patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,365,035 comments by 15,735 users - Al_Sharpton_for_President, Misc, TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter online now
« First « Previous Comments 21 - 23 of 23 Search these comments
uomo_senza_nome
@
2011 Nov 21, 5:02am
some are pure fantasies. He agrees with this, but feels obliged to go on with them as a faithful follower of the Evolution religion.
Examples please, rather than just an accusation.
How did you get to this?
If you just say "pure medieval thinking" but don't back it with facts, you're bound to be asked questions.
was way more complicated than what Darwinian Evolution can explain, without artificial, unwaranted, and improbable assumptions.
sure, but Darwinian evolution theory itself has evolved as well, in that there are more finer explanations to the variety of life.
That doesn't make the theory false, it only makes it more refined. Will you say Newton's laws of gravity are false because Einstein proposed relativity?
His problem is he's the "Leave it up to the states to decide (LIUTTSTD)"man. Should institutional racism be permitted? "LIUTTSTD". Should women be aloud to vote? "LIUTTSTD".
There is the small issue of LIUTTSTD is the way the United STATES of America is supposed to be run. The fact the federal government has usurped powers many orders of magnitude beyond what is constitutional doesn't mean that is the way it should be.
It's a little scarey that people have reached the point where they simply think the federal government is the first and preeminent law making body with the states secondary. It's just not the way it was supposed to be.
MisdemeanorRebel
@
2011 Nov 21, 6:39am
Genetics and the Theory of evolution are two different things.
Genetics is the mechanism of Evolution!
I read once such a passage in a psycology paper: "features passed from parents to children by Evolution."
Blue eyes, ass size, range of hearing, all of these are passed through Genetics. Genetic changes in a population over long periods of time is Evolution.
The difference between a child's inherited traits from parents and the evolutionary branching from an ape-like creature to modern man is only the difference between walking to the mailbox, and walking across the country - the length of time required.
« First « Previous Comments 21 - 23 of 23 Search these comments
Ron Paul allows his personal religion to cloud his judgment, which leads him to actually go against certain individual rights. The man claims that the Constitution was not only guided by religion, but makes specific references to God Himself. For a man who is so adamant in his support of the Constitution, he may be disappointed to know that the words ‘God’ and ‘Creator’ are not mentioned once in the text. Resulting from this is a policy that has religion at its base. Ron Paul, the man who supports the liberties of humanity, is anti-choice. He’d prefer the positive term, pro-life, but as the debate remains unresolved, choice, based on individual values and beliefs, is the best option in the abortion debate.
Yes, Paul is for legalizing pot and cutting the military budget, but he is not the supporter of individual rights that he claims he is; he is a religious fundamentalist who would allow Christianity to infuse with the government, and he lacks compassion for those who are not American citizens.
http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-detroit/the-problem-with-ron-paul