patrick.net

p.s., I'm writing this from my pod on Planet X Niburu

marcus says

Either way, you've expressed a new low (intellectually) with this "there are no degrees of sin."

and with this you show a complete lack of knowing. There is no degree of sin where God's Law (the topic here) is concerned - period. Do a google search or something and get back to me about how right I am. Thanks.

You spent a fair amount of effort distinguishing between killing and murder, which is a very good example of identifying "degrees of sin."

But because of your authoritarian personality, you need to frame it as absolute good (or okay) killing .......versus absolute bad, murder. The truth is they are both bad, it's just that one is worse than the other.

This is degrees of sin.

God's law may not be trying put weights or scores on sin to identify the magnitude of sins. But fortunately everyone was given enough sense to know that some sins are far worse than others.

Bap33 says

ellie,
I was not using the term in a political form ... was I? I ment to use liberal to indicate the mind set that refuses the exisitance of absolutes, and that sees more gray and less black and white ...

Dictionary.com says

1.favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
2.(often initial capital letter) noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform.
3.of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism. 4.favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
5.favoring or permitting freedom of action, especially with respect to matters of personal belief or expression: a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers.

You go on to say that, to you, "liberal" means that God's never changing laws aren't popular with the liberals... But an example is mormonism, that changes the book of mormon with the times. It's been documented that the BoM removed the part about men living on the moon after we found no men on the moon, changed the doctrines of allowing men to have plural marriages in order to be accepted as a state, allowing black people to hold the priesthood... yet the mormon church is notoriously conservative in its views and political leanings.

Bap, you appear to assign the word "liberal" with your own meaning to people who believe differently than you do.

You can package it however you want, slap it silly and call it susan - but it doesn't make it anything more than your story.

People are unpredictable, and assigning labels in order to understand them is a tedious, never-ending task.

Insofar as abortion, it is a huge sin in the mormon church (I use mormon because I live in the land of mormons). When I was younger, I drove more than one young mormon woman to get an abortion because her family, church and peers wouldn't help. Around these parts, you're an outcast slut if you have an unwed pregnancy, yet there's no support for birth control. This very conservative area has a high incidence of prescription drug use, meth and alcoholism.

But they're conservative, damnit - and by definition I guess that makes them good?

Liberal is a political label. Why not say, "People whose belief systems are different than mine?" It would be more truthful.

marcus says

You spent a fair amount of effort distinguishing between killing and murder, which is a very good example of identifying "degrees of sin."

But because of your authoritarian personality, you need to frame it as absolute good (or okay) killing .......versus absolute bad, murder. The truth is they are both bad, it's just that one is worse than the other.

This is degrees of sin.

God's law may not be trying put weights or scores on sin to identify the magnitude of sins. But fortunately everyone was given enough sense to know that some sins are far worse than others.

no, they are not both sin and you are wrong, if we are both using the same Bible. Death itself is only part of man's existance due to sin, but the act of killing someone is not a sin if is just, while murder is always a sin. So is having anger towards another person. Both are sin, both are enough to keep you outof heaven without grace. But, you are 100% wrong to say killing another is a sin based on anthing I have read in the hebrew Bible.

ellie,
I have said Joe Smith was wrong. Those that follow the BoM are being lied to. And that religion is a GREAT example of a "liberal" religion, even if all of the folks that attend have conservative political views.
I do not lump folks into the lib catagory for not having the same view as mine, but the fact that most folks that disagree with me tend to be liberal may play a part, right?
The rest of your post supports my point that no man can follow God's Law. Not even super-religous zelot types.

Bap33 says

I have said Joe Smith was wrong. Those that follow the BoM are being lied to. And that religion is a GREAT example of a "liberal" religion, even if all of the folks that attend have conservative political views.

You do realize that there are a bunch of people who disagree with you on this point, right? So far as "God's Law," I'll gladly follow this law as soon as he appears in front of me and explains to me what his law is.

