« First « Previous Comments 20 - 59 of 79 Next » Last » Search these comments
Unemployment Claims are at 43 year lows
Meaningless stat because
-the economy was not doing well 43 years ago 1971-72. Does it mean we are doing as well as during high unemployemnt, high inflation 1971-72 times?
-fewer people attached to the labor force means few people to get fired
-long term unemployed run out of benefits and can't reapply
The job market is good in select parts of the country-the people that think the economy and labor market are doing well for the most part live in those areas
LA, SF, Boston, NYC- the ones driven by finance, real estate
The rest of the economy is in the toilet but the stock jockeys and real estate pumpers don't see it- it's not their world
It's very easy to get a part time job today- I know many who have two of them
Companies that dont want to pay obama care have set up multiple shifts for part time workers
This brings down the unemployment rate and claims and makes it look like lots of jobs are being created
Its shuffling labor around to make it look like there is "full employment"
154 Million people working
With the world slowing down since 2011 and a oil + commodity crash and it did nothing to change the curve here in America
For a country of our size with 322 million people
Demographics and the U.S. Dollar matter where other countries are at the mercy of the dollar
Why China is so desperate to get out of it's export economy and into a service one
Another reason there are low jobless claims
I've seen this dynamic- someone with two part time jobs either gets fired or hates one of their partime jobs they go and get another part time job
They never file a claim AND they count as a new job created and if they leave voluntarily it makes the labor market appear "dynamic"
Why China is so desperate to get out of it's export economy and into a service one
Excatly everyone would rather consumer than produce- but someone has to do the work!
China will eventually outsource to SE Asia and Africa
I've seen this dynamic- someone with two part time jobs either gets fired or hates one of their partime jobs they go and get another part time job
They never file a claim AND they count as a new job created and if they leave voluntarily it makes the labor market appear "dynamic"
Near 2 decades low here
Near 2 decades low here
The statisitc above is in total workers, not as a percentage of the labor force.
Since the labor force has shrunk the number with two jobs will also have shrunk
I have seen dozens of employers shift their ENTIRE work force to part time- with only a full time manager.
It's true some of the workers only have ONE part time job, when they used to have one fuil time job
But someone is peddling fiction when they claim there are plenty of full time well paying jobs- ie more today then before the Great Recession
If the economy/job market was firing on all cylinders an ignoramus like Sanders wouldn't be attracting crowds and a neo nationalist like Trump wouldn't be either
People would just want "FOUR MORE YEARS' of the same- clearly they don't
There is no deviation of trend here, outside the one time in 2007 where prime age labor force did peak and declined
and we had a uptick of the Elderly
See to someone who doesn't track data for a living, the false narrative economic theory might sound plausible
But to those who actually do track for a living but don't have a ideological spin, we can easily pin point the flaws in the economic theory that is trying to be sought out
I see something different re median household income- from your friend Bullard's St. Louis Fed
US. Bureau of the Census, Real Median Household Income in the United States [MEHOINUSA672N], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/MEHOINUSA672N, May 30, 2016.
The statisitc above is in total workers, not as a percentage of the labor force.
cute...
I see something different re median household income- from your friend Bullard's St.. Louis Fed
That data point moves with employment to population metrics if you channel the data line going back years to employment to population wages they track each other
Again
It's cute, but it only works on people who aren't versed with economic data, please, test me here I have a ton of more charts to prove your economic theories wrong...
I only require you to speak
:-)
Those wonderful "full time" jobs are not helping as household income is IN DECLINE while Home Prices RISE
That is the simple reason fewer homes are being sold
US. Bureau of the Census, Real Median Household Income in the United States [MEHOINUSA672N], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/MEHOINUSA672N, May 30, 2016.
Let me make it easier for you guys
Here is the Table 1. Median usual weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers by sex, quarterly averages, seasonally adjusted
right here =------> http://www.bls.gov/news.release/wkyeng.t01.htm
Go pull charts of the LFPR for 25 to 54
Ok 81%
Due to Demographics you naturally get a uptick
Final data lines correlates .. shocking .. right with the census data and demographics
That is the simple reason fewer homes are being sold
Which tracks employment to population metrics... shocking how that works, isn't it?
Logan feels working full time at Home Depot making $15/hr is awesome, e
If that's all you can do, that's all you go do then
Somehow, Logan feels working full time at Home Depot making $15/hr is awesome, even though that same worker use to have a job paying $30/hr with full benefits. Hey, the government stats tell us UE is at 5%, so every thing is great and tons of people will be buying new houses on their new $15./hr wage..
People are doing so well that we don't need free collidge and helt care in dis cundree. We don't need no stinking money from dah won pahsent we can take care of ourselves!
That is the simple reason fewer homes are being sold
Which tracks employment to population metrics... shocking how that works, isn't it?
