patrick.net

Fake news media will crush her.

She is the only D who makes any sense whatsoever.

Quigley says

The moderators clearly were trying to sideline her, but she chose her moments to shine.

Expect crooked D machine digging something up about her (deepfakes now come in handy), or plain rigging the votes in primaries. Remember how in Iowa in toss-ups Hitlery won 7 times out of 7 coin flips against Sanders, which is a statistical impossibility....

And NPC's are already predictably accusing her of being a Russian stooge - see comments at https://twitter.com/GoogleTrends/status/1144084843115896832

d6rB says

And NPC's are already predictably accusing her of being a Russian stooge - see comments at https://twitter.com/GoogleTrends/status/1144084843115896832

Shes NOT a NAZI? Color me shocked

CBOEtrader says

Shes NOT a NAZI? Color me shocked

Not yet, but just wait if she gets more popular

They will find her with swastika somewhere and claim she is nazi.

More importantly, where can we find nudes of Tulsi Gabbard?

zzyzzx says

More importantly, where can we find nudes of Tulsi Gabbard?

Those will be manufactured and/or stolen if she starts to pull a Bernie and challenge the front runner.

I think I may vote for her, at least in the primaries. Even though she's labeled democrat she is smart, well spoken, and has good ideas.

Google has made themselves obsolete as any kind of Political analyzing tool.

You just can't in good faith use any trend they have on, any Political topic.

I take issue with Google inferring that all of the Southern States uniformly think Spartacus was the winner.
They are fighting for that Black South and I'll be damned if they'll let an outsider White Woman undo all of the work the DNC has done to the South in the decade.

I think even she is a nutjob.

Nothing can trigger a war with Iran? Really? What if they shoot one of our manned planes? What if they invade Kuwait, Bahrain or Attack Israel? Would that do it?

And then Gabbard said no one should tell anyone who to love or who to marry.

The US Federal govt has never told anyone who to love so that’s straight bs pandering nonsense. A feel good piece of fluff. As far as The Who to marry, clearly the fed govt really does have a say so in who people marry. Can’t marry your brother, sister, parents, or children, and polygamy is not allowed either. So her statement in that regard is fly out false. Again, low level pandering with a mostly nonsensical statement.

CovfefeButDeadly says

polygamy is not allowed either

Our polyamorous citizens are discriminated against! How can government decree that love is only between two humans, and not between a group of 21717???

CovfefeButDeadly says

Can’t marry your brother, sister, parents

Discrimination right there again. I wonder why our progressive friends have not taken up this issue...YET.

d6rB says

CovfefeButDeadly says

Can’t marry your brother, sister, parents

Discrimination right there again. I wonder why our progressive friends have not taken up this issue...YET.

Remember with dems today most insane jokes will become tommarows reality.

RC2006 says

d6rB says

CovfefeButDeadly says

Can’t marry your brother, sister, parents

Discrimination right there again. I wonder why our progressive friends have not taken up this issue...YET.

Remember with dems today most insane jokes will become tommarows reality.

Yep, including pedophilia.

RC2006 says

Remember with dems today most insane jokes will become tommarows reality.

I am 100% sure this (polygamy) will be the next level of wokeness. Strictly speaking, either we define marriage in a narrow fashion (according to our culture and traditions), and it is marriage of a man and a woman, or we can broaden the definition of marriage. If we broaden the definition to anything other than man and woman by arguing that "adults should not be limited in their choices and whom they love etc" then there is absolutely no logical reason to restrict marriage to two people, or to not allow seven brothers marry their sister, etc. They are adults and should be able to live without discrimination, right?

Or alternatively we could get the State out of marriage business altogether.

d6rB says

Or alternatively we could get the State out of marriage business altogether.

That’s the libertarian view and the natural progression of the liberal view. Not to mention the fairest and most equitable point of view. The fact that not one candidate last night even faintly alluded to such tells you all you need to know about the Democrats.

There were no liberals...not a one. They are all leftists, happily willing to infringe on your individual freedoms

d6rB says

Or alternatively we could get the State out of marriage business altogether.

Yeah, I've never understood the "marriage rights" issue. Fighting for tax breaks and responsibility for your ex's lifestyle post breakup, ok.

OccasionalCortex says

Use L-O-G-I-C, people! :)

A) She's hot.

She a D you can D

d6rB says

RC2006 says

Remember with dems today most insane jokes will become tommarows reality.

I am 100% sure this (polygamy) will be the next level of wokeness. Strictly speaking, either we define marriage in a narrow fashion (according to our culture and traditions), and it is marriage of a man and a woman, or we can broaden the definition of marriage. If we broaden the definition to anything other than man and woman by arguing that "adults should not be limited in their choices and whom they love etc" then there is absolutely no logical reason to restrict marriage to two people, or to not allow seven brothers marry their sister, etc. They are adults and should be able to live without discrimination, right?

Or alternatively we could get the State out of marriage business altogether.

You'd have to get out of the business altogether as multiple wives create a health and social benefits conundrum that's close to impossible to solve. In a way feminist womyn and gay couples screw up marriage already as they are less stable and have less kids so the government does not benefit from them.

d6rB says

I am 100% sure this (polygamy) will be the next level of wokeness.

Polyamory is already happening.
https://www.bobcutmag.com/stories/polyamory-in-sf

The last desperate phase of the Middle Upper Class Feminists in San Francisco will be to demand open marriages, so they get both their HAWT GUY and the breadwinner. The Beta Breadwinner won't be allowed to complain because he'll get occasional second-rate fuck buddy sex while main partner is in between Hawt Guys, and besides he can see other women.

Interestingly, this won't work for long given the increasing gap between college educated men and women.

As men, our main interests should be limiting refugees/migrants but using feminist "concerns" to insure that (young) women are over-represented in immigration.
"Women suffer the most in war so 80% of Syrian migrants should solely consist of young women"

OccasionalCortex says

Wasn't Oklahoma "Indian Country".

Onvacation says

OccasionalCortex says

Wasn't Oklahoma "Indian Country".

Lol, spot on. OK has the largest % of natives in the country, though I think CA has more by pure numbers.

OccasionalCortex says

A) She's hot.

While she's the most attractive female candidate I've seen from the Dems, hot is a bit over the top. Probably a 6, maybe pushing a 7. Let's call it a 6.5.

Our resident crypto queer would probably call her "cute" and not hot. Tulsi and crypto spam would probably love to have a White Claw together while pumping out lavender essential oils all purchased with dollars.

Sorry, cross posting in a way. Stupidity needs to be stopped though.

Have you noticed noone from CNN/CNBC will even discuss her, let alone give her credit?

Ignoring a threat is the first stage of propaganda.

Also interesting to note the OP's poll is from drudge. TG is the candidate w the most independent appeal, but I think the D's want the free-shit, warmonger clowns.

Sad.

This is a beautiful thing:

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-17/tulsi-gabbard-slams-trump-making-us-prostitute-saudi-arabia

The Hawaiian congresswomen and outspoken US foreign policy critic asserted the president is turning the nation “into the prostitute of Saudi Arabia” and further stated he vetoed the bill “to please his Saudi masters” in a minute-and-a-half campaign video.

"Unlike Donald Trump I will not turn our great country into the prostitute of Saudi Arabia."

I love Tulsi!

The Jews control us, we're a puppet for Saudi. I wish these Conspiracy people would make up their damn minds.

It's the Saudi Zionist axis TPB! Truth be told Trump is nobody's puppet. It is too bad he doesn't call the saudis out for what they are, on the other hand other than Tulsi and Ron Paul, what real politician can you count on not to pander to the Saudis? Certainly not Obama/Clinton/Biden/NPC's

Tenpoundbass says

The Jews control us, we're a puppet for Saudi. I wish these Conspiracy people would make up their damn minds.

Yep, the Russo-Hezbollah-Mullah line:

Trump is controlled by Zionist-Wahabis.

Only if you agree with the Czar Ayatollah are you "woke".

Tulsi is insane. She goes on Rogan, Jimmy Dore, AND Tucker's show. The future is certainly going to be interesting...

Tenpoundbass says

The Jews control us, we're a puppet for Saudi. I wish these Conspiracy people would make up their damn minds.

You have something against equal opportunity conspiracy theorists?

So an instant poll on Drudge gives her the win. Ha Ha. All that proves is there is no way in hell she can ever get the nomination being the favorite of Drudge participants who don't vote in Democratic primaries and probably will vote 95% for Trump. But it makes sense given she was raised in a cult that Trump cultists would favor her.

EBGuy says

Tulsi is insane. She goes on Rogan, Jimmy Dore, AND Tucker's show. The future is certainly going to be interesting...

Yeah funny that she was the only one who appeared sane, cool and collected among the clowns. That and people just want to fuck her. So I'm wondering if she's really all that great.

I feel a bit obliged to at least check her out on Rogan so I know what she's about.

I'd rather she blow me. Call me weird just_dregalicious says

That and people just want to fuck her.

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says

I need to bite her bum!

Get in line buddy! As a consummate Ass Man, I saw it first.

rdm says

But it makes sense given she was raised in a cult that Trump cultists would favor her.

Yes, lets hope that either Creepy Joe or Bankster Whore Kamala gets nominated. That nearly guarantees election of tRUMP...

d6rB says

rdm says

But it makes sense given she was raised in a cult that Trump cultists would favor her.

Yes, lets hope that either Creepy Joe or Bankster Whore Kamala gets nominated. That nearly guarantees election of tRUMP...

What cult? She wasn't raised in a cult. Also Trump voters are the least cultists. Many are swing voters or ex Dems or minorities. Beating this dead and false horse is boring. Politically Trump voters are the most diverse. You want a cult look no further than to the Dems where everyone needs to raise their hand for free handouts to illegals or be ostracized.

mell says

She wasn't raised in a cult.

I did not understand this either. What cult? Perhaps the biggest cult of all is the ORANGEMANBAD cult

CBOEtrader says

I'd rather she blow me. Call me weird just_dregalicious says

That and people just want to fuck her.

Not weird at all. If she had green eyes, smooth skin and was much younger she'd look like a Veronica I banged in high school.

Once.

Veronica had a single long black areola hair that freaked me out.

d6rB says

She wasn't raised in a cult

Try a little research, an off shoot of the Hare Krishnas. I have nothing against her including this, it's just amusing that Trump cultists would gravitate toward her. Someone who 1. will almost certainly never get the Dem nomination and 2. Would be easy fodder for devastating opo research should by some miracle she was on the ticket.