patrick.net

Eventually politicians will strip CDC and other public health agencies of their power, and I won't be able to argue with them.

Why?
Public health misused and abused its powers

Closing beaches
Pouring sand into outdoor skateboard parks............

Discouraging people from outdoor activities
Lying about the evidence for cloth masks in community settings
Lying about the evidence for masking outside
Not running any randomized control trials of masking in high income nations
Pushing masks on 2-year-olds in contrast with world health organization recommendations, evidence, and basic common sense
Culling animals
Using the police state to enforce lockdown

Not letting people hold their father's hand when their father dies.

Not letting people visit their mother when she's hospitalized
Closing schools

But just for poor kids who go to public school, rich kids get to go to school

Making testing companies rich by recommending unproven testing
Inventing a 6-ft distance

Enforcing stupid distances to make it hard to run school buses

Lowering the regulatory bar for vaccines
Lying about the myocarditis after the safety signal is found in Israel

Never making drug companies test lower doses in young men. Doing absolutely nothing to mitigate the risk.
Lying about natural immunity.

Repeatedly lying about it so you can force boosters on people who've already had covid, despite no evidence, and lacking biological rationale
Continuing the emergency state long after it's appropriate.

Continuing emergency powers when the emergency has passed
Vaccine passports

Discriminating against people by vaccine status.

Preventing Novak Djokovic from competing in US Open
Preventing Kyrie Irving from playing but he can watch the game.

Making children wear masks to go to the zoo in California in November 2022 to protect the animals who shouldn't be close to the kids anyway, and they're all outside anyway
Firing healthcare workers who got COVID-19 taking care of sick patients, because they didn't want to get a vaccine for the virus they had already had and cleared
Firing healthcare workers to the point that no one wants to work in healthcare anymore, and it is hard to staff
Discouraging people from getting routine health care.

Publishing propaganda in MMWR to justify your broken agenda
Funding the ecotrust dude after all the issues about where the virus is coming from.
Spending 10 billion on paxlovid without randomized data in vaccinated people
Spending billions on remdesivir when it doesn't do s*.
Spending so much money on useless tests, that faculty members quit universities to go run testing companies selling said useless tests
Using useless test to keep kids out of school.

Inventing unproven Quarantine policies to keep kids out of school
Closing Palo Alto schools, but leasing the space, so parents can drop their kids off in zoom school, wear an instructor who's an underpaid worker opens a laptop so they can take a class with their teacher.
If you stand back and consider the million things public health did to combat the pandemic, the ratio of incorrect to correct things might be 100,000 to one.
And doing all this without running a single cluster randomized trial to figure out anything. To just do it on a whim without data.
So as someone who has long believed in the value of the regulatory state, and long been a champion for increased funding of public health, if the politician asks me should we destroy the CDC, I would have to say 'yes, please and let me help you'
We have to totally destroy it, and try to build a new institution that actually uses science to guide policy, and realizes that You can never follow the science. Science can just articulate trade-offs, but all trade-offs must be decided by citizens.

CDC replaces "pregnant woman" with "pregnant people" on flu vaccine guidance webpage

https://notthebee.com/article/cdc-replaces-pregnant-woman-with-pregnant-people-on-flu-vaccine-guidance-webpage

CDC replaces "pregnant woman" with "pregnant people" on flu vaccine guidance webpage

And they wonder why no one trusts the CDC anymore.

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky has not been seen in public in over two weeks. She was last seen on October 21 — the day after adding 18+ toxic Covid-19 shots to the childhood iatrogenocide schedule. Since then, the quintuple-vaccinated drug dealer developed Covid, took Paxlovid, then got Covid again. It’s important to understand that the FDA and CDC are just repeating the same junk science eugenics that we thought we had vanquished 80 years ago in Germany. The only difference is that these fascists are also self-loathing and trying to off themselves.

Walensky must be prosecuted for crimes against humanity at Nuremberg II.

As historical artifacts, the most notable thing about the “Zombie Pandemic” blog and graphic novel is that they were clearly intended as a means of conditioning young people to believe that in the event of a real infectious disease pandemic, the ONLY solution would be a new vaccine. With zombies roaming the streets, looking for prey, all we can do is hunker down at home and WAIT FOR THE VACCINE.

CDC Knew Covid Shots Damage Heart but Covered It Up ...

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) knew that COVID-19 shots damage recipients’ hearts and cause other serious complications but chose to cover up the information, bombshell documents unsealed under a court order have revealed.

The CDC was forced to hand over documents and data following a November 14 court order by Judge Robert Pitman.

The judge ordered the data to be made public following a Freedom of Information Act request from the Informed Consent Action Network.

The federal health agency has been withholding the data that shows adverse reactions to the vaccinations among those who received them.

Data released under the court order shows that a staggering 1 in 3 among the earliest populations to get vaccinated reported needing medical care, missing school or work, or they were unable to “perform normal daily activities” after receiving the shots.

The information was held in the CDC’s v-safe database.

