« First « Previous Comments 399 - 431 of 431 Search these comments
they also get a lot of data out of this to crunch and sell
Atm fees and account management fees. Likely they can also sweep a certain percentage of your checking account overnight
I use only credit unions now as well.
Plusses:
- they don't close accounts for political reasons like JP Morgan Chase does over and over
- higher rates than banks!
Minuses:
- not as professional
- limited number of physical branches
Patrick says
I use only credit unions now as well.
Plusses:
- they don't close accounts for political reasons like JP Morgan Chase does over and over
- higher rates than banks!
Minuses:
- not as professional
- limited number of physical branches
I disagree on "less professional" part: when I needed to wire transfer a non-trivial sum to an unusual destination I first tried to go through a big bank because they promised 100% online experience and they failed miserably - I had to visit them 3 times, my money were frozen in the account for 3 or 4 days and ultimately they said it couldn't be done. Went to my long time CU and all was done under a 1/2 hour.
Who's less professional here?
PS. Stupid me for not wanting to go in person in the first place.
IMF Chief Boasts CBDCs Harvest ‘Very Useful Data’ for Public’s ‘Social Credit Score’
https://slaynews.com/news/imf-chief-boasts-cbdc-could-harvest-very-useful-data-social-credit-score/
IMF Chief Boasts CBDCs Harvest ‘Very Useful Data’ for Public’s ‘Social Credit Score’
Nah, it's pretty damn hard to trace cash because it passes around so much.
So I'm not sure the point.
- to make it harder to track my daily locations
- to make it harder to track my personal preferences in shopping
- to be able to still buy food if the US goes full Canada and blocks the credit cards of people who object to globalization and death jab mandates
They REJECTED cashless agenda
Shops in Norway that refuse to accept cash now risk major fines.
We are finally seeing a reversal in the cashless agenda that has been ongoing for quite some time now.
As you might know, in Sweden, people have already gone so far that they have injected microchips in their bodies to use for cashless payments. Absolutely crazy.
But now Norway has gone against the cashless agenda.
From the 1st of May, shops that refuse to accept physical cash as payment risk massive fines.
If shops refuse to accept cash, they can be fined up to 4% of their revenue or up to $2.4 million.
The reason for this is to ensure that everyone can pay even if they don’t feel comfortable with digital payments, and to ensure security and preparedness in case of special situations, as we just saw happen in Spain with massive blackouts.
What happens if all power goes away and nobody can buy things anymore? That’s a big problem.
But not only Norway is doing this.
Hungary has also gone against the cashless agenda.
The Hungarian parliament recently passed a constitutional amendment ensuring that paying with physical cash is a fundamental right.
paying with physical cash is a fundamental right.
« First « Previous Comments 399 - 431 of 431 Search these comments
They have a window where you can order a beer while you are waiting. So I ordered a beer and they refused to take cash.
OK, I wanted the beer, so I paid with a credit card. Then the total had an extra $1.50 on it. I asked about that and was told that I added a tip. I specifically did not add a tip because I was pissed that they don't take cash.
I got the manager and made him remove the tip.
We are rapidly approaching the CCP utopia of complete tracking of all citizens at all times.
Lesson: call ahead and make sure a restaurant will take cash. If they will not, don't go there.