patrick.net

richwicks says

It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised

Good excuse for having four times as much sex.

richwicks says

It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised

The man or the woman? I saw a documentary in England where a panel of women claimed they got better sensations from uncircumcised men.

HeadSet says

I saw a documentary in England where a panel of women claimed they got better sensations from uncircumcised men.

Ratings from 1 to 10:
1. Big bowl of chocolate ice cream with sprinkles: rated 9

2. Sex with uncircumcised men: rated 1.5

3. Sex with circumcised men: rated 1.25

4. Sex with very rich, very powerful famous man who can be sexually extorted: rated 10

Circumcision does not reduce pleasure, the only reports of it doing so are in a tiny minority of the adult circumcised, and those usually because they had a medical disease like when smegma makes it so you can't pull back the foreskin and gets all infected.

In WW2, all the combatants, from the UK to US, to Italy and Germany, performed thousands of emergency circumcisions due to filthy dirt getting trapped under the foreskin, causing abrasions, and the lack of regular bathing contributed to a large infection rate. Probably the reason the Egyptians did it. The US, being the most circumcised, had the lowest rate of emergency circumcisions.

I believe the only case of Penile Cancer in the US among circumcised males between the 1950s and 1990s was found in a man who was circumcised in his 20s due to continual infections due to shit getting trapped inside the foreskin. Wet and Dark vs. Airy and Dry...

The Religion excuse doesn't fly, since Pagan Arabs and Egyptians, along with Pagan indigenous tribes in SE Asia and South America and Africa, with no sex hangups, also circumcised.

It's just a medieval superstition with no science behind it, it's like anti-vaping, some people just want to believe that vaping is almost as harmful as smoking so seek to ban it, despite hundreds of millions of dollars over the decade thrown at it by Tobacco and Nicotine Patch growers and makers (ie Big Pharma). In Portugal, they think Circumcised Men rape more. In the USA, the most circ'd groups are the LEAST likely to rape, however.

The San Fran Freakos who want to ban circumcision also pierce the ears of infants, sometimes even tattoo them. Many are gay men who simply prefer the uncircumcised penis and if they are circumcised, have lost the ability to feel pleasure due to aggressive masturbation or continuous rough sex, which dulls the nerves. Same reason they Gillum out on poppers and blood pressure meds and hypnotics. Like everything else, these Urban Sad Sacks blame it on their parents.

Another reason Gay Men like to be uncircumcised is that the foreskin rolls back and forth over the glans during anal sex; statistically insignificant differences have been found in the average time to orgasm between circ'd and uncirc'd men during vaginal penetration or masturbation. It's possible that circumcision was an anti-Anal measure? Unlikely though.

A lot of anti-circ in the USA goes back to the Hippy Naturalistic Fallacies of the 70s.

The number of infections in the very small population of pierced infants and toddlers greatly exceeds any problems, no matter how minor, in the majority of infants that are still circumcised, which carries great health benefits Europeans, who have no culture of circumcision, grasp at straws to deny. Whereas the rate of European penis problems, esp. among pre-teens who aren't known for their enthusiastic self-hygiene, is exponentially higher than the USA.

Look at the population of the Middle East and several African societies where they circumcise, men still want to fuck and enjoy it.

Finally, it's a myth that many cultures don't circumcise. From New Guinea to Arabia to South America, circumcision of some kind was as common than not and typically related to passage into manhood.

Foreskins are an excellent donor tissue for skin grafts, and they cover enormous territory because they can be webbed and stretch so much. "I know you are happy to see me because your skin graft is pulsing." LOL! I don't know that that is a great reason to keep them, aside from the doggy dick drama of their appearance.

HeadSet says

richwicks says

It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised

The man or the woman? I saw a documentary in England where a panel of women claimed they got better sensations from uncircumcised men.

if less skin on penis was a good thing, it would happen evolutionary. but it didn't.

that's my point from evolutionary perspective

Yes, it probably has some protective function.

FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut says

that's my point from evolutionary perspective

Could be, but evolution can leave a few no longer needed relics like pubic hair and musk glands.

HeadSet says

FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut says

that's my point from evolutionary perspective

Could be, but evolution can leave a few no longer needed relics like pubic hair and musk glands.

It depends on the situation, but there is likely no organ or feature which is totally useless, not the appendix (microbiome), not pubic hair (prevents chafing), and not foreskin. IMO it should be removed when there is too much foreskin which happens in quite a few, otherwise left alone. Either way it's not a significant procedure, neither early nor later on. It's become so routine that it's not dangerous and there are pros and cons to both sides. Not worth fighting over IMO, it's def not the same as mutilating females.

mell says

pubic hair (prevents chafing)

I've read that the evolutionary purpose for pubic hair may be to help with the evaporation of certain pheromones to advertise sexual availability.

