patrick.net

bgamall4 says

tatupu70 says

Actually, you couldn't be more wrong. We know it wasn't a controlled demolition. Since it couldn't have been a simple office fire, all that's left is aliens.

You need meds you fool.

Sounds like I hit a nerve. Seriously how much did it take for you to abandon your race?

bgamall4 says

As I argued on another thread with Bigsby before he went away with his tail between his legs

Hardly. I just got sick and tired of dealing with your utter idiocy.

bgamall4 says

all the supports collapsed at once.

No, they didn't.

bgamall4 says

All supports fell at the same time, as the floors stayed equidistant from each other on the way down. Therefore it could not be pancaking, and fire didn't touch every support. Therefore, it had to be explosives.

And the owner admitted as much.

Yet more conspiracy gibberish and misrepresentation. What a surprise.

bgamall4 says

Therefore, it had to be explosives.

Silent explosives at that! And you forgot to mention that you believe they brought down the penthouse and the other roof structures in separate controlled demolitions.

bgamall4 says

And besides, the owner said they decided to Pull It, in his worlds. So if they decided to pull it they had to put the explosives in before that day.

Perhaps you'd like to remind casual readers who he was speaking to when he said that.

bgamall4 says

Abandoning race by abandoning militant Zionism

You know bloody well what I'm talking about. Abandoning the human race in favor of your new alien masters.

bgamall4 says

But you are arguing that that penthouse had a pancake effect. And I have told you that is impossible based on the rate of collapse and based upon the fact that the floors stayed equally distant from each other.

You've told people many things. The problem is that it's all conspiracy nonsense, just like the above post. Part of the lower internal structure of the building collapsed, resulting in the collapse of the penthouse into the INTERNALS of the building. There was a progressive collapse of INTERNAL structures that rippled through the building as evidenced by video of the roof structures across the building dropping and the building bowing. Finally, the entire building collapsed. And guess what, there weren't any sounds of a controlled demolition (let alone the 2 or 3 separate ones you've been claiming) when all this happened.

The Professor says

It seems to me that NIST ignored evidence. They conclude that there could not have been any explosives because they did not hear any. This contradicts earwitness and video evidence.

They then go on to say it could not have been explosives because "most, if not all, interior columns" must be destroyed, which directly contradicts their own story of how heat "caused thermal expansion of the steel beams" followed by a "series of structural failures" resulting in "all of the columns fail[ing] in the core of the building".

In other words, "A fire brought the whole thing down but it would have taken massive amounts of explosives to do the same thing".

Are you mocking your own argument now?

bgamall4 says

tatupu70 says

You know bloody well what I'm talking about. Abandoning the human race in favor of your new alien masters.

I wish you would not waste space in this thread to talk about aliens.

I wish you'd understand what he is doing.

bgamall4 says

Bigsby says

No, they didn't.

You are lying.

How am I lying? Video evidence clearly shows the roof structures collapsing in a progressive fashion as a result of structures much lower giving way. That right there disproves your assertion that ALL supporting structures gave way at the same time.

bgamall4 says

Bigsby says

Video evidence clearly shows the roof structures collapsing in a progressive fashion as a result of structures much lower giving way.

Wrong. If that were the case you would have had to have pancaking, which clearly did not occur. If you just undermine the lower floors, the building would topple over.

Duh. 'If you undermine the lower floors.' What is that supposed to even mean?

For the amusement of everyone on here (apart from your fellow conspiracy nuts), please explain the videos that show the penthouse and then the rest of the roof structures dropping into the internal structure of the building, and then the entire building bowing just before the collapse.

bgamall4 says

Bigsby says

You've told people many things. The problem is that it's all conspiracy nonsense, just like the above post. Part of the lower internal structure of the building collapsed, resulting in the collapse of the penthouse into the INTERNALS of the building.

Listen to yourself. That is total BS. I can't imagine that you can believe that crap. All the building had to let loose at once for the floors to maintain the distance they kept as they fell. None of your bullcrap explains that.

Eh? Of course it can explain how it happened. The official reports give a clear explanation of how they believe it happened. Your explanation is that separate silent demolitions did it. Hmm...

bgamall4 says

Bigsby says

I wish you'd understand what he is doing.

I don't give a shit what he is doing.

Then stop complaining about it you plum.

bgamall4 says

Bigsby says

as a result of structures much lower giving way.

You just said this Bigsby. Now you are arguing with me that the floors at the bottom weren't undermined? You just said they gave way. Were they undermined you stupid idiot?

Eh? Why the choice of that word was obviously my point. It was weakened by uncontrolled fires. Is that what you meant by 'undermined?'

And perhaps you'd like to respond to my other point in that post.

You still haven't responded to my question about who the owner of WTC7 was talking to when he said the words 'pull it.'

bgamall4 says

Bigsby says

It was weakened by uncontrolled fires. Is that what you meant by 'undermined.'

I am saying undermined. You say by fire, and I say by detonation. Regardless, that would not permit the building to fall into it's own footprint. What permits a building to fall into its own footprint is the release of support throughout the building. The entire building had to release, not just the bottom supports.

And there you have my exact point.

And videos clearly show progressive internal collapse across much of the building before the whole building came down, so...

bgamall4 says

bgamall4 says

So that means more than just the bottom floors were released from support. And of course, fire was not everywhere, so that could not have happened without detonation

And I am allowing that fire could have released any of the supports, which in reality is impossible in a reinforced building like this. But since fire was not everywhere, all the supports could not have been released unless by detonation.

Perhaps before you post, you'd actually like to read the official report because judging by what you are saying in these posts, you haven't.

bgamall4 says

Bigsby says

Perhaps before you post, you'd actually like to read the official report because judging by what you are saying in these posts, you haven't.

I don't have to. I know a fraud when I see him. And you are him.

Ah right, you are arguing against something you haven't even read. Why am I not surprised?

bgamall4 says

Bigsby says

Ah right, you are arguing against something you haven't even read. Why am I not surprised?

No, I am arguing the truth. You are arguing against it with arguments that don't hold water. I listen to your lies in debate, but I won't listen to the NIST lies while they hide behind a ream of paper.

Ha, ha. You have been arguing against something you haven't even read. You frequently ridicule the findings in the report. And now we discover you haven't even read the report. How stupid do you think that makes you look?

bgamall4 says

Bigsby says

Ha, ha. You have been arguing against something you haven't even read.

No, idiot. I have been arguing my position. It is unassailable. You have to argue against the truth. If you don't want to I will declare victory now. You cannot defeat my argument so you plea to me to read the NIST.

You are a fraud, Bigsby.

You argue against something that you haven't even read. You criticize the findings of something that you have no knowledge about. And now you claim your argument is 'unassailable' and that you will 'declare victory now.' What a bloody joke you are. You are the fraud and a very stupid one at that.

bgamall4 says

tatupu70 says

You know bloody well what I'm talking about. Abandoning the human race in favor of your new alien masters.

I wish you would not waste space in this thread to talk about aliens.

Aliens are certainly as valid an explanation as silent demolition by government agents who spent months bringing in tons of explosives in backpacks then spent hundreds of hours doing major demolition and rebuilding to place the explosives and detonator wiring while not being seen by anyone who then hired al queda to ram planes that weren't really planes full of people who weren't really people into the wtc to make people think they were brought down by a raging fire instead of demolition from the magic silent explosives that some how manged to work perfectly in the middle of raging fire from the planes as a false flag for something that I can't remember. Makes perfect sense when you write it all down.

Besides which you posted the article for me documenting all the alien activity that has been going on. I didn't know about half that stuff. Aliens rule! Why do you deny your heritage? Why do you deny the truth?

Bigsby says

ow stupid do you think that makes you look?

I would say no more so than the baseline.

bgamall4 says

Marvin Bush, the president's youngest brother, was in charge of security at the towers. You need to check yourself into a clinic.

