« First « Previous Comments 42 - 81 of 170 Next » Last » Search these comments
The architect was OK with that? Doubtful at best, because it throws his design out of whack and affects the HVAC systems too.
I can assure you..... he wasn't. And Buster is floating a line of shit here.
Nope. The house ended up with 60 windows, most of them quite large. Of course I had to pay for them with an upcharge/change order. It took some design modifications yes. HVAC was not a problem as I had already upgraded to the maximum all wall, ceiling, floor insulation and it was a three zone system. Oh, and why are you convinced that I am floating a line of shit here? Anything can be changed & built. You need to get out of your dirt cave more often.
According to this 2x4s on exterior walls are not a violation of code:
Not on 16" centers.
Fine
Nope. The house ended up with 60 windows, most of them quite large.
You're trying to get everybody that reads this, to believe that you increased the total number of windows by 20, and that it had 60 total, and that you did not changed the dimensions or proportions of the floor plan.
I'll say it again...........BULLSHIT. LICENSED architects have design parameters that they must, and do follow regardless of whatever ficticious HVAC modifications that you made, simply because it causes over-cycling of those units. That doesn't even take into consideration the comfort level, and overheating/cooling issues.
I don't know if you're really that stupid, or that you think that everybody else is, as you.
Anything can be changed & built.
Of course it can. We bid on and win challenging projects all the time. We just have to find someone stupid enough to pay for all the bad ideas.
In your case, that stupid person was you.
Darrell is renowned for his excellent soft skills.
Nope. The house ended up with 60 windows, most of them quite large.
You're trying to get everybody that reads this, to believe that you increased the total number of windows by 20, and that it had 60 total, and that you did not changed the dimensions or proportions of the floor plan.
I'll say it again...........BULLSHIT. LICENSED architects have design parameters that they must, and do follow regardless of whatever ficticious HVAC modifications that you made, simply because it causes over-cycling of those units. That doesn't even take into consideration the comfort level, and overheating/cooling issues.
I don't know if you're really that stupid, or that you think that everybody else is, as you.
I dunno, it sounds plausible based on what I've seen in modern designs.
That he didn't have to upgrade HVAC is a bit odd, but maybe he was buying triple glazed things that were as well insulated as walls or something.
I imagine this also depends greatly on climate. In central or northern CA where nobody insulates anything anyway because it's between 50 and 80 year round, it probably doesn't matter. In minnesota I'm sure it affects things greatly.
Darrell is renowned for his excellent soft skills.
Look bud..... I'm not here to be your friend. If you want friends, head on over to facebook.
Sooo I guess I won't be getting a Patnet friend request from you then...
Nonsense,
Wrong again. 2x4 are prohibited for multistory structures.
And PS...... slapping together houses is barely considered "construction". Get out sometime and take a look around you.
NJ ICC code says you can use 2x4 at 24" for 1 story and 16" for 2 stories with 10' or under walls in table R602.3(5) You must use 2x6 on 3 story houses. Where is your AZ ICC code link that disagrees with this or a revision to NJ code I don't know about?
www2.iccsafe.org/states/newjersey/NJ.../NJ_Res_Chapter6.pdf
and PS. I have no idea what the fuck you are talking about get out and take a look at what?
Adding 20 windows in a large modern style home is quite a bit, but not unreasonable. I imagine it added a good $25-50k to the price tag though. Our builder suggested budgeting $1200-1500 per window since we want high grade aluminum instead of vinyl .
Any particular reason for going with aluminum?
Nonsense,
Wrong again. 2x4 are prohibited for multistory structures.
And PS...... slapping together houses is barely considered "construction". Get out sometime and take a look around you.
@ Kevin: ARE you considering a multi-story house? If not this tangent is meaningless.
"6months overschedule"??? Based on what contract duration? As a result of "50% cost 'overruns'"????? Were additional contract days granted as a result of these "overruns" i.e, change orders?
If not, why didn't the owner invoke liquidated damages? I think someone is talking out their ass here and it's not me.
Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just relaying what I have been told. For the record I trust my father's word over yours. He says "more than 6 months behind schedule" and I think 50% is in the ballpark for the cost overrun. Maybe he fucked up, but that's what happened.
Adding 20 windows in a large modern style home is quite a bit, but not unreasonable. I imagine it added a good $25-50k to the price tag though. Our builder suggested budgeting $1200-1500 per window since we want high grade aluminum instead of vinyl .
Any particular reason for going with aluminum?
Like I said, we're going with a modern design. Fiberglass looks like plastic. Clear anodized aluminum is beautiful.
The downside is meeting the energy codes. Milgard is the only vendor I know of that qualifies.
