0
0

Couple's Friends Raise Thousands for Life-Saving Surgery


               
2012 Nov 30, 5:03am   6,509 views  25 comments

by Suburban Gal   follow (0)  

http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/couples-friends-raise-thousands-life-saving-surgery-154330224--abc-news-health.html?source=Patrick.net

Lewis is scheduled to undergo surgery today just days after their healthcare provider dismissed their appeals to pay for the life saving procedure as well as an earlier surgery. His medical bills, he estimates, will be about $400,000.

« First        Comments 21 - 25 of 25        Search these comments

21   bob2356   @   2012 Dec 26, 3:34am  

Nobody says

The total bill came out to more than $100K. I thought C-section was rather a simple procedure.

I don't believe a c section cost 100k. Including a long stay in the NICU, maybe. I've never seen one even close to that and I've done a lot of work in medical billing. Post the bill to show how this is possible.

22   rdm   @   2012 Dec 26, 3:40am  

Very poorly written article. The guy has stage 4 colon cancer which means it has spread outside the colon to other areas of the body. The 5 years survival rate is less then 10%, regardless of treatment. Colon cancer typically spreads first to the liver and liver resections are not uncommon or an experimental treatment. They can help extend life. We don't know what else is going on in his body but the claim of 5 to 7 years further life from the surgery is IMO pretty much bunk. He will almost certainly not be cured and while it is possible he could live another 7 years it is very very unlikely that will happen, surgery or no. Most people with stage 4 colon cancer go on 'permanent' chemo which damps down the disease but never cures it.

23   bob2356   @   2012 Dec 26, 3:43am  

This post is one of those very common can't win situations that the bitchers and moaners love so much. If the guy gets denied surgery then it's heartless death panels. If he gets the surgery then it's wasting money on someone who is terminal anyway.

Homeboy says

Weird. Why would they consider removing tumors as "experimental surgery"?

Read the article more carefully. It doesn't say what the new surgery is going to be. It only says he had surgery in the past to remove tumors.

24   Homeboy   @   2013 Jan 6, 5:32am  

rdm says

Very poorly written article.

That's what I figured. It didn't add up the way it was written. I appreciate you actually explaining it rather than just going in circles and repeating what the article said.

25   Homeboy   @   2013 Jan 6, 5:39am  

bob2356 says

Read the article more carefully. It doesn't say what the new surgery is going to be. It only says he had surgery in the past to remove tumors.

Actually, I think I read it more carefully than YOU did. That's not what it says.

"Lewis' insurance carrier would not pay for the SURGERIES TO REMOVE HIS TUMORS, treatments that doctors told him would stretch his life expectancy from one to two years to at least seven.

Lewis and Blansit got that news just hours before Lewis' second surgery in October but decided to forge ahead with THAT PROCEDURE, as well as a third and final operation...

Lewis' insurance carrier declined to cover the operationS (PLURAL) because they were classified as "experimental" and "exploratory,"..."

Anyway, I think the problem is that it's just a poorly written article.

« First        Comments 21 - 25 of 25        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste