patrick.net

https://usrtk.org/biohazards/american-lab-says-its-contract-with-wuhan-institute-of-virology-may-have-violated-the-law/

A Texas lab said it assumes responsibility for entering into “poorly drafted” agreements with three Chinese maximum biocontainment labs that granted them broad authority to delete so-called “secret files,” including research data stored on U.S. servers.

https://dailycaller.com/2022/08/03/anthony-fauci-gain-of-function-research-wuhan-covid-coronavirus/

Renowned Molecular Biologist Accuses Fauci Of Lying To Congress About Gain-Of-Function Research

Rutgers University microbiologist Dr. Richard Ebright testified before the U.S. Senate Wednesday that top public health officials lied about dangerous gain-of-function (GoF) research experiments conducted in China.

Ebright testified that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other U.S. federal agencies funded research that fit the definition of GoF at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) without proper oversight. His claim directly contradicts those made by numerous public health officials, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). ...

Specifically, Ebright testified that research funded by federal agencies at the WIV in the 2010s violated an NIH pause on GoF research funding between 2014 and 2017. After the pause was lifted in 2017, Ebright claimed that GoF projects which continued did not properly go through the agency’s regulatory process for oversight.

NIH and other federal agencies funded various experiments in the 2010s at the WIV which made bat-based coronaviruses more dangerous by increasing their fatality and infectiousness. According to the strict definition of GoF research, those experiments should’ve fallen under the GoF oversight process or been banned by the funding moratorium.

“Gain-of-function research of concern involves the creation of new health threats–health threats that did not exist previously and that might not have come to exist by natural means for tens, hundreds, thousands, or tens of thousands of years,” Ebright said.

“The statements made on repeated occasions to the public, to the press and to policymakers by the NIAID director, Dr. Fauci, have been untruthful. I do not understand why those statements are being made because they are demonstrably false,” Ebright explained Wednesday.

Ebright’s assertion that the NIH-funded research is GoF work directly contradicts previous testimony by Fauci before the U.S. Senate.

https://patriots.win/p/15JAJddGCn/epoch-times-wuhan-lab-was-geneti/

EPOCH TIMES: Wuhan Lab Was Genetically Manipulating Deadly Nipah Virus, Expert Testifies at Senate Hearing - (~60% Mortality, ~21 day incubation period)
posted 9 hours ago by Bullet3250 +346 / -0
"A forensic analysis shows that the Wuhan Insitute of Virology (WIV) was genetically manipulating the Nipah virus, a highly lethal pathogen, in violation of the Biological Weapons Convention, according to an expert who testified at a Senate subcommittee hearing on Aug. 3.

The finding was another piece of evidence showing that the controversial Wuhan lab was conducting gain-of-function research—experiments that ultimately resulted in the COVID-19 pandemic via a leak from the facility, according to Dr. Steven Quay, CEO of Atossa Therapeutics. Gain-of-function research involves enhancing the potency or transmissibility of a virus." ...

The one media source you should pay for - https://www.theepochtimes.com/?utm_source=share-btn-copylink

Patrick says

This long article will explain how Sars-Cov-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was created as a result of intentional laboratory work. It will also show that the blueprint for Sars-Cov-2 was described in the “Project DEFUSE” proposal by Peter Daszak, which was preceded by years of relevant lab work and virus manipulation.

You missed the new narrative

Two papers on the research were published in the journal Science.

Read more: WHO issues warning as COVID cases triple across Europe

The publications “virtually eliminate” alternative scenarios that have been suggested as origins of the pandemic, the researchers say.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abp8715

It's from "Science" so it must be true.

https://wolfstreet.com/2022/08/06/the-under-demanded-office-market/

The swallows abandoned San Juan Capistrano in the 1990s. Their home—the historic mission—underwent a renovation, the birds lost their ancestral nests and, despite every effort to lure them back, they have yet to return in meaningful numbers.

No less flighty, workers abandoned their office buildings in 2020. They, too, have migrated elsewhere. Those in real estate ask themselves when office employees will return. Others wonder if they’ll return.

The big landlords of downtown office space are generally very rich and powerful people. I have to wonder why they have not publicly objected to the virus fraud. It was never a particularly dangerous virus, not much worse than the seasonal flu. The Fauci flu death numbers were wildly exaggerated, and this cost those office space owners quite a lot.

I don't trust those office space owners more than I trust any other powerful group, but I want them to fight back for their own interest, which happens to be the public interest in this case. Why don't we hear from them?

https://patriotpost.us/articles/90334-yes-nih-funded-gain-of-function-2022-08-05

AUGUST 5, 2022

Yes, NIH Funded Gain-of-Function
Three experts testify the NIH was indeed engaged in funding gain-of-function research, calling Fauci’s claim "untruthful." ...

In May 2021, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) accused the NIH of funding gain-of-function research, specifically at biolabs in Wuhan, China. At the time, Fauci vehemently denied the charge: “Senator Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect. … The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

However, months later, documents revealed that the NIH had indeed funded gain-of-function research via a nonprofit cutout known as EcoHealth Alliance. From 2014 through 2019, the NIH gave some $600,000 to EcoHealth, which was working in and with the Wuhan lab. The money was intended for gain-of-function research into bat coronaviruses. ...

This raises the question of the motivation behind the research. Why exactly was the Wuhan lab engaged in gain-of-function research on coronaviruses, especially if it was implementing two types of forbidden research?

I wonder if Pfizer's $100 billion in recent revenue might have something to do with it...

https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/pfizer-to-exceed-100b-revenue-2022-thanks-to-covid-19-drug-and-vaccine-analyst

Patrick says

I don't trust those office space owners more than I trust any other powerful group, but I want them to fight back for their own interest, which happens to be the public interest in this case. Why don't we hear from them?

Government subsidies to cover their losses
Investments in Pfizer

University Inc.: The Corruption of Higher Education,” Jennifer Washburn explains how in 1980, a law known as Bayh-Dole, was passed which allowed universities to own property rights to federally funded research and to license that research to industry in exchange for royalties. Since then, the worth of scientists has come to be measured more by products than publications, and scientists like Baric have channelled their discoveries toward drug development. Scientists also have been incentivized to take on potentially lucrative partnerships with pharmaceutical companies, or to launch their own start-ups

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-hotez-gain-of-function

https://nitter.pussthecat.org/RNCResearch/status/1557409372636172288



The poison dwarf admits he created the virus and laughs, because he knows that we have a very selective justice system, that is to say, no justice at all.

At least he didn't call the children 'fungible lab rats'. "If only we could keep them in cages. Wait, the adrenochrome factory already does that. Never mind."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/nih-ends-subaward-wuhan-lab-stonewalling

The National Institutes of Health announced it was finally cutting off a subaward to the Wuhan Institute of Virology after it continued to refuse to hand over key information about the coronavirus research it conducted with U.S. tax dollars.

NIH Deputy Director Michael Lauer made the revelation in a letter Friday to House Oversight Committee Republicans, in which he said the Wuhan lab had refused to turn over lab notebooks and electronic files connected to its research funded through an NIH subaward given to it by the U.S.-based EcoHealth Alliance.

But Lauer indicated the NIH may continue funding EcoHealth’s controversial bat coronavirus research despite the group’s documented noncompliance issues, its close links to the Wuhan virology institute, and its history of funneling hundreds of thousands of U.S. tax dollars to the Chinese lab.

Finally Biden and Dems recognizing they can not push further.

https://nypost.com/2022/08/22/dr-anthony-fauci-to-step-down-from-his-post-in-december/
“While I am moving on from my current positions, I am not retiring,” the infectious disease expert said in a statement released by the National Institutes of Health. “After more than 50 years of government service, I plan to pursue the next phase of my career while I still have so much energy and passion for my field.”

Patrick says

Video or it didn't happen.

This story is likely false, and is being used to discredit people who are against the mandates.

https://dossier.substack.com/p/lifetime-government-bureaucrat-resigns

Lifetime government bureaucrat resigns, following 54 year career of corruption, deceit, death and destruction

Just about the only honest summary of Fauci's "career" that I've seen.

rwmalonemd
@rwmalonemd
·
7h
Hypothesis RE Fauci resignation: This will allow him to select his replacement and may enable the appointment to be completed prior to the new congress being sworn in.

Fauci needs a replacement running NIAID who will cover for him.
Posted on 4:28 AM · Aug 23rd, 2022

John Rich🇺🇸
@johnrich
Aug 22
When my Granny Rich had a stroke and was stuck in a hospital, guess how many times I was allowed to see her per the CDC/Dr Evil's rules? ZERO! We got her the hell out of there and let her pass away at home WITH FAMILY PRESENT. I will NEVER forgive these monsters. #FauciForPrison
Aug 22, 2022

https://patriotpost.us/articles/90729

AUGUST 23, 2022
Fauci’s Outrageously Lucrative Retirement

The bureaucrat who thinks he is the science is set to really cash in on his powerful career in the swamp.
It’s a shame that every American doesn’t have the same retirement package as the man arguably most responsible for wrecking their retirement savings. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, announced he will retire in December. And the current highest-paid federal official will do so while earning an annual pension of at least $350,000.

