by Patrick ➕follow (59) ignore (3)
« First « Previous Comments 27,812 - 27,851 of 45,509 Next » Last » Search these comments
Claims it has anti gravity capability.
Anti-gravity would break all our physics. It would mean Relativity is wrong or at very least, extremely flawed.
Relativity predicts time dilatation in a gravity well, and we know this happens with atomic clocks. You can actually measure the difference of a gravity field between two SHELVES in a lab with an atomic clock.
No it doesn't. If mass is zero or near zero, look at what happens with the formula then.
So if an object can be rendered massless, then gravity and inertia would be nullified. Speed of light limitations will no longer apply.
Anti-gravity would break all our physics. It would mean Relativity is wrong or at very least, extremely flawed.
And what exactly is wrong with that? It means that it is falsifiable. That's a good thing.
Many observes believe that an arcane advanced physics exists, for the secret few, to hold it back from the teeming masses (as usual) and we are given the archaic and stagnant physics of Einstein and Newton as if they are the final inquiries. The masses are supposed to gnaw on these forever as flawed bones, while the elites, as usual, keep the good stuff for their own utilitarian, secretive academians.
So if an object can be rendered massless
It is fireball season, but I imagine quite a few represent the new space wars of strategic satellites being shot down.
Ceffer says
It is fireball season, but I imagine quite a few represent the new space wars of strategic satellites being shot down.
I saw one of these myself:
https://patrick.net/post/1328018/2019-10-20-patrick-saw-a-green-fireball-last-night
Trollhole says
So if an object can be rendered massless,
dis integrated?
I saw one of these myself:
« First « Previous Comments 27,812 - 27,851 of 45,509 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,307,436 comments by 15,522 users - HANrongli, komputodo online now