The new mask recommendations are a disgraceful debacle, doomed to fail...againAs soon as politicians, media members and incompetent and terrified “experts” became ideologically committed to ineffective interventions, they could never end.The CDC has been the most reliable and consistent contributor to destructive and functionally useless mask recommendations. They’ve used unconscionably bad, dangerously incompetent and misleading “studies,” along with hilariously useless “hairdresser” examples to “prove” mask efficacy. Finally though, after throwing out their own pre-pandemic planning documents to promote a policy with no demonstrable benefits, the CDC displayed confidence in the “safe and effective” vaccines and removed their useless mask guidelines just two and a half months ago.And yet. It’s all happening. The CDC flip flopped again. Masks are back.Many of us arguing against lockdowns and masks and other related and equally ineffective “mitigations” have been pointing out for months now that the CDC has been unbelievably bad at their literal one job. We’ve been pointing out that the CDC’s credibility has been irreparably damaged based on their demonstrable incompetence and ever changing messaging with unchanging certainty. But no one, and I mean no one, could have foreseen that the death blow to the CDC’s credibility would come from the CDC itself.I guess it shouldn’t be as surprising as it is that they put the final nail in their own coffin, but somehow their devotion to pseudoscience never ceases to amaze.Bringing back masks is the end. It has to be. They were unequivocal in their assertions that the available vaccines were remarkably effective at preventing infections and transmission, symptomatic illness, severe cases and ultimately deaths.Yesterday’s announcement is completely incompatible with their previous statements and should be an inescapable disaster for the country’s trust in “public health” and what the CDC, Fauci and others laughably refer to as “science.”So let’s go over this unfolding debacle!April 1INTELLIGENCER HEADLINE: “CDC Data Suggests Vaccinated Don’t Carry, Can’t Spread Virus”Got that? No hemming and hawing, no uncertainty, no “don’t spread the virus as much,” it literally says that the vaccinated CAN NOT SPREAD THE VIRUS. CAN NOT. It’s not possible for them to spread it, that’s what the “data” says.Here’s a direct quote from the CDC director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky:“Vaccinated people do not carry the virus — they don’t get sick,” Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the CDC, told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow on Tuesday. That’s “not just in the clinical trials, but it’s also in real-world data.”They do not carry the virus and do not get sick. Focus on the “they do not carry the virus” part for a second. If vaccinated people can’t carry it, how can they spread it?They can’t! That’s what the CDC says:Walensky was referring to a new CDC study that suggests those fully inoculated with the vaccines produced by Moderna and Pfizer don’t transmit the virus.So naturally,“The authorized vaccines are the key tool that will help bring an end to this devastating pandemic.”They are the key tool. Masks used to be, of course, but now vaccines will end the pandemic. Let’s keep that in mind. ...July 27CNBC Headline: “CDC reverses indoor mask policy, saying fully vaccinated people and kids should wear them indoors”There it is. The destruction of any remaining shreds of credibility the CDC and Fauci had left.So what was the justification for this dramatic shift? The delta variant! The same variant that Fauci said the vaccines did “very well” against. ...
« First « Previous Comments 256 - 295 of 313 Next » Last » Search these comments
CDC published data in January 2022 from California and New York affirming that infection-acquired immunity was way more superior than vaccine-induced immunity: why was it covered up still today?Why has the CDC pretended this data, their own data, does not and did not exist? These results demonstrate that surviving a previous infection protects against a reinfection & related hospitalizationWhy did the CDC deny and shove aside their own study showing infection-acquired immunity is optimal and superior to vaccine induced immunity (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7104e1.htm) while promoting this failed and sub-optimal study methodologically flawed study (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7044e1.htm) as so aptly described by Dr. Martin Kulldorff (https://brownstone.org/articles/a-review-and-autopsy-of-two-covid-immunity-studies/)?
Clinical Trials in the UK are Down by 44% Primarily Due to Lack of ParticipantsThe public trust in pharma is vanishing. This is good news.
Pfizer, CDC Withheld Evidence of Myocarditis After COVID Shots, New Documents RevealPfizer and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) withheld evidence that COVID-19 vaccinations were causing myocarditis, according documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense via a Freedom of Information Act request to the CDC, and documents leaked this week to Project Veritas.
Don't believe me? Read it for yourself, straight from page 4 of the contract:
You just can’t beat the fact that the conference bragged about its 100% vaccinated rate. Of course, given the bad optics, the CDC strained to find some good news, which it smugly said was that none of the 180 infected attendees had to go to the hospital, proving the jabs work or something.The truth is, they probably knew better than anybody not to go to the hospital, if they even got a serious case, that is.Now contrast the CDC’s self-righteous jab efficacy claims with last month’s Cleveland Clinic study of 51,000 hospital employees, which concluded: “effectiveness was not demonstrated when the XBB lineages were dominant.”1And compare the CDC’s lies with a story published earlier this month in the Epoch Times about a new Danish jab study, headlined, “Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines Had No Effect on Overall Mortality: Trial Data Reanalysis.” The study concluded the Pfizer and Moderna shots did NOT show any benefit for overall mortality. No effect. So.Of course, at this point the covid hospitalization rate is so low you wouldn’t expect any of the CDC’s attendees to have been hospitalized in the first place, proving the CDC can’t do basic math, which explains a lot when you think about it. They’re scientists, not mathematicians, after all. Nor did the CDC calculate waning jab efficacy. What was the last booster date for the conference go-ers?Remember, this is the same government health agency that recommended OUTDOOR MASKING, until it was shamed into dropping that guidance, due to being ridiculed by none less than The Washington Post and the New York Times.Anyway. After reading the conference story, I was left with an abiding sense that the greatest danger from covid these days comes from the CDC ITSELF — obviously a massive superspreading bureaucracy — and so we have no choice but to disband the agency, to save grandma, but reluctantly, appreciating all the good it’s done over the years, like helping create that Cholera epidemic in Haiti, and not because we WANT to pull the plug, but only because we MUST.Now that I think about it, we should probably also tear down the CDC’s Atlanta headquarters, right to the ground, and make it into a memorial park for the victims of communitarianism. That seems appropriate.
New CDC director, (((Mandy Cohen))):I can't wait to be called antisemitic - yet again - for criticising the CDC director.
WookiemanWhat's did you find out about Jamie Fox?
In 2350 if we could be around, it might be the dumbest thing in history. Outside of nuclear war I'm not sure what could beat it?
Key Takeaways• CDC Director Walensky confirmed that the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) promoted prolonged school closures that harmed America’s children.• When America faced a public health crisis and turned to the CDC for help and guidance, the CDC provided misguided, unscientific, confusing, and at times blatantly false answers.• AFT President Randi Weingarten had a direct line to CDC Director Rochelle Walensky’s personal and professional cellphones — raising further questions about potential political influence at the CDC.• Dr. Rochelle Walensky testified that she spoke in her capacity as CDC Director during a White House briefing in February 2021. The Biden White House’s claim that her statements were made in her “personal” capacity when discussing school reopenings and vaccinations for teachers was false. • Public health officials and organizations — including the CDC — must be held accountable for their failures and false statements during the pandemic in order to earn back the trust of Americans.• The CDC needs structural reform to address current information and infrastructure issues, lack of transparency within the agency, and processes surrounding guidance publication. ...And she blew it a couple of times,” remarked Dr. Wolf, but she also “lied twice.”Here are those two lies, as outlined by Dr. Naomi Wolf.Lie One: when Dr. Walensky stated that she didn’t know the COVID shots didn’t stop transmission when she touted “95% effective” to the American people.“Well, our experts, our report  has shown that she knew perfectly well she was lying at the time she said that to Americans — that our experts found that Pfizer knew in November of 2020, which means she knew because she had the same documents, that the vaccines did not work to stop COVID,” stated Dr. Wolf.“And in fact, Pfizer got rid of [at least] 200 vaccinated COVID-sick people in their trials in order falsely to make the claim that they were 95% effective. But the fact that they got rid of those 200-[plus] sick people is right there in the documents that Rochelle Walensky was given.” ...Lie Two: when Dr. Walensky stated you couldn’t transmit COVID while vaccinated.“This was the basis for the illegal mandates,” lamented Dr. Wolf. “Well, she knew perfectly well at the time she said it that that was a lie. And in fact, the Pfizer Documents show, as of November 2020, that the vaccines didn’t work to stop transmission — that there was vaccine failure and failure of efficacy. So she categorically lied to Congress twice,” Dr. Wolf asserted.In fact, Dutch MEP Rob Roos got a Pfizer spokesperson (J. Small) to admit that the pharmaceutical giant never confirmed its COVID shots stopped transmission because it had to “move at the speed of science.”