But yes, I agree that there is likely no organ or feature which is totally useless. Evolution doesn't keep what you don't need. For example, fish which evolve in perfectly dark caves for millions of years completely lose their eyes. The reason is that eyes occasionally get infected, so they become a net loss in total darkness, leading to selection against eyes.

https://archive.fo/At2rz

Texas school district official tell teachers to offer books with ‘opposing’ Holocaust views

Booger says

https://archive.fo/At2rz

Texas school district official tell teachers to offer books with ‘opposing’ Holocaust views

It won't be actually opposing viewpoints. It will be strawman arguments.

Don't you think it's odd the Nazis went through all that trouble during a time of war and chronic energy shortages to cremate the bodies to hide the crime, but they kept the shoes around for the Holocaust museums?

There's a LOT of propaganda around the Holocaust and WWII.



And it's still being produced today.

richwicks says

Don't you think it's odd the Nazis went through all that trouble during a time of war and chronic energy shortages to cremate the bodies to hide the crime, but they kept the shoes around for the Holocaust museums?

They kept the shoes to reuse, just like they kept the gold tooth filings.

And never underestimate the German's love of Red Tape. So many hundreds of thousands of pages. Supply Chains must be tracked or Gotdammt Kaos!!!


Nazis made great use of the Weimar Anti-Extremist law that Registered Guns between 34-38. They were able to individually disarm any likely opponents, including all Jews of course. Obviously, the gun registration, like the anti-hate speech laws, failed to prevent any extremism, Communist or Nazi.

Of course, denying a Genocide is the final phase of one, as the Turks-Kurds can tell you about Armenians, or many Soviet Apologists about the Holodmor.

The same reason the Elite wants the Vax Passports.
https://freedomwire.com/ibm-vaccine-passports/

Patrick says

Another example: far more Russians died in WWII than Jews did, about 27 million Russians. But we are not taught that in school.

Yep, The very first mass killings by the Nazis weren't Jews, but current and retired Polish local leaders, from Professors to former Police Chiefs and Mayors, to School Deans and popular Priests and Pastors. The mass executions began before the fall of Warsaw and were in the tens of thousands by the end of 1939.

The ultimate goal of the Nazi Regime was lebensraum, which you can't get if the Slavs are still around in large numbers in Poland and Russia. The Jews were the test run, and as the most despised by all parties would face the least resistance. Himmler already had maps renaming South Ukraine and Crimea "Gotenau", after the old Gothic Kingdom there and estimated Aryanization under Ahnenerbe ("Ancestral Heritage") policies would take about 20 years after their defeat of the USSR.

Select details about Generalplan Ost was a great book called "POLAND UNDER NAZI OCCUPATION" by two non-Jewish Polish authors,

https://web.archive.org/web/20110409034704/http://www.dac.neu.edu/holocaust/Hitlers_Plans.htm

Interestingly, the Germans felt the Poles could not be totally exterminated, because they were too fiercely patriotic and too aggressive AND the rest of the world would see their extermination as a threat (whereas Jews and Russians wouldn't piss many off), therefore they would be slowly deported over the Urals, but in small numbers and greatly dispersed, lest they intermingle with the native Siberians and create a future Polish Threat.

https://www.tampafp.com/california-school-district-bans-political-flags-after-two-students-use-a-teachers-pride-flag-for-toilet-paper/

California School District Bans Political Flags After Two Students Use A Teacher’s Pride Flag For Toilet Paper

I only want to date white people:

I think it's a mistake to talk about race at all.

The oligarchy wants to divide us with race so that we don't talk about how the oligarchy is screwing all of us.

Patrick says

I think it's a mistake to talk about race at all.

The oligarchy wants to divide us with race so that we don't talk about how the oligarchy is screwing all of us.

I think like they cater to various groups based on power those groups have over elections. For example, you know it too. If you tear down Floyd statue, it'll be hate crime. But if you tear down statue of a Catholic priest... it's "understandable".

I think if right developed a counter to the left wing cancel culture, to a point government was actually afraid of them as much as they are of black people rioting, things would change. It wouldn't be a one way street like it is now.

Patrick says

Tourists who visit Dachau are often "disappointed" that there are no gas chambers.

I'm a bit doubtful of the story of gas chambers at all.

There's no point in transferring people to a concentration camp, just to kill them although I'm certain the people unable to work, were killed.

I'm as old as you. When I was a kid, it was accepted as FACT that Jewish bodies were being rendered into soap and their skin being used for lampshades. None of those stories are true. We didn't have DNA technology then, but we do now.

It's, shocking, how much propaganda there is still accepted as fact, but it is what it is. You're not allowed to discuss it, any attempt to discuss it gets you branded as anti-Semitic as well. I hate that propaganda survives to become "fact".

And it's quite possible, I'm wrong about my beliefs, but I can't find out, because it's become impossible to have a reasonable discussion with it. I've had to deal with Hasbera more times than I can count. The Israeli government has NO PROBLEM with defaming people, ruining people, and lying to people. They are one of the most ethically bankrupt governments on this planet.

Remember when it was said that when the Palestinians disarmed the conflict would end? Well, when is the last time the West Bank attacked Israel? Still, the settlements grow. In time the Palestinians will be entirely destroyed and a complete fiction of history will be created to make it morally justified.

I wonder if I had any relatives that were guards at Treblinka.

HunterTits says

Would have been better if bro said instead, 'No. I am.'

I missed the joke. Would that be implying the little bother is the real dad?

MisdemeanorRebellionNoCoupForYou says

Of course, denying a Genocide is the final phase of one, as the Turks-Kurds can tell you about Armenians, or many Soviet Apologists about the Holodmor.

I'm not saying there weren't a lot of people killed. I'm saying there's a TON OF BULLSHIT about what happened in the concentration camps.

There's been censorship on the discussion of this for decades. Lies need censorship to be protected, truth doesn't need any protection.

Booger says

I wonder if I had any relatives that were guards at

are you polish?

richwicks says

I'm not saying there weren't a lot of people killed. I'm saying there's a TON OF BULLSHIT about what happened in the concentration camps.

For sure. Human Soap, Lampshades, etc. Why on Earth would a Nazi want to wash themselves with subhuman fat?

The #1 method was working to death in squalid conditions, followed by simple shootings. The same way millions of Slavs were killed by the Nazis. Or the NKVD for that matter. Gulag work camps, followed by shootings.

The real forgotten Holocaust is the murder of hundreds of thousands of Poles and millions of POWs/Civilians. That German Death Camps had lots of space devoted to Non-Jews, or that they murdered Polish professors, mayors, ex-mayors, officers, ex-officers, Deans, Principals, Schoolteachers, etc. by the thousands within weeks of the 1939 Invasion. Also by gunshots in the forest. Or Generalplan Ost. Can't have Lebensraum if it's full of "non-Aryans". Truth is Jews were only a third of the victims.

And of course, Stalin was much, much worse. At one point the Gulags had 14M/year residents.

One Russian NKVD agent shot 7000 mostly Polish POWs with a Walther PPK. He aimed for 300/day but that was a long shot. Vasily Blokhin, personally honored by Beria himself. Naturally they used the Walther to have plausible deniability in case of discovery.

MisdemeanorRebellionNoCoupForYou says

The #1 method was working to death in squalid conditions, followed by simple shootings.

Yes, but what is never talked about is, why were they worked to death? Why would you intentionally kill useful workers, who are working (albeit forced) on behalf of the Nazi war effort? You wouldn't.

But the Allies cut supply lines, they destroyed infrastructure, they prevented food and supplies from entering the camps. This was logical to do, but it was the Allies that created those skin and bone, barely living, skeletons.

The Allies could never admit this, so they concocted a bunch of lies about what the Nazis did. I think (powerful) Jewish interests saw how this could be used to their long term advantage, and as a result, that's where the stories of the Holocaust arose.

The Nazis, I'm certain, were ruthless. As ruthless as anybody is in a war. Look at what the US has done in Guantanamo? There's one prisoner who is attempting to testify that he was repeatedly raped, had food shoved up his rectum, had an eye torn out, was hung by hooks, and was basically brutally tortured for years.

There's speculation this is done to INTENTIONALLY create terrorists. Traumatize them, create a clear enemy in their mind, and use them to enter nations that the US wants to invade. Torture is a way to brainwash, not extract information. If you, or I, or anybody is placed under torture, we will say ANYTHING to make it stop. Anything. We'll lie, tell the truth, anything. And of course, we'll want revenge.

Torture is used to manufacture monsters, it's speculated.

richwicks says

Yes, but what is never talked about is, why were they worked to death? Why would you intentionally kill useful workers, who are working (albeit forced) on behalf of the Nazi war effort? You wouldn't.

The USSR did. Might as well get the uncooperative to produce until death.

