« First « Previous Comments 1,700 - 1,739 of 2,067 Next » Last » Search these comments
Green Party Seeks Supreme Court Intervention over Jill Stein’s Exclusion from Nevada Ballot
Left-wing Green Party candidate Jill Stein has been excluded from Nevada’s 2024 election ballot, provoking a likely court battle.
As the November presidential election draws nearer, issues of ballot access continue to make their way through the courts.
The exclusion of Stein, who threatens to draw votes from Democrat nominee Kamala Harris, is yet another ballot issue to emerge.
According to The Hill, the Green Party in Nevada is seeking U.S. Supreme Court intervention after the state’s highest court excluded Stein from the general election ballot.
As the outlet explains, in a 5-2 decision, the Nevada Supreme Court booted Green Party candidates from the ballot.
The court cited clerical problems with the group’s signature collection practices.
Notably, a lower Nevada court had sided with Stein and her party.
Technicalities are the friend of the wealthy, who can afford to hire people to understand and deal with all of them.
Election officials in Arizona have admitted that almost 100,000 voter registrations have been validated in the state without their citizenship being verified.
In announcing the shocking discovery, Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer blamed an “error” for the issue.
This massive blunder was allegedly caused by an “error” in the Arizona Motor Vehicle Department’s (MVD) system
The MVD provides driver’s license information to the state’s voter registration system for citizenship verification.
Richer admitted that 97,000 voter registrations have been approved without citizenship verification.
It’s unclear how many non-citizens have now been registered to vote in the state.
Alarmingly, this same “error” has been happening for 20 years and was somehow not discovered until now. ...
The issue has existed since Arizona began requiring documentary proof of citizenship to vote in 2004.
Licenses issued before Arizona required proof of citizenship to drive in 1996, regardless of citizenship status, showed as proof of citizenship on file with the MVD.
This massive blunder was allegedly caused by an “error” in the Arizona Motor Vehicle Department’s (MVD) system
By combining these data, the author’s “best” estimate was that 25.1% of non-citizens were illegally registered to vote.
The authors calculated voter turnout with the same datasets, but their methodology yielded a best estimate that 6.4% of non-citizens voted in 2008—lower than the 8.0% of non-citizens who stated “I definitely voted” and explicitly named the candidate they voted for. This and other matters led Just Facts to engage in extensive correspondence with the lead author of the study to verify practically every detail of it.
Just Facts then conducted a comparable study that used the same datasets, a more straightforward methodology, and related studies to constrain assumptions. This found that roughly 27% of non-citizens were registered to vote and about 16% of them voted in the 2008 national elections.
https://www.kgw.com/article/news/verify/elections-verify/yes-vp-kamala-harris-can-certify-the-election-results-even-if-shes-a-presidential-candidate/536-6eb8fc15-c36f-4ca9-87c3-376a2e16442a
Yesterday, NPR ran another intensely encouraging story headlined, “Georgia's Republican-led election board OKs controversial rule to hand-count ballots.” Finally!
Yesterday —pushing through opposition from the state’s own Republican Secretary of State and Attorney General— the state’s conservative election board approved a rule requiring hand counts of voter ballots in November’s election.
They’re to count the numbers of ballots, not the individual races.
In other words, they’ll be double-checking the electronic machines. Technically, each voting precinct’s local supervisor is required to hand-count the cast ballots, and cross-check those results against how many ballots the electronic machines claim to have tabulated.
NPR whined that, according to experts, hand-counting is slower and less reliable than electronic tabulation. Thanks, Captain Obvious, for pointing out hand counting is slower. But whether it is less reliable — well, that one seems debatable.
Why not count them? Counting cast ballots at the precinct level hardly seems impossible. One suspects all the hysteria must be for a different reason.
On top of that great news, the board passed six other rule changes yesterday. The new rules included: allowing poll watchers to access more places during vote tabulation, daily posting of the numbers of people in each county who cast ballots, and publicly posting reconciliation reports to the county website.
Here’s an example of what we learned today, from an alert VoteAlert user who sent in this picture 👇 from travels in Vienna, Austria, where Democrat-backed groups like ‘Vote from Abroad’ are actively registering voters. Screenshots from their website affirm that you needn’t ever have lived in the U.S., nor are any identifying documents necessary to register or to vote.
THE CHEAT IS ON! Democrats Reveal Their Plan to Use Overseas Ballots to Win in 2024 — Here’s How Easy It Is to Cheat — Are Republicans Really Going to Let This Happen?
The next President of the United States and the next Congress may be decided by 3.5 million mail-in ballots from ineligible or preposterous addresses.
Because voter rolls are constantly out of date, many mail-in ballots are unwittingly sent to imaginary people at ineligible or preposterous addresses like a Walmart, UPS box, empty strip mall, park bench, laundromat or vacant lot, where organizations determined to hijack our elections harvest them.
Who benefits from this broken mail-in ballot process?
Many mail-in ballots come from NGO (Non-Government Organization) ballot mills, who fill out ballots and submit them without that person knowing it.
The “voter” may be dead or moved out of state yet remains on the voter roll. The time is now for citizens to take a stand and demand our politicians and courts put a stop to what a growing number of Americans call the rigging of our democratic republic.
The Good News
A group of patriots is harnessing cutting-edge technologies capable of pinpointing long hidden voter roll anomalies, with provable, actionable data that can be used in court and the court of public opinion to safeguard our elections by creating legislative change in America.
so what about the 24% of "undecided" black voters ? all of them will vote for Harris ?
Video Shows Hacker Overriding Voting Machine, Changing Votes in Seconds
A disturbing video has emerged that shows a hacker using a USB stick to override an election voting machine and change the system’s recorded votes in a matter of seconds.
The process was so fast that the hacker needed to slow down his software to demonstrate what he was doing.
After gaining control of the system, the hacker noted that he could “do anything you want” with the machine and the votes.
The hacker, whose identity wasn’t revealed, provided a live demonstration on Patrick Bet-David‘s PBD Podcast.
During the demonstration, he explains that he is using a simple “USB computer” device that can be easily bought online for around $120.
“If this had been an election, I could have gone to the database and, for example, change the votes,” the hacker states.
“How much of it could you have changed?” Bet-David asked.
“Anything,” the hacker replied.
“[I could] add a new candidate who was not even on a ballot.
“It doesn’t matter because if you have total control over the system.
“You can do anything you want.”
Illegals in Arizona admit they are registered to vote, support Kamala.
California’s Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom has signed a bill into law to ban voter ID requirements for elections in the state.
The legislation was introduced by Democrat State Sen. Dave Min (D-Orange County).
Under the new law, local governments are prohibited from requiring residents to present identification to vote in elections.
« First « Previous Comments 1,700 - 1,739 of 2,067 Next » Last » Search these comments
Trump continues to insist there was mass fraud, but all media simply dismisses his claim as "false" without any reasoning or evidence.
I'm pretty damn sure Biden's election was fraudulent.
Update: after 2000 Mules presented the evidence, I'm 100% sure that Biden's election was fraudulent. See https://2000mules.com/