patrick.net

This guy thinks the global population has already dropped by a BILLION... he makes a few good points:

"The general consensus was that there were 7.84 billion people on Earth in January 2020. The United Nations reported that the global population eclipsed the 8 billion mark in November 2022. As of publishing, Worldometer has the current global population at 8.028 billion.

There have been 40 million births and 20 million deaths, for a net population growth of 20 million thus far in 2023, according to the same source. The only people who believe any of the foregoing also believe that men are really women, and vaccines are safe and effective.

As of March 2023, there are two jobs available in the U.S. for every one unemployed worker. You don’t even need the ADP Workforce Vitality Reports to know that wages have been at all-time highs since Q4 2021. Just look around your local area, and you’ll see McDonald’s, Kum and Go, Circle K, Walmart, and all those former minimum wage jobs hiring at $15 per hour and up. They are forced to offer higher wages (or hire illegal immigrants) to entice what’s left of the U.S. workforce.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce acknowledged the ongoing labor shortage earlier this month. If every unemployed person got a job tomorrow, there would still be 4 million job openings. Mainstream media continually blame #ABV for this two years and counting labor dearth.

RELATED: Washington Post caught telling the truth – “vaccines” do in fact lower the risk of hospitalizations because vaccinated people are dying too fast (November 25, 2022)

The bottom line is that millions of Americans have died or are severely maimed from the lethal mRNA and viral vector DNA injections, and physically cannot work. Further, U.S. birth rates in 2021 were the lowest since World War I. You cannot find a straight answer anywhere as to 2022 U.S. birth rates. They now “splain” it as fertility rates and ramble on about 2015-2019 instead of just giving straight statistics about birth rates in 2022.

It’s not just the United States. The COVID Blog® is confident in declaring that the global population has dropped from 7.8 billion in January 2020 to 6.8 billion today – about a 13% drop in 28 months. The powers-that-be (“TPTB”) will never report the truth on this, and will do everything to conceal, manipulate and distort the real numbers. So all we can do is crunch everything we know to determine the progress of their goal – 500 million humans left on Earth by 2030.

We posited in August 2022 that the world population would be down to 4.5 billion by the end of 2024. It does not take a giant leap to accept that the world population is down to 6.8 billion today (from 7.8 billion in January 2020) because of the following five phenomena."

FULL ARTICLE: https://thecovidblog.com/2023/04/20/5-reasons-to-believe-the-global-population-is-already-one-billion-people-less-than-it-was-in-january-2020/

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-moderna-hid-serious-side-effects

Moderna hid serious side effects suffered by its Covid vaccine recipients when it reported clinical trial results for the shot
Moderna scientists said in a 2021 paper no mRNA jab recipients in the trial had "serious adverse effects." In fact, 14 ultimately did, including three miscarriages. No placebo recipients did.

In February 2021, Moderna scientists published results from the Phase 2 trial of the company’s mRNA Covid jab in the journal Vaccine.

Moderna had started the “P201” trial with 600 healthy volunteers on May 29, 2020, mostly to examine if the shots were safe.

The company had good news on that front. In the “Highlights” section at the top of the paper, Moderna’s scientists reported:

No serious adverse effects were observed.

That statement was untrue. ...

In all, during the placebo-controlled phase of the trial, which ended in early 2021, seven of the 400 healthy volunteers who received a two-shot regimen of Moderna’s vaccine suffered serious side effects. ...

The problems included a heart attack and two miscarriages.

In comparison, the 200 people who received a placebo shot without any mRNA had no serious side effects.

Seven vs. zero. ...

Comments

Brooke
21 min ago
Fear fueled EUA shifted endless dollars into pharma coffers, which they paid to lawmakers who won’t hold them accountable because: endless dollars. 🔄

Howling for Harmony
16 min ago
"Moderna says it hopes to offer new vaccines for cancer, heart disease, and other conditions by 2030" Moderna ---the firefighter that sets the fires!!

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/speechless-saturday-april-22-2023

Regular readers will immediately recognize Dr. Peter McCullough’s point, made in a recent Shannon Joy interview, and previously discussed here on C&C. The heroic covid doc explained that, according to a solid recent study, the real numbers of American adults that somehow avoided jabbing was actually 25%, not 8% like the CDC claims.

And 25% of adults — obstinate, passionate, and more than a little chafed at being prodded with needles every time they turned around in 2021 — that 25% group forms a monolithic, single-issue voting bloc, if some politician is smart enough to take advantage of it.

