Just looked into it, but haven't been following. Without media reporting on it, this mostly looks like procedural legal shit so far. Looks like it's starting to get to the meaty courtroom part soon though.
If anyone wants to look further into it or has connections, here's the Orange County case # 19HF0572 and some screen shots of the current activity. 3/3/2020 looks like the next court date.
Did anyone else have a detective contact them to grill them on where they were, what's their relationship with the decease and what did they mean by comments in the original thread?
Gotta give the lawyers a couple of years of delayed justice to soak the perp and system for every last dollar first. Fleecing procedure isn't done yet.
Yes, sorry. Usually these public court case sites don't do well with sharing links due to the specific nature of the search, so I didn't even try to share (I think your link is dead FYI). I searched his first and last name and for some reason it didn't show the info as detailed. I found the case # via an article and that's how I was able to see more. So that's why I shared that.
: Yeah I missed the one in LA. She was an interesting woman. I wonder if her sometimes hanging out on Patrick.net was in any way connected to the fact that she might have been in a crazy relationship (more crazy than the usual that is). Making online friends that would notice and ask questions if she disappeared. Just a thought.
What did he post that was personal? I may have missed it but I responded to comment 12 which was after this one? I didn't see anything that warranted a flag, but I could be wrong.
It was flagged personal, something about TPB. I always try NOT to flag something personal, unless it's pretty damned obvious and I can't find a reason to let it go.
I emailed back and forth with her for a while, exchanging ideas on home renovations. She was a real energetic and engaged person, smart and personable. If her husband did it, he’s guilty of taking one of the good ones out of this sorry world.
Did anyone else have a detective contact them to grill them on where they were, what's their relationship with the decease and what did they mean by comments in the original thread?
Something to the effect that at times TPBs comments on the forum might reflect the mindset of someone that should be looked in to as a suspect. That he shouldn't be surprised.
I said it in a more colorful way though. I doubt TPB minded. He must know the image he sometimes projects.
Tpb is in FLorida (supposedly), so it does seem strange, and he might have even been kidding about being contacted by a detective.
Tpb is in FLorida (supposedly), so it does seem strange, and he might have even been kidding about being contacted by a detective.
Yes it did seem strange, and you're right I do live in South Florida, and everyone knew I lived in South Florida and didn't go to the meet up.
I've never been to San Fran Shithole in my life.
I suspect some butt hurt, Patneter sent them to me, especially seeing how seething Liberals always resort to weaponizing law enforcement to intimidate people they can't best in Political debate.
especially seeing how seething Liberals always resort to weaponizing law enforcement to intimidate people they can't best in Political debate.
Yeah. That sounds exactly like liberals. Btw, there is nobody easier to beat in political debate than you. Hell, you make up such bizarre stuff, "winning" for you is just getting a little attention for those whacko supposed opinions.
Patrick emailed me and gave me the detective's number. And I called the Detective.
Oh, I see, then I guess we can file this (below) under, classic TPB ? Or did Patrick actually email you becasue the detective specifically had wanted to talk to you ?
I suspect some butt hurt, Patneter sent them to me, especially seeing how seething Liberals always resort to weaponizing law enforcement to intimidate people they can't best in Political debate.
You don't think that the flop had anything to do with it , do you?
If I were everyone I would wait until the court case is over and done. This is still on going. Trump isn't even immune from talking about on going legal matters. Do so at your own peril. That being said, I will be happy to say everything the detective asked me about, when the court case is over.
Put it this way, the killer or his lawyers were cunning enough to send the Detectives to Patnet to search for suspects. Purely because we were discussing it.
You don't think that the flop had anything to do with it , do you?
I don't think so, not directly anyway. From what I could gather, he had a previous wife who took a lot of money in the divorce. Maybe he was afraid of going through the same thing again. But this is pure speculation.
he had a previous wife who took a lot of money in the divorce. Maybe he was afraid of going through the same thing again. But this is pure speculation.
This is perhaps true, however, a DA's office doesn't prosecute based upon a speculative theory because otherwise, it would be swamped with more cases than hours in the year.
It's highly feasible that she had a large life insurance on her and thus, given a suspicious accident, they would have enough of a probable motive to prosecute and gain a conviction, given the fact that jurors can be swayed by spousal abuse stories with the payout-in-the-end, as the coup de grace.
invite response
Comments 1 - 40 of 144 Next » Last » Search these comments
No idea. I’d love to hear if anyone knows more. Patrick maybe?
If anyone wants to look further into it or has connections, here's the Orange County case # 19HF0572 and some screen shots of the current activity. 3/3/2020 looks like the next court date.
WookieMan says
Would you post a link to the case details above ? Or does it require some sort of acct and access to a state system ?
I found the case, but not details. Given time, perhaps I would find it, but do you have a link ?
https://ocapps.occourts.org/CourtIndex/case_details_criminal.jsp?cn=19HF0572&pi=10110810&iped=false&isc=&sct=0#ocDetailsA
https://ocjustice.occourts.org/Vision_PublicNS/Case.do#first
Not much more detail than this though.
Yes, sorry. Usually these public court case sites don't do well with sharing links due to the specific nature of the search, so I didn't even try to share (I think your link is dead FYI). I searched his first and last name and for some reason it didn't show the info as detailed. I found the case # via an article and that's how I was able to see more. So that's why I shared that.
We got stuck in horrible traffic on the 880, then freaking BART delays because they were single tracking between Lake Merritt and West Oakland.
By the time we got to SF the event was ended.
Sent this thread, with some other links, to Dateline NBC.
Yeah I missed the one in LA. She was an interesting woman. I wonder if her sometimes hanging out on Patrick.net was in any way connected to the fact that she might have been in a crazy relationship (more crazy than the usual that is). Making online friends that would notice and ask questions if she disappeared. Just a thought.
What did he post that was personal? I may have missed it but I responded to comment 12 which was after this one? I didn't see anything that warranted a flag, but I could be wrong.
Update: That might have been from another thread.
Tenpoundbass says
Something to the effect that at times TPBs comments on the forum might reflect the mindset of someone that should be looked in to as a suspect. That he shouldn't be surprised.
I said it in a more colorful way though. I doubt TPB minded. He must know the image he sometimes projects.
Tpb is in FLorida (supposedly), so it does seem strange, and he might have even been kidding about being contacted by a detective.
Yes it did seem strange, and you're right I do live in South Florida, and everyone knew I lived in South Florida and didn't go to the meet up.
I've never been to San Fran Shithole in my life.
I suspect some butt hurt, Patneter sent them to me, especially seeing how seething Liberals always resort to weaponizing law enforcement to intimidate people they can't best in Political debate.
I feel pretty sure that her husband did it, but we have a justice system exactly for this kind of thing.
Yeah. That sounds exactly like liberals. Btw, there is nobody easier to beat in political debate than you. Hell, you make up such bizarre stuff, "winning" for you is just getting a little attention for those whacko supposed opinions.
I suspect it was your email conversation.
What Email conversation?
It should be tpb that decides whether to flag my comment, not you Patrick. Sure it was about him, but it wasn't false.
Then how would he have contacted TPB and "grilled" him.
marcus says
Patrick emailed me and gave me the detective's number. And I called the Detective.
I wasn't grilled, he just asked some basic questions in the pursuit of diligence.
Tenpoundbass says
Oh, I see, then I guess we can file this (below) under, classic TPB ? Or did Patrick actually email you becasue the detective specifically had wanted to talk to you ?
Tenpoundbass says
Actually I flagged it, normally I let cheap shots roll off. But in the given context of this thread, it was libelous and slanderous.
Then she deleted the image after a week or something.
Depending on backup timing, I may possibly have the image somewhere.
www.youtube.com/embed/aQNkeugaAMc
You don't think that the flop had anything to do with it , do you?
If I were everyone I would wait until the court case is over and done. This is still on going. Trump isn't even immune from talking about on going legal matters.
Do so at your own peril. That being said, I will be happy to say everything the detective asked me about, when the court case is over.
Put it this way, the killer or his lawyers were cunning enough to send the Detectives to Patnet to search for suspects. Purely because we were discussing it.
How do you know her name?
I don't think so, not directly anyway. From what I could gather, he had a previous wife who took a lot of money in the divorce. Maybe he was afraid of going through the same thing again. But this is pure speculation.
This is perhaps true, however, a DA's office doesn't prosecute based upon a speculative theory because otherwise, it would be swamped with more cases than hours in the year.
It's highly feasible that she had a large life insurance on her and thus, given a suspicious accident, they would have enough of a probable motive to prosecute and gain a conviction, given the fact that jurors can be swayed by spousal abuse stories with the payout-in-the-end, as the coup de grace.
Comments 1 - 40 of 144 Next » Last » Search these comments