I don't think Obama was awful, a bit of a pussy for sure, but when you start from the bottom because of Bush there's no where to go but up. I think you and I both agree that economic success being linked to the POTUS is over the top by both parties. Much of what happens economically was going to happen regardless of who was POTUS.
Unlike Hillary, he's not untouchable and protected by the Deep State. If there was any "There" Their then they're would be some Impeachment action going on right now, and Nancy wouldn't have the Sads.
more or less becasue republicans decided it wasn't impeachable anyway
Correct. There is no evidence of wrongdoing, and noone suggested Bolton or anyone else has any evidence to change that fact. Gossip mind reading is not evidence.
Who is "you" and "your" referring to in the circle of diversity above. IT's almost as if some group had things great, and then when they let in the others, the others ruined it and now somehow the cycle will repeat ? Or did it repeat before ? It's sort of implied that the group was better off without the "others" and it can be again, but the others would ruin it again.
I think the Black Queer Alliance would be better with some more diversity. A little Motorhead, some Cheryl Tieg swimsuit posters circa 1982.
What's wrong with that? Diversity and a broader spectrum of things makes everything better.
You never present any kind of argument to this, just adhominem.
You want me to present evidence of lack of evidence?
You are running cause you have no facts. You have innuendo, assumptions, mind reading, and gossip. You can call that stuff "evidence" but it's not. Period.
I'd love for you to list the facts that all reasonable people agree with, but you wont (cant).
I've never said Trump didnt lie. I could pick out 25 Trump statements that are factually inaccurate. BUT, it's all stuff like "we are setting all time records" when something is merely good. Or the hamburgers were "stacked to the moon". Yeah, who cares.
I care about whether I can ascertain a politicians political agenda from his speech. Trump is indeed the most transparent and honest potus in memorable history by that regard.
Asking you to share a lie you want to discuss is my way of showing you that the Trump "lies" are typically fluffed up nonsense or outright lies by the establishment. Ex : "https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/02/politics/justice-department-trump-tower-wiretap/index.html" The important lies reported by the MSM have been proven to be 100% accurate. Obama did wiretap Trump at Trump Towers, meanwhile the entire MSM establishment called Trump a liar.
Still waiting for your big lie, that you havent found in 3 years of Trump.
That’s your response to CBO’s post? I’m picking up my toys and leaving you smelly pants?
CBO has a major point. That is, how in the universe are the charges on impeachment nebulous? I’m still impossibly unclear on why/how anyone can determine guilt of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The thing is, CNN and MSNBC are full on propaganda. Not an alternative point of view. They are not the counterpoint to Fox. Fox is counterpoint to ABC, CBS, and NBC. CNN and MSNBC are counter points to Glen Beck and Alex Jones...that is, straight up crap.
Yet you have admitted you watch both. You admitted you trust the NY Slimes which hasn’t endorsed a Republican President in over half a century. You probably also read the Washington Post which is a leftist pile of garbage at this point.
The impeachment was a political stunt intended to satiate a looney left wing base. It was unfair, wrong, and likely costs the Dems the house in 2020.
Look the case was made by both sides, I heard both sides directly make their case.
Both sides? Dude the impeachment was 100% one sided. You havent even in the slightest "heard both sides" as one side wasnt allowed to speak.
The ease with which you lie to yourself is emblematic of our CNN/MSNBC propagandized times. Look at the facts and try, at least... or just be a bunch of righteous mob nazis.
You've been lied to, but you wont even find his quote to prove me wrong, will you. Ask yourself why
I heard it myself on the radio live as I was driving. You're the one that learns through a biased filter, not me. If only you had the integrity to read Dershowitz' argument rather than just repeatedly call me names. What are you afraid of learning ?
YOU made a statement. YOU cant find evidence or even a direct quote to back it up. The lie in your statement is that D somehow suggested something wrong happened. He didn't. D suggested the allegations even if true, couldn't legally result in impeachment, to which there is currently no evidence anyways.
i listened to most of the impeachment proceeding. I heard everything D said, and I heard the lies CNN/MSNBC told about him. I listen to CNN/MSNBC far more than any right winger purely via osmosis. Keep lying to yourself though. I mean, everyone who disagrees with you is a nazi right? Thats what Don Lemon tells you to think, just go with it.
D suggested the allegations even if true, couldn't legally result in impeachment,
Ah, you finally fucking looked it up. I like the way you act indignant and like I was wrong as you FINALLY admit that what I said was correct.
Oh, I was lied to by CCNN and all the propaganda that I supposedly get my opinion from. Hahaha, then finally you look it up only to realize that I was right, and then in Trump like dishonest fashion you still press on spinning it as if I said something different.
Even DErshowitz clearly states that the issue isn't even what he did
is a factually incorrect concept, fed to you by the MSM. The CNN/MSNBC spin on D the entire time was that D was somehow admitting Quid Pro Quo, BUT it wasnt impeachable. The left took it further with implications that D admitted Trump wrongdoing, but its not impeachable. Its slippery thinking, based on illusory facts spun to you by propagandists.
D NEVER SAID that he thought trump did something wrong. He never said that a quid pro quo for a political favor in return for $$ would be ok with anyone, but that was the spin and you twirled right along w it.
« First « Previous Comments 5,112 - 5,151 of 41,361 Next » Last » Search these comments
Lol, shes still trying? Or purely fucking w me? Either way, I gained some respect for team Bloomberg
www.youtube.com/embed/az352YaZNM0
Which lie is that, Marcus?
LOL
I don't think Obama was awful, a bit of a pussy for sure, but when you start from the bottom because of Bush there's no where to go but up. I think you and I both agree that economic success being linked to the POTUS is over the top by both parties. Much of what happens economically was going to happen regardless of who was POTUS.
Cash for Clunkers, 11 years STRONG!
None. I'll be putting up my Poison and Motley Crue posters in the Black Genderqueer Feminist Alliance Office, so it's more inclusive for me.
www.youtube.com/embed/P9d5WPSmmaU
Please show us on the doll where the white supremicist touched you Marcus.
Unlike Hillary, he's not untouchable and protected by the Deep State.
If there was any "There" Their then they're would be some Impeachment action going on right now, and Nancy wouldn't have the Sads.
Facts of the case disagree w you.
marcus says
Gossip is not evidence.
marcus says
Correct. There is no evidence of wrongdoing, and noone suggested Bolton or anyone else has any evidence to change that fact. Gossip mind reading is not evidence.
CNN? Is that you?
Marcus, you've been lied to and dont seem to care. Show the evidence you have perhaps? Or nah, just lash out at those who use facts and empiricism.
I think the Black Queer Alliance would be better with some more diversity. A little Motorhead, some Cheryl Tieg swimsuit posters circa 1982.
What's wrong with that? Diversity and a broader spectrum of things makes everything better.
You want me to present evidence of lack of evidence?
You are running cause you have no facts. You have innuendo, assumptions, mind reading, and gossip. You can call that stuff "evidence" but it's not. Period.
I'd love for you to list the facts that all reasonable people agree with, but you wont (cant).
I've never said Trump didnt lie. I could pick out 25 Trump statements that are factually inaccurate. BUT, it's all stuff like "we are setting all time records" when something is merely good. Or the hamburgers were "stacked to the moon". Yeah, who cares.
I care about whether I can ascertain a politicians political agenda from his speech. Trump is indeed the most transparent and honest potus in memorable history by that regard.
Asking you to share a lie you want to discuss is my way of showing you that the Trump "lies" are typically fluffed up nonsense or outright lies by the establishment. Ex : "https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/02/politics/justice-department-trump-tower-wiretap/index.html" The important lies reported by the MSM have been proven to be 100% accurate. Obama did wiretap Trump at Trump Towers, meanwhile the entire MSM establishment called Trump a liar.
Still waiting for your big lie, that you havent found in 3 years of Trump.
That’s your response to CBO’s post? I’m picking up my toys and leaving you smelly pants?
CBO has a major point. That is, how in the universe are the charges on impeachment nebulous? I’m still impossibly unclear on why/how anyone can determine guilt of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The thing is, CNN and MSNBC are full on propaganda. Not an alternative point of view. They are not the counterpoint to Fox. Fox is counterpoint to ABC, CBS, and NBC. CNN and MSNBC are counter points to Glen Beck and Alex Jones...that is, straight up crap.
Yet you have admitted you watch both. You admitted you trust the NY Slimes which hasn’t endorsed a Republican President in over half a century. You probably also read the Washington Post which is a leftist pile of garbage at this point.
The impeachment was a political stunt intended to satiate a looney left wing base. It was unfair, wrong, and likely costs the Dems the house in 2020.
Just because. Practice and you'll get it.
No, he didnt. You've been lied to, but you wont even find his quote to prove me wrong, will you. Ask yourself why
Both sides? Dude the impeachment was 100% one sided. You havent even in the slightest "heard both sides" as one side wasnt allowed to speak.
The ease with which you lie to yourself is emblematic of our CNN/MSNBC propagandized times. Look at the facts and try, at least... or just be a bunch of righteous mob nazis.
YOU made a statement. YOU cant find evidence or even a direct quote to back it up. The lie in your statement is that D somehow suggested something wrong happened. He didn't. D suggested the allegations even if true, couldn't legally result in impeachment, to which there is currently no evidence anyways.
i listened to most of the impeachment proceeding. I heard everything D said, and I heard the lies CNN/MSNBC told about him. I listen to CNN/MSNBC far more than any right winger purely via osmosis. Keep lying to yourself though. I mean, everyone who disagrees with you is a nazi right? Thats what Don Lemon tells you to think, just go with it.
marcus says
is a factually incorrect concept, fed to you by the MSM. The CNN/MSNBC spin on D the entire time was that D was somehow admitting Quid Pro Quo, BUT it wasnt impeachable. The left took it further with implications that D admitted Trump wrongdoing, but its not impeachable. Its slippery thinking, based on illusory facts spun to you by propagandists.
The truth: https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/481073-dershowitz-any-citizen-would-find-ukraine-quid-pro-quo-troubling
D NEVER SAID that he thought trump did something wrong. He never said that a quid pro quo for a political favor in return for $$ would be ok with anyone, but that was the spin and you twirled right along w it.
Obama fought the LGBTQ community until he was elected.
Guess which POTUS is the only POTUS in history to support them before election? 25 years before his election, at a minimum.
And remember Obama sent Biden out to test the waters before Obama himself would "evolve."
« First « Previous Comments 5,112 - 5,151 of 41,361 Next » Last » Search these comments