0
0

Revising Prop 13 – Benefit Actual Owners


 invite response                
2008 Feb 25, 8:41am   24,333 views  223 comments

by Peter P   ➕follow (2)   💰tip   ignore  

We all know the problems caused by the Jarvis-Gann ‘Prop 13’ tax revolt CA constitutional amendment. It was sold to the voters as a measure to “keep granny in her family home”, but in reality the prime beneficiaries have been major corporations, whose campuses pay inordinately low property taxes, and those boomers who never seem to move.

Let’s say that the US Supreme Court strikes down Prop 13 as being an infringement of the 14th Amendment “equal protection” clause. How could we replace it and still keep granny in her home?

I have a fiendish idea. Let any owner-occupied residential property be FULLY EXEMPT from all property taxes IF the home is owned free and clear. But if there is a mortgage, trust deed, HELOC, MEW withdrawal, or any other suchlike activity, then the owner must pay his or her fair share of property tax.

Granny in the paid-off family home would thus be exempt. So would responsible homeowners who bought a house compatible with their income and who paid it off.

Irresponsible home “owners” who either bought more house than they could afford or who kept withdrawing from the home ATM would get stuck paying property tax. Hey, you guys get a mortgage-interest deduction: just roll those tax-savings over into your property tax bill!

To me most of the “unintentional consequences” of this plan are positive. What are your thoughts about this reform?

-DennisN

#housing

« First        Comments 52 - 91 of 223       Last »     Search these comments

52   Malcolm   2008 Feb 25, 2:12pm  

Freaking hilarious. What else is left now?

53   MarkInSF   2008 Feb 25, 5:13pm  

So if you're rich and can buy your house outright you contribute zilch to city services. Let all the common folk pay for it.

Brilliant.

54   MarkInSF   2008 Feb 25, 5:20pm  

OK, I have to admit, I do very much like your idea of doing away with the deductions from the federal income tax, for mortgage interest and for property tax.

Get rid of phantom depreciation deductions for property investors too. That's part of the reason property values are so out of whack, and so damn expensive for the non-investor class. You can make almost as much pretending that your investment property's value is going down as you can collecting rent.

55   HelloKitty   2008 Feb 25, 5:20pm  

there is whole society that worships Howard Jarvis(wrote p13) and they exist to keep it 4eva alive.

http://www.hjta.org/node/320

BTW: June 6th, 2008 is the 30th anniversay of Prop 13

30 years of inequity and poor land use (poor elderly on SSI in beach front homes which are now crapshacks....near the beach/employment centers.....)

I hope someone starts a 'move outta CA on june 6th day' and every year people can rush to uhaul and leave CA forever.

56   HelloKitty   2008 Feb 25, 5:22pm  

@malcolm
I might be confused about that part of p13 where pre p13 owners do not pay the 2 percent increase.

her is a quote from a good article
"For purposes of transition from one system to another, Proposition 13 rolled California property values back to their assessed fair market values in 1975-76. California properties which have not been sold or had substantial new construction since the 1975-76 assessment retain the 1975-76 base assessment value indefinitely."

http://vls.law.vill.edu/orgs/tax-law-compendium/Student/prop13.htm

57   HelloKitty   2008 Feb 25, 5:51pm  

"In Anaheim, for example, the Walt Disney Co. pays on average 5 cents a square foot for some of the Disneyland property it has owned since the 1950s. By contrast, a person who just bought a home at the median Orange County price of$428,000 pays $1.71 a square foot in property taxes."

"In downtown Sacramento, for example, the Holiday Inn pays 22 cents a square foot, while the nearby Sheraton Grand pays $1.45 a square foot, according to data collected by the California Tax Reform Association, an advocate of Proposition 13 reform."

Well i read most of the text of the actual law on the howard jarvis shrine:
http://www.hjta.org/node/67

cant tell if pre 78 purchases are subject to 2%....any accountants here?

58   CaseyHaterz   2008 Feb 25, 6:54pm  

You see, I'm not that smart so I need something to help me understand the subprime mess. Fortunately, somebody put this together.

http://docs.google.com/TeamPresent?revision=_latest&fs=true&docID=ddv7hj34_03774hsc7&skipauth=true&pli=1

WARNING: Language

59   SP   2008 Feb 25, 11:50pm  

OT to the thread, but may be of interest to Fortress Watchers...

Cupertino's prime area, in the foothills west of Hwy 85, top shcools and everything...

21609 Edward Way
For Sale: $1,325,000
Last Sold Nov 2006: $1,366,000

21422 Elm Ct
For Sale: $1,525,000
Last Sold Dec 2007: $1,567,000

21897 Shattuck Dr
For Sale: $1,350,000
Last Sold Nov 2007: $1,488,000

1100 Elmsford Dr
For Sale: $1,590,000
Last Sold May 2007: $1,625,000

11622 Seven Springs Dr
For Sale: $1,595,000
Last Sold July 2007: $1,670,000

Nice Haircut, Suxorz!

60   SP   2008 Feb 25, 11:52pm  

And speaking of haircuts, anyone see the action on GOOG today?

61   DinOR   2008 Feb 25, 11:55pm  

OT but the IRS has now made arrangements for those wanting to deposit their "rebate" directly into their IRA! Use IRS Form 8888 (must be REALLY lucky) or begin on line 73 (Form 1040) to have it deposited directly.

This will apply as a contribution for 2008.

*Not Inv./Tax Advice

62   DinOR   2008 Feb 25, 11:59pm  

DennisN,

Loved it! Are there some loopholes that are bound to be exploited? Sure. Is it healthier than what we currently have? You bet.

63   Malcolm   2008 Feb 26, 12:50am  

"Proposition 13 allows for an upward adjustment in the base assessment value each year for inflation, however it caps this annual adjustment at 2% of base value."

HelloKitty, yes, the next sentence clarifies it. The base amount is set at the 75-76 level "for ever" but is adjusted upwards a maximum of 2% per year. There's no freeze for the older transactions, it was passed in 78 and rolled all the prices back to the 76 level. You're correct in principle, if there are no transfers or significant rennovations the base assessment is the 76 value plus a max of 2% per year.

64   DinOR   2008 Feb 26, 1:03am  

Oh... "Suckers"!

Thanks SP. (Also notice they didn't even leave in a "fudge factor" to cover the commish)

65   Malcolm   2008 Feb 26, 1:07am  

There's one other angle that gets left out of the P13 debate. property tax is not 1% of the assessed value. P13 allows additional taxes, like school bonds, to be added in addition to the 1%. Here in San Diego there is another 10th of a percent that was set to expire but was added on for another 30 years with prop MM. The tax bills are closer to 1.2% of the assessed + 2% annually adjusted values. Voters can always add to the tax rate, but it requires what is called a super majority which is an election where 2/3rds have to vote in favor. The logic for that is that it wouldn't be fair to have a simple majority vote for the increase when not everyone would be paying it directly. I use the word directly because I've said before that owners occupying their homes pay directly and renters pay indirectly since the tax is built into the price of the monthly rent.

66   DennisN   2008 Feb 26, 1:14am  

In Anaheim, for example, the Walt Disney Co. pays on average 5 cents a square foot for some of the Disneyland property it has owned since the 1950s. By contrast, a person who just bought a home at the median Orange County price of $428,000 pays $1.71 a square foot in property taxes.

This is the prime example of how Prop 13 was "overbroad" to use some lawyer speak....

Established corporate giants such as Lockheed, HP, Intel, Disney, Warner Bros., Gallo Vineyards, and their brethern pay pennies on the dollar for property taxes when compared to new innovative companies. This is a huge disincentive for start-ups contemplating doing business in California. It may be easier to get VC funding in Silicon Valley, but the flipside is that you are going to be taxed at a higher rate. A start-up competing with, say, Apple Computer or HP will pay an order of magnitude greater property tax.

67   Malcolm   2008 Feb 26, 1:18am  

DinOR Says:
February 26th, 2008 at 7:55 am
"OT but the IRS has now made arrangements for those wanting to deposit their “rebate” directly into their IRA! Use IRS Form 8888 (must be REALLY lucky) or begin on line 73 (Form 1040) to have it deposited directly."