💉 Ironically, the CDC used a cartoon this week to tell people a joke about mixing and matching vaccine brands in the agencies’ summer push for more jabs. Except it wasn’t a joke.This is not a serious health agency. The only reason it doesn’t matter what brand of vaccine you took last time is because none of them work. We’re two years into the vaccine rollout and we don’t know whether any of the jabs is any better than the others? Seriously?And, what’s with the cartoon glasses?It’s a clown world now, and the CDC isn’t even trying very hard to pretend otherwise anymore.
@toadmeisterDefenders of free speech warned the public health authorities that if you suppress vaccine scepticism you will increase vaccine hesitancy, not reduce it. Why? Because it makes it look as though you cannot answer the sceptics’ criticisms in the public square, i.e., you have something to hide. But our warnings were ignored and the predictable consequence is that vaccine hesitancy has increased and we’re now facing a Measles outbreak. When will the censors ever learn? Censorship is always self-defeating.
The obligatory glorification of the vaccines, which is still required for any study like this to get published, continues to be watered down. Here’s the how these particular researchers worded the compulsory language:"The BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines have been found to be both relatively safe and effective at preventing severe infection. Serious adverse complications due to these vaccines are uncommon and may include anaphylactic reactions, myocarditis, pericarditis, myocardial infarction, cerebral sinus thrombosis, stroke, pulmonary embolism, neuropathies, and autoimmune hepatitis."Hahahaha! Let us count the ways the stuffing was streaming out of the jab endorsement. First, they didn’t say “safe and effective.” They said, relatively safe and effective. But relative to what? Getting crushed by a meteorite?Next, did you notice they didn’t regurgitate the line that serious adverse reactions are rare? Instead, they said serious adverse reactions are uncommon. Those are terms of art. Uncommon is a LOT different from rare. It’s a huge difference. ‘Rare’ adverse reactions occur in fewer than 1 in 1,000 people. ‘Uncommon’ adverse reactions occur in more than 1 in 1,000 people, but less than 1 in 100.So now it’s uncommon, headed straight toward common at 60 mph, the last stop on pharma’s criminal railroad.Finally, the researchers named a non-exclusive list of serious adverse events with NINE different categories of injuries. This was particularly remarkable considering that the CDC and the FDA currently only recognize THREE of those nine types (anaphylactic reactions, myocarditis, and pericarditis).
The BMJ has learnt that in the face of an unprecedented 1.7 million reports since the rollout of covid vaccines, VAERS’s staffing was likely not commensurate with the demands of reviewing the serious reports submitted, including reports of death. While other countries have acknowledged deaths that were “likely” or “probably” related to mRNA vaccination, the CDC—which says that it has reviewed nearly 20 ,000 preliminary reports of death using VAERS (far more than other countries)—has not acknowledged a single death linked to mRNA vaccines.
« First « Previous Comments 256 - 295 of 313 Next » Last » Search these comments