura MDX could carry out the automatic follow very well, even when inserting into a lane as soon as the driver executes the insertion. Tesla since 2021 claims to be able to do the same using cameras only without Radar, so why would single-pedal-driving even be relevant to this? How is it even relevant to the EV vs. ICE debate? ACC has been standard function on all new cars introduced by Honda and Toyota since about 2018. The car can literally follow the car in front and stay in its own lane without any input from the driver (except for a couple fingers resting on the steer wheel to let the car know the driver is still around, not making a sandwich in the back seat).

Reality says

Writings like this make one wonder if the author drives any car made in the last decade at all.

It's socal2.

He's usually full of it.

socal2 says

I remember when I had to get off the couch to change the channel on the TV. Didn't think it was a bother until I got a remote control.

Except I drive rental automatics and EVs all the time and still come away with a giant "meh, I prefer my manual jalopies".

Reality says

Why would a regular two-pedal automatic car commandeer any additional appendage of the driver at all?

Wasn't he talking about manual shift cars?

HeadSet says

Wasn't he talking about manual shift cars?

I was talking about manuals.

One of my buddies is having the joy of teaching his daughter how to drive a manual and is pulling his hair out with frustration. I get why advanced drivers with sports cars could prefer a manual just for fun. But don't get why anyone would purposefully go seek out a manual transmission if they are not a driving enthusiast.

Eric Holder says

Except I drive rental automatics and EVs all the time and still come away with a giant "meh, I prefer my manual jalopies".

Pretty much all EV's that are not Tesla are lame. I believe Tesla only rented out their rear wheel drive cars to Hertz and not the much faster dual motor versions. Renting EV's can be stressful if you are not around your homebase and familiar with the roads or have an easy/convenient place to charge.

One of of my co-workers in Boise rented a Model Y while in LA last year for work and was also meh. It didn't have the data plan enacted so he didn't get all the extra streaming for music, movies and internet. No FSD either. I encouraged him to test drive the same car for a few days in his home town and he came back with a totally different experience and ended up buying one.

HeadSet says

Reality says

Why would a regular two-pedal automatic car commandeer any additional appendage of the driver at all?

Wasn't he talking about manual shift cars?

95+% new ICE cars sold in the US are automatics. He/she was pointing out the workload issue with driving a manual as if that were a problem with all ICE cars , and touting the less workload when driving an EV using the "one-pedal-driving" method. 95+% ICE cars sold are automatics (and in the last 5+ years overwhelming majority of which also have ACC, Advanced Cruise Control, which makes touching any foot pedal unnecessary most of the time when following in traffic), over which the EV's have no workload advantage whatsoever.

Reality says

HeadSet says

Reality says

Why would a regular two-pedal automatic car commandeer any additional appendage of the driver at all?

Wasn't he talking about manual shift cars?

95+% new ICE cars sold in the US are automatics. He/she was pointing out the workload issue with driving a manual as if that were a problem with all ICE cars , and touting the less workload when driving an EV using the "one-pedal-driving" method. 95+% ICE cars sold are automatics (and in the last 5+ years overwhelming majority of which also have ACC, Advanced Cruise Control, which makes touching any foot pedal unnecessary most of the time when following in traffic), over which the EV's have no workload advantage whatsoever.

ACC stands for “Adaptive Cruise Control”, in that it adapts the set vehicle speed to respect the set following distance and speed of the vehicle in front of it.

ForcedTQ says

ACC stands for “Adaptive Cruise Control”, in that it adapts the set vehicle speed to respect the set following distance and speed of the vehicle in front of it.

This shit annoys me to no end. It takes one slowpoke to create a long line of ACC-equipped cars to line up behind it and chug along 10mph below speed limit with drivers fingerfucking their phones oblivios to the fact.

socal2 says

Tesla only rented out their rear wheel drive cars to Hertz and not the much faster dual motor versions.

And you'd be wrong. I rented LR AWD ModelY from them.

Reality says

workload issue with driving a manual

Yeah, some back braking labor, LOL. What's next: the unberable burden of steering with your hands?... Wait, I think we already starting to hear that.

Eric Holder says

And you'd be wrong. I rented LR AWD ModelY from them.

Then you must have it set at "chill" mode or drove it like an old lady.

There is no way you can drive a dual motor Model Y and not be impressed with the acceleration. It is one of the quickest cars on the road.

ForcedTQ says

ACC stands for “Adaptive Cruise Control”, in that it adapts the set vehicle speed to respect the set following distance and speed of the vehicle in front of it.

My wife's Hyundai has ACC which is nice for long freeway drives.

But it is nothing like Tesla's Full Self Driving that can literally drive you door to door through busy city streets and now navigate and park itself in busy COSTCO parking lots.

Basically $99/month to have a full time chauffer. No one in the world is close to what Tesla has already accomplished here. GM just announced they are bailing out of Cruz and Waymo is basically locked into geofenced areas that were heavily mapped by LIDAR.

Hope some of you guys were smart and picked up some TSLA shares before the election.

socal2 says

Eric Holder says

And you'd be wrong. I rented LR AWD ModelY from them.

Then you must have it set at "chill" mode or drove it like an old lady.

There is no way you can drive a dual motor Model Y and not be impressed with the acceleration. It is one of the quickest cars on the road.

It accelerates briskly, I give it that. But it is also heavy as fuck and makes you aware of that. It is also underdamped and gets upset where my other cars don't. And that "one pedal driving" thingy? It bored me to death. But it is useful in snow and on ice. Brilliant, actually. People of SFBA in general have no fucking idea how to drive on slick roads so this might save some grief to many occasional travelers to Tahoe area.

socal2 says

Basically $99/month to have a full time chauffer. No one in the world is close to what Tesla has already accomplished here. GM just announced they are bailing out of Cruz and Waymo is basically locked into geofenced areas that were heavily mapped by LIDAR.

$1,200/yr? That's gas for the average commuter with sedans. They have 14 gallon tanks tops. That's 2 fill ups and 400-450 miles or just under 1k/mo. That's not including hybrids. All this done in under 5 minutes one time a month.

EV owners don't value time. It's not green. They're fast on acceleration increasing a risk of an accident. Cool. My niece 16 has a Prius and doesn't fill up for 2 months. She spends less than $200/mo on gas. The up front cost of EV's is 1,000% not worth it in the long run. You've got to change my mind Socal besides it's fun to drive. Which I don't disagree with that.

Eric Holder says

Reality says

workload issue with driving a manual

Yeah, some back braking labor, LOL. What's next: the unberable burden of steering with your hands?... Wait, I think we already starting to hear that.

I loved it for sure and it wasn't hard for me. You learn a lot about driving doing it. Mine was a POS 4 cylinder. 205k miles and no new clutch. One brake change. 1/8th the cost of a Tesla out the door. Not sure how that's not winning. My gas and maintenance was covered before I dumped the car. Spent probably a 1/2 at least overall on what a Tesla sedan costs.

Just because the market "seems" to be changing doesn't mean it is. Power supply is a massive factor that hasn't hit yet. Give it 3-5 years. Our grid is in a bad place and it's at the brink. Especially in CA. Put this in the predictions thread. The fan is spinning the shit just hasn't hit it yet.