Many people are out there who want others to follow their interpretation of "God's law." What a load of crap - everyone has an agenda. All ya gotta do is write a book and get other people to buy into it and you've got a religion. This isn't just an explanation of mormonism or scientology - it's also easily applied to christianity and basically all other religions.

Be a good person and it's all good. Preaching to others about what is sin and what is murder merely leads to arguments no one will win.

elliemae says

I'll gladly follow this law as soon as he appears in front of me and explains to me what his law is.

elliemae says

Be a good person and it's all good.

Here's a genius, explaining more:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeSSwKffj9o

Joe Pesci is God:)

thanks, i needed that!

elliemae says

his isn't just an explanation of mormonism or scientology - it's also easily applied to christianity and basically all other religions.

even in their own scripture this Jesus guy doesn't say anything about a lot of the stuff present-day Christianists want to legislate.

And much of the stuff he does talk about explicitly, they call Godless socialism.

Go figure.

I don't want to legislate anything.
Can you give some examples?

Vicente:
I have to apologize for my berating you over my "last meal." I was kinda bitter when I ate at McDonald's, when I could have eaten at... probably another crappy fast food restaurant.

The world didn't end, I still gotta do the dishes and patnet posters continue to quote the bible as the answer to it all.

Bap33 says

When Noah finally stepped from the Ark, it had been hundreds of years, and the first major change God made was to reduce the number of years a man lives. The sun would now come to Earth through clouds and water vapor, making a rainbow possible. That is the sign that God uses to promise man he wont flood Earth again. Next time, he takes us out with fire.

Guess we're too late... the Donald hath spoken

elliemae says

Vicente:
I have to apologize for my berating you over my "last meal." I was kinda bitter when I ate at McDonald's, when I could have eaten at... probably another crappy fast food restaurant.

Well, you do live in Utah after all, so here's what you should have been cramming down your gullet:

But don't feel so bad, we won another reprieve. I'm sure it was due to the PURE CLEAN LIVING or maybe Angel Moroni wasn't ready for us quite yet.... or something.

Me, I'm thinking some place where everybody knows my name.....

cheers was funny

Bap33 says

OTOH, God's law does not change. That is one reason I think the liberal minds do not like God or his laws. It's that whole, "absolute right and absolute wrong" thing that they do not like.

God's law is what people say it is. There are several different bibles. Most of them are bastardizations of the original Greek having gone through one or more intervals since then and reinterpreted and retranslated by humans.

Furthermore, one of the biggest changes for many Protestant faiths is that people have more of a direct connection to god rather than having to go through a priest. In Catholicism, god's law is what the Pope or your local priest says it is. In many Protestant faiths, it's what god told you it is.

Last, as ellie said, I don't know what believing in brightline rules has anything to do with liberal or conservative. That's silly.

Bap33 says

If you break one itty bitty portion of any one of God's laws you are guilty. You are just as guilty as if you had broke them all. The is no "degrees" of sin.

Actually, Catholics make a difference between venial sins and mortal sins, but you probably think they are blasphemers, since you're a fundie.

Bap33 says

I ment to use liberal to indicate the mind set that refuses the exisitance of absolutes, and that sees more gray and less black and white ...

Yes, this is the nonsense definition that you made up because it's your own personal belief and has absolutely nothing to do with most other people's definition of liberal and conservative.

What's funny is that any Protestant faith is liberal with respect to Catholicism. Catholicism is the OG. Everyone else wanted change -- i.e. liberal.

corntrollio says

What's funny is that any Protestant faith is liberal with respect to Catholicism. Catholicism is the OG. Everyone else wanted change -- i.e. liberal.

Yes. And with his authoritarian personality, if he had been around and a Catholic in the time of Martin Luther, he would have been WILDY opposed to the radical who wanted to break away from the one true Christianity.

OF course I don't even think that fundamentalists call themselves protestants or even know that they are. They just think (and are told) that they have the one true Christianity, and that all the others are wrong.

I had a FANTASTIC Pizza Margherita, and some good beer tonight. Sitting outdoors by a warm fire.

I'll make this a weekly thing until the Friday when it finally DOES all come to an end.

corntrollio says

Furthermore, one of the biggest changes for many Protestant faiths is that people have more of a direct connection to god rather than having to go through a priest. In Catholicism, god's law is what the Pope or your local priest says it is. In many Protestant faiths, it's what god told you it is.

wrong, but that doesn't tend to stop you from continuing, so enjoy.

Catholicism is far far far from following anything God had in mind.

And, if you don't mind, tell me what Bible the greeks wrote, please.

Here's some info for that subject:
The Old Testament was written from approximately 1400 B.C. to approximately 400 B.C.
The Old Testament was written over a period of some centuries as noted above. Moses wrote the first five books known as the Pentateuch, which included the editing of Genesis into its final form from oral or earlier written records. In this latter regard some scholars consider that Abraham himself wrote much of Genesis, since we now know that writing was in use for centuries before Abraham. His birth in 2161 BC would then date his writing considerably earlier than Moses, probably done during his time in Canaan. These tablets would then have been preserved and handed down to eventually come into the hands of Moses. In terms of preservation it is worth noting that this is a very small time considering that tablets have been found in the 20th Century which date to around this time. This theory, known as the 'Tablet Theory' is advanced by some Bible scholars to explain the 'toledoth phrases' found in a number of places in Genesis which mark the end of a tablet dealing with a particular subject. This theory dates the original writing somewhat earlier than its final edited form which would be what has been handed down to us.
Some scholars say that the formal beginnings of the Old Testament took place during the seventh-century BCE reign of King Josiah of Judah, when an anonymous source, now known as the Deuteronomist, collected the earlier writings of sources known as the Yahwist and the Elohist and added new material of his own, to begin the development of the Pentateuch. The Priestly source amended the work of the Deuteronomist and added further new material. Then the Redactor created the Pentateuch in much the form we know today. Gradually over the centuries that followed, up until the third century BCE, other books were written and added to the collection of scriptures from which the Council of Jamnia, in about 90 CE, selected those books considered worthy of inclusion in the Hebrew Bible, or Old testament.

Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/When_was_the_Old_Testament_written#ixzz1ccVXUl33

@Vincent,
Great idea.

Vicente says

I'll make this a weekly thing until the Friday when it finally DOES all come to an end.

It would really suck if the world were to end on a thursday and you missed that final meal by one day...

Bap33 says

Catholicism is far far far from following anything God had in mind.

Really, bashing other religions I see.

Bap33 says

All of the fresh water that we now have was still wrapped around Earth in a large ice sheet in the upper atmosphere.

I worship ice, and my God would never let my ice just hang out in the upper atmosphere doing nothing.

Blasphemy!

Not Sure says

The world didn't end on Friday, Oct 21st, but the UNITED STATES definitely croaked in 2008

Is that when you got your first computer?

Bap33 says

Catholicism is far far far from following anything God had in mind.

Again, it's hard to take you seriously if you're going to start with that. It's also impossible to reconcile that statement with your statement that what your religion says is god's law and not man's. Your liberal sect of fundamentalism wouldn't exist without the conservative sect of Catholics.

Bap33 says

And, if you don't mind, tell me what Bible the greeks wrote, please.

You're not reading what I said correctly -- I said the bible was written in Greek. If I were to be more precise (although I was going with the assumption that we were talking about Revelations, since that's the theme of this thread), I would have said the New Testament was written in Greek, since the Old Testament was written in Hebrew and Aramaic:

http://ask.yahoo.com/20030227.html

dude, you are wrong.
God's law is OT and was verbal for centuries until sumerians wrote it down ... the first thing they wrote too ... weird.
Catholic is just a bunch of man rules. It has no special place in God's Church.
I do not see were I mentioned Revelations in any post. God's Law was first, that I did say. Greeks wrote lots of stuff, so what?

What is "my religion" dude?

Bellingham Bill says

elliemae says

his isn't just an explanation of mormonism or scientology - it's also easily applied to christianity and basically all other religions.

even in their own scripture this Jesus guy doesn't say anything about a lot of the stuff present-day Christianists want to legislate.

And much of the stuff he does talk about explicitly, they call Godless socialism.

Go figure.

“Nessuna soluzione . . . nessun problema!„

Bap33 says

I don't want to legislate anything.
Can you give some examples?

still waiting

Just to clarify, I said, "this isn't just an explanation..."

Not "his isn't..."

My point was that I'll follow God's law as soon as he appears in front of me and explains what the law is. My beliefs are very real to me - just as your religious beliefs are real to you, Bap. They're not right or wrong, they're personal beliefs.

I try not to get into religious conversations, because imho religions are often a competition about who is the more reverant. Religions are also a way to feel superior. In order for one to believe that their religion is the "true" one, he must believe that all others aren't "true." Praising God is an asinine way to feel superior to someone.

If there is a God, he's hovering over the "Shit on This Attitude" button on his own patnet.

Bap33 says

still waiting

And I am still waiting for your answer on what of god's laws are impossible for you to follow?

leoj707 says

Bap33 says

I never, ever, ever, suggested that it was possible to follow God's Law, as I firmly believe MAN can't do it.

What of god's law do you find impossible to follow?

Bap33 says

What is "my religion" dude?

Hmmm... I am guessing fundamental christian juggalo.

Bap33 says

What is "my religion" dude?

Some sort of fundamentalist Christian from your posts here. Aka derived from Catholicism.

corntrollio says

Bap33 says

What is "my religion" dude?

Some sort of fundamentalist Christian from your posts here. Aka derived from Catholicism.

are you suggesting that Christianity comes from Catholicism?

leoj707 says

Bap33 says

still waiting

And I am still waiting for your answer on what of god's laws are impossible for you to follow?

leoj707 says

Bap33 says

I never, ever, ever, suggested that it was possible to follow God's Law, as I firmly believe MAN can't do it.

What of god's law do you find impossible to follow?

I'm sorry my answer was mixed in the stuff, but what I suggest is this: All of the laws must be followed, and falling short by even a little itty bitty bit on any one law results in total failure ... If we fall short on one or half or all, the results are the same, total failure. But, I also understand what you are getting at, and I would say I could not follow the law aginst murder, adultry, and keeping the sabbath. As for other folks, it is hard to say. But, nobody has been able to do it, or will. I say that based on the detailed examples given by Jesus, explaining how man can't do it. That is why Jesus had to come, you know the story? Besides, I don't know of anyone able to follow Gods laws.

"To argue with a man who has renounced his reason is like giving medicine to the dead." -- Thomas Paine, The Crisis

elliemae says

Just to clarify, I said, "this isn't just an explanation..."

Not "his isn't..."

My point was that I'll follow God's law as soon as he appears in front of me and explains what the law is. My beliefs are very real to me - just as your religious beliefs are real to you, Bap. They're not right or wrong, they're personal beliefs.

I try not to get into religious conversations, because imho religions are often a competition about who is the more reverant. Religions are also a way to feel superior. In order for one to believe that their religion is the "true" one, he must believe that all others aren't "true." Praising God is an asinine way to feel superior to someone.

If there is a God, he's hovering over the "Shit on This Attitude" button on his own patnet.

Eschew Obfuscation

You are 100% correct on much of this. "Religion" is a man made thing, and that's why it fails. God did not make religion, man did. And that is why there are 800 different slices of the same loaf of bread. It is very silly, really, but in the quest for power/glory/money/whatever some men just started picking apart God's word to create their own niche. Silly men, messed it up.
Your view of wanting to hear and see what God wants from you - right from the horses mouth - is not rare. So far, you have been blessed by being born into freedom, safety, and health. That alone puts your existance into a minority of humanity. You can speak about religion or politics at will -- that is an even smaller minority. And, assuming your on-line persona matches the real world, you are a female with the power and wealth needed to have time and money for entertainment, such as net access and a home computer and the free time to enjoy them both .. an even smaller minority of humanity. It may be that God has blessed you to give you the chance to find him and share him with those less lucky than you. This era, this location, this time in man's existance, these will never be the same again. You have a very unique view, but it was provided for you. You have a very unique position in humanity, but you did not put yourself here. You only control the choices you make.

And hovering over the button .. excellant image. I kinda see a DEL/ALT/ESC pose with Earth on the screen ... lol

Bap33 says

Catholic is just a bunch of man rules. It has no special place in God's Church.

As a Catholic, I find offense in that statement. However, you are entitled to your opinion. The Catholic Church is the first Christian church founded by Jesus through St. Peter. Even though I participate in the Church because I believe that it is good as a whole, they will not sway my mind on certain topics.

We won't really find out until it is your time to die. Until then, believe whatever you want and try to live the best life you can.

leoj707 says

You only have time to grab one. What do you do?

That's an Easy one, I'd get the hell out of there.

Bap33 says

...I would say I could not follow the law aginst murder, adultry, and keeping the sabbath.

Ummm... so... who have you murdered? Have been convicted, or did you "get away with it?"

***on a side note, as forum participants are we legally obligated to report this confession?***

And, please tell me that your penchant for fucking other peoples spouses (adultery) is not related to the murdering.

Bap33 says

I say that based on the detailed examples given by Jesus, explaining how man can't do it.

Interesting I am unaware of these detailed examples can you post a bible reference where Jesus says no may is capable of following god's law?

Bap33 says

All of the laws must be followed, and falling short by even a little itty bitty bit on any one law results in total failure

Right, from what I understand this is totally consistent with the bible.

So, what you are saying is that a person who eats a lobster (Leviticus 11:12) is just as guilty of breaking god's law as the person who rapes and murders children? Both go to hell, right?

Also, what you are saying is that no one is capable of following god's law. So, everyone goes to hell? (except Jesus of course)

I just want to make sure that I am understanding your position.

I have to say that I disagree on the ability of people to follow god's law. I think that if you were to go through the bible and list all of the "laws" you would find that many people --even many non-christians-- follow the laws, and an even greater number could with a few tweaks --i.e. not eating shellfish, wearing cotton wool blends, etc.-- would find their lives in perfect harmony with god's law.

I do understand that some people --like yourself perhaps-- have... certain... compulsions... and they cannot resist. I know that as humans it is often difficult to see the world through the eyes of another, but what you should probably understand is that others do not feel compelled to murder, cheat on their spouses, fuck married people or break any of the other, more damaging to society, laws of god.

leoj707 says

Bap33 says

...I would say I could not follow the law aginst murder, adultry, and keeping the sabbath.

Ummm... so... who have you murdered? Have been convicted, or did you "get away with it?"

Bap33, as your attorney, I advise you not to answer this question or any others.

Your honor, I submit that there is amble evidence on patrick.net to support my client's plea of not guilty by reason of insanity, and I move to dismiss the trial and relocate my client to Arkham Asylum in lieu of police custody.

Dan8267 says

Your honor, I submit that there is amble evidence on patrick.net to support my client's plea of not guilty by reason of insanity, and I move to dismiss the trial and relocate my client to Arkham Asylum in lieu of police custody.

See, my guess on Bap's religion is does not seem so funny now...

leoj707 says

Bap33 says

What is "my religion" dude?

Hmmm... I am guessing fundamental christian juggalo.

I am guessing this will be the first poster on his cell wall:

Also, if I remember correctly there is another clown in Arkham Asylum that will keep him company.