In other words, given that — even in a presidential election cycle — only 60% of Americans vote, we are THIS CLOSE to becoming an Anti-Vaxx Nation. Assuming the morons in charge don’t blast us back into the Stone Age, that is, I know, that’s a pretty big assumption, but if we somehow survive the next couple years, there WILL be a reckoning.

https://twitter.com/twc_health/status/1649511940220403712?ref_src=patrick.net

Dr. McCullough: The Voting Power of Unv'd Americans Cannot Be Ignored

The CDC said 92% of Americans took at least one S , but it turns out the CDC was double-counting people. 25% of American adults took zero shots.

And when it comes to the ballot box, "Let me tell you — this 25% is going to vote

25% of the adult population who's gonna vote are going to be charged on the v issue. Only 60% of adults vote in a presidential election.

So nearly half of the voting base will want a candidate who addresses the v issue."

Speaking of "dies suddenly noises" - Remember this?


original link


Start the video at about 1:00 in.

That was Gabriel Poliquin. I wonder if he lived through that?

https://twitter.com/AnneMar45451941/status/1651115196922863618?ref_src=patrick.net

joshuatrio says

It’s not just the United States. The COVID Blog® is confident in declaring that the global population has dropped from 7.8 billion in January 2020 to 6.8 billion today – about a 13% drop in 28 months.

If that's true, there would be way more listings on the MLS.

joshuatrio says

https://twitter.com/AnneMar45451941/status/1651115196922863618?ref_src=patrick.net

Hey, this sounds exactly like what Luc Montagnier warned about!

And it looks like Reuters is just another elite lapdog which will publish lies to protect toxxine industry revenue at the cost of public health:

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-boosters-hiv-idUSL1N2UM1Q0

There is no possibility that COVID-19 vaccines in use can cause HIV, AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome, the name given to illness resulting from HIV) or false positive HIV tests, according to experts who spoke to Reuters.

joshuatrio says

https://twitter.com/AnneMar45451941/status/1651115196922863618?ref_src=patrick.net

Patrick says

And it looks like Reuters is just another elite lapdog which will publish lies to protect toxxine industry revenue at the cost of public health:

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-boosters-hiv-idUSL1N2UM1Q0

There is no possibility that COVID-19 vaccines in use can cause HIV, AIDS (acquired immune deficiency syndrome, the name given to illness resulting from HIV) or false positive HIV tests, according to experts who spoke to Reuters.

From the same obviously false article:

Social media users have since shared a quote attributed to Montagnier, but Reuters could not find any evidence the words came from the French scientist. It reads: "For those of you that have taken the third dose, go and take a test for AIDS. The results may surprise you. Then sue your government.”

I'm pretty sure I saw video of him saying exactly that, but now I cannot find that video. If anyone can, please let me know.

https://slaynews.com/news/wef-member-calls-86-reduction-worlds-population/

A celebrated member of the globalist World Economic Forum (WEF) has called for a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans, arguing that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.”

Hmmm.

Patrick says

A celebrated member of the globalist World Economic Forum (WEF) has called for a staggering 86 percent reduction in the population of humans, arguing that the goal can be achieved “peacefully.”

Now that is extreme, but there is a basis in reality. The US cannot maintain a first world standard of living if it grows to a billion people. The population needs to stabilize by controlling immigration and limiting the birth rate. People are trending toward smaller families anyway, so just stop paying the lower classes to breed by paying welfare child subsidies.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/good-catch-thursday-may-4-2023-c

That may be for flu vax instead of the jab. At least I hope so.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/covid-19-vaccine-maker-novavax-133132097.html

COVID-19 vaccine maker Novavax to chop workforce, expenses

Interesting, isn't it, that when people have a positive from proven invalid and non specific PCR testing, it is 'valid' for non existent Covid fraud, but when they have a positive test for HIV, it is suddenly a 'false positive'.

Murder Clown World.

It should dip even more now that we have experienced the complete crushing of basic human rights for the power of Pfauci and profits of Pfizer.

I suspect that all vaccinations are merely a medically harmful money-making scam now.

Patrick says

What is that?

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/bail-and-sail-wednesday-may-17-2023?publication_id=463409&post_id=122025901&isFreemail=true

💉 On Monday, the National Institutes of Health issued a cheerful press release titled, “Clinical Trial of mRNA Universal Influenza Vaccine Candidate Begins.” The sub-lead stated, “Trial will test the experimental vaccine for safety and its ability to induce an immune response.”

Wait a sec. Right there’s your first problem. “Ability to induce an immune response” is not the same as “preventing disease,” or even “reducing severity” of disease, whatever that means. Injecting topsoil or lemonade mix also induces an immune response, but that doesn’t mean it protects anyone from taking a dirt nap or catching scurvy.

These scientists. S.M.D.H.

Anyway, the NIH’s proud press release described the “clinical trial of an experimental, [mRNA, quadrivalent,] universal influenza vaccine” developed, not by big pharma, but by the government itself. In fact, the new “universal” vaccine was developed by Fauci’s old team, the boys over at the NIAID, the crack team who seems to be all involved with DoD’s bioweapons development, purely for defensive reasons, of course, and not that it has anything whatsoever to do with the new mRNA flu vaccine, no, don’t be a silly goose.

You don’t need to study any of this stuff. Leave it to the government experts. Keep playing your cell phone games, aren’t they fun?

The NIH experimental vaccine trial will enroll up to 50 healthy volunteers, aged 18 through 49. I have some questions for these volunteers. I’d like to understand the thought process that leads someone to agree to have an “experimental quadrivalent mRNA vaccine” injected into them in exchange for a small styrofoam cup of watery orange juice and a stale donut.

Will the volunteers ask who will pay for their long-term medical care, or who will support their loved ones if something bad happens? Do they care?

Somehow I doubt these people are as reckless with their money as they are with their bodies. But, if they are, I have some exciting investment ideas I’d like to pitch to them while the opportunity is ripe (i.e., before they get the shot).

The early-stage jab trial will be run through a government program called the “Collaborative Influenza Vaccine Innovation Centers” (CIVIC) program, which was established by NIAID long, long ago, in 2019. I suppose it wasn’t that long ago.

But what’s so interesting is that the GOVERNMENT is developing this drug, not the pharmaceutical companies. Why? Why is the U.S. government getting into the pharmaceutical business? Is there an “influenza emergency?” For a couple years there, we had a good long stretch without any flu at all, and that was even without any experimental quadrivalent mRNA flu vaccines.

What I’m especially wondering is: are the regulatory rules different, maybe less stringent, for government study researchers as opposed to private sector researchers? Or is this all because the government is completely shielded from liability for jab injuries by sovereign immunity?

https://sensereceptornews.com/?p=15980

Like I said, first woman we knew before and after she got vaxxed (got real sick from second jab) in Santa Cruz now has recurrent breast cancer 15 years after she was considered cured. It's been just around the 20 month mark from vax.

Patrick says

“Ability to induce an immune response” is not the same as “preventing disease,” or even “reducing severity” of disease,

Yep. Historically cancer vaccines have induced the generation of target specific T cells with zero effect on the disease.

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

Patrick says

“Ability to induce an immune response” is not the same as “preventing disease,” or even “reducing severity” of disease,

Yep. Historically cancer vaccines have induced the generation of target specific T cells with zero effect on the disease.

That's mostly but not fully true, there are some immuno therapeutics that do work at least somewhat. But the question is why don't they work better? Interesting field. Also some become too toxic for the healthy tissue as they attack the whole body. It's a promising field is my prediction, jabs and immunontherapies will become better. But I prefer drug conjugates over jabs, my favorite field. Not much chatter about it yet, but it will be yuge imo, beating out jabs.

@Al_Sharpton_for_President

https://www.acrobiosystems.com/A1210-Targets-for-Antibody-Drug-Conjugates.html?gclid=CjwKCAjwscGjBhAXEiwAswQqNEnc9VDJudNAXKSEaSMFj9rO9Bzw5Xe2ex64IBvfx2_2Ixf-o6PEDhoC92sQAvD_BwE

https://www.cidara.com/cloudbreak/

mell says

Al_Sharpton_for_President

https://www.acrobiosystems.com/A1210-Targets-for-Antibody-Drug-Conjugates.html?gclid=CjwKCAjwscGjBhAXEiwAswQqNEnc9VDJudNAXKSEaSMFj9rO9Bzw5Xe2ex64IBvfx2_2Ixf-o6PEDhoC92sQAvD_BwE

https://www.cidara.com/cloudbreak/

Thanks, Mell. So many biotech companies. ADC’s have come a long way. Protein engineering, too. And let’s not forget CAR T cells.