12
1

Election Fraud News


 invite response                
2021 Feb 2, 10:07pm   210,395 views  2,065 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (61)   💰tip   ignore  

Can't find anything at all in the media anymore, except wildly biased yellow journalism.

Trump continues to insist there was mass fraud, but all media simply dismisses his claim as "false" without any reasoning or evidence.

I'm pretty damn sure Biden's election was fraudulent.

Update: after 2000 Mules presented the evidence, I'm 100% sure that Biden's election was fraudulent. See https://2000mules.com/

« First        Comments 2,026 - 2,065 of 2,065        Search these comments

2026   Patrick   2024 Nov 12, 9:35am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/magic-votes-tuesday-november-12-2024


The New York Times rushed out a broken-narrative-mending article yesterday headlined, “Why Was There a Broad Drop-Off in Democratic Turnout in 2024?” The ominous sub-headline offered: “Many Democrats failed to turn out to vote at the rate they did in 2020 when they ousted Donald Trump.” Baffling! Where could the mysterious missing Democrat voters from 2020 have gone?

It’s tempting to think the Times is edging toward uncovering a terrible truth, but do not be fooled. The New York Times knows perfectly well why all those magical 2020 Democrat voters didn’t turn out in 2024: Because they don’t exist.

The only reason the Times is talking about it now is because it has to; a lot of Democrats questions about the 2020 election are starting to boil over. So the Times raced to put a lid on that sort of thinking before it could ruin Thanksgiving dinner.

The Times had to do something. In the vacuum of any other permissive programming, some smart Democrats were connecting some very inconvenient dots and starting to think for themselves. ...

Could the truth that the Times was trying to bury under a railcar of rationales be that fake mail-in ballots and overnight electronic cheating falsely inflated the 2020 Democrat voting figures? And the 2024 figures are closer to the real vote? Is that the truth the Times was desperately trying to stop smart Democrats from figuring out?

Many of us feared a repeat of 2020 this year. What changed? In hindsight, the good news was that fixing egregious, 2020-style cheating only required focusing on a few urban, blue counties from which Democrats could tip the statewide scales...

The Times can never admit this, but what really changed was that in the wake of 2020, the Trump-led GOP devised a four-year strategy with two main prongs. First, it found untapped voters —like the Amish— to ensure a turnout that was too big to rig.

Second, it worked across the country to tighten election laws, through lawmaking in red states and litigation in blue states. It also successfully elected friendly or at least fair supervisors of elections, and strategically prosecuted a handful of election crimes in the right places. The plan to tighten election laws was back-loaded, shifting into the highest gear mainly in the final six months before the election.

Take a look at how it changed Florida. The Sunshine State went +3% for Trump in 2020. This year, after four years of election-law improvements and new Republican voter registrations, Florida went Trump +13%. In 2020, Orange County (Orlando) went +23% for Biden. But thanks to a disgruntled Democrat commissioner who got primaried and turned whistleblower, we learned about the Democrats’ Orange County ballot harvesting operation.

Ballot harvesting is now illegal in Florida. And in 2024, without ballot harvesting, Harris only won Orange County by +5.6%, a +18% swing. ...

Imagine being a Democrat and having to read these kinds of migraine-provoking headlines. Call it their 2020 hangover.

But now, in the wake of this glorious victory, the quest for real election integrity continiues. We still need nationwide voter ID verification, for example. I am very optimistic. We swung this election with four years of fighting under a hostile federal regime. We now have four more years and a cooperative Administration to get it right.

Without being able to rely on cheating, the Democrats may finally need to sacrifice the zaniest parts of their platform (like DEI), and tack centerwards. Ahoy!
2027   Ceffer   2024 Nov 12, 9:50am  

Democrats thinking for themselves. Now, there's something completely different. Maybe hyper novelty IS a thing.
2029   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2024 Nov 12, 10:37am  

Catholics, white women(Christian’s) and Latino men.

Catholics - 54% for Trump
Latino men - 55% for Trump(and 46% overall Latino vote for Trump…highest since modern Latino population for a Republican presidential candidate…bodes very well for the future)
White women 52%

And btw, no “journalist” better ever meet me face to face. Assholes write about how women are traitors and racists and crap. Fuck them. My mom (white Christian) voted for Donald Trump. My wife(latina Christian) voted for Donald Trump. My Sister in Law(white Catholic) voted for Donald Trump. Her mom loves Donald Trump with a passion. I’ve got two lifelong friends whose families I care about deeply and who are like brothers to me whose spouses, both latina Christian, voted for Donald Trump. One of their daughters is an adult in the military and voted for Donald Trump. Another close family friend (asian Catholic) voted for Donald Trump and so did her adult daughter and basically every extended member of her family.

It’s no wonder these “journalists” all live in select area of big cities. They’d get popped in the face anywhere else on a daily basis.
2030   Ceffer   2024 Nov 12, 11:36am  

The 'lowest common denominator' defense. "We're all scum, so don't choose me out for being a scum in particular." Guess she never read the DEI small print about sacrificial optics.