No marvin bush was a director on the board of a subcontractor and left the board before 9/11. You need to check your facts. It hasn't happened yet, but hope springs eternal. I'll be behind you in line checking into the clinic.

"Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life" Animal House.

bgamall4 says

Bigsby says

You criticize the findings of something that you have no knowledge about.

I understand how buildings fall you fricken idiot. WTC7 was detonated. Period.

You do? Do buildings only 'fall' as a result of detonation?

Just a suggestion, but perhaps you should actually read the report that you so frequently attack before you do the attacking.

bgamall4 says

Marvin Bush, the president's youngest brother, was in charge of security at the towers. You need to check yourself into a clinic.

Are you implying that Marvin Bush is an alien as well??

bgamall4 says

No marvin bush was a director on the board of a subcontractor and left the board before 9/11. You need to check your facts.

His replacement's was John Oneill

Sorry, but bush was a company director (I'm also sorry you are not smart enough to know what that means) and O'neil was head of security for completely different companies;. But don't let actual facts interfere with you thinking. So far it hasn't happened, so let's keep it a perfect track record.

Little know fact was that O'neil was an alien sacrificial lamb. He was about to reveal all he know about the alien plot, but his neferious plan was foiled by the head of alien security vaporizing his briefcase full of classified documents including all the details of the judeo-alien plans to cd the wtc after hiring al queda to fly planes into the wtc so that people would believe that based on terrorists flying into the wtc that the building collapse was actually a government plot to cd the buildings because even though it appeared that the planes caused the collapse people would of course believe that it was a false flag because of the magic silent demolition was actually a cover up for the alien death ray mounted on the holographic planes. This lost briefcase led to his being under suspicien at the FBI forcing him to take the alien arranged (silverstein being part of the judeo-alien conspiricy of course) job at the wtc so that he would die his first day on the job. The aliens even arranged to have his body lie in a stairwell for 12 days with no deterioration at all so he could be positively identified so that everyone would know to never cross the head of alien security in the future.

It's all perfectly clear. Why do you deny truth?

The Professor says

For some people believing in aliens is easier than believing that our government could be complicit in murder.

These are not mutually exclusive concepts. Why would you think so?

The Professor says

In 2012 I learned about WTC7. The OT's have made the evidence easy to understand. The Professors' mission is to help spread the truth.

OK then Professor, spread away. Please detail exactly what happened.

(I don't want to know what DIDN'T happen. Very clearly and precisely detail how the towers were demolished. What role did the planes play? Was al-Quaeda involved? Did our government play a role? etc. Please lay out the whole kit and kaboodle)

And NO VIDEOS. Do it in your own words. You want to spread the truth--please do so.

bgamall4 says

Bigsby says

Do buildings only 'fall' as a result of detonation?

They only fall into their own footprint into a small pile of rubble as a result of detonation. I am not attacking the NIST report. I ignore the NIST report because it has nothing to say about the demolition because it is a lie. I don't care about their report. It is not accurate and is to be dismissed, just like the JFK report that ignores LBJ's involvement and prediction of the assassination.

And, btw, Cheney was friends with Operation Northwood's general. They worked together. You know about Northwoods right Mr Cockroach?

Before dismissing something, it would be a good idea to know what the report actually said.

Bigsby says

Before dismissing something, it would be a good idea to know what the report actually said.

You are such an old school stick in the mud. This is the internet age, only video's matter.

However to his credit bigmouth did post an excellent article detailing in great depth the true extent of the alien invasion into the us society.

The Professor says

Why hire a controlled demolition company to clean up an office fire?

The obvious reason, because aliens were in control of rudy juliani so they delibratly choose a company called control demolitions inc so that everyone would think it wasn't a controlled demolition because no one that was trying to hide a controlled demolition would hire a company by that name. Big time false flag.