God dammit this tax code is a cluster f-ck. That's so not right, here I am having to withdraw excess contributions because of penalties because up until this minute you could only deposit "earned income" into an IRA. I couldn't sleep last night because on top of that nonsense the Feds without any notice "corrected" my taxes for 2006 by adding back in my state refund (normally right) but because I had AMT in 2005 which replaced the normal itemized deductions my tax preparer correctly did not add it back in. Yesterday I was on the phone with the state going "How in the world can you have a different figure here when I filed electronically and you are telling me up and down that there were no changes made?" Then come to find out they made changes :(

68   MCM   2008 Feb 26, 1:18am  

The OFHEO House Price Index is out for 4Q 2007:

http://www.ofheo.gov/media/pdf/4q07hpi.pdf

One nugget is that starting in March, they are going to release monthly reports in addition to quarterly reports.

Since this is a DennisN thread with Idaho based comments...

I am beginning to think Boise, Idaho is more of a fortress than the Bay area, since it's 5 year appreciation (65%) blew away the Bay area (46%), yet it is still appreciating over the past year (1.74%) while the Bay area has declined (-0.86%).

* Definitely *not* an invite for specuvestors. Or maybe it is. ;)

69   Malcolm   2008 Feb 26, 1:23am  

Dennis, I almost buy into that argument. I've been wanting to put together a business plan for an amusement park in Anaheim but it just isn't feasible because I can't compete with Disneyland's property tax rate.....kidding.
Actually the property values today compared to then would be the major stumbling block but I agree with you that one could make the argument that the tax rate does favor one business over another and creates an unreasoanble barrier to entry.

70   Peter P   2008 Feb 26, 1:28am  

And speaking of haircuts, anyone see the action on GOOG today?

What happened?

71   DennisN   2008 Feb 26, 1:30am  

MCM,

Check this sidebar feature from a posting on the main Patrick news page today. http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/retro-MORTGAGE0807.html Go to the median price tab. You will see that the three "fortress" cities in the US apparently are Seattle, Boise, and Salt Lake City.

72   Patrick   2008 Feb 26, 1:40am  

Getting votes to repeal Prop 13 is trivial if someone has the energy to do the obvious thing:

Publish all property taxes by address in an easy to search way.

Once recent buyers see how much they're being screwed by their older neighbors, Prop 13 will end in a hurry.

73   DennisN   2008 Feb 26, 1:50am  

Interesting thought Patrick. Income tax amounts are confidential. However I believe property taxes are not. Places like Propertyshark.com already publish the tax basis for property tax. It would be simple to just multiply in the 1% + special assessments to yield the actual property tax bill.

74   DinOR   2008 Feb 26, 1:57am  

MCM,

Point taken. Even at today's prices though I believe that only drives the median in Boise slightly above 200k. Lord, what were homes in ID selling for in 2001?

75   MCM   2008 Feb 26, 2:00am  

It just doesn't make sense - a day of reckoning has to come:

Boise - median income ~58k - median house price ~212k = 3.7 times median income.

SLC - median income ~60k - median house price ~220k = 3.7 times median income.

Seattle - median income ~71k - median house price ~425k = 5.9 times median income.

Middle class debt slave cannot continue to roll debt from one loan to another and increase total debt load indefinitely.

76   DinOR   2008 Feb 26, 2:01am  

Malcom,

It might make sense for you to have some sort of consulting, side-job gig to show "some" earned income. I agree it's a mess and outside of Patrick.net regulars I doubt a lot of Americans will take advantage of any sort of IRA Direct Deposit program?

77   DinOR   2008 Feb 26, 2:02am  

MCM,

Hence the term: Peak Debt

(we're there!)

78   Peter P   2008 Feb 26, 2:07am  

Once recent buyers see how much they’re being screwed by their older neighbors, Prop 13 will end in a hurry.

Prop 13 is just a small part of the generation warfare.

Based on the demographics, it is a war Gen-Xers can't win. We can only find a way to join them.

79   DennisN   2008 Feb 26, 2:07am  

Part of the problem with that WSJ map is it compares all prices to an arbitrary "peak in Q4 2005" value. That may have been the peak in many places but the peak here in Boise came about a year later, which skews the figures. Boise prices are now soft and somewhat down over Q2 2007, but you would miss this fact from the WSJ map. The out-of-state speculators have all fled, leaving an over-supply of new houses.

80   Malcolm   2008 Feb 26, 2:27am  

DinOR Says:
February 26th, 2008 at 10:01 am
"Malcom,
It might make sense for you to have some sort of consulting, side-job gig to show “some” earned income. I agree it’s a mess and outside of Patrick.net regulars I doubt a lot of Americans will take advantage of any sort of IRA Direct Deposit program?"

Good advice, and I've actually done a small test for that. I put a Criaigslist ad out advertising MBA business coach for startups. I actually got a client. She is dirt poor but onto something in my opinion so I've invested quite a bit of time. I helped her out last week and actually did give her a small bill. I would love to just find some fun part time job, or something really serious full time to devote my life to. Otherwise I'm just sitting back waiting for prices to make sense and then I'm going to do environmental rehabs on homes including solar installations. It seems no one can afford to pay cash for solar and when you have to finance it, it doesn't make sense so I'm going to buy houses, install solar and either resell them or rent them out for eventual resale.

81   skibum   2008 Feb 26, 2:28am  

And speaking of haircuts, anyone see the action on GOOG today?

What happened?

Maybe they read this piece:

http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/2/2008/2/google_disaster__comscore_reports_awful_january

82   skibum   2008 Feb 26, 2:30am  

Or maybe this one:

"Google Very Exposed to US Recession--Expert"

http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/2/google_very_exposed_to_us_recession__expert

83   Malcolm   2008 Feb 26, 2:31am  

Administrator Says:
February 26th, 2008 at 9:40 am
"Getting votes to repeal Prop 13 is trivial if someone has the energy to do the obvious thing:
Publish all property taxes by address in an easy to search way.
Once recent buyers see how much they’re being screwed by their older neighbors, Prop 13 will end in a hurry."

Sorry to disagree, once you're in you don't worry about the ones before you, you feel very stable knowing that is one cost that is somewhat contained. In my case it just went hand in hand knowing I had paid 113K for my first house where my neighbor had paid something like $25K for the same house in the 50s. People are more wowed by the price difference over the disparity in property taxes.

84   DinOR   2008 Feb 26, 2:38am  

DennisN,

I noticed that "line in the sand" as well. Given it's a national article, 4th qtr. 2005 probably makes the most sense. As far as PDX is concerned you could almost put that out to 1st qtr. 2007?

All and all Boise probably has a lot less to worry about than Bend.

85   DinOR   2008 Feb 26, 2:43am  

Malcom,

My wife and I pretty much agreed that over the next few years she'll likely retire (at around 50) but it is my lot in life to continue working. I feel one of the reasons that's important is to keep your contacts current.

A lot of guys go into retirement/semi and really fall of the radar. Everyone assumes you're content and out of the loop. They don't include you in their plans and quickly fill your place in line. When they try to re-engage they find it frustrating. So for me it's worth it to "soldier on". IMHO

86   Peter P   2008 Feb 26, 2:44am  

“Google Very Exposed to US Recession–Expert”

Well, I don't invest in "growth" companies.

Let's focus on food and blue gold :)

87   Peter P   2008 Feb 26, 2:48am  

Is it too late to short GOOG?

88   DinOR   2008 Feb 26, 2:51am  

"blue gold"

Water?

89   Peter P   2008 Feb 26, 2:53am  

Yes. H2O. Amazing substance.

90   DinOR   2008 Feb 26, 2:54am  

I was reading that at one time (back in the day) Walker Lake (south of Reno) covered much of the Western U.S. Better get the boat in before it's gone altogether!

91   Malcolm   2008 Feb 26, 2:56am  

You've got me pegged. That happened to me. I've done well but at a cost to a career. I didn't think I wanted one but now I feel somewhat useless. Funny thing is, I look around and people who stuck with it seem to be falling out of their career paths as well. In my neighborhood there are tons of men who seem to stay home all the time with their wives out working in offices. It is such a dynamic marketplace that particular skills are getting obsoleted making learning them a bit of a waste. I don't know what to do, I can easily find "a job" but I'm trying to do something meaningful. It is amazing how valuable the skillset I have now would have been just 5 years ago but now anyone can make a website, everyone can be a middle manager, and there are very few interesting manufacturing companies close by that aren't just giant corporate headquarters. I've got a resume in with www.aptera.com they build that car that I'm so excited to buy. They are in Carlsbad, and I am hoping maybe I can get in there. I would do just about any job they needed me for, short of answering the phone :)
I don't even mind physical work, I like building and assembling things.

« First        Comments 52 - 91 of 223       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions