patrick.net

CDC Knew Covid Shots Damage Heart but Covered It Up ...

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) knew that COVID-19 shots damage recipients’ hearts and cause other serious complications but chose to cover up the information, bombshell documents unsealed under a court order have revealed.

The CDC was forced to hand over documents and data following a November 14 court order by Judge Robert Pitman.

The judge ordered the data to be made public following a Freedom of Information Act request from the Informed Consent Action Network.

The federal health agency has been withholding the data that shows adverse reactions to the vaccinations among those who received them.

Data released under the court order shows that a staggering 1 in 3 among the earliest populations to get vaccinated reported needing medical care, missing school or work, or they were unable to “perform normal daily activities” after receiving the shots.

The information was held in the CDC’s v-safe database.

V-safe is a safety monitoring system that lets people report any adverse reactions to the CDC after getting a COVID-19 vaccine.

The unsealed files revealed that the CDC knew that the shots caused damage to the heart tissue, blood clots, and strokes.

However, the data shows that the CDC intentionally left out questions regarding these serious side effects from its v-safe survey. ...

Among the 10 million-plus users of the agency’s v-safe active monitoring smartphone app through July — 8.5 million of whom signed up between December 2020 and April 2021, before all adults were eligible for COVID vaccines — nearly 8% said they required medical care after receiving the vaccines, according to Just the News.

For patients aged 3 and older needing such care, nearly 3 in 4 couldn’t rely on telehealth visits.

They required urgent care (48%), emergency room (15%) or hospitalization (10%).

U.S. — As distrust in experts reaches record highs across the country, many experts are issuing a dire warning that if you stop listening to them it will make them feel sad.

"We cannot stress enough just how serious this is," said Harvard Sociologist Marv Werdleskeez, an expert on experts. "If people stop unquestionably believing every single thing experts say, experts' feelings will be very hurt. Then they might lose their confidence and retire from being experts. This will leave us with no more experts and everyone will die."

According to a survey of experts nationwide, 90% of experts believe it would be very terrible if everyone stopped believing them. The other 10% said they would jump off a cliff. Sources familiar with the impending crisis say we are running out of time to start believing the experts before it's too late. "Lives are at stake," said Werdleskeez. "If we don't salvage the self-esteem of the expert class soon, it could be catastrophic."

At publishing time, several experts disagreed that the "expert crisis" was really a crisis, leading to them being immediately demoted from being experts.

Rob Schneider
@RobSchneider

The Tuskegee experiment was not an experiment,
It was CDC sponsored torture and murder. The participants were NEVER told that they were deliberately given syphilis so they gave it to their families as well. These poor people were not ‘doing a sacrifice’ they were BEING sacrificed

Clifton Duncan.
@cliftonaduncan
Nov 30
This is one of the most disgusting fucking things I have ever read.

Don't ever talk shit to me about not trusting these people, ever again.

https://twitter.com/RobSchneider/status/1598131878564794368?cxt=HHwWgMCo4b2e2q0sAAAA

Rob Schneider
RobSchneider

The Tuskegee experiment was not an experiment,
It was CDC sponsored torture and murder. The participants were NEVER told that they were deliberately given syphilis so they gave it to their families as well. These poor people were not ‘doing a sacrifice’ they were BEING sacrificed

Clifton Duncan.
cliftonaduncan
Nov 30
This is one of the most disgusting fucking things I have ever read.

Don't ever talk shit to me about not trusting these people, ever again.

I think the Tuskegee experiment is a limited hangout fake admission of guilt. Note that the “experiment” consisted of withholding treatment, so in the end it promotes the medical establishment as necessary to health, and how important it is to “treat” the “underserved” communities. Let’s see the CDC talk about how wrong they were to promote spraying people with DDT.

Has this man actually cut his dick off?

The fact that "she" has transitioned, is a distraction.

CDC Had Direct Access to Big Tech Censorship Tools to Control Covid Narrative

The U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Census Bureau had direct access to Big Tech companies’ censorship tools, which were set up to allow government officials to control the Covid pandemic narrative online, newly unsealed emails have revealed.

Emails between an employee at the CDC and Twitter reveal that at least one CDC staff member and the US Census Bureau had access to Twitter’s dedicated “Partner Support Portal.”

The portal allows approved government officials and “stakeholders” to gain direct access to Twitter’s systems and flag content for censorship.

According to documents, government operatives were able to flag posts or users’ accounts that allegedly contained COVID-19 “misinformation.”

However, the portal didn’t appear to require submissions to include any supporting evidence to dispute the so-called “misinformation” and posts were removed simply for conflicting with the official narrative.

Do you read anything in the above that suggests that political correctness or correcting wrong-speak is part of the CDC mission? When did the CDC decide that they should take on the progressive left’s cause to reshape American language (oh, I used that “forbidden” word -”America”, which according to Stanford University- that is now verbotten).

Did the CDC Doctor Their 2021 Study That (Still) Showed Vaccinated People Were as Infectious as Unvaccinated People?
CDC: 'Centers for Data Concealment'

CDC passes the point where malfeasance can be mistaken for incompetence ...

CDC published data in January 2022 from California and New York affirming that infection-acquired immunity was way more superior than vaccine-induced immunity: why was it covered up still today?

Why has the CDC pretended this data, their own data, does not and did not exist? These results demonstrate that surviving a previous infection protects against a reinfection & related hospitalization

Why did the CDC deny and shove aside their own study showing infection-acquired immunity is optimal and superior to vaccine induced immunity (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7104e1.htm) while promoting this failed and sub-optimal study methodologically flawed study (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7044e1.htm) as so aptly described by Dr. Martin Kulldorff (https://brownstone.org/articles/a-review-and-autopsy-of-two-covid-immunity-studies/)?

Clinical Trials in the UK are Down by 44% Primarily Due to Lack of Participants
The public trust in pharma is vanishing. This is good news.

Pfizer, CDC Withheld Evidence of Myocarditis After COVID Shots, New Documents Reveal

Pfizer and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) withheld evidence that COVID-19 vaccinations were causing myocarditis, according documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense via a Freedom of Information Act request to the CDC, and documents leaked this week to Project Veritas.

Don't believe me? Read it for yourself, straight from page 4 of the contract:

You just can’t beat the fact that the conference bragged about its 100% vaccinated rate. Of course, given the bad optics, the CDC strained to find some good news, which it smugly said was that none of the 180 infected attendees had to go to the hospital, proving the jabs work or something.

The truth is, they probably knew better than anybody not to go to the hospital, if they even got a serious case, that is.

Now contrast the CDC’s self-righteous jab efficacy claims with last month’s Cleveland Clinic study of 51,000 hospital employees, which concluded: “effectiveness was not demonstrated when the XBB lineages were dominant.”1

And compare the CDC’s lies with a story published earlier this month in the Epoch Times about a new Danish jab study, headlined, “Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines Had No Effect on Overall Mortality: Trial Data Reanalysis.” The study concluded the Pfizer and Moderna shots did NOT show any benefit for overall mortality. No effect. So.

Of course, at this point the covid hospitalization rate is so low you wouldn’t expect any of the CDC’s attendees to have been hospitalized in the first place, proving the CDC can’t do basic math, which explains a lot when you think about it. They’re scientists, not mathematicians, after all. Nor did the CDC calculate waning jab efficacy. What was the last booster date for the conference go-ers?

Remember, this is the same government health agency that recommended OUTDOOR MASKING, until it was shamed into dropping that guidance, due to being ridiculed by none less than The Washington Post and the New York Times.

Anyway. After reading the conference story, I was left with an abiding sense that the greatest danger from covid these days comes from the CDC ITSELF — obviously a massive superspreading bureaucracy — and so we have no choice but to disband the agency, to save grandma, but reluctantly, appreciating all the good it’s done over the years, like helping create that Cholera epidemic in Haiti, and not because we WANT to pull the plug, but only because we MUST.

Now that I think about it, we should probably also tear down the CDC’s Atlanta headquarters, right to the ground, and make it into a memorial park for the victims of communitarianism. That seems appropriate.