Comments 1 - 15 of 51 Next » Last » Search these comments
Sounds like a comment from the very late 60s when "kids" were protesting something else. They knew then and they know now.Those kids ruined America, destroyed family, gave rise to feminazis and 54 genders.
This is less than 5,000 ?
Quigley saysI don’t know what they want, and I doubt they do either.
Sounds like a comment from the very late 60s when "kids" were protesting something else. They knew then and they know now.
Those kids ruined America, destroyed family, gave rise to feminazis and 54 genders.
This is less than 5,000 ?
I love the disconnect. Bezos Blog is doing a live minute-by-minute promotion of this silly march by Professional Activists.
Here is evidence it was pretty damn small - the LA Times says "Thousands". FYI the LA Unified School District, not counting the burbs, has 640,000 students. So maybe 1%, and of course many marchers are adult Left Wing Militants.
If you want to see what is happening in Washington, etc - lots and lots of people. Don't let L.A. be the sole basis that people are not marching.
There are no shortages of people marching - none.
Feux Follets saysThis is less than 5,000 ?
Is that LA? Obviously not.
What is that even? According to the image meta data, that picture was taken on "12/13/06".
WTF?
This is less than 5,000 ?
This photo is Washington DC. Goran_K's article title clearly said "March for our Lives LA projected crowd: 60,000, Actual crowd: < 5000"
For you to dispute the <5000 in LA by using a crowd shot of DC to imply a huge crowd in LA hurts credibility.
Maybe you meant "The LA crowd may have been small, but look at DC."
There are no shortages of people marching - none.
Comments 1 - 15 of 51 Next » Last » Search these comments
“Well kids get up much later on weekends!”
LOL
Maybe kids are less likely to support something if it doesn't mean they can cut classes.
Idiots.