Retiring doesn’t mean retiring, however. “While I am moving on from my current positions, I am not retiring,” insisted the 81-year-old Fauci. “After more than 50 years of government service, I plan to pursue the next phase of my career while I still have so much energy and passion for my field.” That no doubt means the nation’s foremost celebrity doctor will cash in on the speaking circuit and a lucrative book deal or two.

Life’s hard for Science Himself.

“Whether you’ve met him personally or not,” gushed Joe Biden, “he has touched all Americans’ lives with his work.”

That’s one way to put it.

"Has made the life of every American significantly worse" is another way to put it.



From https://bengarrison.com/

Why do they always show that young or retouched photo of Fauci? He looks much more cadaverish in real life.

The target op was always the vaccines as walk away poison and sterilizations. Fake Covid and fake PCR were just the brand name calling cards of the assault.

Ceffer says

The target op was always the vaccines as walk away poison and sterilizations. Fake Covid and fake PCR were just the brand name calling cards of the assault.

I still believe this, as I did in early 2021. Nothing at all has happened to contradict this view. And in fact most events support it. I think they rigged the election based on democrats being vaccine skeptics if the vax came from a Trump administration. So they delayed the approval until after the election and cheated Biden in and then had him model the vax himself and push it until democrats came around. Maybe they thought with approval from both Presidential candidates, the vax would enjoy universal approval. But conservatives never Trusted Trump like that. And we damned sure don’t trust any Democrats.

Good Riddance, Dr. Fauci

Perhaps what’s most frustrating about the final years of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s career in government service is that it didn’t have to end this way. Fauci undoubtedly brought a great deal of intellect, dedication, compassion, and hard-earned experience to his career in public health, and the controversies of the past years shouldn’t obscure that.

But once the Covid-19 pandemic turned Fauci into a celebrity — complete with his own prayer candles, action figures, and associated merchandising — it was as if his worst instincts were unchained. Fauci’s public statements grew more strident and his dismissal of his critics more arrogant. By November 2021, Fauci started contending that he had become the walking and talking embodiment of science itself: “It’s easy to criticize, but they’re really criticizing science because I represent science.” La science c’est moi.

No doubt, Fauci attracted more than his share of unhinged criticism. But the national media loved to focus on the unhinged conspiracy theorists and garden-variety nutjobs and death threats against Fauci, because it helped discredit the much fairer, much more legitimate questioning of Fauci’s advice and decision-making.

One of Fauci’s first pieces of advice during the pandemic was to discourage Americans from wearing masks, declaring in a March 8 interview with 60 Minutes, “There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And, often, there are unintended consequences — people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face.” The problem isn’t that Fauci changed his mind as masks became more widely available; it’s that he never really addressed his previous declarations that they were ineffective — declarations that apparently he didn’t believe. Fauci didn’t create the anti-masking sentiment in American life, but his quick reversal fed the suspicion that wearing masks was more about public perceptions than empirical evidence.

Those who were paying close attention noticed that Fauci kept shifting his assessment of the percentage needed to reach herd immunity from the virus. In December 2020, Fauci admitted to the New York Times that he finessed his public statements, based on what he felt the public was ready to hear: “In a telephone interview the next day, Dr. Fauci acknowledged that he had slowly but deliberately been moving the goal posts. He is doing so, he said, partly based on new science, and partly on his gut feeling that the country is finally ready to hear what he really thinks.” This did not align with Fauci’s much-celebrated reputation as a straight shooter.

Fauci’s emails suggested he had a symbiotic relationship with adoring reporters. He offered evasive answers about U.S. taxpayer money financing gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. He offered a full-throated defense of gain-of-function research, which looks a little different in the aftermath of a global pandemic that killed millions.

With Fauci, a discerning audience grew to doubt they were getting the full truth, as opposed to what he felt the country should hear at any given moment. Wait a few weeks, and Fauci may well conclude that the country needed to hear a different message.

As our Michael Brendan Dougherty laid out in a cover piece in May 2021, “whatever Fauci’s prior career achievements, he has shown in the COVID-19 pandemic that he is not the disinterested expert he claims to be. He survives in Washington not just because he launders politics through science and has an affable demeanor but because he’s also a cutthroat in the media game. Even when his critics are right, they get cashiered, and Fauci wins more public accolades.”