Higher new home prices and fewer people with income to buy them- yes simple- no chart or selfie required to explain
Higher new home prices and fewer people with income to buy them- yes simple- no chart or selfie required to explain
Shocking how this stuff works
One of these days, you guys are going to remember my demographic economics and then it's going to make sense
Outer band limits can be discussed both positive and negative
But not the core thesis ...
That's kind of how economics works
If you theories were valid we would see much lower bands of economic output.. especially in this cycle...
Which I have said since 2010, was going to be weak... but you guys are taking it to a much darker place...
And that's the problem with your skewed narrative... you just want to count "bodies" employed versus reality on the ground.
I do feel sorry for a high school drop out working at Home Depot, or a non college educated America working at home depot and a non trade show Skill American working at home depot
But ...
They're working and if they were in a lot other countries they wouldn't be working at all...
Back to the cute thesis
The chart you posted above shows those aged 25-54 have fewer part time jobs which makes sense given they are less attached to the labor force in general as the chart below shows:
This 25-54 age group is not working as much,
their incomes are not rising,
they have over a trillion in student loan debt (nearly half in default) and
new home prices are at all time highs, so fewer new homes are sold.
No amount of posting endless charts and ridicule will change that.
There you go.. I wasn't referring to the high school kid or non-educated... but you refuse to read and learn.
Who do think is working at these jobs
College 2015 Grad median pay is 48K-54K...
See the %, do you now get why I find this thesis to be strange
It moves with employment to population metrics
Look at the % gaps, I mean you're basically saying America is a failure because
The last remaining high school drop outs, high school grads, and those who are drug addicts and criminal active aren't working full time jobs?
Because the rest are working
Again, you guys are versed in the data and now you're making my points for me
This is all you guys got about how pathetic America is ..
Try harder than that ....
Back to the cute thesis, look at all these job openings???
Where the hell are these last remaining Americans not working??
Might it be that prime age labor force growth has something to do it...
There are many EXPERIENCE workers at Home Depot (business people, experience contractors, etc.) who are working there
I know a few-they don't make it to a chart
The question remains unanswered. New home sales remain abysmal. Why? If there is a supposed roaring economy with full employment and rising incomes why hasn't that translated into new home sales?
Nothing to do with no wage growth, massive student loan debt overhand/defaults, low labor participation rate among 25-54 year olds and all time new home prices?
massive student loan debt
Majority of Student loan debt is under 14K
30% of all student loan debt are from college drop outs and the average balance their is 9K
40% of total Student loan debt are from Grad students and trust me on this ... you don't need to worry about Grad Students, they will be fine
30% of all student loan debt are from college drop outs and the average balance their is 9K
40% of total Student loan debt are from Grad students and trust me on this ... you don't need to worry about Grad Students, they will be fine
I don't even see student loans as a problem. If no one went to college our country would become like Africa.
A better thesis to use for the weak demand curve for new homes in this cycle, which I have been writing about for years
1. New Homes much more expensive than existing homes
2. The build out curve has been bigger and bigger homes making the demand curve much less
3. Without exotic loans, the capacity for the middle end to buy higher end is limited
4. Massive over investment and over purchase new home housing bust from the previous cycle
Looking longer term, you will need the builders to build cheaper homes to get the growth because their are limits on the high end
5. Demographics prime age labor for growth peaked in 2007
I don't even see student loans as a problem. If no one went to college our country would become like Africa.
Most of the wage, income and job problems comes from those who don't finish high school or never go to college
All my buyers for the last 20 years had one thing in common
They went to college
All my buyers for the last 20 years had one thing in common
They went to college
Which is why they can afford OC prices.
Aren't we in 2016, not 2012?
2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 all the data lines are very similar, never changed at all
People aren't versed in this data line, because they hear on T.V. that everyone has 70K
Tsk tsk....
This is why the real focus problem group is the 30% of total college debt held by college drop outs, they make up majority of the delinquent loans in the loan profile
Because college Grads work and base median pay for 2015 was between 48K-54K
Again
Because student loan debt can't BK like other debts, the nominal growth will be flushed higher because you can't BK the debt
This stuff works on being not versed in the data, I know, I have seen this for 8 years on social media, especially on facebook...
But you have to explain all the variables
40% of all student loan debt comes from Grad students which make 100% of the higher debt loads
:-)
No jobs/poor paying jobs,no consumers.
The economy doesn't need no stinkin' consumers.
We just need to to pray to our pretzel logic economic theology to make things change.
More fiat currency,more subprime loans,more financial instruments & reduction in manufactured goods. "YEAH! That's the ticket."
Creation of more "apps" & tech gadgets will certainly send the economy soaring.
« First « Previous Comments 20 - 59 of 79 Next » Last » Search these comments
Three Reasons New Home Sales are at 1960's Levels
https://smaulgld.com/new-home-sales/