« First « Previous Comments 62 - 69 of 69 Search these comments
None of what you just posted is against the law
Actually if Zimmerman instigated the fight (or even threw the first punch (missing)), then I don't think there's any way he should not be found guilty of at least manslaughter.
How did you refute my point?
Me-you posted nothing against the law.
You -well I think the law should be XYZ
Kinda odd for a guy who's running around calling others unintelligent, yes yes?
How did you refute my point?
Me-you posted nothing against the law.
I guess there is one entire sentence there for you to comprehend. Is it that you can't comprehend it or that you don't think manslaughter is against the law.
Btw, I reallly can't help you with your race issues. But I think it's really cute, and in keeping with your style and intelligence level that you try to turn it around on me.
The jury did not conclude beyond a doubt that Zimmemran cause d the fight. I don't even know how much of a thrust that was to their legal strategy. But if they were emphasizing manslaughter, it probably would have been. I'm sorry that these things aren't more simple for you.
You're correct that there probably is no Florida law that says one can claim self defense in a killing that was a consequence of a fight that they started. OR maybe it is part of the Florida law. I haven't read all their laws.
The jury did not conclude beyond a doubt that Zimmemran cause d the fight.
And that's all that matters.
Now stick to the topic of Angela Corey being corrupt prosecutor who is being indicted for withholding evidence from the defense.
Well, maybe trayvon was the gay one, with all the jewelry and such. And he was trying to come on to the community watchdog, who would have none of it.
I thought the most damning pic from Trayvon's phone was the pile of jewelry on the bed. Zimm was after the right burglar. All of a sudden it makes sense that TM would attack someone who was reporting on his activities. TM's death may have been tragic, but so was his life, and his career in crime was already quite a nuisance to his neighborhood.
Marcus, dude, I get that this case trips your buttons but you got to stop calling people stupid simply because they disagree with your interpretation of the facts. Also you went and restated your entire tired speculation on the case that we've all heard many times before. It's straight off the lame stream media tag line. You could at least stick to the topic of whether the prosecutor should do time for her crimes.
Ok on a related note, this case is sheer distraction of the American people. It's designed (and I do mean designed, fabrication of story, etc) to cause racial tensions and create heated debate among people. The tag line of "watchman kills kid walking home" is perfectly crafted to trip the natural buttons of anyone who thinks kids should be protected (including me, at least before I found out more). So this whole situation blows up as intended, the jury acquits Zimmerman as they HAD TO if they followed the law, and the distraction rages on. I called the acquittal here on patnet over a week before it happened, and I felt safe in doing so because I saw the point of this whole thing: distraction.
The wealthy elite want us at each others throats and not watching what they're doing, selling our futures to foreign powers and stealing our childrens' futures. They have to be giggling like Dr. Evil, one pinky raised to pallid lips in a sneer of contempt for the naïveté of the American people.
The real rape, the real murder is happening all around us, and the mighty wiZard implores us to "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!"
Bread and circuses, as usual.
« First « Previous Comments 62 - 69 of 69 Search these comments
She bypassed a grand jury, lied on her affidavit to the court, overcharged Zimmerman and failed to provide an honest evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of her case to the judge who allowed her to proceed with the case.
She then withheld evidence from the defense team unlawfully, and after being exposed for her crime, she fired the IT manager who leaked the unlawful action.
According to Angela Corey, the case was filed to, "Put the facts in front of a jury". Umm, you don't put someone on trial to put facts out there, you put someone on trial because an investigation shows someone committed a crime. We didn't have that in Zimmerman's case, in fact, after an ethical investigation into Zimmerman's past, a lie detector test, witness accounts, he was let go! Zimmerman was put on trial to appease a block of people who wanted to see Zimmerman on trial, and possibly fish for a conviction. Angela Corey is an evil woman.
But don't take my word for it, here's a professor from Harvard Law who analyzed Corey's affidavit to the court before the trial began:
Here's a few words from the former president of the American Bar Association:
This woman is unstable, and possibly a psychopath.
What happened to Martin is a tragedy, but what Angela Corey tried to do with our justice system is a TRAVESTY!
#crime