by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 238 - 277 of 336 Next » Last » Search these comments
Has this man actually cut his dick off?
The fact that "she" has transitioned, is a distraction.
CDC Had Direct Access to Big Tech Censorship Tools to Control Covid Narrative
The U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Census Bureau had direct access to Big Tech companies’ censorship tools, which were set up to allow government officials to control the Covid pandemic narrative online, newly unsealed emails have revealed.
Emails between an employee at the CDC and Twitter reveal that at least one CDC staff member and the US Census Bureau had access to Twitter’s dedicated “Partner Support Portal.”
The portal allows approved government officials and “stakeholders” to gain direct access to Twitter’s systems and flag content for censorship.
According to documents, government operatives were able to flag posts or users’ accounts that allegedly contained COVID-19 “misinformation.”
However, the portal didn’t appear to require submissions to include any supporting evidence to dispute the so-called “misinformation” and posts were removed simply for conflicting with the official narrative.
Do you read anything in the above that suggests that political correctness or correcting wrong-speak is part of the CDC mission? When did the CDC decide that they should take on the progressive left’s cause to reshape American language (oh, I used that “forbidden” word -”America”, which according to Stanford University- that is now verbotten).
Did the CDC Doctor Their 2021 Study That (Still) Showed Vaccinated People Were as Infectious as Unvaccinated People?
CDC: 'Centers for Data Concealment'
CDC passes the point where malfeasance can be mistaken for incompetence ...
CDC published data in January 2022 from California and New York affirming that infection-acquired immunity was way more superior than vaccine-induced immunity: why was it covered up still today?
Why has the CDC pretended this data, their own data, does not and did not exist? These results demonstrate that surviving a previous infection protects against a reinfection & related hospitalization
Why did the CDC deny and shove aside their own study showing infection-acquired immunity is optimal and superior to vaccine induced immunity (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7104e1.htm) while promoting this failed and sub-optimal study methodologically flawed study (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7044e1.htm) as so aptly described by Dr. Martin Kulldorff (https://brownstone.org/articles/a-review-and-autopsy-of-two-covid-immunity-studies/)?
Clinical Trials in the UK are Down by 44% Primarily Due to Lack of Participants
The public trust in pharma is vanishing. This is good news.
Pfizer, CDC Withheld Evidence of Myocarditis After COVID Shots, New Documents Reveal
Pfizer and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) withheld evidence that COVID-19 vaccinations were causing myocarditis, according documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense via a Freedom of Information Act request to the CDC, and documents leaked this week to Project Veritas.
Don't believe me? Read it for yourself, straight from page 4 of the contract:
You just can’t beat the fact that the conference bragged about its 100% vaccinated rate. Of course, given the bad optics, the CDC strained to find some good news, which it smugly said was that none of the 180 infected attendees had to go to the hospital, proving the jabs work or something.
The truth is, they probably knew better than anybody not to go to the hospital, if they even got a serious case, that is.
Now contrast the CDC’s self-righteous jab efficacy claims with last month’s Cleveland Clinic study of 51,000 hospital employees, which concluded: “effectiveness was not demonstrated when the XBB lineages were dominant.”1
And compare the CDC’s lies with a story published earlier this month in the Epoch Times about a new Danish jab study, headlined, “Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines Had No Effect on Overall Mortality: Trial Data Reanalysis.” The study concluded the Pfizer and Moderna shots did NOT show any benefit for overall mortality. No effect. So.
Of course, at this point the covid hospitalization rate is so low you wouldn’t expect any of the CDC’s attendees to have been hospitalized in the first place, proving the CDC can’t do basic math, which explains a lot when you think about it. They’re scientists, not mathematicians, after all. Nor did the CDC calculate waning jab efficacy. What was the last booster date for the conference go-ers?
Remember, this is the same government health agency that recommended OUTDOOR MASKING, until it was shamed into dropping that guidance, due to being ridiculed by none less than The Washington Post and the New York Times.
Anyway. After reading the conference story, I was left with an abiding sense that the greatest danger from covid these days comes from the CDC ITSELF — obviously a massive superspreading bureaucracy — and so we have no choice but to disband the agency, to save grandma, but reluctantly, appreciating all the good it’s done over the years, like helping create that Cholera epidemic in Haiti, and not because we WANT to pull the plug, but only because we MUST.
Now that I think about it, we should probably also tear down the CDC’s Atlanta headquarters, right to the ground, and make it into a memorial park for the victims of communitarianism. That seems appropriate.
https://twitter.com/healthbyjames/status/1618704461207334914?ref_src=patrick.net
New CDC director, (((Mandy Cohen))):
I can't wait to be called antisemitic - yet again - for criticising the CDC director.
Wookieman
What's did you find out about Jamie Fox?
In 2350 if we could be around, it might be the dumbest thing in history. Outside of nuclear war I'm not sure what could beat it?
« First « Previous Comments 238 - 277 of 336 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,252,978 comments by 14,959 users - askmeaboutthesaltporkcure, DhammaStep, ForcedTQ online now