« First « Previous Comments 841 - 880 of 1,408 Next » Last » Search these comments
If I can't have my own M134, assault rifle, and some RPG's, then freedom has no meaning.
What shotgun did you go with?
richwicks says
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
after a day of training with carbine, i lose hearing for good 5 to 6 hours.
This is foolish for you to do. You're going to go deaf.
100%
I have a family member that’s been losing his hearing over the last decade (gradually) and it’s been particularly difficult on him. Don’t take hearing for granted. Life get significantly harder if you can’t hear what’s around you.
I really want a 12 pounder cannon.
Really, I think the best protection against a home intruder is a shotgun with bird shot. It probably won't kill them, but it sure as hell will hurt them.
Al_Sharpton_for_President says
Yeah, can't afford to shoot that.
20 Gauge is almost as effective, lighter, much easier to handle the recoil, especially for females.
https://www.pewpewtactical.com/rock-island-vr60-vr80-vrbp100-review/
Oh, it's not mine. Saw in on a Sunday Gunday thread and started drooling though.
OIC, picture I posted is actually a shotgun.
I built this AR last week, standard chassis, self-milled lower receiver, .300 Blackout, holographic red dot sight, 30 round mag and silencer.
Shoots like a dream.
30 round mag and silencer.
100%
I have a family member that’s been losing his hearing over the last decade (gradually) and it’s been particularly difficult on him. Don’t take hearing for granted. Life get significantly harder if you can’t hear what’s around you.
Yeah, I'm about to be 40 with wicked bad tinnitus.
By John Petrolino. Nov 6, 2022
The other week the NYS Jewish Gun Club approached a Federal court in Manhattan for a stay on New York's draconian carry law. The NYS Jewish Gun Club is one of many that have lined up to challenge the unconstitutional provisions in New York's law, which were signed by unelected Governor Hochul. The case Goldstein v. Hochul challenges what "sensitive places" are under the new law.
One of the attorneys representing the NYS Jewish Gun Club, Ameer Benno, previously stated, "By designating all houses of worship as 'sensitive places' where exercising the fundamental right to self defense will now be punishable by prison time, the government has not only violated the Second Amendment but also the First Amendment's guarantee of the free exercise of religion." Different cases have yielded different results, but according to the NYS Jewish Gun Club, the court they've filed in are slow rolling the process.
I built this AR last week, standard chassis, self-milled lower receiver, .300 Blackout, holographic red dot sight, 30 round mag and silencer.
Shoots like a dream.
Hopefully soon Texas will win their lawsuit against the ATF regarding Texas made suppressors.
thenuttyneutron says
Hopefully soon Texas will win their lawsuit against the ATF regarding Texas made suppressors.
How loud is that silencer?
I had the media BS about silencers. In films, they make it appear that it's nearly silent, and you wouldn't hear it one room away. All they do is make it so that the person with the weapon isn't as likely to have ringing ears.
I thought as much. The only silent gun I know of is a British military weapon that has a barrel that is the size of a small muffler and shoots a subsonic round. I do not see how a silencer on a normal supersonic round weapon can stop the sonic crack when the bullet leaves the gun.
« First « Previous Comments 841 - 880 of 1,408 Next » Last » Search these comments
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Couple things to note in there:
1. The specific mention of a militia being the reason for the need to bear arms.
2. The 2nd Amendment never mentions the word gun at all.
So, what exactly is the definition of "arms"?
In 1755 Dr. Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language was first published. It defined “arms” as “weapons of offence, or armour of defence.”
Weapons of offence would seem to include pretty much anything and everything, from knives to nuclear weapons. The US has already seen fit to ban some weapons of offence so the 2nd Amendment clearly has not been interpreted strictly as meaning that the US cannot ban all "arms". Therefore, the 2nd Amendment does not guarantee citizens the right to own whatever weapons they choose.
So it then becomes a question of which weapons should be banned, which should be strictly regulated, and which should be lightly regulated or not at all. Like anything else, we should weigh an individual's right with society's right. When looked at in that manner, it becomes very difficult to justify why fully automatic or semi automatic rifles should be allowed. What purpose do they serve an individual? And why would that purpose outweigh the extreme damage those weapons have cased society??
Patrick thinks the Chamber of Commerce is the worst organization, and he may be correct, but the NRA is not far behind.