Nonsense,
Wrong again. 2x4 are prohibited for multistory structures.
And PS...... slapping together houses is barely considered "construction". Get out sometime and take a look around you.
@ Kevin: ARE you considering a multi-story house? If not this tangent is meaningless.
It may be meaningless, but I would never consider building a house with 2x4s regardless of size. The cost difference is inconsequential (it might actually be cheaper in a single story, since you could go 24" OC instead of 16"). In cold weather the 2x6 will pay for themselves in two winters.
Our actual building plans are for a two-story home with a walkout basement (so essentially three stories on one end).
Don't shoot the messenger, I'm just relaying what I have been told. For the record I trust my father's word over yours. He says "more than 6 months behind schedule" and I think 50% is in the ballpark for the cost overrun. Maybe he fucked up, but that's what happened.
I don't know that he fucked up, but it sounds like he was dealing with a contractor that either:
a.) Ripped him off big time
or
b.) Low balled the estimate to get the contract.
b is *extremely* common amongst shady contractors. If you get quoted anything less than $150/sf average, double and triple check references.
Another common thing is providing an estimate for construction costs only, and not being upfront about the GC's fee, site prep, utilities, etc.
swebb says
The architect fees made up a significant portion of the overall cost.
Nonsense. 10% at the very max. and that is high
If you notice in my original message I estimated (with a ? mark, If I recall) 10%. As built, all in it was about 6.5% of the total. As planned without the land, it was closer to 12%.
In any event I consider that a significant cost, especially if it can be essentially eliminated by going with a stock floorplan.
Site specific problems can be a major pain.
Then don't build on it. Get another lot. Lots are cheap.
They bought the last riverfront lot available in the area they wanted to build. The lot was not cheap and buying another wasn't an option.
Custom houses mean custom problems.
Complete BULLSHIT.
Folks, when you hear "custom" as it relates to housing, know that you're getting bamboozled. It's just another way to inflate the price per square foot. There is no "custom" anything. Everyone builds to IBC. EVERYONE.
I did give an example of an unanticipated issue that was due to the custom design. If it had been a spec plan the porch-over-living-space problem would have been dealt with and "baked in" to the price. As it happened for them, they had to "solve" the problem when it came time to build. Maybe the architect fucked up. Maybe the builder took advantage of the situation. I don't know. All I know is that they had to spend a significant chunk of unplanned $, and I think it's fairly easy to attribute it to the custom nature of the house. Staircase, being custom, was also quite a bit more expensive than what you would get from a typical build. The south facing sunroom also added cost. I stand by my statement.
lololol. 6" walls is CODE.
Not in Kentucky. To humor you, I called my brother and asked him. He's in new construction on a daily basis. What he said to me was that "every once in a while you will see 2x6 construction"...the rule is 2x4.
you get quoted anything less than $150/sf average, double and triple check references.
Don't be silly. We bid, win and build wood framed structures for a very small fraction of that amount.
In phoenix, where nobody wants to live and you don't have any weather.
are river front lots everywhere. There is always a substitute.
Oh, my bad.
And I stand by my experience that "custom" is simply another means to upcharge in the contract or add as a change order. Both are massively inflated. I know because I prepare CO's daily.
When I say custom, I guess I mean not only that you get to specify the floorplan and such, but that you will be doing things that are non-standard, more costly, etc. If you build dozens of the same home, you have economies of scale working for you, you learn any tricks or difficulties with the build, and you amortize those costs over many houses. When you do a one-off house, you don't have that advantage. On top of that you are probably building something that is more expensive anyway (100 windows, for example). I think the phrase "custom house" has meaning beyond just a way to charge more for the same thing. Take, for example, the cost of the architect. That is a cost that a custom home has that your step-and-repeat homes don't.
And we're in the heavy construction biz. And let me assure you, if you bought a new house with 4" walls, you got ripped.
Maybe so, but that's what you buy in Kentucky. My original point wasn't whether or not the additional cost of a 2x6 was worth it...I was just trying to help the original poster with his question. In my experience deviating from the local norm can be costly beyond the difference between a 2x4 and a 2x6. Maybe the whole 2x6 thing is complete BS and was used as an excuse to charge even more...but the fact is that they deviated from the norm, and it cost them.
Usually when someone says "custom house", they really just mean "you get to pick from one of three floor plans and one of five counter tops".
Unless an architect draws up a unique plan tailored for your lot, nothing is custom.
You're trying to get everybody that reads this, to believe that you increased the total number of windows by 20, and that it had 60 total, and that you did not changed the dimensions or proportions of the floor plan.
Since the architect cashed my checks, perhaps you may want to ask him if I am full of bullshit.
swebb says
Maybe so, but that's what you buy in Kentucky. My original point wasn't whether or not the additional cost of a 2x6 was worth it...I was just trying to help the original poster with his question. In my experience deviating from the local norm can be costly beyond the difference between a 2x4 and a 2x6. Maybe the whole 2x6 thing is complete BS and was used as an excuse to charge even more...but the fact is that they deviated from the norm, and it cost them.
No. It's what you choose to buy. People don't know any better and they hand over all power to guys like me, lying realtors, mortgage pimps and "inspectors". 2x6 perimeters might add 0.5% to my framing number. The labor is the SAME.
@ Darrell
Clearly as a builder you have a lot of information that is useful to Kevin. So can you please tell us how would you as a builder advise Kevin to handle things to minimize costs yet achieve most of his goals?
If custom plans are too expensive where can Kevin find thousands of standardized floor plans to choose his dream house from?
If he needs to modify the plans to suit his goals would a draftsman be a good way to go to save money or should he go to an architect? What kind of modifications to the plans might he be able to do himself?
If he wants to use a CAD model what software package would you recommend?
How should he go about finding the best GC for the job? What questions should he be asking of the GC and references?
What does he need to know going into the negotiations?
How can he minimize change orders?
What materials from what suppliers should he specify for the build? For example who makes the best aluminum windows? Which manufacturers suck or are likely to go bankrupt and nullify any warranty?
What are the common tricks a GCs may try use to try to wring more dough out of Kevin and how can Kevin combat them?
What tools should Kevin bring to the build to check the quality of work with? What should he look for?
What should Kevin buy out of pocket and what can he trust the GC to source? For example should he buy a wall oven himself? How about the water heater?
As a builder what do customers demand that you feel is a waste of money and what do they NOT ask for that in your opinion they should?
Since the architect cashed my checks, perhaps you may want to ask him if I am full of bullshit.
lmao.... It's a development. You didn't pay anyone except a contractor.
Wrong again, probably like you were ignoring Nate Silver's prediction of the GOP implosion this month I bet. But of course you already phoned the architect to verify your ignorant assertion? No, guess you didn't.
@ Kevin
How about a fireplace? Are you thinking gas, wood, pellet or electric?
That's it. You get to pick your IFS. And overpay for them by massive amounts.
So is that what all the confusion is about? You are talking about picking a floor plan and finishes and call it custom when we are talking about a house designed as a one-off by an architect?
New Renter says
If custom plans are too expensive where can Kevin find thousands of standardized floor plans to choose his dream house from?
There's this thing called google. "Dream"? Are you a realtor?
Sure there's Google. There is also you, a builder who I had hoped should know a better answer to this simple question that "Google it"
An no, I am not a realtor. If I were don't you think I'd be trying to convince Kevin to buy an overpriced existing house rather than build one new? I can't get a commission on that!
lmao
Is "Kevin" an alias? Possibly. Do I have anything else to call the OP? No. So "Kevin" it is.
@ Kevin
How about a fireplace? Are you thinking gas, wood, pellet or electric?
Gas, if any. Not one of those bullshit fake log things. I view a fireplace as purely decorative though.
lmao
Is "Kevin" an alias? Possibly. Do I have anything else to call the OP? No. So "Kevin" it is.
That would be the dumbest alias ever. Kevin is what it says on my driver's license.
lmao
Is "Kevin" an alias? Possibly. Do I have anything else to call the OP? No. So "Kevin" it is.
That would be the dumbest alias ever. Kevin is what it says on my driver's license.
That it would. Makes one wonder what name is on "Darrell's" licence.
@ Kevin
How about a fireplace? Are you thinking gas, wood, pellet or electric?
Gas, if any. Not one of those bullshit fake log things. I view a fireplace as purely decorative though.
That does leave you with more options. Personally I liked the idea of the fireplace as a back up heater as it remains operable during power blackouts.
The truth is resale housing prices are nearly double retail construction costs. New construction is far far less costly than resale housing.
I wish that were true in my state.
Builders around here are sitting on thier lots. No one wants to build a spec just to be undercut by resale and languishing new construction. Contracts come first before they will even build one of their standard models, and the price is significantly higher than similar existing resales homes. I presume labor, material, and lot costs must decrease for the builder to profitably compete (which does not help the bulders who already bought expensive lots).
Optional – hardwire in Cat6 or better in all rooms. This might not be as necessary as wireless improves
Definately hardwire in new constrution, preferably Cat7. Wireless may improve, but as soon as you get 1gig wireless you may need 10gig wired for 4k TV or some other high bandwidth device that may come along.
Contracts come first before they will even build one of their standard models, and the price is significantly higher than similar existing resales homes.
Contracts coming first has been the long term norm, but not really during the early 2000s.
You think that an old/older house should be priced the same as a new one? New technology, amenities, etc., and today's labor rates, versus paying for outdated everything(that hasn't been brought up to date) and part of that labor, that was incurred at lower(past) rates but paying today's rates for it?
No, but if I were to buy a new house, I would want it custom built so that I could have real plywood instead of tha engineered wood crap, real wood in place of particleboard, 2x6 or 2x8's on the exterior walls for extra insulation, and way less windows than all new houses have (since windows are energy inefficient and reduce your privacy).
Again..... why make a distinction when there is no difference?
I think it's clear there is a difference, and I think you are being disingenuous, which is nothing new. It's a shame that you seem to have knowledge and experience that you could share but instead you insist on ridiculing people, being deceptive and evasive, and generally act like a troll.
I think it's a good time to put you back on ignore.
Contracts coming first has been the long term norm, but not really during the early 2000s.
Not too long ago, builders used to make "model homes" along with specs homes to sell right away. Now the model homes are up for sale long before the subdivision lots are sold and very few specs are going up. Even some "Parade of Homes" and "Homerama" showcase homes are languishing for years unsold.
You think that an old/older house should be priced the same as a new one?
I was refering to builders competing with houses that are only 5-10 years old.
Not too long ago, builders used to make "model homes" along with specs homes to sell right away. Now the model homes are up for sale long before the subdivision lots are sold and very few specs are going up. Even some "Parade of Homes" and "Homerama" showcase homes are languishing for years unsold.
It costs a lot of money to maintain those model homes, and the developer/builder pays for that by passing on the cost to each and every one of their buyers. Yes, eventually those houses are sold too, but in all reality, isn't a model home a very inefficient waste of available resouces? Usually the parade of homes-houses are pre-sold, again as was the norm.
You think that an old/older house should be priced the same as a new one?
I was refering to builders competing with houses that are only 5-10 years old.
A house 5-10 y/o, is still technically out of date compared to a new house, is it not?
No, but if I were to buy a new house, I would want it custom built so that I could have real plywood instead of tha engineered wood crap, real wood in place of particleboard, 2x6 or 2x8's on the exterior walls for extra insulation, and way less windows than all new houses have (since windows are energy inefficient and reduce your privacy).
Custom built does not guarentee that plywood is spec'd versus OSB, unless it is specifically spec'd. Particle board isn't used at all in any structural way in ANY house, but Masonite type stuff is for finishes. And, 2x6 or 2x8 walls isn't really even nescessary in most of the US. What determines the structural design is heating and cooling degree days(climate), and of course location.
Are you aware of some type of engineering study and testing that says OSB is an inferior product? Hint: the glue is the exact same in plywood(framing/structural) as OSB.
You want to make a distinction where there is none. If you believe there is one, DEFINE the word "custom" as it relates to building out a project.
LOL, some people just want to believe that "custom built" somehow = a gold plated shitter. It's a marketing gimmick, and it's usually aimed at potential top-end customers that can afford to "design" each and every room. And pay for it they do.
You want to make a distinction where there is none. If you believe there is one, DEFINE the word "custom" as it relates to building out a project.
Go on. Do it.
How about a project that has features, construction techniques, materials or design elements that are not commonly found in spec homes.
I want my home to be able to float in case of a flood. I want to incorporate the tree that is on the lot into the inside of the home. I want to use dovetail joints instead of nails. I want an interconnected whole-house aquarium system. I want all floors to be made of glass. I want the windows to be exact copies of a late 1700 example, made from the trees on my property. I want traditional plaster instead of drywall, lime mortar on the hand made bricks, made from the clay on the property.
And I don't want any power tools used in any part of the construction of the house.
Thank you for demonstrating you just don't know and don't want to know.
LiarWatch = Darrell ?
Another troll to ignore.
« First « Previous Comments 42 - 81 of 170 Next » Last » Search these comments
I've decided that since I have to live out in the 'burbs anyway, I might as well live in the perfect house. 9 out of 10 builders around here just slap together the same old generic qasi-craftsman style homes with awful layouts and pointless features like tiny unusable porches and formal living rooms.
We have a crap ton of money and I'm overpaid.
We're looking to buy a few acres of land and then spend ~$800k to build the thing (architecture, land prep, construction, etc.)
Does anyone have experience with having a custom home built (particularly modern design; no shingles or crown molding here)? Was it worth it compared to what you could have bought for the same amount of money? How was the financing?