Trump would resign Mueller would find collusion The stock market would crash Jussie Smollett was honest Trump’s base would leave him A recession would happen War would break out Avenatti was a serious candidate
As for the rest of the "people of Earth," you can be sure that his popularity is much lower in much of the rest of the world, compared to other PResiedents.
Duh, foreigners want a weak President that gives them money, helps enact THEIR policies, and doesn't stand in their way.
Germany, for example, doesn't want to stop trading tech and machines to Iran, and doesn't want to be reminded that while they spend luxuriously on migrants, they are shorting their NATO commitments.
Only the left would draw a comparison between temporarily jailing children vs permanently killing fetuses yet believe they "made a funny" by pointing out hypocrisy.
Actually all of the last 9 Presidents, even Jimmy Carter were more popular at this point in their Presidency, than Trump. But hey, do what the others do, say that it's the media's fault. It couldn't be that the media actually reflects the collective observations and average opinions of a lot of intelligent citizens.
You believe polls after they were so incredibly wrong about the last presidential election?
The only poll that actually matters is the voting booth.
It couldn't be that the election of Trump actually reflects the collective observations and average opinions of a lot of intelligent citizens. Or could it be?
The analogy between human races and breeds of dog is in fact quite accurate. It's even an understatement of the reality.
The different breeds of dogs definitely have different physical and mental characteristics. No one would seriously deny this.
Yet to call attention to the fact that humans also come in different breeds is met with outrage and denial.
Dog breeds have been separate for less than 50,000 years. But the differences are considerable.
Human races have been separate for 100,000 years at least, but we are supposed to pretend that the differences do not exist.
There are people in the Andaman Islands who have been isolated from the rest of humanity for 50,000 years themselves. And this is just one small example.
It is the left which denies science, not the right.
Racism would be the denial of rights on the basis of race. I would never advocate that. But race does exist. It is real.
True, but we are all individuals and race is but one attribute of any distinct human. A person still has unique features (IQ, sex, interests), regardless of which extended family that person shares skin color and bone structure with.
If you're goal is to help people, cultural vs genetic is core to the discussion.
Todays PC cult of diversity would NEVER allow scientific, helpful research on such a topic and you know it.
The big problem, is that the left today ALSO wants every to accept that differences of outcomes in life are signs of racism from white people. This is itself racist as fuck, but the left seems cool with it.
Studies which identify the racial and cultural differences in aptitude would be called tools of white supremacy or something equally as cartoonish.
Therefore memes like Patrick's are important to remind people that the PC cult of diversity is tyrannical, wrong, and standing in the way of societal progress.
You are talking about supremacy of “one better than other”. I’m not talking about that. I see that every time economy downturns people get into groups of like looking. Blacks only hang with blacks, Mexican with Mexican, etc... basic racism is survival instinct. And all the inclusivity and presence that everyone is sane is unnatural. You still haven’t answered what makes racism morally wrong.
: Another thing you might want to realize is that accepting race as a mostly a social and cultural construct, but that differences in intelligence , character, ethics, empathy and many other attributes vary within each race FAR FAR more than they might between races on avg, if they even do, is good for white people as they become a minority.
Perpetuating the idea that some races are better than others is not in anyone's best interest. The reasons for this should be obvious, even if you can not imagine yourself as a member of the oppressed group.
Meritocracy should be supported independent of race so that they are not ever conflated as being interdependent.
« First « Previous Comments 4,295 - 4,334 of 42,280 Next » Last » Search these comments
So, Trump wanting to investigate probable corruption by the son of a sitting vice president in Ukraine is "abuse of power" be CAUSE why?
Trump would resign
Mueller would find collusion
The stock market would crash
Jussie Smollett was honest
Trump’s base would leave him
A recession would happen
War would break out
Avenatti was a serious candidate
None of that shit happened.
Booger says
www.youtube.com/embed/hyomP-XTYY8
Fake news. Trump is more popular than Obama.
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-approval-rating-higher-obama-1460076
marcus says
Duh, foreigners want a weak President that gives them money, helps enact THEIR policies, and doesn't stand in their way.
Germany, for example, doesn't want to stop trading tech and machines to Iran, and doesn't want to be reminded that while they spend luxuriously on migrants, they are shorting their NATO commitments.
Did you unsourced and unsupported chart come from CNN? Lolz, dude admit you are being lied to and like it
Why isn't the incredible wealth politicians and their cronies amass front page news? Rhetorical question; they own the newspapers.
Only the left would draw a comparison between temporarily jailing children vs permanently killing fetuses yet believe they "made a funny" by pointing out hypocrisy.
Utter meme failure.
What you talkin bout, Willis?
The economy is booming, wages rising, stocks rising.
You believe polls after they were so incredibly wrong about the last presidential election?
The only poll that actually matters is the voting booth.
It couldn't be that the election of Trump actually reflects the collective observations and average opinions of a lot of intelligent citizens. Or could it be?
Krugman before 2016 Election: "Ignore the Debt Scolds"
Krugman after 2016 Election: "Muh Deficits"
The different breeds of dogs definitely have different physical and mental characteristics. No one would seriously deny this.
Yet to call attention to the fact that humans also come in different breeds is met with outrage and denial.
Dog breeds have been separate for less than 50,000 years. But the differences are considerable.
Human races have been separate for 100,000 years at least, but we are supposed to pretend that the differences do not exist.
There are people in the Andaman Islands who have been isolated from the rest of humanity for 50,000 years themselves. And this is just one small example.
It is the left which denies science, not the right.
Racism would be the denial of rights on the basis of race. I would never advocate that. But race does exist. It is real.
True, but we are all individuals and race is but one attribute of any distinct human. A person still has unique features (IQ, sex, interests), regardless of which extended family that person shares skin color and bone structure with.
marcus says
Todays PC cult of diversity would NEVER allow scientific, helpful research on such a topic and you know it.
The big problem, is that the left today ALSO wants every to accept that differences of outcomes in life are signs of racism from white people. This is itself racist as fuck, but the left seems cool with it.
Studies which identify the racial and cultural differences in aptitude would be called tools of white supremacy or something equally as cartoonish.
Therefore memes like Patrick's are important to remind people that the PC cult of diversity is tyrannical, wrong, and standing in the way of societal progress.
marcus says
« First « Previous Comments 4,295 - 4,334 of 42,280 Next » Last » Search these comments