V-safe is a safety monitoring system that lets people report any adverse reactions to the CDC after getting a COVID-19 vaccine.

The unsealed files revealed that the CDC knew that the shots caused damage to the heart tissue, blood clots, and strokes.

However, the data shows that the CDC intentionally left out questions regarding these serious side effects from its v-safe survey. ...

Among the 10 million-plus users of the agency’s v-safe active monitoring smartphone app through July — 8.5 million of whom signed up between December 2020 and April 2021, before all adults were eligible for COVID vaccines — nearly 8% said they required medical care after receiving the vaccines, according to Just the News.

For patients aged 3 and older needing such care, nearly 3 in 4 couldn’t rely on telehealth visits.

They required urgent care (48%), emergency room (15%) or hospitalization (10%).

U.S. — As distrust in experts reaches record highs across the country, many experts are issuing a dire warning that if you stop listening to them it will make them feel sad.

"We cannot stress enough just how serious this is," said Harvard Sociologist Marv Werdleskeez, an expert on experts. "If people stop unquestionably believing every single thing experts say, experts' feelings will be very hurt. Then they might lose their confidence and retire from being experts. This will leave us with no more experts and everyone will die."

According to a survey of experts nationwide, 90% of experts believe it would be very terrible if everyone stopped believing them. The other 10% said they would jump off a cliff. Sources familiar with the impending crisis say we are running out of time to start believing the experts before it's too late. "Lives are at stake," said Werdleskeez. "If we don't salvage the self-esteem of the expert class soon, it could be catastrophic."

At publishing time, several experts disagreed that the "expert crisis" was really a crisis, leading to them being immediately demoted from being experts.

Rob Schneider
@RobSchneider

The Tuskegee experiment was not an experiment,
It was CDC sponsored torture and murder. The participants were NEVER told that they were deliberately given syphilis so they gave it to their families as well. These poor people were not ‘doing a sacrifice’ they were BEING sacrificed

Clifton Duncan.
@cliftonaduncan
Nov 30
This is one of the most disgusting fucking things I have ever read.

Don't ever talk shit to me about not trusting these people, ever again.

https://twitter.com/RobSchneider/status/1598131878564794368?cxt=HHwWgMCo4b2e2q0sAAAA

Rob Schneider
RobSchneider

The Tuskegee experiment was not an experiment,
It was CDC sponsored torture and murder. The participants were NEVER told that they were deliberately given syphilis so they gave it to their families as well. These poor people were not ‘doing a sacrifice’ they were BEING sacrificed

Clifton Duncan.
cliftonaduncan
Nov 30
This is one of the most disgusting fucking things I have ever read.

Don't ever talk shit to me about not trusting these people, ever again.

I think the Tuskegee experiment is a limited hangout fake admission of guilt. Note that the “experiment” consisted of withholding treatment, so in the end it promotes the medical establishment as necessary to health, and how important it is to “treat” the “underserved” communities. Let’s see the CDC talk about how wrong they were to promote spraying people with DDT.

Has this man actually cut his dick off?

The fact that "she" has transitioned, is a distraction.

CDC Had Direct Access to Big Tech Censorship Tools to Control Covid Narrative

The U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Census Bureau had direct access to Big Tech companies’ censorship tools, which were set up to allow government officials to control the Covid pandemic narrative online, newly unsealed emails have revealed.

Emails between an employee at the CDC and Twitter reveal that at least one CDC staff member and the US Census Bureau had access to Twitter’s dedicated “Partner Support Portal.”

The portal allows approved government officials and “stakeholders” to gain direct access to Twitter’s systems and flag content for censorship.

According to documents, government operatives were able to flag posts or users’ accounts that allegedly contained COVID-19 “misinformation.”

However, the portal didn’t appear to require submissions to include any supporting evidence to dispute the so-called “misinformation” and posts were removed simply for conflicting with the official narrative.

Do you read anything in the above that suggests that political correctness or correcting wrong-speak is part of the CDC mission? When did the CDC decide that they should take on the progressive left’s cause to reshape American language (oh, I used that “forbidden” word -”America”, which according to Stanford University- that is now verbotten).

Did the CDC Doctor Their 2021 Study That (Still) Showed Vaccinated People Were as Infectious as Unvaccinated People?
CDC: 'Centers for Data Concealment'

CDC passes the point where malfeasance can be mistaken for incompetence ...

CDC published data in January 2022 from California and New York affirming that infection-acquired immunity was way more superior than vaccine-induced immunity: why was it covered up still today?

Why has the CDC pretended this data, their own data, does not and did not exist? These results demonstrate that surviving a previous infection protects against a reinfection & related hospitalization

Why did the CDC deny and shove aside their own study showing infection-acquired immunity is optimal and superior to vaccine induced immunity (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7104e1.htm) while promoting this failed and sub-optimal study methodologically flawed study (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7044e1.htm) as so aptly described by Dr. Martin Kulldorff (https://brownstone.org/articles/a-review-and-autopsy-of-two-covid-immunity-studies/)?