Or the totally not obvious reason, because controlled demolitions inc is one of the few companies with the equipment and experience to clean up the rubble from buildings this big. No, say it ain't so joe.

bob2356 says

The obvious reason, because aliens were in control of rudy juliani so they
delibratly choose a company called control demolitions inc so that everyone
would think it wasn't a controlled demolition because no one that was trying to
hide a controlled demolition would hire a company by that name. Big time false
flag.

Come on bgamall. Don't tell me you've never heard of Operation Northwoods?? You can't be that big of an idiot.

The Professor says

...that have been destroyed by controlled demolition

Great point. The rubble from controlled demolotion cleans up much differently than the rubble from a fire weakened demolition.

That's just more proof that it was aliens--they probably don't know the finer points of rubble clean-up like humans do.

tatupu70 says

Great point. The rubble from controlled demolotion cleans up much differently
than the rubble from a fire weakened demolition.

That's just more proof that it was aliens--they probably don't know the finer
points of rubble clean-up like humans do.

You people with your theories of Aliens & neocons are so delusional. Take a look at this video and its IRREFUTABLE PROOF that the towers were brought down by the Devil

http://www.youtube.com/embed/16bPTlsf1Fc

The National Institute of Spirits & the Paranormal (NISP)report clearly states that a number of Glenn Danzig Albums were found among the debris, especially, his second album: Lucifuge.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/KL7Jk8IMVXA&list=PLD533016FCE48B59F

The NISP report fails to mention that Lucifuge is the name of the Dark Lord's chief minion, so clearly he was conjured to the site, probably by Yitzak Rabin and the coach of the New Jersey Nets... Why wouldn't the NISP report mention this?

Also, why didn't the NISP report test for Judas Priest first album which we all know has demonic conjuring powers? Oh sure, they said testing could give a false positive because it was such a crappy record that unsold copies were used as landfill during site construction, but still, why not test for it anyway?

bgamall4 says

Bigsby says

Before dismissing something, it would be a good idea to know what the report actually said.

No, that is where you screwed up Bigsby.

So you consider that actually knowing about what it is you are critiquing to be 'screwing up.' I see.

Sullenberger crashed the planes into the towers on a hudson river practice run...

No you screwed up bga....
the reason the coaster crashed at 6 flags was because 5 of em were false!

bgamall4 says

No, that is where you screwed up Bigsby.

bgamall4 says

So, what do you gain from making an ass out of yourself?

More likes than you do.

There have been exactly the same number of aliens positively identified as being involved in bringing down the wtc as government employees. Zero. So why are my theories any less valid than yours?

CDon says

Also, why didn't the NISP report test for Judas Priest first album which we all know has demonic conjuring powers? Oh sure, they said testing could give a false positive because it was such a crappy record that unsold copies were used as landfill during site construction, but still, why not test for it anyway

Excellent point. They also failed to test for paranormal activity. Why wasn't ghostbusters involved? Seems like this a much, much deeper cover up than we all first imagined. Aliens, ghosts, lucifer, and dick cheney. This is serious. Very serious.

Let me guess... that's the same video you posted before with no sound of a huge explosion on it.

Bigsby says

bgamall4 says

Bigsby says

Ha, ha. You have been arguing against something you haven't even read.

No, idiot. I have been arguing my position. It is unassailable. You have to argue against the truth. If you don't want to I will declare victory now. You cannot defeat my argument so you plea to me to read the NIST.

You are a fraud, Bigsby.

You argue against something that you haven't even read. You criticize the findings of something that you have no knowledge about. And now you claim your argument is 'unassailable' and that you will 'declare victory now.' What a bloody joke you are. You are the fraud and a very stupid one at that.

This is why I have bgamall on my ignore list. You can't have a civil discussion w/ this guy. Trust me, he's a complete waste of everyone's time, including yours..

The Professor says

You want the whole story? There it is. The story that was fed to us from day one. Could it be the truth? The evidence says no.

OK--let me try again. I don't want to know what you think isn't supported by the evidence. I want to know what you think IS supported by the evidence--ie, what really happened.

Not a video showing what somebody else thinks--what do YOU think happened on 9/11