patrick.net

Why anyone would take a “vaccine” which DOUBLES their chance of dying is really beyond my capacity to imagine.

Why anyone would take a “vaccine” which DOUBLES their chance of dying is really beyond my capacity to imagine.

Why anyone would take a “vaccine” which DOUBLES their chance of dying is really beyond my capacity to imagine.

I love the discussion that we've stimulated.

Isn't it great when we discuss science transparently instead of trying to cancel one another?

I'm going to respond to the more substantive critiques.

#1. "Diagnosis codes for cardiac-related deaths are imperfect."

Yes! But that is true for every subgroup we examined. Only in young men was the risk extremely high, and it was also increased in older men.

#2. "COVID test information was only available on death certificates."

No!

We used all of our data resources-test results, vaccine records, death records-to exclude individuals who had documented COVID-19 infection, as we write in the Methods section.

#3. "The sample size is too small."

3a. Elevated cardiac risk was also found in older men, and there were thousands of deaths in this group.

3b. The total cardiac deaths meeting inclusion criteria among young men was 77, not 20, as has been going around the web.

3c. Read the references about the method!

Self-controlled case series tell us whether events (death) are occurring unusually close to an exposure (mRNA Covid vaccine), or whether their timing is due to chance.

3c cont.

Even if the sample size was half of what it is, if events cluster after an exposure, that is valuable information about causation.

Finally, is it really that hard to imagine that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines that increase myocarditis in young men by 10x, 20x, or 30x (see Karlstad et al,
JAMA Cardiology, 2022) also increase the risk of cardiac death in that age group?
Of course it's not, and we all know that.

Dr. Joe Ladapo, Florida's Surgeon General, got the most inaccurate, disrespectful letter back from Walensky (CDC) and Califf (FDA). Now he's fired back at them.

He exposes their criminal hiding of the evidence of deaths and disabilities from the COVID shots, challenges them to respond.

💉 Last week, Florida’s Department of Health issued its official government guidance on the new covid boosters. In addition to recommending against the shots for anyone healthy under 65, the guidance also requires providers ti discuss the risks even with patients 65 and older who want the shots.

Wait till you see the risks that doctors have to disclose to jab-happy seniors.

The guidance requires doctors to disclose the following list of jab “safety and efficacy concerns:”

mRNA vaccines are associated with negative effectiveness.

Studies show vaccinated developed an increased risk for infection.

The shots present a risk of subclinical and clinical myocarditis and other cardiovascular conditions for healthy people.

There is an unknown risk of adverse events with each additional dose.

Elevated levels of spike protein persist in some people for an indefinite period of time, which increases health risks by an unknown amount.

The guidance included two pages of studies. In other words, Florida is following “the science.” Or, it has “the evidence.” Your pick.

Establishment Media was not happy about Florida informing seniors about the science. They might hesitate! Worse, according to the Washington Post, the new guidance “worries experts:”




https://floridahealthcovid19.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/20230913-booster-guidance-final.pdf