3
0

Should we institute temp bans?


               
2017 Nov 11, 8:05am   13,161 views  67 comments

by Goran_K   follow (4)  

#patnet

So far I think the new rules are working. The deleting of personal attacks seems to be working a lot better than “uncivil”.

However certain members are still having a hard time understanding the new rule. I've had to delete 5 straight personal attacks from errrc.

Should we institute a 24 hour ban for repeated offenses? Like being deleted 3-4 times and warned with no improvement?

« First        Comments 65 - 67 of 67        Search these comments

65   Strategist   2017 Nov 12, 4:36pm  

Patrick says

Not necessarily. Vulgarity can be good natured. Consider AF. Usually vulgar, but rarely if ever uncivil.


He is a good barbarian. I like him.
66   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2017 Nov 12, 6:43pm  

Strategist says
Patrick says

Not necessarily. Vulgarity can be good natured. Consider AF. Usually vulgar, but rarely if ever uncivil.


He is a good barbarian. I like him.


I agree. He's opposite of me on the political spectrum, but he is by far the funniest poster on Patrick.net.

I see quite a few have him(her?) on ignore, and I think they are missing out.
67   mell   2017 Nov 12, 7:03pm  

Fucking White Male says
Strategist says
Patrick says

Not necessarily. Vulgarity can be good natured. Consider AF. Usually vulgar, but rarely if ever uncivil.


He is a good barbarian. I like him.


I agree. He's opposite of me on the political spectrum, but he is by far the funniest poster on Patrick.net.

I see quite a few have him(her?) on ignore, and I think they are missing out.


Agreed.

« First        Comments 65 - 67 of 67        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste