patrick.net

All Women are supposed to be as smart as the most smartest man if not smarter, so says your average shit stirring Liberal with nothing better to do. Yet, they can never be held accountable for the situations they put them selves in EVER!

I'm shocked that Dan would color a story, what with his impeccable logic and all.

Dan8267 says

Cop gropes rape victim

Is this the best you can do Dan?

Strategist says

Is this the best you can do Dan?

It was a slow day on youtube...

indigenous says

Strategist says

Is this the best you can do Dan?

It was a slow day on youtube...

After all his claims about how criminal all the cops are, he finds an example of a cop who became horny long ago. Meanwhile we have rapes, murder, assault and crime after crime every second of the day.
Damn cops.

Where is the rape in this? she willingly sleeps with a married man and makes the same accusations twice. How is this rape?? Why should the officer be fired?

And a married "Sex Crimes" (Special Victims) detective who invites a woman who is not his wife back to a hotel room is totally acting appropriately to both his marital and professional duties.

Call it Crazy says

lostand confused says

Where is the rape in this? she willingly sleeps with a married man and makes the same accusations twice. How is this rape?? Why should the officer be fired?

In Dan's twisted mind, the cop is guilty.. In the real world, she carries the responsibility.

I give Dan credit for his hard work exposing crimes of evil cops. Sadly he exposed nothing.
Hey Dan, you couldn't expose anything even if you stripped.

thunderlips11 says

And a married "Sex Crimes" (Special Victims) detective who invites a woman who is not his wife back to a hotel room is totally acting appropriately to both his marital and professional duties.

Reminds me of Clinton.
Who cares who sleeps with who.

Strategist says

thunderlips11 says

And a married "Sex Crimes" (Special Victims) detective who invites a woman who is not his wife back to a hotel room is totally acting appropriately to both his marital and professional duties.

Reminds me of Clinton.

Who cares who sleeps with who.

Just saying that the cop isn't a Pure Saint in this case - he made some ill decisions.

thunderlips11 says

Just saying that the cop isn't a Pure Saint in this case

There are no crimes committed where either is completly innocent.

Isn't that what they're supposed to do?

thunderlips11 says

And a married "Sex Crimes" (Special Victims) detective who invites a woman who is not his wife back to a hotel room is totally acting appropriately to both his marital and professional duties.

That is morality issue -not rape. Whores like these ought to be charged -there have to be consequences for these kind of fake accusations.

If she's interacting with a cop, she's a criminal, and I don't care about criminals.

indigenous says

thunderlips11 says

Just saying that the cop isn't a Pure Saint in this case

There are no crimes committed where either is completly innocent.

Call it Crazy says

Does that make him guilty of rape?

Didn't suggest that. Just said he made some ill decisions.

I'm not one of those "always believe the rape victim. Convict and lock away for decades based on one person's assertion, even when it's far from beyond a reasonable doubt" rad fem / social justice warrior "allies'.

Just pointing out that a married man who works for the Sex Crimes division ought to exercise better judgement than to invite an alleged victim out for drinks and to a hotel room.

I find this cop guilty!.... Of having too few vowels in his name! Dang east Europeans .....

Call it Crazy says

Dan has gone off the rails... again...

I strongly disagree, you are implying that Dan was ever on the rails.

sbh says

Guys, guys, you're missing the point here. Identify what God's plan is in this event and go with it. This "he said/she said" stuff just muddies the waters of divine grace. Keep your eyes on the prize, now, everything else is just vanity.

God says these two should be stoned to death.

Anyone who thinks this cop behaved ethically is morally bankrupt.

There you go conflating again, ethics and morals are not the same thing.

indigenous says

There you go conflating again, ethics and morals are not the same thing.

No, but there is a lot of overlap. And I wasn't implying that anyway.

Implying and conflating are not the same thing either.

thunderlips11 says

Strategist says

thunderlips11 says

And a married "Sex Crimes" (Special Victims) detective who invites a woman who is not his wife back to a hotel room is totally acting appropriately to both his marital and professional duties.

Reminds me of Clinton.

Who cares who sleeps with who.

Just saying that the cop isn't a Pure Saint in this case - he made some ill decisions.

That he did. He could jeopardize some legal issues while trying to prosecute the rapist,

Strategist says

thunderlips11 says

Strategist says

thunderlips11 says

And a married "Sex Crimes" (Special Victims) detective who invites a woman who is not his wife back to a hotel room is totally acting appropriately to both his marital and professional duties.

Reminds me of Clinton.

Who cares who sleeps with who.

Just saying that the cop isn't a Pure Saint in this case - he made some ill decisions.

That he did. He could jeopardize some legal issues while trying to prosecute the rapist,

Yup. Prosecutor and Police Chief are NOT going to be happy with him.

The Thug Union will fight hard on his behalf, though.

Dan8267 says

Anyone who thinks this cop behaved ethically is morally bankrupt.

You just described the whole damn country.

indigenous says

Implying and conflating are not the same thing either.

And neither applies to what I said.

Strategist says

Dan8267 says

Anyone who thinks this cop behaved ethically is morally bankrupt.

You just described the whole damn country.

Hardly

And coming from the guy who defended the cop who deliberately shot an unarmed, sleeping 9-year-old girl in the head, that really isn't convincing.

I know you can't read for jack-diddly-shit, CIC, so I'll dumb it down for you. The title of the original post is Cop gropes rape victim, not Cop rapes rape victim. The title is an accurate reflection of the article.

So your statement "you felt strongly enough that this woman was raped (by the cop)" is simply wrong as everything you always say.

The original post was always about ethics and abuse of power and trust. No Straw Man argument you make can change that.

Now, if you want articles about cops raping women, there are a multitude of them. Should I post some?

Dan8267 says

And coming from the guy who defended the cop who deliberately shot an unarmed, sleeping 9-year-old girl in the head, that really isn't convincing.

Can someone please tell me why a cop would deliberately shoot a sleeping 9 year old in the head? I can't think of any reason.