2
0

Freakonomics


               
2021 Sep 19, 8:18pm   3,447 views  38 comments

by tanked   follow (0)  

It just occurred to me that today's death jab correlates to abortion becoming legal in 1973 and what occured 16 to 18 years after - the sudden crime drop - as highlighted by the book Freakonomics.

This is explainable by the would be crime-doers killed before they get a chance to live.


This is eugenics and I do not support abortion nor this method.


But are we not seeing this happening again which would explain their motivation.


Nearly all who take the death jab are not conservatives. Arguably it is an IQ test to take it or not.


Crime will drop dramatically once all the takers of it die. That is likely to be their real motivation once again.

« First        Comments 31 - 38 of 38        Search these comments

31   richwicks   @   2021 Sep 21, 3:12pm  

Patrick says
There could also be a motive to make conservatives lose jobs, out of resentment at their having elected Trump.


I think that would just result in a lot of new businesses.

I don't know any small business owners who are democrats. People that start out as one, I can't see as lasting as one for very long. Running a small company you learn what a vile piece of shit the government is in short order.
32   tanked   @   2021 Sep 21, 3:21pm  

Patrick says
The obvious motivations seem to be profit via systemic corruption of the CDC/FDA/NIH, and the power to restrict life for anyone who does not obey.

People lower down in the hierarchy may be motivated by anxiety reduction, the comforting believe that this is all about the virus and can be solved by obeying the order to submit to the jab.

https://patrick.net/post/1341418/2021-09-20-prof-mattias-desmet-explains-the-mass-psychosis

There could also be a motive to make conservatives lose jobs, out of resentment at their having elected Trump.

I'm not sure we need any more motives than those to explain everything. The conspiracy is pretty much out in the open.


I tend to like Shaman's analysis. There's a very clear split between liberals and conservatives as to who took the jab. Liberals is 90% took it, non liberals only 24%. If this was meant to punish conservatives then it backfired. Which means that perhaps it was on purpose.

If you look at what they did in 1973 they were absolutely targeting the lower IQ people knowing they are far more prone to kill their own kids, and be a sink not source on society. In other words, liberals. We're seeing it again, them tricked into self voluntary genocide.

The user Reality is also on the right track, I don't believe the financial motivation and the productivity motivation to be mutually exclusive, they go hand in hand.
33   Patrick   @   2021 Sep 21, 3:52pm  

tanked says
There's a very clear split between liberals and conservatives as to who took the jab. Liberals is 90% took it, non liberals only 24%. If this was meant to punish conservatives then it backfired.


I don't see how it backfired.

it is 76% conservatives who are being forced out of a job by not subjecting their bodies to the unknowns of the jab.
34   tanked   @   2021 Sep 21, 4:18pm  

Patrick says
tanked says
There's a very clear split between liberals and conservatives as to who took the jab. Liberals is 90% took it, non liberals only 24%. If this was meant to punish conservatives then it backfired.


I don't see how it backfired.

it is 76% conservatives who are being forced out of a job by not subjecting their bodies to the unknowns of the jab.


That's a bluff, there's no way that will stand after it is settled in court. Any companies worth anything will wait until that point before acting. Already General Dynamics chose instead to wait for the courts to review it after 40% of their employees threatened to resign rather than take the death jab.

But what it will do is cause a few thousand more to take it ahead of it being settled, but they were already on the fence about it. The vaccine hesitant vs the vaccine hell no. And the damage will already be done. So it was low hanging fruit. Biden and his handlers don't care at all about any backlash for anything they say.

The few thousand won't scratch the surface of the 100M standing strong unvaxxed. Which is likely to be a propaganda number and the real number perhaps 200M, 250M, or more, in the US alone. Easily billions worldwide have refused to take it and never will voluntarily.
35   Shaman   @   2021 Sep 21, 8:43pm  

Yah I feel like Biden’s mandate is just a bluff. It probably won’t hold up in court and will absolutely be delayed past the point of relevance by the lawsuits. Even if it goes into effect for a few months, that’s just a few months we have to test every week. PITA but beats dying of the vax. And in half a year the fallout from the vax is going to be MUCH harder to hide. Especially with the boosters going into effect. People are already dying of ADE, excess cancers triggered by the vax, and pulmonary heart disease is vastly increasing beyond and resemblance of a baseline. Half a year from now, there will be more vaxxed people bemoaning their unfortunate status than vaxxed people screaming for unvaccinated blood.
36   Patrick   @   2021 Sep 21, 9:27pm  

tanked says
Any companies worth anything will wait until that point before acting.


I agree that any company would be stupid to fire anyone for refusal to take a drug still entirely under EUA and before OSHA even issued any guidelines.

But a guy on this site has been fired already for refusal.
37   tanked   @   2021 Sep 21, 10:45pm  

Patrick says
tanked says
Any companies worth anything will wait until that point before acting.


I agree that any company would be stupid to fire anyone for refusal to take a drug still entirely under EUA and before OSHA even issued any guidelines.

But a guy on this site has been fired already for refusal.


That is terrible of course and we wish him the best in finding his next job.

Priority wise it is a no brainer, health and body first, job second. Jobs can be replaced your life cannot.

He is a casualty of war but this war has had and will have many other casualties of actual death, and far more on the left.
38   Shaman   @   2021 Sep 22, 8:34am  

tanked says
He is a casualty of war but this war has had and will have many other casualties of actual death, and far more on the left.





True. Think of job loss as taking a wound in the war against the Left. You’ll miss some income, but they’ll fucking DIE. No brainer on which side you’ll want to be on in the long run.

« First        Comments 31 - 38 of 38        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste