by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 110 - 149 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Uh, you're kidding about this right? There is a reason that America (along w/ the West in general) is the CENTER of innovation in the world. Our patent and trademark and system definitely needs work but it is what ALLOWS the small guy to actually be able to beat the big companies. Without that protection innovation would cease. No one will work on anything new and innovative if it can just be stolen.
How many NEW products (ie not modifications of existing technology) has China produced in the last 20 years vs the US?
There's also a whole other discussion about how the West vs East teach their kids which results in different skillsets in this area.
Plus your arguments are contradictory. In one paragraph you say that we need to be more like China and then later you say that govt taking over business doesn't solve the problems. Hello!? In China the govt owns everything.
Riley is correct in that the best ideas are sometimes bought up by big corporations and shelved, usually if the invention in question is a threat to their industry. One example would be the special electric battery designed for the proto-electric car that was bought by one of the big petroleum companies. But I would cite such as examples as more of a shortcoming of free industry - almost a trifle compared to the drudgery of draconian rule, which seems like it would be an impediment to the very fundamentals of invention.
Because of our corruptable form of government,
Holy shit, there's a form of goverment that isn't? Sign me up!
Uh, you’re kidding about this right? There is a reason that America (along w/ the West in general) is the CENTER of innovation in the world. Our patent and trademark and system definitely needs work but it is what ALLOWS the small guy to actually be able to beat the big companies. Without that protection innovation would cease. No one will work on anything new and innovative if it can just be stolen.
Yeah! Who would work on technology if they couldn't prevent people from "stealing" what they're doing? People who want to fix the IP system make me so mad that I almost crash firefox!
Laws must be put in place to make sure that a patent cannot be slightly modified and resubmitted, creating perpetual patents.
That "slight modification" has beem plagueing us for a long time. I can see a patent on a transister, but not on the Darlington Circuit which is really just two transisters stuck together. That Darlington patent is from the early 50's.
Which is patently false. But Mozilo (stupidly) believed it:How is it false? Default rates amongst so-called "prime" borrowers are now higher than "sub-prime". Clearly the way that we judge credit worthiness is very flawed. There was supposed to be only a 5% default rate for people with credit scores above 750, but in housing we're seeing numbers nearly 4x that. But what do you expect? A guy making $20k a year can still have an 800 FICO, but that doesn't mean he can afford a $200k house. At the same time, I make over $150k a year and have a sub-700 FICO (I don't use credit very often). Who's more credit worthy?
On the Sidelines says
Which is patently false. But Mozilo (stupidly) believed it:How is it false? Default rates amongst so-called “prime†borrowers are now higher than “sub-primeâ€. Clearly the way that we judge credit worthiness is very flawed. There was supposed to be only a 5% default rate for people with credit scores above 750, but in housing we’re seeing numbers nearly 4x that. But what do you expect? A guy making $20k a year can still have an 800 FICO, but that doesn’t mean he can afford a $200k house. At the same time, I make over $150k a year and have a sub-700 FICO (I don’t use credit very often). Who’s more credit worthy? Obviously, the guy making $20k a year is a better credit risk. I'd loan him a million, because he pays his minimums and believes in the credit system. You, on the other hand, bad risk. You might only borrow what you can afford, pay it off early, and make the rest of (us) look bad. :)
The Enquirer is also the only reliable news source about space aliens on earth. See "Men In Black". Hell, I like to drink. No problem with that as long as no one gets hurt and work gets done. I'll probably catch some shit for this, but I think Muslims and Mormons are way too uptight and could both benefit from learning to appreciate red wine.The Enquirer broke the John Edwards story. It is the only major news source that provides credible stories on Democrats anymore.
I’d love nothing more than a two term Palin presidency, to Slap America out of stupid and the Notion that our only valid choices is either one of the two busted broken parties running around the world embarrassing me for America every chance they get.Oh please. Palin agrees with 100% of the Republican agenda. The reason that the GOP turned against her is because she became a great big joke -- a caricature of the right that drove the independents screaming in terror. Name one GOP policy that Palin isn't a supporter of. Name one of Palin's policies that isn't in full agreement with the GOP. On the other hand, a Palin presidency might convince the left leaning states that the union needs to be dissolved, which is probably the best outcome for the people at this point. Let the whackos elect whackos to run their countries and keep them out of everyone else's business.
Destined to lead. Destined for the White House. Sarah Palin is the real champion of the middle class. That is why the media attacked her. She would have prevented the puppet Obama from shovelling 2 Trillion of our money to the DOW and Wall Street.Or destined to continue on her path as national scapegoat for the republican party? time will tell.
Sarah Palin is the real champion of the middle class. That is why the media attacked her.Champion of the middle class? Where do you get your weed? Which of her stated policies and objectives supports the middle class? Her opposition to health care, her support for big oil, or her support for cutting taxes on the rich? Perhaps you think her theft of $480m in federal funds for the bridge to nowhere was helping the middle class somehow? No? How about her outright lies in claiming that she didn't want the money in the first place? Only a moron would believe that she is any different from any other Republican. Every single stance that she has ever taken has been right in line with the GOP agenda. She's pro-war, anti-abortion, anti-gay, anti-stem cell, pro-gun, anti-union, pro-death penalty, pro-creationism, and a global warming denier. How is that ANY different from ANY OTHER mainstream GOP candidate? Claiming that she's "different" is intellectual dishonesty. She has the exact same agenda as every Republican leader since Nixon. By the way, "the media" didn't attack her. The left attacked her (obviously, just as the right attacks leading democratic figures), and Comedians mocked her for coming across as a complete idiot and not being able to speak coherently. The GOP doesn't like her because they think that she cost them the presidency. I don't think that's entirely fair though -- it was GOP who lost the election. The real Presidential race in 2008 was the Democratic primary.
By the way, “the media†didn’t attack her. The left attacked her (obviously, just as the right attacks leading democratic figures), and Comedians mocked her for coming across as a complete idiot and not being able to speak coherently.The media did attack her. They attack everyone, and she's no different. But she did make it easier...
he media did attack her. They attack everyone, and she’s no different. But she did make it easier…Which "media"? Other than the left (who attack every leader on the right), and Comedians, who was attacking her? Was Fox, WSJ, or any other right wing media outlet attacking her?
That stuff didn’t stop Bush now did it? Bush couldn’t tell the difference between WMD’s from Shineola, and he said New-que-lur around polite company. He was president twice.Palin's dad isn't George H.W. Bush, and turd blossom won't have anything to do with her. I'm highly skeptical that the GOP would actually allow a non-white male be their candidate any time in the next 20 years. she could run as an independent, sure, but all that would do is split the GOP vote and guarantee another 4 years for the democrats.
Remember, it is like that Star Trek episode with the “Will of Landru†and mind control cultist everywhere programmed to report on you. Keep cult members at bay, never let them persuade you to attend their “gatherings,†or enter your house or for god’s sake see your home made beer until you finish your phd and get the hell out of there… At least that is what my cousin told me… he did 3 1/2 years in Utah…I've spent most of my life here. I use the pioneer method, and do what the pioneers did. Yep, drive over the state line and buy alcohol in Vegas. :)
« First « Previous Comments 110 - 149 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,259,128 comments by 15,027 users - Al_Sharpton_for_President, The_Deplorable online now