2033   RWSGFY   2024 Nov 12, 3:23pm  

Patrick says


https://x.com/ULTRA_MAJESTY/status/1855467613305934067





Ok, I'll play devil's advocate: are you saying that "they" cheated against Lake, but not against Trump? Why is that? What's the point? If you have the whole operation set up, why not cheat against both? Especially taking into account that strait party-line voting looks LESS suspicious than split ballot.
2034   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Nov 12, 4:06pm  

RWSGFY says

Especially taking into account that strait party-line voting looks LESS suspicious than split ballot.


Not this election. AOC and most Dems running outperformed Kamala. Split voting is back, it seems.
2035   RWSGFY   2024 Nov 12, 4:23pm  

DemocratsAreTotallyFucked says

RWSGFY says


Especially taking into account that strait party-line voting looks LESS suspicious than split ballot.


Not this election. AOC and most Dems running outperformed Kamala. Split voting is back, it seems.


How would "they" know beforehand?
2037   AmericanKulak   2024 Nov 13, 4:25am  

Pennsylvania: just "Found" 3200 new ballots, and surprise! They broke for democrat Casey
2038   WookieMan   2024 Nov 13, 4:52am  

This is going to be a harsh take, maybe get me in trouble. At some point we need to find and kill these people that are manipulating the system.

Trump is fine, he's not the best. But this manipulation has to stop on ALL sides. The votes should be done in two days WORST case. This is a fucking joke at this point. If you can't determine a senate or house seat over a week later, you're a fucking retard. There's not that many votes to count.

I guess the positive takeaway is you know what states to not live in because they're incompetent in counting votes and governing. AZ and PA are for sure off the short list and on to the short bus...
2041   Eric Holder   2024 Nov 14, 11:38am  

Patrick says






Does he have an answer to this question? Or too lazy to research? It's not hard to find examples. Here's one: in 2016 election Wisconsin Republican Senator Ron Johnson received more votes than Republican candidate at the top of the ticket - Donald Trump.
2042   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Nov 14, 11:41am  

Eric Holder says

Here's one: in 2016 election Wisconsin Republican Senator Ron Johnson received more votes than Republican candidate at the top of the ticket - Donald Trump.


So?
2043   Eric Holder   2024 Nov 14, 11:46am  

DOGEWontAmountToShit says


Eric Holder says


Here's one: in 2016 election Wisconsin Republican Senator Ron Johnson received more votes than Republican candidate at the top of the ticket - Donald Trump.


So?



Answers the question positively. That's all. If you have twatter account feel free to reply to that Vance Murphy twat with this shocking revelation.
2044   Patrick   2024 Nov 14, 3:28pm  

https://omega4america.substack.com/p/how-the-kari-lake-election-was-stolen


How The Kari Lake Election Was Stolen - Again

Lake and 3 other senate seats were stolen, by legal ballots, to legal people at legal addresses that were UNDELIVERABLE

Kari Lake did not lose.

The Arizona senate election was stolen, in plain sight, in a provable, predictable way.

There are three overriding reasons Lake “lost.”

First, she was marked early on as a breakout candidate who, left unchecked, would quickly become a national, perhaps international star propagating the hated common sense of the MAGA crowd.

Second, for 4 years after the 2020 steal, the election integrity narrative focused on cleaning voter rolls to stop the Left’s steal.

Lake lost to legal ballots, sent to legal addresses, to legal voters, which were undeliverable.

Cleaning voter rolls - which never happened - although great money was spent on lawyers in that quest - would do nothing - did nothing - to thwart undeliverable ballots, collected by NGOs against Lake.

Lake’s party and her campaign fought a 2024 battle, using 1980s tactics, against a determined opponent who knew how to find over 80,000 loose ballots invisible to all current voter integrity technology.

The third reason Lake lost is the belief that the get-out-the-vote campaign and voter registration drives were effective. They were not.

Let’s build an Undeliverable Ballot Database for Arizona, time stamped to election day and see how many ballots were cast from an address where a mail-in ballot cannot be received.

So if a ballot comes from a Walmart, a bank, a gas station, it’s ineligible and likely fraudulent.

If a ballot comes from any of the innumerable address types where a ballot cannot be received - no apartment number, wrong street address, incorrect zip to the city, and two dozen more - those are likely ineligible.

Why is this important?

The Left commits fraud in elections.

We see it in the data of every state we have examined - over 20 so far.

Republicans do not commit voter fraud at scale - for a number of reasons, but they just don’t.

So when we find a pile of ineligible ballots, we know 97% or more of them are set to vote for a Leftist. Ineligible ballots come in flavors.

The flavor of the day for 20 years is PHANTOMS. Fake people casting a ballot.
2045   The_Deplorable   2024 Nov 14, 5:52pm  

Patrick says
"Lake and 3 other senate seats were stolen, by legal ballots, to legal people at legal
addresses that were UNDELIVERABLE"

If mail to these voters, at their home address is undeliverable, then these says that the ballots are
fraudulent and the elections were indeed stolen. This is election fraud that can be proven in court.
Just because the fraudsters declared victory does not mean they won the election.
2050   HeadSet   2024 Nov 19, 5:28pm  

DOGEWontAmountToShit says





Not misinterpreted at all, she was full gangster until she saw that election judge in MN actually get arrested. Now she is scared.
2051   Patrick   2024 Nov 21, 10:51am  

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/walking-backwards-thursday-november


Ruh roh! In this morning’s first “great moments in walking it back” story, CNN ran an article yesterday headlined, “Pennsylvania Democratic official apologizes for comments about ignoring election laws.” She must have realized it’s not the pre-2020 world anymore.




I am sure you will recall Bucks County, Pennsylvania’s arrogant, hyphenated Democrat Commissioner Diane Ellis-Marseglia who, while counting illegal votes that the state’s Supreme Court forbade be counted, infamously sneered “People violate laws any time they want.” To drive the stake deeper into her own shriveled heart, she pompously added, for absolute clarity, as though she were the center of the universe, “For me, if I violate this law, it’s because I want a court to pay attention to it.” Then, to clamp shut her own coffin lid, she snidely tossed in for good measure, “precedent by a court doesn’t matter anymore in this country.”

The feckless county commissioner was practically daring Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court to do something about it.

Ms. Ellis-Marseglia rapidly became a woman on a deserted political island. On Monday, following national fury, Democrat Governor Josh Shapiro distanced himself from the debacle saying, “to be clear: any insinuation that our laws can be ignored or do not matter is irresponsible and does damage to faith in our electoral process.” The same day, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ordered all counties (meaning Bucks County) to comply with its previous rulings over undated ballots. Some of the justices blasted Bucks officials for “upending the rule of law.”

In Sunday’s C&C, I observed that Ms. Ellis-Marseglia had placed herself in the crosshairs of potential criminal prosecution as an insurrectionist or worse, an election interferer. There’s no evidence she’s yet been charged but apparently, for some reason, Ms. Ellis-Marseglia has experienced a significant heart change.

At yesterday’s board meeting, Ellis-Marseglia faced a fiery crowd and international news coverage. She began by apologizing. She first apologized that people misunderstood her comment and took it out of context. When that non-apology landed with a thud, Ellis-Marseglia groveled a little further, seeking empathy and blaming her controversial comments on her passion for public service. “The passion in my heart got the best of me, and I apologize again for that," she said.

Internet: 1, Rebellious County Commissioners: 0.
2053   Ceffer   2024 Nov 21, 11:40am  

Just California digesting the election fraud at its leisure, making sure any anti-fraud activities are identified and roundly squashed so that the designated appointments can proceed as if they are real.
2059   stereotomy   2024 Nov 26, 9:22pm  

Globohomo is trying to spread the story that Trump won by mass E-voting fraud.

Go figure . . .
2060   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Nov 27, 12:38am  

Patrick says






It turns out that many voters voted for Trump...but didn't vote for any other office on their ballots. They left those blank.
2061   WookieMan   2024 Nov 27, 5:37am  

DOGEWontAmountToShit says

It turns out that many voters voted for Trump...but didn't vote for any other office on their ballots. They left those blank.

I'd agree with this. Not all but a lot of Trump voters in my area are rather low IQ if I'm being honest. They just went to vote for Trump and that was it. I'd guess 5 out of 10 don't know what Congress is when voting. Probably common in other states. Likely shy or embarrassed to make a vote on down ballot because they have no clue who the people are.

Low IQ men will also likely vote for the man on the ballot. I'll probably never vote for a female POTUS, but I think that may have been a factor for Kari Lake. I don't think there will ever be a women at the top job. Senators are about the max and Kamala was DEI by default VP pick. I'm still youngish and don't see a female POTUS in my lifetime. We like military and I can't see a woman running the executive branch. They'll either be weak or overly aggressive to act tough and get us into wars.
2062   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Nov 27, 8:45am  

WookieMan says


I'd agree with this. Not all but a lot of Trump voters in my area are rather low IQ if I'm being honest. They just went to vote for Trump and that was it. I'd guess 5 out of 10 don't know what Congress is when voting. Probably common in other states. Likely shy or embarrassed to make a vote on down ballot because they have no clue who the people are.


Dems had these voters up until recently. That is why they worked so hard to remove barriers to voting (barriers to lazy voters).

Now that the GOP has them, look to see Dems start to insist on voter ID, etc. while the GOP actually starts to warm up to it.
2063   HeadSet   2024 Nov 27, 1:31pm  

DOGEWontAmountToShit says

Now that the GOP has them, look to see Dems start to insist on voter ID

The lack of voter ID was to enable fraud. It had nothing to do with lazy voters. Dems will continue to fight voter ID.
2064   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Nov 27, 6:09pm  

HeadSet says

had nothing to do with lazy voters


Sorry, but it is the main reason. Same for being auto registered at the DMV. Then mail in voting.

Low propensity voters are that bad.

The voter fraud bennies became apparent later.

« First        Comments 2,026 - 2,065 of 2,065        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste