« First « Previous Comments 33 - 59 of 59 Search these comments
Obama is out of office since jan 2017. You didn't get the memo? I guy called trump is president now and it's all better
he is working on it. He selected an imbecile Jeff Sessions who is just stupid. But the director, deputy director of FBI have all been fired and several key palyers of the coup have been forced to leave. He is getting there. My hope is after his brush he too will get onboard with criminal justice reform. That is one area I do not like with trump-his alw and order stance. WE need law and order-but they should serve the people, not the other waya round.
What he is working on is emulating putin where the president orders and law enforcement does without those nice little legalities like the rule of law holding things up.
What he is working on is emulating putin where the president orders and law enforcement does without those nice little legalities like the rule of law holding things up. I don't think I've ever liked anything Sessions stood for in the senate, but I am actually impressed at his standing by the rule of law at justice no matter how much it pisses off trump. who simply wants his own personal gestapo like all the other dictators he admires so much have.
Law and order is serving the people. Money launderers and tax evaders are going to jail. Are you saying they should be let off because they are friends of trump. Would that be serving the people?..
Zero facts support this. You've been lied to.
Strategist saysbob2356 says
They learned to live together in piece when? You never heard of WWI or WWII?
WTF. After WWII they have lived together in peace. Something magical about democracy.
Like the Yugoslavia thing?
Strategist saysbob2356 says
They learned to live together in piece when? You never heard of WWI or WWII?
WTF. After WWII they have lived together in peace. Something magical about democracy.
Like the Yugoslavia thing?
CBOEtrader says
Zero facts support this. You've been lied to.
ROFLOL. so trump lied to me with his tweets. If you say so.,
Small kerfluffles compared to the neverending wars in Africa and the middle-East and wherever they migrate. Note that the Albania Kosovo conflict was already a middle eastern conflict brought to Europe. Plus the eastern European conflicts were mostly a result of communism/leftoids suppressing any identity for too long and keeping regions together by force that didn't necessarily belong, so there was some delayed release of tensions.
Show us his tweet where he says he will be a tyrant. You are living in a fantasy Bob.
Yugoslavia was a democracy?
mell saysSmall kerfluffles compared to the neverending wars in Africa and the middle-East and wherever they migrate. Note that the Albania Kosovo conflict was already a middle eastern conflict brought to Europe. Plus the eastern European conflicts were mostly a result of communism/leftoids suppressing any identity for too long and keeping regions together by force that didn't necessarily belong, so there was some delayed release of tensions.
Two world wars were a small kerfuffle? What's a big kerfuffle then? Ok so they are homogeneous and live in peace except when they don't but that doesn't count. Right. I got it. Just out of curiosity do you read what you write?
CBOEtrader says
Show us his tweet where he says he will be a tyrant. You are living in a fantasy Bob.
Nice strawman and shuffle totally off the subject. Try again.
I was referring to Yugoslavia. WW2 pretty much involved most major nations across ethnicity culture and religion. They also weren't limited to Europe or the US only. WW1 maybe mostly a Caucasian affair. But 100 years have passed since, and back then there were conflicts everywhere at most times. The western world and parts of Asia have advanced in peace and stable societies since then, the rest hasn't.
What he is working on is emulating putin where the president orders and law enforcement does without those nice little legalities like the rule of law holding things up.bob2356 says
CBOEtrader says
Zero facts support this. You've been lied to.
ROFLOL. so trump lied to me with his tweets. If you say so.,
CBOEtrader says
Show us his tweet where he says he will be a tyrant. You are living in a fantasy Bob.
Nice strawman and shuffle totally off the subject. Try again.
Dodging and dodging and dodging. Show us what tweets exactly suggest Trump wants to be a tyrant.
bob2356 saysWhat he is working on is emulating putin where the president orders and law enforcement does without those nice little legalities like the rule of law holding things up.
I can show you a summary of evidence suggesting Obama/HRC's transgressions in using the intelligence community and DOJ for his political cronies. Look no further than the almost daily Strojk texts being released.
More arrests will be made as Sessions works his way up the corruption chain. This is exactly why the establishment is afraid of Trump.
So cut the bullshit. Trump has tweeted time and time again about using the justice department, military, and security system in ways that are totally against the conventions of the US governmentOh, bob, put sock in it, already. Both parties confirmed Wall Street criminal Hank Paulson to be Treasury Secretary. He headed up Goldman Sachs during that period of the record GS fraud settlement. 99% of citizens were opposed to the Wall Street bailout, and yet it didn't matter. It's Kabuki theater. So, please, don't pretend otherwise with puffed up indignation.
Where is the scientific, historic or empirical evidence that the greater the racial, ethnic, cultural and religious diversity of a nation, the stronger it becomes?
Our diversity is increasing, regardless of whether you think it's such a great question, it's up to us to make it a big positive.
One of my only black friends died yesterday, after a long struggle with cancer. Great guy, I will miss him.
« First « Previous Comments 33 - 59 of 59 Search these comments
Reaction to Carlson’s question, with some declaring him a racist for having raised it, suggests that what we are dealing with here is not a demonstrable truth but a creed not subject to debate.
Yet the question remains valid:
Where is the scientific, historic or empirical evidence that the greater the racial, ethnic, cultural and religious diversity of a nation, the stronger it becomes?
From recent decades, it seems more true to say the reverse: The more diverse a nation, the greater the danger of its disintegration.
Ethnic diversity, after all, tore apart our mighty Cold War rival, splintering the Soviet Union into 15 nations, three of which — Moldova, Ukraine, Georgia — have since split further along ethnic lines.
Russia had to fight two wars to hold onto Chechnya and prevent the diverse peoples of the North Caucasus from splitting off on ethnic grounds, as Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan had done.
Ethnic diversity then shattered Yugoslavia into seven separate nations.
And even as we proclaim diversity to be our greatest strength, nations everywhere are recoiling from it.
The rise of populism and nationalism across Europe is a reaction to the new diversity represented by the Arab, Asian and African millions who have lately come, and the tens of millions desperate to enter.
Center-left and center-right parties are losing ground in European elections because they are seen as feckless in meeting what more and more indigenous Europeans believe to be an existential threat — mass migration from across the Med.
Japan’s population has ceased to grow, and each year brings fewer toddlers into its schools. Yet Tokyo resists the racial and ethnic diversity greater immigration would bring. Why, if diversity is a strength?
What South Koreans dream of is uniting again with the 22 million separated members of their national family who live in the North, but share the same history and blood.
This summer, in its Basic Law, Israel declared itself an ethnonational state and national home of the Jewish people. African migrants crossing the Sinai to seek sanctuary in Israel are unwelcome.
Consider China, which seeks this century to surpass America as the first power on earth. Does Xi Jinping welcome a greater racial, ethnic and cultural diversity within his county as, say, Barack Obama does in ours?
In his western province of Xinjiang, Xi has set up an archipelago of detention camps. Purpose: Re-educate his country’s Uighurs and Kazakhs by purging them of their religious and tribal identities, and making them and their children more like Han Chinese in allegiance to the Communist Party and Chinese nation.
Xi fears that the 10 million Uighurs of Xinjiang, as an ethnic and religious minority, predominantly Muslim, wish to break away and establish an East Turkestan, a nation of their own, out of China. And he is correct.
What China is doing is brutalitarian. But what China is saying with its ruthless policy is that diversity — religious, racial, cultural — can break us apart as it did the USSR. And we are not going to let that happen.
Do the Buddhists of Myanmar cherish the religious diversity that the Muslim Rohingya of Rakhine State bring to their country?
America has always been more than an idea, an ideology or a propositional nation. It is a country that belongs to a separate and identifiable people with its own history, heroes, holidays, symbols, songs, myths, mores — its own culture.
Again, where is the evidence that the more Americans who can trace their roots to the Third World, and not to Europe, the stronger we will be?
Is the Britain of Theresa May, with its new racial, religious and ethnic diversity, a stronger nation than was the U.K. of Lloyd George, which ruled a fourth of mankind in 1920?
Was it not the unity Bismarck forged among the diverse Germanic peoples, bringing them into a single nation under the Kaiser in 1871, that made Germany a far stronger and more formidable power in Europe?
Empires, confederations and alliances are multiethnic and multicultural. And, inevitably, their diversity pulls them apart.
The British Empire was the greatest in modern history. What tore it apart? Tribalism, the demands of diverse peoples, rooted in blood and soil, to be rid of foreign rule and to have their own place in the sun.
And who are loudest in preaching that our diversity is our strength?
Are they not the same people who told us that democracy was the destiny of all mankind and that, as the world’s “exceptional nation,” we must seize the opportunity of our global preeminence to impose its blessings on the less enlightened tribes of the Middle East and Hindu Kush?
If the establishment is proven wrong about greater diversity bringing greater strength to America, there will be no do-over for the USA.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-14/pat-buchanan-unpardonable-heresy-tucker-carlson