Comments 1 - 20 of 20 Search these comments
My educated guess is obstruction of justice and 18 uSC 1001.
ohomen171 saysMy educated guess is obstruction of justice and 18 uSC 1001.
WOW! I actually made ohomen respond!
Eric Holder saysFor what crime exactly?
Draining the swamp
Robert Mueller and his team could answer this quation with authoritity. I have not read his report. I cannot answer.
My educated guess is obstruction of justice and 18 uSC 1001.
For what crime exactly?
Eric Holder saysFor what crime exactly?
Yeah? What is the biggest crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed?
I was listening to the black information network (racist radio) yesterday and they were talking about how Trump was going to be prosecuted for the Russian collusion as well as other state and federal crimes come January. They also talked about how he was trying to steal the election but all 20 of his lawsuits have failed.
Clown world is going dystopian.
This question has intrigued me for some time. It also intrigued the MSNBC news network. They went to a Constitutional Law Specialist at Harvard Law School.
He researched the matter. Nothing turned up in US legal precedents going back for centuries. He had to go back 410 years ago to a British Common Law case that addressed the issue of the right of a sovereign (king or queen) to issue a pardon.
The British High Court ruled that the sovereign had the power to pardon anyone except himself or herself. The court reasoned that when a defendant applies to the sovereign for a pardon, the sovereign assumes the position like a judge in a court case. The nature of the crime and the particulars of the defendant are considered by the sovereign as if he or she were a judge in a court. The justices reasoned that a defendant cannot act as his own judge in a trial or court action.
Trump will need to resign and allow Pence to become president and issue the pardon.