patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,362,900 comments by 15,748 users - floki, Misc online now
Obama slammed by black Chicago residents: Worst president ever
2014 Jul 15, 1:48am 3,558 views 20 comments
by zzyzzx follow (9)
Comments 1 - 20 of 20 Search these comments
Tenpoundbass
2014 Jul 15, 3:03am
They sound racist, they are talking about people from other countries getting all of THEIR opportunities, like those Racist crackers were doing 8 years ago. When the GOP were building fences and militarizing the Mexican border.
Oh Now, THOSE KIDS are getting all of that Free Obama Change money.
They aint having none of it!
Sounds like they are getting mad, because the Welfare checks and the part time Mickey D's job isn't keeping the peasants fat and happy.
Obama truly is the worst LEADER in the history of the world, for failing to realize. That it takes more than Def Comedy Jam political tours, and Gladiator battle arenas, to keep his minions happy.
Strategist
2014 Jul 15, 3:15am
Black residents of Chicago’s South Side, who recently rallied to decry a spate of violence in the city, ripped President Obama for ignoring their plight while pushing for funding for illegal immigrants at their expense.
When Obama became President, the Black population, especially the low income ones, believed their Messiah would wave his magic wand and all their problems and all their gripes would mysteriously disappear. Now they find out after 6 years they are just as poor.
The moral of the story:
There is no magic wand. It's up to you to make something of yourself. Grow up.
Nah, they want the nanny state to handle it...
The same nanny state that creates money out of thin air to keep them in their place.
Strategist
2014 Jul 15, 3:36am
Nah, they want the nanny state to handle it...
The same nanny state that creates money out of thin air to keep them in their place.
They get free everything. Great place to be in, in my opinion.
Tenpoundbass
2014 Jul 15, 5:19am
I bet the outcome was she got to cut in front of the line.
Why didn't she just make it easier on her future employment, by renting a Handicapped person for the day?
Oh lookie. You found a token story about some people who don't approve of the job Obama is doing. That must mean EVERYONE must believe the same way...
zzyzzx
2014 Jul 16, 12:55am
Oh lookie. You found a token story about some people who don't approve of the job Obama is doing. That must mean EVERYONE must believe the same way...
Given Obama's poor poll numbers lately, it's safe to say that these disappointed constituents are the norm, not the exception.
His poll numbers are a lot higher than good ole' Bush's at this point in his career. Also- the approval of congress is the lowest its ever been. Seeing as how Congress is basically GOP controlled that is a bigger story.
But I'm sure out resident right winger trolls will continue to post more trollish stories like this one to try and convince themselves that their beloved GOP isn't in trouble and likely prone to lose not only in the fall but 2016 as well.
His poll numbers are a lot higher than good ole' Bush's at this point in his career
Oh sure, a LOT lower. Bush was at 39%, Obama is at 42%, that's within the margin of error. I think you are confusing the two compared to Clinton(62%) and Reagan(63%). Now that's a difference, you could say is "a lot".
I guess making ill informed predictions is really easy to do when you are armed with "facts" you have conjured up in your own mind.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/barack-obama-presidential-job-approval.aspx
Yup. thanks for confirming what I just said, which was that Obama's poll numbers are a lot higher than what Bush's was.
With more nations under seige, attacks, invasion, drug smuggling turned militant than the lead up to WWI or WWII, its time to explain what hope and change is.
Because if we and our allies want liberty, we have to find the courage to fend off the multitudes of bullies. AKA we have to at some level defend liberty and freedom. Because bullies do what they do.
We are basically a reeling republic with hoping and changing towards massive socialism.
Massive socialistic objectives are ignoring the liberty and egalitarism that are the spirit of free societies.
Strategist
2014 Jul 16, 2:42am
I bet the outcome was she got to cut in front of the line.
Why didn't she just make it easier on her future employment, by renting a Handicapped person for the day?
That dumb gal ruined what could have been a nice family trip to Sea World.
With more nations under seige, attacks, invasion, drug smuggling turned militant than the lead up to WWI or WWII, its time to explain what hope and change is.
Because if we and our allies want liberty, we have to find the courage to fend off the multitudes of bullies. AKA we have to at some level defend liberty and freedom. Because bullies do what they do.
We are basically a reeling republic with hoping and changing towards massive socialism.
Massive socialistic objectives are ignoring the liberty and egalitarism that are the spirit of free societies.
So WTF is the US supposed to do? Go in an intervene with boots on the ground in ALL instances of ANY conflict in the world? I find it ironic that somehow there seems to be this contingency of people out there who clearly drank the Kool Aid and truly believe that we should be some sort of global police. In fact the US has been geared in a position of getting involved on a regular basis in global military affairs since the end of WW2. Americans don't know what NORMAL is supposed to be.
So for perhaps the first time in decades the US actually started relying more on collaborative diplomacy and joint actions with allies instead of barnstorming into yet another country, boots on the ground and all. That isn't "weak", Its called being smart. I find it simply amazing that people would come to a conclusion that unless we handle global affairs with military action that somehow that makes us weak. If anything it makes us more effective.
The rest of nonsense about socialism is classic right winger ranting so I'll just ignore that.
A read of the news on CNN may show of invasions of Russia to Crimea, and various radical groups in over 20 countries are spiking. Perhaps reporting on CNN is right wing?
Chamberlain said dont worry about it also, until the time that bombs and planes were overhead.
zzyzzx
2014 Jul 16, 3:43am
His poll numbers are a lot higher than good ole' Bush's at this point in his career.
Only if you poll blacks. If you take those out of your poll, Obama scores much worse than Bush.
Chamberlain said dont worry about it also, until the time that bombs and planes were overhead.
So what's your ingenious solution then? None of those situations you mentioned directly involve or were caused by the US. Second of all, Russia, like the US has a huge arsenal of nuclear weapons. They call "Nuclear deterrent" that name for a very good reason: All out war with either country would likely mean mutually assured destruction- another term that pertains to countries that possess massive quantities of nuclear weapons. The response to Russia was rapid and appropriate: We quickly collaborated with allies to formulate a series of responses and economic consequences. As seen, this dramatically slowed down Russia's advance into that country. That's called using smart diplomacy and besides- boots on the ground was NOT an option for the reasons I mentioned above.
Secondly, comparing Chamberlain to Obama is historically dumb. Chamberlain was at that point dealing with a Germany that eventually invaded France and thus was within 30 miles off the UK's coast. The UK was situated between numerous Nazi-occupied countries. The threat to the UK was immediate, close, and real. That is not the situation we have here at all.
Only if you poll blacks. If you take those out of your poll, Obama scores much worse than Bush.
Typical bullshit response. Ironic seeing the article you posted...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/14/obama-slammed-worst-president-ever-black-chicagoan/
Black residents of Chicago's South Side, who recently rallied to decry a spate of violence in the city, ripped President Obama for ignoring their plight while pushing for funding for illegal immigrants at their expense.
The protest against the rash of shootings was staged Friday at the Chicago Police Department headquarters building. Over the Fourth of July weekend, nine people were killed and more than 60 injured, authorities said.
Demonstrators blasted the Obama administration's inaction in Chicago while federal funds are earmarked to help the roughly 50,000 illegal immigrants who have crossed into America since October.
http://www.J9ixOsjut3E
“Mr. President, we're asking for you,” one woman said. “You're spending billions of dollars in Texas, but we've a problem here in Chicago. We will not stand by this here, and keep letting this senseless killing and shooting happen in our community.”
Another resident said, “Today, if you look at the time that we were brought here as slaves 400 years ago, we got the same results today.”
One man called for Mr. Obama to step down if he continued to shun the city's problems.
“For the president to set aside all of these funds for immigrants and [have] forsaken the African-American community, I think that's a disgrace,” the man told the blog Rebel Pundit. “He will go down as the worst president ever elected. Bill Clinton was the African-American president.”
#politics