by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 1,488 - 1,527 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
So what happens when it comes to May and the price is up around 135? Would the option still be trading for $1.20-1.30, or would it be less becasue of the lack of time value.
500% -- You mean like a $100k house selling for $500k or a $200k house selling for $1 million? You mean like California?
I predict that someone - a normal American - will rise to greatness when he/she takes part in a reality tv show. This person will experience a meteoric rise as a celebrity, only to hit rock bottom soon after and retire into relative obscurity. Only to take part in a "where are they now" show like Big Brother, and regain his/her career.
Oh - and I predict more foreclosures.
I'm sure that no one saw either of those coming...
It will be a tough year.
I think by the time 2010 is done, Iran get the bomb and Citibank goes bankrupt.
The government continues to props up market, prices stay mostly flat, or decline slowly.
No economic recovery in sight.
Bernanke does not abandon QE but doubles down with QE2, pushing 30-year fixed mortgage rates to 2.5%.
2010 Affordable Homes Act turns mortgage interest from a deduction to a straight tax credit, raises the FHA limit to $2M, sets required down payment at 2%, which is provided directly by the Fed not the buyer.
This results in a $750,000 property having a PITI of under $3000 and thus raises 2009 values up $200,000 across the board. And the housing market is saved as nobody is under water any more, not even Casey Serin.
Unfortunately, only the lower middle class and the middle upper class need to pay income taxes any more and the $1T deficit becomes $2T.
In May 2000 I moved back from Japan. Not one of my smoother moves, not that Japan is doing any great shakes now.
As we stand ready to enter the 2010s, two great forces are in collision -- deflation and inflation.
It is a battle of pricing power. Some producers have it -- OPEC, doctors, lawyers, accountants, gummint workers, but J6P certainly doesn't.
Certainly every consumer goods producer has tons of surplus capacity now. The question is whether they can or will lower prices. A walk through the grocery store tells me they are quite hesitant to do so, and so their products have fewer turns.
Whither J6P's wages? It is the story of the decade. MZM more than doubled this past decade:
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/MZM
yet J6p didn't see any of this money. It can double again, and he prolly won't see any of /that/ either.
Just to add, typically at the bottom of a Bear Market the average P/E ratios decline significantly, usually well below 15.
Yes, but this is obviously not the bottom anymore--stocks have risen 30+% over the lowpoint of the bear market...
Wow, the CDC recalls 800,000 swine flu shots because they are weak. CDC, is that a federal agency? I wonder why they would be recalling this? Homo? Anything?The article pretty clearly answers your questions--did you read it?
^ LOL. You don't really seem to understand the situation of the nation's fisc last January.
From 2003-2007, we collectively borrowed $850 billion PER YEAR more on our houses than we were paying down. Most of this wasn't secured by wealth-creation but just redirected into the economy via mortgage and HELOC.
$850B per year / $50K per job is around 17 MILLION jobs directly or indirectly driven by nothing but debt drawdowns on fairy-tale home valuations. This was unsustainable -- in 2008 total mortgage debt DECLINED $100B, and it will decline a bit more for 2009. This loss of several hundred billion of fake buying consumer power is entirely why we're so screwed now.
If the gummint weren't deficit spending like Reaganites on eightballs -- the national debt has risen $1.4 trillion this year -- the economy would have imploded in a series of cross-defaults that would have made 1930 look good.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/179121-so-much-for-those-4-bad-bears
This wasn't so much a "soft-landing" as a controlled crash.
I'm not optimistic about where we go from here, but I *do* know I couldn't have done anything one bit better than the present team in office.
The situation left by the previous administration was simply parlous, as if they were intentionally trying to destroy the country's fisc.
I’m not optimistic about where we go from here, but I *do* know I couldn’t have done anything one bit better than the present team in office.
Well put Troy, that I can believe.
I’m not optimistic about where we go from here, but I *do* know I couldn’t have done anything one bit better than the present team in office.
I mostly agree with Troy this time except the above.
Anyway, ecomony in this year is strange. Dow went up while we're seeing people losing home, job and money. Companies make profit not by sales but by cutting costs. Banks get profit not by investing but by getting TARP and increasing fees. Retailers sell more not by regular sales but by discounts. They can't do like this forever. So what is so shocking about the news?
bigger fool you make yourself out to be.spoken like a man who knows, a load of personal experience and growing every moment. the biggest christmas miracle would be NOMO going home for the holidays to his cave and out of internet access. he works so tirelessly on this site almost like he has internet access even in that cave. More power to you, jolly holiday man.
Gotta love Ad Hominem.I'm glad that you love you. I guess that a good example of a recall where a public agency is involved, besides the h1n1 vaccine, would be the USDA recalling beef. http://www.fsis.usda.gov/recalls/ They didn't make the beef. They didn't go to someone's farm, kill a cow, cut it up & package it, and distribute it to the masses. But they do have the ability to recall (or order a recall) on a product that isn't up to standards. Ad hom, once again I must ask why you get your feelings hurt when someone points out that your info is incorrect and you are a reactionary conservative who asserts himself to be a victim of the liberal media per your multiple statements. You then claim that you're a victim of mine & Nomo's and that you don't have a tinfoil hat lying around to protect you from liberal thoughts & soundwaves - and claim that we're mean to you, after which you make asinine comments about Nomo living in a cave? You can't have it both ways - oh, wait. In Adhominem world, you do swing both ways. I realize that you're not happy when people disagree with you - but you must be an unhappy person. This thread is indicative of your lack of independent thinking. The more you say, the less informed you appear. We're having fun at your expense, dear Adhom. It's easy, because you give us so much ammunition.
We’re having fun at your expense, dear Adhom.Actually all the fun you are having is at your own expense. Unless you are on public assistance? That is what is so great about a free society. And aint it great we can expect you to waste more of your time and energy arguing with me? I like to call this experiment the waste a bunch of socialists time initiative. So far a brilliant success. Could not have done it without you. but thanks for calling me dear, I think it brought a tear to my eye. Which is pretty rare for a "reactionary conservative victim of liberal media tinfoil hat wearing, non independent thinking unhappy, and less informed appearing" one such as you describe.
Arch heels have tapped out souls. I say shine it on and give them the boot for horning in on the toe jam, since they're out of step when they're hell bent for leather.
That photo looks more like the final frame of Rocky Three, than the Cha Cha Cha.
AdHominem saysReally is that what I said. Or is it just what NOMO wants you to believe to stroke his own ego and make him feel superior? Probably so. Wouldn't be the first time either.I like to call this experiment the waste a bunch of socialists time initiative. So far a brilliant success. Could not have done it without you.Folks, keep in mind that Patrick.net is a real estate chat forum. AdH simply labeled a bunch of complete strangers talking about real estate as ’socialists’, and is having a fake Internet battle with his imaginary enemies. Let’s hope he keeps up the fight
how does zillow attain its #s??I'm totally convinced they make them up out of thin air
So, the gubnent regulates the beef industry but not the medical industry? Wow.Are you really this clueless or are you just playing?
Interesting, gold had a nice pop today. I think the end of the year doldrums were just fund managers taking profits. Now it's time to see how far this bubble will go.
I'm with staynumz, above. Gold is mostly a speculative instrument not an industrial commodity. $50 an ounce or $5000, it really doesn't matter. But it is pretty. Wish I had been buying up these . . .
http://www.pandaamerica.com/details.asp?item=6219&grp=1&categ=29
At worst case with each folder I'd have a month's living expenses in solid yen for living in Japan, plus the glod.
Gold was never an industrial commodity. It's the only form of money that is immune from debasement. That's all. Deflationists should love gold. For some reason, they insist that it should behave as an industrial commodity. During all the deflationary episodes of the 1800s, paper currencies did exist and gold still gained on all of those currencies while increasing its own purchasing power.
Gold was never an industrial commodity. It’s the only form of money that is immune from debasement.
Huh? Gold is an industrial commodity--it is used in several industries, not the least of which is electronics.
It's immune from debasement? How do you figure? What happens when we mine more of it?
Money is a medium that serves to facilitate the exchange of goods and services. Nothing more, nothing less.
"Huh? Gold is an industrial commodity–it is used in several industries, not the least of which is electronics.
It’s immune from debasement? How do you figure? What happens when we mine more of it?
Money is a medium that serves to facilitate the exchange of goods and services. Nothing more, nothing less."
Industry has never significantly even dented the above ground gold supply and we've yet to find any industrial applications that will consume it. Your computer has about 50 cents worth of gold in it.
As far as mining goes, I suggest you study the mining sector. They haven't made any significant dents in the gold supply in well...forever. It takes years to open a mine.
Money is not just a medium of exchange. It is also a store of value. Paper money is losing its function as a store of value. Gold never lost its function as a store of value.
As far as mining goes, I suggest you study the mining sector. They haven’t made any significant dents in the gold supply in well…forever. It takes years to open a mine.
That's because there was no incentive to do so. Gold prices have been relatively low for awhile. That would change if gold became currency.
Gold never lost its function as a store of value
Not sure what that means. Gold prices go up and down just as the dollar does. Or silver, or copper, or platinum. Or any industrial commodity. How is gold any different? Other than it's prettier...
"That’s because there was no incentive to do so. Gold prices have been relatively low for awhile. That would change if gold became currency."
No...it didn't even happen when gold made it's run in the 1970s. You have an above ground supply of 2000 years worth of mining sitting in bank vaults. You'll never put a dent in that supply. 2.5% is the amount of new gold they bring to the market every time. You also completely ignored the fact that it takes years to open new mines. Btw...the old ones that are in operation are running out.
"Not sure what that means. Gold prices go up and down just as the dollar does. Or silver, or copper, or platinum. Or any industrial commodity. How is gold any different? Other than it’s prettier…"
I know you don't know what that means. I'm trying to teach you. Gold prices go up and down, but over time, they retain their purchasing power. The dollar goes up and down, but over time, it just goes down.
I know you don’t know what that means. I’m trying to teach you. Gold prices go up and down, but over time, they retain their purchasing power. The dollar goes up and down, but over time, it just goes down.
lol--thanks professor. My point is that gold doesn't retain it's purchasing power. You're wrong.
"lol–thanks professor. My point is that gold doesn’t retain it’s purchasing power. You’re wrong."
Actually, it's just Mr. right now. I'll be professor once Obama's stimulus package to my University's grant runs out. As for gold not retaining it's purchasing power, I have read quite a few academic papers that traced gold's purchasing power against land, commodities, and labor going back over 700 years for all price data they could find within Europe. Over that time, prices have been flat. Sure, you get 30% fluctuations every now and then but the crucial point is that it never goes to zero. On the other hand, every single fiat currency has always gone down to zero within a matter of decades.
Over very long periods of time, perhaps. But few of us live for more than 100 years.
An ounce of gold today buys several times what it could buy ten years ago.
But it buys less than half of what it could buy in 1980.
That is a very wide range for something that "holds it's value."
Of course, paper money can go to zero.
And, believe it or not, paper money can increase in value. All it takes is for the velocity of money to fall. Money moving more slowly is in effect deflation.
« First « Previous Comments 1,488 - 1,527 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,249,074 comments by 14,896 users - Ceffer, Patrick, rocketjoe79 online now