« First « Previous Comments 65 - 67 of 67 Search these comments
Not necessarily. Vulgarity can be good natured. Consider AF. Usually vulgar, but rarely if ever uncivil.
Patrick says
Not necessarily. Vulgarity can be good natured. Consider AF. Usually vulgar, but rarely if ever uncivil.
He is a good barbarian. I like him.
Strategist saysPatrick says
Not necessarily. Vulgarity can be good natured. Consider AF. Usually vulgar, but rarely if ever uncivil.
He is a good barbarian. I like him.
I agree. He's opposite of me on the political spectrum, but he is by far the funniest poster on Patrick.net.
I see quite a few have him(her?) on ignore, and I think they are missing out.
« First « Previous Comments 65 - 67 of 67 Search these comments
So far I think the new rules are working. The deleting of personal attacks seems to be working a lot better than “uncivil”.
However certain members are still having a hard time understanding the new rule. I've had to delete 5 straight personal attacks from errrc.
Should we institute a 24 hour ban for repeated offenses? Like being deleted 3-4 times and warned with no improvement?