The Nazis did the same. No point in Lebensraum if it's full of Jews, Slavs, and Gypsies. Might as well work 'em with limited calories until they die, then toss 'em out. No shortage of population to process this way, and with Ukraine and Russia, a long way to go, might as well start right away.



Genocide Aside, the Nazis invaded the Czech Republic, Poland with False Flags and Lies. Austria was similar - the referendum on Anschluss was only held after the Wehrmacht invaded the country. German Kommandos didn't get the notice that Fall Weiss was delayed due to a demand for radio silence and were arrested by Polish Patrols days before the actual invasion. They exterminated potential opponents there with gusto and enthusiasm. Then they invaded Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Luxemborg, and Belgium, all neutral countries, without bothering for with a causus belli. ALL of these countries were Democracies that were not Communist nor could any reasonable observer say they faced any kind of imminent Communist takeover.

WW2 is a classic example of entities ganging up after another entity begins a pattern of ruthless expansion.

richwicks says

But the Allies cut supply lines, they destroyed infrastructure, they prevented food and supplies from entering the camps. This was logical to do, but it was the Allies that created those skin and bone, barely living, skeletons.

The Allies could never admit this, so they concocted a bunch of lies about what the Nazis did.

I had not heard that before. Seems plausible.

But I am pretty sure that the camps were intended to wear down and ultimately kill political prisoners anyway, even the camps without gas chambers.

Patrick says

I had not heard that before. Seems plausible.

One problem with the "Cut off Supplies" argument is that Strategic Bombing (as always, like in Vietnam and anywhere else it's tried) failed. It had to be called off within a few weeks of the 1943 Daytime Campaign, since the 8th USAAF was suffering 1% per day casualty rate, unsustainable even with US Resources; the "Bomber Box" of "Flying Fortresses" turned out to be a chalkboard theory jackoff that failed royally when confronted with AAA and Interceptors and Radar working in tandem.

Most of the time, if a B-17 was hit, it usually could not make it back to the UK; and IF the trained flight crews bailed, they would invariably be captured by the Nazis and thus out of combat.

Daytime bombing was targeted to specific industries, such as Ball Bearing or Power Plants. A few times they tried to bomb railheads, but by then the B-17s were forced to fly well over 15,000 to avoid Flak and accuracy was a joke. The Germans had also tried to bomb UK railheads in daytime bombing and failed as well in 1940. As with the UK in 1940, any rail damage was rapidly repaired, often within 24 hours until the last few months of the war.

The true interdiction of barges, rolling stock itself (rather than railyards), etc. of Germany didn't start until Fall 1944 when the Allies could base the much-shorter-range than 4-engine heavy bomber Mosquitos and other CAS aircraft in numbers on the Continent itself; with lots of days off due to Fog and Rain of European Seasons. The other problem is that US/UK POW camps in Germany didn't suffer starvation like the camps for Jews and Russian POWs did.

In any case, Dachau - located in well resourced Munich area - was a place were medical experiments occurred. At Natzweiler-Struthof, gas chambers were used and installed, and evidence is incontrovertible because the bodies of 80 gassed Gypsy Prisoners were sent to a University for Skull-measuring Anthropometry research created to prove the Roma were untermenschen.

MisdemeanorRebellionNoCoupForYou says

The other problem is that US/UK POW camps in Germany didn't suffer starvation like the camps for Jews and Russian POWs did.

Big difference in that the US/UK prisioners we're not held in Eastern Europe.

Booger says

Big difference in that the US/UK prisioners we're not held in Eastern Europe.

Many were, like Zagan ("Sagan") aka Stalag Luft III. Difference was many of the Allied POWs were bailed out Airmen, so were detained by the Luftwaffe. Other camps were run by the SS or other agencies.

Whereas at Stalag VIIIB, in Germany not in Poland, at least 40,000 Russian POWs died. More than half of Russian POWs died under Nazi control, compared to only a tenth of US/UK Prisoners.

Consider the total number of British POWs ever detained by Germany was 170,000. On the other hand, the Nazis mass executed British and American troops in 1944 at both Arnhem and in the Ardennes. There was a famous rivalry between the Canadians and the (12th?) SS Hitlerjugend Division that started shortly after D-Day over atrocities.

When Hitler comes again, make sure to be under the Luftwaffe and not the SS.

And Stalin shot a shitload of Russian POW AND Civilians upon liberation, probably in the hundreds of thousands at least.

40,000... 3.3M... the six gorillion... pretty soon you're talking real numbers. Fact of the matter is the shit the Nazis did like Aktion T4 and the shooting of Polish Civilians in 1939 is more than enough as it is, not to mention their false flags and invasions without causus belli at all (Denmark, Low Countries).