Fauci wasn’t single-handedly responsible for all the federal and state governments’ failings during the pandemic. But considering his gargantuan public reputation and ubiquitous media presence, he could have done more to point out that participating in a protest over George Floyd was no less or more dangerous than any other outdoor activity in the summer of 2020, or pushed for reopening public schools earlier, or rebuked stupid examples of pandemic-preparation theater such as outdoor mask mandates, declarations that visiting the beach was a life-threatening risk, and the arrest of paddleboarders off the coast of Malibu.

We heard altogether too much from Fauci during the last three years, which is partly his fault and partly that of our country’s felt need for a scientist who can play the role of an oracle. When we hear from him next, let it be at a House hearing about reforming public health.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/08/good-riddance-dr-fauci/amp/

Much too nice of an article.

Fauci is a mass murdering criminal who did it for money and power.

https://nitter.pussthecat.org/P_McCulloughMD/status/1563737894384242688#m

Peter McCullough, MD MPH
@P_McCulloughMD
Aug 28
Gave my analysis for Amanda and Carl on NewsMax on the Pfizer v Moderna lawsuit. Will be good for America to learn about the pre planning and collaboration with NIH and CCP years before the virus was released from Wuhan bio-security annex built by Bancel while at French IVD.

It was all planned for years.

https://nitter.pussthecat.org/P_McCulloughMD/status/1563970814013308929#m

Peter McCullough, MD MPH
@P_McCulloughMD
21h
Nunez-Castilla, Viruses, more evidence it was engineered by man. Astonishing homology with human proteins. No wonder autoimmune syndromes in nervous system and in the heart (myocarditis) are clinically manifest after parenteral administration of genetic code for Spike protein.

Patrick says

parenteral

Had to look up parenteral:

Administered by some means that avoids the gastrointestinal tract, particularly intravenously or by injection.

Patrick says

https://nitter.pussthecat.org/P_McCulloughMD/status/1563970814013308929#m

Peter McCullough, MD MPH
@P_McCulloughMD
21h
Nunez-Castilla, Viruses, more evidence it was engineered by man. Astonishing homology with human proteins. No wonder autoimmune syndromes in nervous system and in the heart (myocarditis) are clinically manifest after parenteral administration of genetic code for Spike protein.

Ah yes molecular mimicry is also a problem for glyphosate. But "they" tell you it's !safe!

https://nitter.pussthecat.org/P_McCulloughMD/status/1564241401478582272#m

Peter McCullough, MD MPH
@P_McCulloughMD
1h
Follow this story. US NIH-UNC collaboration engineered the invasive and deadly Spike protein. EcoHealth Alliance orchestrated lab work in Wuhan BSL-4 built by Bancel now with Moderna. Virus harvested from bats and tested in rodents with humanized respiratory epithelial cells.

https://expose-news.com/2022/09/04/real-reason-moderna-suing-pfizer/

That’s because official documents suggest the real reason Moderna is suing Pfizer for patent infringement is that Moderna helped to create the Covid-19 virus as early as 2013 during gain of function research and then patented parts of the virus. This means Moderna essentially owns SARS-CoV-2.

This may explain why further documents prove Moderna had developed its Covid-19 vaccine months before the world was aware that Covid-19 even existed.

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/closing-ranks-against-the-truth

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/fauci-misled-congress-about-gain-function-research-protected-biden-admin-former-cdc-chief

Fauci "Misled Congress" About Gain-Of-Function Research, But 'Protected By Biden Admin'; Former CDC Chief Says ...

Robert Redfield told former Senate Finance Committee investigator Paul Thacker that National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci "knew" he funded gain-of-function research that makes viruses more dangerous, and "misled Congress" when he denied it." ...

"Everyone had to agree to the narrative" pushed by Fauci and then-National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins that SARS-CoV-2 emerged from a "wet market" in Wuhan, not the Fauci-funded Wuhan Institute of Virology miles away, to avoid becoming a public target of the two officials, he said.

Redfield said he believes The Lancet spring 2020 letter that lumped in the lab-leak hypothesis with "conspiracy theories" was "orchestrated ... under direction of Fauci and Collins, trying to nip any attempt to have an honest investigation of the pandemic’s origin."

"There was nothing scientific about that letter. It was just an attempt to intimidate people," he also said.

"I was threatened, my life was threatened," he said.

"I have letters I got from prominent scientists, that previously gave me awards, telling me that the best thing I could do for the world was to shoot myself because of what I said." ...

So, finally, we ask, how has Fauci been able to survive all this (politically, bureaucratically, and freedom-wise)?

Dr.Redflied has the answer - and you won't like it:

"[n]othing's going to happen as long as the Biden administration is here."