by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 568 - 607 of 995 Next » Last » Search these comments
These findings suggest that mask use might pose a yet unknown threat to the user instead of protecting them, making mask mandates a debatable epidemiologic intervention.
Carbon dioxide rises beyond acceptable safety levels in children under nose and mouth covering: Results of an experimental measurement study in healthy children
Environ Res. 2022 Sep; 212: 113564. 2022 May 28. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113564
This shocking paper had no coverage by the state-sponsored media, even though it shows that the average CO2 levels in inhaled air with nose and mouth coverings in children between age 6 and 17 is well beyond acceptable levels. ...
In conclusion we have produced experimental data that show that carbon dioxide content in inhaled air rises on average to 13,000 to 13,750 ppm no matter whether children wear a surgical or an FFP2 mask. This is far beyond the level of 2,000 ppm considered the limit of acceptability and beyond the 1,000 ppm that are normal for air in closed rooms. This estimate is rather on the low side, as we only measured this after a short time without physical exertion. Decision makers and law courts should take this into consideration when establishing rules and guidance to fight infections.
In Mexico City right now and often a majority of people walking down the street are masked. Can't go into any museum without them.
Bacterial and fungal isolation from face masks under the COVID-19 pandemic ...
We propose that immunocompromised people should avoid repeated use of masks to prevent microbial infection.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/new-study-adds-growing-body-evidence-suggesting-mask-mandates-are-ineffective
More Cities Vote Not to Enforce LA County’s Mask Mandate Proposal
With a decision expected tomorrow on whether Los Angeles County will re-impose an indoor mask mandate due to COVID-19, officials from several cities said they will not enforce such a rule if it is implemented.
Study finds plastics found in masks present in patients’ lungs
Microplastic fibres were found deep in the lower lungs of living human beings in almost every person sampled in a recent UK study.
The study from Great Britain discovered microplastic particles — present in many COVID-19 masks — in the lung tissue of 11 out of 13 patients undergoing surgery.
Polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) were the most prevalent substances present in the lungs.
The microscopic plastic fragments and fibres were discovered by scientists at Hull York Medical School in the UK. Some of the filaments were two millimetres long in patients undergoing surgery whose lung tissue they sampled.
The plastic dust and microscopic debris comprises the same plastics used to manufacture the ubiquitous surgical masks worn by hundreds of millions of people around the world as mandated by governments in an attempt to halt the spread of COVID-19.
Bernie's Tweets
@BernieSpofforth
7h
CANADA - Trudeau arrives in Costa Rica by private plane and without a mask. The Covid Climate change theatre doesn’t affect the leading actors, just the audience.
Keean Bexte 🇳🇱
@TheRealKeean
4h
Video has emerged of dirtbag Trudeau and his family getting off a private airforce jet not wearing any masks. The entitlement of Trudeau and his family is un-fuckung-real. Meanwhile, moms in Canada are thrown off planes because their kid won't mask up.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/new-study-adds-growing-body-evidence-suggesting-mask-mandates-are-ineffective
These images are from the so-called Spanish Flu days (1918). People then were against compulsion, just as today.
The difference today is that we know the public health officials should know better.
Rospotrebnadzor recommends returning the mask regime in public places in regions where more than 50 people per 100,000 get sick per week
50 cases per 100 thousand is 0.05 percent. Despite the fact that the epidemic threat occurs when there are 5 percent of the sick of the population. Roskomnadzor does not explain the difference by two orders of magnitude. Such measures are not provided for in any regulatory documents, as they are absolutely absurd.
« First « Previous Comments 568 - 607 of 995 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,257,742 comments by 15,008 users - DOGEWontAmountToShit online now