« First « Previous Comments 48 - 87 of 167 Next » Last » Search these comments
I predict we bounce hard off the new bottom, just like the stock market did in March 2009.
The things fuelling equities are not the same that would be fuelling residential real estate.
Here's why I think that we're at bottom.
In the last two bubbles (1970's and 1980's) prices didn't overshoot on the down side. At the end of the 80's bubble (and even in the smaller mid 90's bubble) prices did not revert to the benchmark index value of100. They reverted to an index value of about 110. My hypothesis is that this is due more multi-income homes being commonplace, but I haven't dug up the data to support or refute that.
At the end of the day an index value of just over 110 (say 112 to 113) is about the right place for a bottom. So if the article is correct that prices have returned to 2001 prices in most areas... That's why I'm saying that this is the bottom - certainly time will tell if I am right or wrong.
n the last two bubbles (1970's and 1980's) prices didn't overshoot on the down side.
Those weren't really bubbles. Those were like booms or overheated markets. What we had in '02-'06 was first and foremost a credit bubble.
No realtors here. I am a investor. I am buying as many houses as I can. ; -D
You show me some evidence that Texas or anywhere here in the Inland Empire is on the fritz and I'll grant you that I am wrong. I am not a proud guy in that way. I am reasonable and sensitive. But otherwise these little tit-for-tats are just wasting both our times and energies.
Time will tell who is right.
I knew I'd get flack for this thread, but I stand by my perdiction that when we look back on this mess in another year or two, early 2012 will bee seen as "the bottom".
Time will tell who is right.
I knew I'd get flack for this thread, but I stand by my perdiction that when we look back on this mess in another year or two, early 2012 will bee seen as "the bottom".
It all depends on what the fed does with the money supply and interest rates. If interest rates stay at rock-bottom, and if lots of new money is created and finds its way into real estate, we'll get rising prices again. And if (or when) monetary policy is tightnened, prices will go down. It's all at the mercy of the Fed.
I don't know about you, but I can't predict the Fed's actions. So I'm not going to make bets which are subject to those actions.
I'm going to throw my opinion in the hat and state that no- we haven't hit bottom. At least that's my guess. The only reason I say is due to my own ancedotal observations I'd mentioned on another thread. For all practical purposes where I live is more or less a broad representation of the general Bay Area populace: well-educated, well-paid professionals living in a Bay Area bedroom community in the east bay. Lately I've noticed what seems to be a sudden uptick in short sales and foreclosures. What's more, stuff is just sitting and sitting. We're not talking about a neighborhood full of folks who flip burgers for a living. They're probably about like me and do pretty well financially. Yet I'm starting to see foreclosures and short sales where I haven't seem them before.
So my wild and highly speculative guess is that the bust will finally start affecting the areas that had previously not been affected as much... in other words, the areas most people want to live.
I don't know about you, but I can't predict the Fed's actions. So I'm not going to make bets which are subject to those actions.
They are going to kick the can down the road until it causes so much inflationary pressure it will likely get out of hand fairly quickly. The country would default very quickly if rates were to rise to even a normally low rate of 5%
What are we at now? 0 to 0.25%?
So my wild and highly speculative guess is that the bust will finally start affecting the areas that had previously not been affected as much... in other words, the areas most people want to live.
i've noticed the west side (ie the nice side) of belmont, san carlos, millbrae which are second tier cities start to have reasonably priced non-crappy, non-tear-down homes - as low as $600k which i've never seen before this year.
this coming year should see more inventory priced in this lower range.
$600k seems still rather steep. Then again I'm not familiar with stuff in Millbrae or Belmont. Around here we're seeing stuff sell in the $350-$450k range. Anything higher generally sits. Even the lower priced stuff doesn't sell immediately.
599K for a nice 3/2 in a decent neighborhood and 499K for a crappy house in a really terrible neighborhood.
I think your anecdote shows a lot of truth to where things are - a market trying to find it's equilibrium.
The crappy over-priced specifically smells like desperation, sucker fishing, or folks hoping the fringe effect (people settling for less, and sketchy loan instruments pumping up buying power) isn't really gone.
The real issue is that because the market is so disjointed, everyone here could be right. Some places in the Bay Area are probably at or near bottom. Others still have a way to go.
Here's an excellent comparison of zip codes 94611 and 94621 in Oakland. 94621 is probably, pretty darn safely, bouncing along the bottom.
http://bayarearealestatetrends.com/2012/02/27/location-location-locationand-a-reversion-to-the-mean/
The big gorilla in the room is the 70 million baby boomers that will be dying in the next 30 years.
My crystal ball is very murky, but here's one other possible scenario. Housing starts have been crushed by the downturn. Perhaps they never return to historic levels and demand is met by boomer inventory. Hard to know how the markets will reach their equilibrium as we've got the normal business cycle and boomer dieoff both feeding back into the system.
save your cash (haha yeah right)
buy with all cash in five years.
that's exactly why it won't go there
The big gorilla in the room is the 70 million baby boomers that will be dying in the next 30 years.
Newsflash - People die all day. And baby's are also born daily. Amazing, eh?
Those houses will be passed on to the next generation that will rent them out, fixed income without having a dime invested is nice. I wish I had that coming.
The real issue is that because the market is so disjointed, everyone here could be right. Some places in the Bay Area are probably at or near bottom. Others still have a way to go.
Here's an excellent comparison of zip codes 94611 and 94621 in Oakland. 94621 is probably, pretty darn safely, bouncing along the bottom.
http://bayarearealestatetrends.com/2012/02/27/location-location-locationand-a-reversion-to-the-mean/
East Bay Real Estate Agent and Blogger
Nope, eventually all prices will track down. Only one group will be right. Houses from the sea, in the hills, across the valleys will all be aging and devaluing in this country. "Location, Location, Location" will only be heard from someone that stutters. If a realtor even so much as mumbles the words people will be running them out of town. The "Buy now!", "Interests rates will never be better", "Home prices always go up" rhetoric is old. It worked during the Ponzi scheme growth, but now that everyone is wiser (well almost everyone), realtards better change the vocabulary. Buy for quality, value, because you cannot see yourself living anywhere else. Stop trying to time the market and make a buck. Go to work for money, invest in stocks to grow your savings, live in a friggin house Goddammit. If you want get rich quick, then watch the late night infomercials.
save your cash (haha yeah right)
buy with all cash in five years.
that's exactly why it won't go there
The big gorilla in the room is the 70 million baby boomers that will be dying in the next 30 years.
Newsflash - People die all day. And baby's are also born daily. Amazing, eh?
Those houses will be passed on to the next generation that will rent them out, fixed income without having a dime invested is nice. I wish I had that coming.
SubO, you aren't saying that the baby boomers are being replaced 1-to-1 with the new generation. Wow, that is out there. We are not having another bab boom right now. If anything our baby rate is pathetic. We are going to be screwed by the aging baby boomers, no doubt. They put us in the hole with the debt and they will keep putting us in the hole. As soon as a baby is born he/she goes ~50K in debt. Thanks baby boomers, we love you.
I think we'll have several more years of no movement in real estate industry. I certainly do not see prices go up without people willing to go into debt with as much uncertainty as there exists today, and huge rotting inventory.
At most you'll get a tiny temporary increase during summer for seasonal adjustment. And NAR will use this Bull Trap as an excuse to sucker unsuspecting buyers.
A few rare deals here and there is not a trend, plenty of crazy people out there trying to live off flipping still. Stocks returning 10% last year now that was a trend, which has at least few more years to go.
Nope, eventually all prices will track down. Only one group will be right.
Clearly you were so excited to promote your own point of view that you didn't bother to read the article...
Nope, eventually all prices will track down. Only one group will be right.
Clearly you were so excited to promote your own point of view that you didn't bother to read the article...
East Bay Real Estate Agent and Blogger
I read it, and concluded that one area has more people in denial than the other. The macro economics of the country will affect all areas. The more distress quicker than the more affluent. Eventually, though, even the affluent neighborhoods will adjust to the circumstances. Remember, many people who are buyers of the higher priced homes actually come from the selling group of the lower priced. Not many people just start out buying a million dollar home. You need locked in equity or other forms of luck. We just screwed a whole generation of starter home folks in the 2000's. You don't think that will affect the high end homes? Just because there is a lag, doesn't mean there isn't correlation.
SubO, you aren't saying that the baby boomers are being replaced 1-to-1 with the new generation. Wow, that is out there. We are not having another bay boom right now. If anything our baby rate is pathetic
What does this look like to you?
The most recent US Census demonstrated that population growth is at the lowest level in US history.
what does that tell you?
Housing prices are falling.
Ok. So growth is at the lowest level - that means its still growing! Just slower. What don't you understand about the very straight forward graph that I posted. Do you have data that shows that the population in the US is actually going down?? Please upload. Just because you say it is - doesn't mean it is.
Population growth is at the Lowest Level in US history.
Even if you say it 100 times....population growth is what it is. It describes GROWTH as in MORE PEOPLE.
My graph is very clear and useless to argue.
Period.
Realtors are liars (what does that have to do with anything we are discussing???)
Real estate only goes up. Buy now, or be priced out forever.
No, don't do that. 1975 prices just around the corner...
Population growth ranks as one of the stupidest claims for real estate investment ever!
Did the population grow over the past 4 years? YES! did it keep house prices from collapsing? NO!
Correct.
The population growth discussion started with somebody talking about baby boomers dying, I then posted a response to that...it was not really meant to prove anything that had to do with house prices going up or down.
I was saying that it wouldn't matter if baby boomers died because old ones die and new ones are born. The population curve is going up, even with baby boomers dying so the point of house prices must go down because the baby boomers will die is BS just like saying house prices must go up for the same reason.
But some here are so determined for house prices must go down - realtors are liars that they don't even leave things alone...
Me: I just ate at McDonalds
RaLiars: Don't twist it around. House prices must go down. Realtors are liars.
Lol
What does this look like to you?
Can you show the birth rate numbers that are offsetting the retiring baby boomers. Most of the growth in the US right now is not organic, it is foreigners that are much older than babies, which actually adds to the problem.
The U.S. population growth rate is slowing.
Despite these large increases in the number of persons in the population, the rate of population growth, referred to as the average annual percent change,1 is projected to decrease during the next six decades by about 50 percent, from 1.10 between 1990 and 1995 to 0.54 between 2040 and 2050. The decrease in the rate of growth is predominantly due to the aging of the population and, consequently, a dramatic increase in the number of deaths. From 2030 to 2050, the United States would grow more slowly than ever before in its history.
From this link
http://www.census.gov/population/www/pop-profile/natproj.html
it is foreigners that are much older than
Foreigners with money. I forgot, they don't live anywhere. They just are.
come on dude.
Foriegners??? lmao
Ok then...don't want to hold you back from LOL about yourself. After all, YOU said it...
lol!
I was saying that it wouldn't matter if baby boomers died because old ones die and new ones are born. The population curve is going up, even with baby boomers dying so the point of house prices must go down because the baby boomers will die is BS just like saying house prices must go up for the same reason.
Yes it does matter. Baby boomers are something like 27% of the population. GenX/Geny the next 20 years of births are a much smaller group. Immigration and babies coming of age in the next 20 years is not going to make up the difference in the decrease in the number of people of house owning age with the ability to buy a house. Babies being born today won't be in the market for a house until the vast majority of boomers are dead.
Rentingwithhalfabrain, these kind of quotes make you look like an utter idiot!
There you go again doing personal attacks instead of using any valid arguments. Same story different day. Don't worry about what I am looking like, take more of your energy and worry about yourself.
it is foreigners that are much older than
Foreigners with money. I forgot, they don't live anywhere. They just are.
come on dude.
You guys find it hard to stay on subject. The issue started with someone saying that the birthrate in this country will offset the baby boomers growing old and having to sell their house. How is an influx of foreigners (what is driving the population growth right now) adding that original theory. It doesn't, that was my point. Then you take sentences I say and use them any which way you want. If it is a game of win/lose then you can win. I'll save my victories in life for those that matter, like being financially wise, for providing for my family, for keeping healthy, for adding to society. You can win the tick-for-tact here on the forum that keeps you up at night. Congrats.
More data about baby boomers and their ultimate effect on practically everything from soap to houses. A great real to put you mind pointed in the proper direction is "Freakonomics". It makes you realize that many things you thought were just chance, where not at all. Just people and ideas that happened to be in the right place at the right time. The gen-X and gen-Y are going to go down in history as being in the wrong place at the wrong time unfortunately.
The population curve is going up, even with baby boomers dying
The boomers as a class were far more wealthy than the next crop. Gen X to buy what the boomers leave behind in today's prices are not prepared to handle that. The move up buyers arent doing well.
Now that you've bought, you want prices to rise, yes? well, think about your kids. You want housing to skyrocket so your kids can live nowhere near you? Realize that with massive house price bubble inflation so goes the electric bill and tuition. You really want that?
Stable prices would be great, but instead we have FHA-backed speculation. Again. It will be different this time - how?
I've already made back 15% of the outlay in one years rent.
No, some poor destitute hard working wage slave paid for you to sit around and collect his money while not doing anything productive. Its called rentier income. Its called unearned for a reason.
The obsession with renting to hardworking people after hoarding land is strange to me. They should savagely rental incomes and properties to cut this madness out. Instead, the system of banksters and the rentier class conspire to reinflate the crushing housing bubble.
Those houses will be passed on to the next generation that will rent them out, fixed income without having a dime invested is nice. I wish I had that coming.
Keep doing this long enough, and violence becomes logical. Having a rentier class sucking up the wealth of nations with unearned income leaves most people poor, hungry, angry and without security.
« First « Previous Comments 48 - 87 of 167 Next » Last » Search these comments
http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/22/real_estate/home_sales/index.htm
Now in some areas prices might still have 5% to 10% to go, but on the average, we're probably more or less at the bottom. Prices may move slightly (+/- 1.5%) up or down month to month from here on out, but from my take on the available data, the days of large year over year price drops are over.
Just my two cents.